logo
Trump fury over US court bid to block tariffs – as experts warn uncertainty could hit economy

Trump fury over US court bid to block tariffs – as experts warn uncertainty could hit economy

Independent29-05-2025
A cloud hangs over the global economy, experts have warned after a bombshell court ruling blocked Donald Trump's tariffs, creating more global economic 'confusion and uncertainty'.
Financial markers reacted positively to the unanimous ruling by three judges, but the decision enraged the White House, with Trump's official spokesman Stephen Miller calling it another 'judge coup'.
The White House has appealed the decision, but it means all of the president's 'Liberation Day' tariffs now face a protracted legal process that could overshadow trade talks and delay the implementation of existing deals, including with Britain.
Only the 25 per cent tariffs on steel, aluminium, and cars are unaffected by the ruling.
Chris Southworth, secretary general of the International Chamber of Commerce United Kingdom (ICCUK), said months of legal wrangling would further weaken economic confidence.
He said: 'It just puts a whole cloud over the top of any negotiation with the US because it's unclear what the US is negotiating and what their position will be from a legal standpoint.
'The problem is, these tariffs change almost every day with the US at the moment, and this uncertainty isn't good for business.'
Marco Forgione, director general of the Chartered Institute of Export and International Trade, is also worried about the impact.
He said: 'It's clear that we live now in a time of growing uncertainty. But businesses, especially our world-leading food and drink producers, should not rush to react. Whatever the outcome of the legal appeal, keeping calm is the best approach.
'The UK must keep backing open, rules-based trade to give our exporters the certainty they need to succeed.'
Trade economist Simon Evenett told The Independent that the ruling could mean tariffs on sensitive sectors such as cars, steel, aluminium and pharmaceuticals intensify instead of coming down, as they're not covered by the judgement.
He said: "Britain's principal interests lay in the area of cars, steel, aluminium and pharmaceuticals. All of these are covered by investigations under national security and are not covered by the ruling yesterday. This means the risks to the UK in those sensitive sectors remain, and are likely to intensify.'
However, an ally of the Trump administration – Andrew Hale, a trade expert from the influential Heritage Foundation – told The Independent that the judges' decision is 'good news' for the UK.
Mr Hale described the deal signed by Trump and Sir Keir Starmer earlier this month as 'just a framework document with very little in it'.
He added: 'It was meant to be a start for further trade negotiations and deal with some of the tariffs. So [the ruling] is good news [for the UK] because it prevents the [Trump administration] because it is detrimental to the Trump administration; negotiations. They cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs quickly and broadly as a negotiating tactic in negotiations.'
In a speech on Thursday, Sir Keir Starmer defended his deal with Trump despite new question marks over the terms – and revelations the US has yet to lower tariffs on car and steel exports from the UK as originally agreed.
The prime minister highlighted how the deal will ultimately help workers at Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), whose jobs had been under threat.
But the uncertainty created by levies has already led to smaller firms in the UK abandoning the US market, according to Federation of Small Business (FSB) policy chair Tina McKenzie.
She said: 'This court decision offers the possibility of short-term relief for small businesses trading across the Atlantic, many of whom have spent the last few months caught in a tangle of uncertainty, shifting rules and sudden extra costs. In fact, one in five said they had already stopped, or may stop, exporting to the US altogether.'
The Commons select committee on business and trade is set to open an inquiry on trade with the US.
Labour committee chairman Liam Byrne said: 'There's still considerable uncertainty about when the sector-specific exemptions in the recent deal actually come into effect, and what UK firms need to do to access them. This is a key thing we want to cover next week. On the broader tariffs, my understanding is that these now go back to the previous level.'
Meanwhile, Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey demanded that the foreign secretary David Lammy summoned the new US ambassador, Warren Stephens to explain the situation.
He said: 'The levels of chaos from Trump's economic policy is putting Liz Truss to shame.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up
Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up

The Air Force 's top uniformed officer is set to retire early in the most recent shake-up of military leadership during President Donald Trump's second term. Gen. David Allvin will continue serving as the service's chief of staff until a replacement is confirmed by the Senate, the Air Force announced Monday. He expects to retire around Nov. 1, two years into his four-year term, it said in a statement. Allvin joins other top military officials who have stepped down or been fired by Trump 's Republican administration during a broader leadership upheaval, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth 's plans to slash the number of senior military positions in what he calls an efficiency effort and a purge of top officers who were believed to endorse diversity, equity and inclusion programs. For example, Trump fired Air Force Gen. CQ Brown Jr. as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in February. Brown was the second Black general to serve as chairman, and Air Force Gen. Dan Caine later took over the role. Allvin, a command pilot with more than 4,600 flying hours, was appointed Air Force chief of staff by President Joe Biden, a Democrat, serving since November 2023. Before that, he was vice chief of staff during Trump's first term. 'I'm grateful for the opportunity to serve as the 23rd Air Force Chief of Staff and I'm thankful for Secretary Meink, Secretary Hegseth and President Trump's faith in me to lead our service,' Allvin said in the Air Force's statement. When asked for more details on Allvin's departure, the Air Force directed The Associated Press to its statement. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Air Force at

Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown
Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown

Jesse Watters professed his love for the former Department of Government Efficiency staffer, better known by his nickname ' Big Balls,' claiming that the teen's assault in Washington, D.C., spurred Donald Trump 's decision to deploy the National Guard. Watters praised Edward Coristine for taking a 'beating for the rest of the city' during Monday evening's episode of Jesse Watters Primetime, about two weeks after the 19-year-old was brutally assaulted in an attempted carjacking. According to the Fox News host, Coristine's assault was directly linked to the president mobilizing the military in D.C. last Tuesday. 'When Big Balls went down, that's when Trump had to call it,' Watters told fellow Fox News host Will Cain. 'If Big Balls isn't safe, no one's safe. And I'm glad he took a beating for the rest of the city, and he's back up on his feet.' In closing, Watters declared: 'So, Big Balls, we love you.' Cain also chimed in that, though he doesn't frequent the capital, he said that through 'anecdotal evidence' he can see just 'how bad' crime is there. 'And you're seeing this evidenced by the fact that, as you've pointed out, so many people are happy to see President Trump take over Washington, D.C., and make it feel safe,' he added. Since Trump tried – and subsequently failed – to hand over responsibility for policing the district to Pam Bondi, the attorney general announced on Tuesday morning that 465 arrests have been made – 52 on Monday evening alone. Days after posting a picture of a bloodied Coristine across social media, Trump insisted at a press conference last Monday (August 11) that his strategy was necessary because crime in D.C. is 'out of control.' The president claimed the city required 'liberation' from 'violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.' His claim is not consistent with official crime statistics over the past two years, which report that street crime has declined to 30-year lows, leading his opponents to suggest he is seeking a 'distraction' from the Jeffrey Epstein firestorm. Last week, tourists in D.C. were met by the unusual and eerie sight of U.S. military members patrolling the city upon sunrise. Members of the National Guard were present along the Mall last Thursday as part of the administration's show of force, which was trailed in advance by an insider who spoke to ABC News.

United Airlines faces lawsuit after selling ‘windowless' window seats
United Airlines faces lawsuit after selling ‘windowless' window seats

The Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • The Independent

United Airlines faces lawsuit after selling ‘windowless' window seats

United Airlines is facing a class action lawsuit for allegedly selling 'windowless' window seats to passengers. The potential lawsuit, which is still recruiting members, claims that the airline 'misled customers' by charging for aircraft window seats without windows. According to Top Class Actions, plaintiffs are seeking compensation for the 'false advertising' practice that they say violated air passenger rights. California passengers who paid extra for a window seat on a United Airlines flight within the last four years but did not sit next to a physical window may be eligible to join the lawsuit. Airlines often allow passengers to reserve popular window seats for an additional fee. Passengers pay from $24 (£18) per person for preferred seating in United's standard Economy class. That charge rises to $36 (£27) per person for those in 'Basic Economy'. However, different aircraft designs require different configurations, with some rows falling on a blank wall that is not reflected on the plane's seating chart when booking online. The class action would seek to 'hold United Airlines accountable' for the 'misleading and unfair practice', reported Top Class Actions. The lawsuit is being organised by Greenbaum Olbrantz LLP, a legal firm based in New York. According to the airline, no lawsuit has currently been filed against United. In June, a Ryanair passenger who did not pay to reserve a seat found himself bumped from a flight to Mallorca after the airline switched planes at the last minute for an aircraft with fewer seats. Gym coach Scott McCormick and his girlfriend were due to fly with Ryanair on flight FR1954 from Birmingham Airport to Palma de Mallorca on 1 May. The couple said that when they booked their flight, they opted out of paying for a reserved seat, which can range from €4.50 (£3.85) to €33 (£28.20) per flight. 'They put us through at the end, and they said, 'as you are last to check in and you haven't reserved a seat, we have one seat remaining.'' They eventually paid another £100 for a new ticket and waited around four hours to board the next flight to Palma.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store