logo
‘Give it up': Leonardo DiCaprio is being ruthlessly mocked for revealing how old he feels

‘Give it up': Leonardo DiCaprio is being ruthlessly mocked for revealing how old he feels

News.com.au2 days ago
The king of not dating people his own age, Leonardo DiCaprio, is being ruthlessly mocked after announcing that he feels like he is...... 32.
The 50-year-old Academy Award winner, who predominantly dates women in their early 20s, made the grand reveal during an interview with Esquire, when director, Paul Thomas Anderson, asked DiCaprio how old he felt.
'If you didn't know how old you are, how old are you right now?' The director asked.
DiCaprio responded, '32.'
He later joked in the same interview that he 'emotionally turned 35 last year,' which I suppose means he wants to make it clear he doesn't have the average emotional maturity of a 50-year-old man.
We could have all seen that coming: a guy who spends most of his free time strutting around on yachts with models doesn't precisely scream 'emotionally developed,' but what compelled him to admit it will remain a mystery.
It is amusing that even if DiCaprio feels 32, that doesn't even make him the same age as his Italian model girlfriend Vittoria Ceretti.
In fact, they'd still be considered an age-gap romance; she's 27 now, but when they started dating, she was 24.
It's hard to know if DiCaprio felt 32 when he was in his late 40s, or if the mental age of 32 is a new perspective now that he is 50.
Did he feel like he was 28 when he was 49?
The Inception star has a long history of dating women noticeably younger than him, and considerably younger than his mental age of 32.
Before Ceretti, he dated Gigi Hadid in 2022; she was 27 at the time, and he was rapidly approaching 50.
Before he was canoodling with that particular supermodel, he was dating … you guessed it, another model.
Camila Morrone and the pair broke up either just before or just after she turned 25; the timeline is unclear, but DiCaprio was in his late 40s during that affair.
The movie star has also been linked to a bunch of other models throughout the 2000s, all of whom were in their 20s, while he was in his late 30s and 40s.
They include German model Toni Garrn, American model Kelly Rohrbach and Danish model Nina Agdal.
The movie star has a type, and it is models half his age; even if you consider the fact that he feels 32, most of his girlfriends have been in their early 20s. The man isn't even in having an appropriate age-gap romance mentally.
DiCaprio's history of dating women in their early 20 has become notorious to the point it has become a pop culture meme.
When pop singer Sabrina Carpenter turned 25, her cake was frosted with a meme of DiCaprio's face that reads, 'no don't 25, you're so sexy', a reference to the fact that he often doesn't date women above that age.
DiCaprio's revelation that he only feels like a man in his early 30s, rather than his actual age, has not gone down well. In fact, he is being brutally mocked over it.
People are genuinely worried that it is a line he uses with women he is dating, so they feel less awkward about the fact he is often old enough to be the father of the women he dates.
'That doesn't make dating women below 25 any less creepy,' one wrote.
Someone else claimed it sounded like a 'tactic' he used to justify hooking up with women way younger than him.
Smeone else joked 'give it up Grandpa' another said he was clearly using the fact he feels younger as an 'excuse' to date younger women.
'That is funny because emotionally 35 is still 10 years younger than anyone he's dated,' another joked.
'Straight man is emotionally immature. Groundbreaking stuff,' someone else said.
'He has a problematic age gap with himself,' another quipped.
DiCaprio's age-gap romance with himself certainly isn't doing him any favours, at least, not when with people his own age.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meghan and Harry announce huge Netflix news
Meghan and Harry announce huge Netflix news

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Meghan and Harry announce huge Netflix news

