China is allegedly suppressing coverage of deadly attacks. Some people are complaining online
A four-sentence police statement said a 35-year-old male driver hit pedestrians due to 'improper operation' of the car. It didn't mention the school or that the victims included children. Photos of the aftermath, which showed a half-dozen people lying in the street, were scrubbed from China's closely controlled internet. 'We need the truth,' said one post on Weibo, a leading social media platform similar to X.
The ruling Communist Party has expanded information control since leader Xi Jinping came to power in 2012, seeing it as a way to prevent unrest. More and more topics, from negative news about the economy to LGBTQ+ identity, have become subject to some form of censorship. In the past half year, mass attacks — in which a person kills or injures multiple people with a vehicle or knife — appear to have been added to the list.
Some people in China are pushing back, complaining online in at least two cases in recent months after drivers hit pedestrians. The government may be trying to prevent copycat crimes, experts have said. Another motivation could be local authorities wanting to cover up when they fail to do so.
Deadly case in November sparked government reaction
There was a spate of attacks last fall, but it's difficult to gauge whether they are increasing, given the dearth of information.
The attacks weren't always a taboo topic. In the past, authorities released the basic details. Typically, the assailant was described as taking out their anger on society, often over financial losses.
That appears to have changed following a particularly horrific case in November that killed 35 people in Zhuhai in southern China. Authorities said the driver was upset about a divorce settlement. Orders came from the very top — from Xi — to take steps to prevent similar attacks.
Eight days later, an SUV hit students arriving at an elementary school in Hunan province. The number of injured — 30 children and adults — wasn't made public until nearly a month later when the driver was sentenced.
The clampdown on information has tightened further since. In April, reports circulated online that a car had run into people outside a primary school in Jinhua city. At least three provincial state media outlets posted stories — but they were quickly taken down.
To date, authorities haven't released any information.
Censorship makes some people hungry for information
Twelve days later, a fast-moving car veered off a street and into people at a bus stop in the city of Tengzhou in eastern China. Authorities said nothing. Videos of the May 4 crash were taken down from social media.
The next day, online criticism of the silence began to appear. People said the police should release basic information such as the driver's identity and the number of casualties. A few defended the police, saying it happened on a holiday.
'If a few such precedents are set, and more local governments follow this way in the future, the rules of information disclosure may not be upheld and may be compromised,' Hu Xijin, the former editor of a state-owned newspaper, warned in a social media post.
Local governments want to cover up news that reflects badly on them or their polices, said Jennifer Pan, a Stanford University professor who researches how political censorship and information manipulation work in the digital age. The central government sometimes has other priorities.
'When the issue gains attention despite local censorship efforts, the center has an incentive to preserve the legitimacy of the overall system through responsiveness and acknowledgement of the event and underlying issues,' she said in an email response.
The details came out 48 hours after the crash. Six people had died, and it had not been an intentional attack: The driver was drunk, a state media report said.
Police respond with quick statements that are short on details
Since then, local authorities, at least in two cases in Beijing, seem to be taking a new approach: Issue a report quickly but with scant details.
Eleven days after the drunk driving case, a car hit people outside an elementary school in Beijing on May 15. The Beijing Traffic Police issued a report within a few hours but left out that the location was near a school. It said only that four people had been injured when a car sideswiped pedestrians on Jian'an West Road, and that the driver had been detained.
Authorities appeared to impose an information shutdown that evening. Police were stationed along the stretch of road and a person who appeared to be a neighborhood watch volunteer cautioned people in a nearby residential compound not to speak to strangers.
