
Trump fury over US court bid to block tariffs – as experts warn uncertainty could hit economy
A cloud hangs over the global economy, experts have warned after a bombshell court ruling blocked Donald Trump's tariffs, creating more global economic 'confusion and uncertainty'.
Financial markers reacted positively to the unanimous ruling by three judges, but the decision enraged the White House, with Trump's official spokesman Stephen Miller calling it another 'judge coup'.
The White House has appealed the decision, but it means all of the president's 'Liberation Day' tariffs now face a protracted legal process that could overshadow trade talks and delay the implementation of existing deals, including with Britain.
Only the 25 per cent tariffs on steel, aluminium, and cars are unaffected by the ruling.
Chris Southworth, secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce United Kingdom (ICCUK), said months of legal wrangling would further weaken economic confidence.
He said: 'It just puts a whole cloud over the top of any negotiation with the US because it's unclear what the US is negotiating and what their position will be from a legal standpoint.
'The problem is, these tariffs change almost every day with the US at the moment, and this uncertainty isn't good for business.'
Marco Forgione, director general of the Chartered Institute of Export and International Trade, is also worried about the impact.
He said: 'It's clear that we live now in a time of growing uncertainty. But businesses, especially our world-leading food and drink producers, should not rush to react. Whatever the outcome of the legal appeal, keeping calm is the best approach.
'The UK must keep backing open, rules-based trade to give our exporters the certainty they need to succeed.'
Trade economist Simon Evenett told The Independent that the ruling could mean tariffs on sensitive sectors such as cars, steel, aluminium and pharmaceuticals intensify instead of coming down, as they're not covered by the judgement.
He said: "Britain's principal interests lay in the area of cars, steel, aluminium and pharmaceuticals. All of these are covered by investigations under national security and are not covered by the ruling yesterday. This means the risks to the UK in those sensitive sectors remain, and are likely to intensify.'
However, an ally of the Trump administration – Andrew Hale, a trade expert from the influential Heritage Foundation – told The Independent that the judges' decision is 'good news' for the UK.
Mr Hale described the deal signed by Trump and Sir Keir Starmer earlier this month as 'just a framework document with very little in it'.
He added: 'It was meant to be a start for further trade negotiations and deal with some of the tariffs. So [the ruling] is good news [for the UK] because it prevents the [Trump administration] because it is detrimental to the Trump administration; negotiations. They cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs quickly and broadly as a negotiating tactic in negotiations.'
In a speech on Thursday, Sir Keir Starmer defended his deal with Trump despite new question marks over the terms – and revelations the US has yet to lower tariffs on car and steel exports from the UK as originally agreed.
The prime minister highlighted how the deal will ultimately help workers at Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), whose jobs had been under threat.
But the uncertainty created by levies has already led to smaller firms in the UK abandoning the US market, according to Federation of Small Business (FSB) policy chair Tina McKenzie.
She said: 'This court decision offers the possibility of short-term relief for small businesses trading across the Atlantic, many of whom have spent the last few months caught in a tangle of uncertainty, shifting rules and sudden extra costs. In fact, one in five said they had already stopped, or may stop, exporting to the US altogether.'
The Commons select committee on business and trade is set to open an inquiry on trade with the US.
Labour committee chairman Liam Byrne said: 'There's still considerable uncertainty about when the sector-specific exemptions in the recent deal actually come into effect, and what UK firms need to do to access them. This is a key thing we want to cover next week. On the broader tariffs, my understanding is that these now go back to the previous level.'
Meanwhile, Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey demanded that the foreign secretary David Lammy summoned the new US ambassador, Warren Stephens to explain the situation.
He said: 'The levels of chaos from Trump's economic policy is putting Liz Truss to shame.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
White House insists Trump tariffs to stay despite court ruling
Update: Date: 2025-06-02T09:46:32.000Z Title: White House: Tariffs to stay despite legal setback Content: Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog. I'm Tom Ambrose and I will be bringing you the latest news lines over the next few hours. We start with news that president Trump's top economic advisers have said they would not be deterred by a court ruling that declared many of the administration's tariffs illegal. They cited other legal options the White House could use to pressure China and other countries into trade talks. They also indicated that Trump had no plans to extend a 90-day pause on some of the highest tariffs, making it more likely those duties will take effect in July. 'Rest assured, tariffs are not going away,' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Fox News Sunday. Asked about the future of the suspended reciprocal tariffs first announced in April, Lutnick added: 'I don't see today that an extension is coming.' It comes as China accused the US of 'seriously violating' the fragile US-China detente that has been in place for less than a month since the two countries agreed to pause the trade war that risked upending the global economy. China and the US agreed on 12 May to pause for 90 days the skyrocketing 'reciprocal' tariffs that both countries had placed on the others goods in a frenzied trade war that started a few weeks earlier. Tariffs had reached 125% on each side, which officials feared amounted to virtual embargo on trade between the world's two biggest economies. In other news: The US veterans agency has ordered scientists not to publish in journals without clearance. The edict, laid down in emails on Friday by Curt Cashour, the VA's assistant secretary for public and intergovernmental affairs, and John Bartrum, a senior adviser to VA secretary Doug Collins, came hours after the article published in the New England Journal of Medicine. Russell Vought, the director of the office of management and budget (OMB), on Sunday cast doubt on the constitutional obligation of the White House to ask Congress to sign off on Donald Trump's massive cuts to the federal workforce spearheaded by Elon Musk. Vought indicated the White House preferred to rely on 'executive tools' for all but a 'necessary' fraction of the cuts instead of submitting the whole package of jobs and agency slashing that took place via the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge), to the congressional branch for its official approval. The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) removed a list of 'sanctuary' states, cities and counties from its website following sharp criticism from a sheriffs' association that said a list of 'noncompliant' sheriffs could severely damage the relationship between the Trump administration and law enforcement. The White House budget director Russ Vought on Sunday dismissed as 'totally ridiculous' fears expressed by voters that cuts to benefits in the huge spending bill passed by the House will lead to premature deaths in America. Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, now awaiting debate in the US Senate, will slash two major federal safety net programs, Medicaid, which provides healthcare to poor and disabled Americans, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which helps people afford groceries, which will affect millions of people if it becomes law.


Times
21 minutes ago
- Times
China warns Britain over Royal Navy aircraft carrier in east Asia
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.


Times
29 minutes ago
- Times
Looser lending rules may help more first-time buyers
Act now to keep your subscription We've tried to contact you several times as we haven't been able to take payment. You must update your payment details via My Account or by clicking update payment details to keep your subscription.