Hallmark doesn't sell a 'Congratulations - kinda' card but maybe they should start in case Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's Montecito neighbours want to send them something. On Tuesday, the couple announced they have struck a new, lesser deal with Netflix, which is a far cry from their golden handcuffs, dumptruck-of-cash-kinda arrangement they snagged in 2020. Back then the value of their Netflix marriage was pegged at a reported USD$100 million ($153 million) but in its place, this time, they have secured what The Hollywood Reporter (THR) has called a 'downgraded' arrangement that will give the company a first-look at the Sussexes' projects. In further less sunny news, the New York Times broke the news this week of previously unreported 'tensions' between the couple and the billion-dollar company over their tell-all 2022 docu-series Harry & Meghan. Step back and things are not as they were in 2020. When the duke and duchess announced the news five years ago, the New York Times hailed it as a 'megawatt' deal; now it says that the streamer is 'loosening its ties' with the couple and suggested that they 'may not have met expectations.' Back then the Sussexes proclaimed that 'Our focus will be on creating content that informs but also gives hope'. They were a unit, a twofer, co-producers, co-stars, and an indivisible package. This time, per THR, the upbeat statement came only from the duchess, with her referring to 'My husband and I' and saying 'We're proud to extend our partnership'. Looking ahead, while Meghan's TV plate looks laddled-on bulging, Harry's appears to have only far slimmer pickings. On the upcoming slate for the Sussexes: Masaka Kids, A Rhythm Within, a short documentary that both will produce about orphans in Uganda; a second season and a Christmas special of With Love, Meghan; and their adaptation of the book Meet Me At The Lake, which they have been working on for two years now. There is no director or stars attached (or even quietly mooted) and it has not been revealed if there is even a script. In all this, what is really in here for Harry? Masaka Kids sounds right up in his wheelhouse but it's a co-pro with Meghan and not feature length. And of Lake, it's hard to see a weepy romance as a natural fit for the two-tours-on-the-Afghanistan-front-line Duke of Sussex. The day after the Sussexes' new Netflix deal was revealed, the trailer for the second season of WIth Love dropped. Unlike the first season, there is no glimpse of a doting, proud Harry. (And in all fairness to the Sussexes, the reality is that Netflix has long abandoned those plump $100 million, padded deals of yore and Harry and Meghan now fall into the same basket as the Obamas and their friend Tyler Perry who also have first look deals with the platform.) Unlike back in 2020, now, the duke and duchess appear to have two-track careers. While over the last six months, Meghan set out her commercial stall with her As Ever line, putting flower sprinkles on the cultural map and generating more headlines about jam than it has enjoyed since it was invented in 6th century Sasanian Persia, Harry seems professionally adrift. He increasingly looks like a prince without a portfolio and as far has been announced, has no solo projects to his very grand name. How different a reality is this to the way the future looked for the Sussexes in 2020. Back then, when the news came they were getting into bed with Netflix, it seemed like a surefire success in the making: They could make some largely inoffensive viewing about elephants or melting glaciers and the entertainment giant could brag about having the world's most famous couple on their books. The couple's biggest success has been their pound-of-flesh, six-parter Harry & Meghan, which set records and left Buckingham Palace sorts quailing from behind a chintzy sofa. However this week revealed that Harry & Meghan was not the unabashed win it outwardly appeared, with the New York Times reporting that there had 'been tensions between Netflix and Archewell' around the project. 'The streaming giant found out about the release date of Harry's memoir Spare just a few months before the documentary series about the couple was set to debut,' the Times revealed. 'That upset some Netflix executives because the book covered some of the same ground as the series, undercutting the exclusive nature of the show.' However since then, independently, while Meghan has found her niche with With Love, Harry's forays (Heart of Invictus and Polo) have proven about as successful as his ability to keep his trousers on in Las Vegas. Widen the lens further and while the duchess stretches her entrepreneurial legs and hits her stride, having launched herself back onto Instagram (@Meghan has 4.1 million followers), releasing a new podcast (Confessions of a Female Founder) and setting up a ShopMy account to monetise her incredible style, the duke seems to have struggled to find any sort of groove. He never managed to get a podcast across the line with Spotify during the couple's two and a half year contract; his TV projects have been ratings turkeys; and in March he resigned from his own charity Sentebale along with the co-founder and trustees after a bitter falling out with the chair. Last week the UK's charity commission issued a report that 'criticised all parties to the dispute', including the duke. (The report cleared him of bullying allegations.) The father-of-two is reportedly 'utterly devastated' over the situation and he is considering setting up a new charity. He certainly appears to have the time. Outside of his mainstay charity biggie the Invictus Games, the Duke of Sussex now appears to be at sea. With no individual TV projects of his own and having cut ties with Sentebale, where does he go from here? Meghan's path now seems set - more of With Love and her plinking flowers on plates and trying to teach the world how to use crimping shears and make chutney and more selling out of her As Ever wine and jam. By contrast, Harry, despite his charm, energy and drive to do good, seems to be stuck in the work wilderness. At least, should his father King Charles ever extend even a spindly sapling of an olive branch, his calendar should be clear that week's announcement has truly set off those in the bitterly opposing Sussex factions. Supporters have been gleefully heralding the news on social media with all the gusto of Vatican bell-ringers catching sight of the second coming; detractors have been doing plenty of unseemly crowing about the reduced nature of it all.