Six weeks later, posts appeared online on June 26 saying a car had hit children in Miyun, about 60 kilometers (40 miles) northwest of central Beijing. One well-reputed media outlet, Caixin, reached area shop owners who said that children had been hit, and a hospital that confirmed it was treating some child victims. Whether it was an intentional act remains unclear.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
24 minutes ago
- First Post
Why should US trade with Russia and not allow others: China hits back at Trump
China's deputy permanent representative to the UN, Geng Shuang, slammed the United States for imposing tariffs on Beijing due to its trade with Russia, but pointed out how Washington continues to trade with Moscow despite sanctions and the Ukraine war. read more China slammed the United States and called out the hypocrisy of the West regarding trading with Russia. While speaking at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) meeting, China's deputy permanent representative to the UN, Geng Shuang, refuted the claims made by the US representative. US President Donald Trump's administration has been accusing both India and China of helping Russia in the war with Ukraine by continuing to trade with Moscow, especially by buying oil. During the UNSC meeting, the Chinese representative pointed out how the US and the West continue to engage in trading with Russia despite the war and the sanctions. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The US itself continues to engage in trade with Russia to this day. Why should it be acceptable for the US to do so, but not for others? Isn't this 'only allowing oneself to set fires while forbidding others from lighting lamps?'' China's deputy permanent representative to the UN said at the meeting. 'In fact, the US itself continues to engage in trade with Russia to this day. Why should it be acceptable for the US to do so, but not for others? Isn't this 'only allowing oneself to set fires while forbidding others from lighting lamps?'' China's deputy permanent representative… — Global Times (@globaltimesnews) August 1, 2025 China accuses the US of playing the blame game While speaking to the reporters after the meeting, Shuang once again reiterated the matter and said that it was not China that created the crisis in Ukraine. 'I responded to such accusations on multiple occasions in past meetings. Since the US insists on repeating the same rhetoric, I find it necessary to set the record straight once again," Shuang said. 'First, China is not the creator of the Ukraine crisis, nor is it a party to the conflict. China has never provided lethal weapons to any party involved in the conflict." 'We have always strictly controlled the export of dual-use items, including drones. Second, the UN Security Council has not imposed sanctions on any party to the conflict," he added. The Chinese UN representative made it clear that Beijing maintains trade ties with both Russia and Ukraine, in compliance with the trade law. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'China maintains normal trade relations with both Russia and Ukraine, in full compliance with international law and without breaching any international obligations. China's legitimate and lawful rights and interests must not be infringed upon," he said. 'Third, the Ukraine crisis is currently at a critical juncture, with a genuine prospect for a political resolution. The US cannot, on the one hand, ask China to play a constructive role in ending the war, while on the other hand, continuously smear and pressure China," he added. The Chinese representative concluded his argument by saying that the US should not be playing the blame game in this regard. The remarks from China came after US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned Chinese officials that continued purchases of sanctioned Russian oil would lead to big tariffs due to legislation in Congress, but was told that Beijing would protect its energy sovereignty. India's oil purchase from Russia has been facing similar scrutiny. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Did US use Microsoft bugs to spy on China's military?
Synopsis China accuses the US of exploiting Microsoft's email server vulnerabilities to steal military data and launch cyberattacks on its defense sector. This accusation follows Microsoft's repeated blaming of China for major cyber incidents involving its software, including breaches of Exchange servers and SharePoint. The US embassy has not yet responded to the allegations. Reuters Microsoft logo is seen through broken glass in this illustration taken, January 25, 2023. China accused the US of exploiting a flaw in Microsoft Corp.'s email servers to steal military data and carry out cyberattacks on its defense sector, Bloomberg Cyber Security Association of China, a little-known entity backed by the Cyberspace Administration of China, said Friday that US actors had been linked to two major cyberattacks on Chinese military companies. The attackers allegedly exploited vulnerabilities in Microsoft Exchange to control the servers of a key defense-sector company for nearly a year, it Microsoft has repeatedly blamed China for major cyber incidents tied to its software. In 2021, an alleged Chinese campaign compromised tens of thousands of Microsoft Exchange servers. In 2023, another alleged Chinese breach of Exchange impacted senior US officials' email accounts, prompting a US government review that accused Microsoft of a 'cascade of security failures.' Last month, Microsoft also said state-backed Chinese hacking groups exploited flaws in its SharePoint file-sharing software.'Every nation state in the world carries out offensive cybersecurity campaigns against others,' said Jon Clay, vice president of threat intelligence at Trend Micro. 