Chrisnadia Sinam resigns from PKR to focus on career and studies
Chrisnadia
KOTA KINABALU (May 19): Former Sabah Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) information chief, Chrisnadia Sinam, has officially announced her resignation from the party and her decision to take a break from active politics.
In a statement issued today, Chrisnadia confirmed that she had submitted her resignation letter to PKR Sabah liaison chairman Datuk Mustapha Sakmud earlier this month.
A former engineer with the Public Works Department, Chrisnadia entered the political arena during the 14th General Election (GE14), where she contested the Tuaran parliamentary seat under the PKR banner at the age of 35. She garnered 14,870 votes but was defeated by Barisan Nasional's Datuk Madius Tangau, who received 22,494 votes.
Chrisnadia explained that her decision to step away from politics was driven by a desire to focus on her business career, pursue a PhD in Engineering at Open University Malaysia, and expand her involvement in charitable initiatives and community service.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
a day ago
- Malay Mail
Amirudin denies vacating Sungai Tua state seat, amid claim of by-election for Tengku Zafrul to become Selangor MB
SHAH ALAM, June 3 — Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) vice president Datuk Seri Amirudin Shari today denied that the Sungai Tua state seat he won in the 2023 state election would be vacated. Describing the claim as imaginary and baseless, the Selangor Pakatan Harapan (PH) chairman said that vacating a seat to make way for an individual is not as easy as one might think. 'It's not that simple, it requires some research,' he said when met at the E-Bike Handover Ceremony to Selangor police at Selangor police contingent headquarters, here today. Amirudin, who is also the Selangor Menteri Besar, said this in response to the claim that the Sungai Tua state seat would be vacated to allow for a by-election to be held, as well as to make way for Trade, Investment and Industry Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz to contest. Last Friday, Tengku Zafrul announced his resignation from UMNO and his intention to join PKR. — Bernama * Editor's note: An earlier version erroneously spelt Sungai Tua as Sungai Tea in the headline and has since been corrected.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
PM immunity: High Court to rule on legal questions referral tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has set Wednesday (June 4) for its decision on an application by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain fixed the date on Tuesday (June 3) after hearing submissions from lawyer Alan Wong Teck Wei, representing Anwar, and lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, acting for Yusoff, during in-chamber proceedings. Anwar filed the application on May 23, seeking to have the High Court, which is hearing the suit, refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. According to a supporting affidavit for the application, lawyer Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, who is authorised to represent the defendant (Anwar), said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. "The plaintiff's (Yusoff's) claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties," Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit. Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions. Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident. The PKR president, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. The High Court last year set June 16 to 19 and June 23 to 25, 2025, for the hearing of the lawsuit.- Bernama
The Sun
a day ago
- The Sun
PM immunity: High Court to rule on legal questions referral tomorrow
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here today set tomorrow for its decision on an application by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits. The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago. Judge Roz Mawar Rozain fixed the date after hearing submissions from lawyer Alan Wong Teck Wei, representing Anwar, and lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, acting for Muhammed Yusoff, during in-chamber proceedings today. Anwar filed the application on May 23, seeking to have the High Court, which is hearing the suit, refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment. According to a supporting affidavit for the application, lawyer Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, who is authorised to represent the defendant (Anwar), said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. 'The plaintiff's (Muhammed Yusoff's) claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties,' Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit. Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions. Muhammed Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Muhammed Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident. The PKR President, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Muhammed Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister. The High Court last year set June 16 to 19 and June 23 to 25, 2025, for the hearing of the lawsuit.