‘Not supposed to say': Mila Kunis recalls barely eating for role in Black Swan
‘Not supposed to say': Mila Kunis recalls barely eating for role in Black Swan

News.com.au

time3 hours ago

  • News.com.au

‘Not supposed to say': Mila Kunis recalls barely eating for role in Black Swan

Mila Kunis restricted her eating habits immensely when starring in the psychological thriller Black Swan. 'My prep was a lot of dancing and very little eating — which I know you're not supposed to say, but it's the truth,' the actor told Vogue in a joint interview with her co-star in the 2010 film, Natalie Portman. 'I drank a lot of broth and danced for 12 hours a day.' Kunis, now 42, added that she and Portman — who played professional ballerinas — only expected to have three months to prepare for their dance intensive roles. However, after producers lost some financing, the project 'got extended to six months while Darren (Aronofsky, the film's director) tried to find money.' 'It sucked for Darren, but Nat and I were so happy because we had three extra months to dance,' the That '70s Show star said. Kunis — whose alter-ego character Lily is billed as the Black Swan — also shared some of the brutal physical effects of the ballet sequences. 'We would shoot those dancing scenes for hours, and I had bruises all over my ribs just from being lifted over and over again,' she recalled. 'I also dislocated my shoulder pretty early in the production and thought I was completely screwed, but Darren sent me to an acupuncturist and I somehow came out totally fine.' Portman, who played lead Nina Sayers, said she learned a lot about the ballet industry throughout filming. 'One of the most surprising side effects of doing the physical training was that I ended up spending a year talking extensively to my trainer, who was a former New York City Ballet dancer and told me hours of stories that gave so much colour and insight into that world,' the Oscar winner said. 'It was like doing investigative journalism, but I was just gossiping with her while doing pliés.' Kunis first spoke out about her dramatic 20-pound (10kg) weight loss for the film back in 2012. At the time, she told Harper's Bazaar that her physique 'has never been the same.' 'My shape is different,' the Ted star said. 'When I got down to 95 pounds (43kg), I was muscles, like a little brick house, but skin and bones. When I gained it back, it went to completely different areas.' Kunis further explained that 'all the weight that left (her) chest went to (her) sides, hip, (her) stomach.' When asked if she would take on another role that required her to lose weight, the Friends With Benefits star noted, 'I'm not going to say I'd look forward to it, but if an offer came along, I'd do it.'

Liz Pelly on the Spotify machine, and remembering jazz greats Judy Bailey and Sheila Jordan
Liz Pelly on the Spotify machine, and remembering jazz greats Judy Bailey and Sheila Jordan

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

Liz Pelly on the Spotify machine, and remembering jazz greats Judy Bailey and Sheila Jordan

Liz Pelly's book Mood Machine: The Rise of Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist has been received as an evisceration of the streaming platform and the way it has fundamentally changed the business model of music (to its own advantage) over the past fifteen years. Liz joins Andy to talk through her investigation and look at the future of music listening. And we remember American jazz singer Sheila Jordan who died this week at 96, and Australian jazz pianist and composer Judy Bailey who died last week at 89. We'll hear delightful snippets from their interview appearances on The Music Show about discovering jazz as children, choosing repertoire, and teaching the next generations. Listen to the long conversation with Judy Bailey on The Music Show in 2018 in part 1 here and part 2 here. Liz Pelly is speaking at events in Melbourne, Sydney, Brisbane and Perth at the end of August and start of September. Find the full details here. Music at the start of the program: Title: SOULACOASTA Artist: Close Counters Composer: Allan Leslie McConnell, Finnian Alexander Rees Album: SOULACOASTA Label: Vinyl Digital GmbH Music in Liz Pelly's interview: Title: Light Lingers On (feat. Damian Lane) Artist: Amanda Brown Composer: Amanda Brown Album: Eight Guitars Label: Independent Title: Briefly Artist: Nils Frahm Composer: Nils Frahm Album: Music For Animals Label: Leiter Music in Sheila Jordan's interview: Title: Falling In Love With Love Artist: Sheila Jordan Composer: Richard Rodgers, Lorenz Hart Album: Portrait Of Sheila Label: Blue Note Title: The Bird / Tribute (Quasimodo) / Embraceable You Artist: Sheila Jordan, Mark Murphy Composer: Sheila Jordan, Charlie Parker, George Gershwin Album: One For Junior Label: Muse Records Music in Judy Bailey's interview: Title: Pendulum Artist: Judy Bailey Trio Composer: Judy Bailey Album: Pendulum Label: Creative Vibes Title: My Favourite Things Artist: Judy Bailey Composer: Richard Rodgers, Oscar Hammerstein, arr. Judy Baily Album: My Favourite Things Label: CBS Music at the end of the program: Title: Born To Run Artist: Bruce Springsteen Composer: Bruce Springsteen Album: Born To Run Label: CBS The Music Show is made on Gadigal and Gundungurra Land. Technical production by Simon Branthwaite and Roi Huberman.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store