'I'm assuming at this point, because of the recent SharePoint vulnerability that Microsoft attributed to China, they are coming out and saying, hey, the US has been targeting us with exploits.'The US embassy in Beijing did not immediately respond to Bloomberg's request for comment. Ben Read, director of strategic threat intelligence at noted in a recent blog that China increasingly uses 'public attribution of cyber activities' to pressure Taiwan and shape 'the international dialogue around cybersecurity.' Earlier this year, Beijing accused Taiwan of multiple April, China alleged that three NSA employees hacked the Asian Winter Games in Harbin, targeting systems containing personal information of event participants. While Washington has often named alleged Chinese hackers and filed charges against them, Beijing has historically avoided directly accusing US spies, Bloomberg said.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Rebalancing trade ties: India's path to reduced Chinese import dependence
Synopsis Despite escalating geopolitical frictions and diplomatic tensions, India's merchandise trade with China has shown significant resilience, increasing by 81% to $128 billion in FY 2024-25 from $71 billion in FY2015-16. iStock India's top imports from China in 2024 were concentrated in machinery and electronics, such as electronic integrated circuits, telephone sets and parts, automatic data processing machines, and photovoltaic cells. Over the past decade, India's merchandise trade with China has shown significant resilience, increasing by 81% from $71 billion in FY 2015-16 to $128 billion in FY 2024-25 (Figure 1), despite escalating geopolitical frictions and diplomatic tensions. However, this growth masks a significant imbalance for India. Although total trade has grown, this expansion has been largely driven by an 84% surge in imports. In 2024-25, imports from China accounted for about 16% of India's total import basket, totalling around $114 billion. This made China India's largest source of imports. The economic asymmetry has been further aggravated by the relatively sluggish growth in India's exports to China, leading to a widening trade deficit over the years. In 2024-25, this deficit reached a record high of $99.2 billion. China now accounts for nearly 35% of India's overall trade deficit, making it the country's biggest trade imbalance with another country. India's top imports from China in 2024 were concentrated in machinery and electronics, such as electronic integrated circuits, telephone sets and parts, automatic data processing machines, and photovoltaic cells. These items together accounted for 56% of total imports from China (Figure 2). Significant import volumes were also concentrated in critical sectors, such as chemical products (15%), which include pharmaceuticals, organic and inorganic chemicals, and fertilisers. Base metals, plastics, and rubber followed at 8% and 6%, 75% of India's imports from China comprised high- and medium-technology manufactures in 2024 (Figure 3). In terms of the industrial use, intermediate and capital goods accounted for 55%.China's dominance is further underscored by its overwhelming share in India's global imports in several products. In 2024, India imported 560 different products from China, with at least 80% of its total global imports originating from China alone. The combined value of these imports was approximately $19.5 heavy dependence on Chinese imports raises critical concerns about India's industrial reliance and strategic autonomy. However, as highlighted in the Economic Survey 2023-24 and echoed by several prominent economists, a complete decoupling from Chinese supply chains may not be a viable option for India due to China's deep integration into global supply chains, particularly the large share of intermediate and capital goods sourced from China that are vital for sustaining India's manufacturing capacity. Hence, a more pragmatic approach would be to reduce overdependence on imports by encouraging greater Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in India's manufacturing sector, especially through the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. This approach holds particular promise for India's electronics and automobile sectors—areas where import dependence on China is high. Another key concern regarding the long-term sustainability of India's trade balance with China is the dominance of uncompetitive imports in India's import basket. A product imported from China can be considered uncompetitive when its per-unit import price is higher than that offered by at least one of India's top three alternative supplier countries for the same product. In 2024, of India's top 50 imported products from China at the HS-6-digit level, 23 were uncompetitive. For instance, penicillin, which India imports from China, is available from Hong Kong at a 15% lower price, and from the UAE, it is about 36% cheaper. These uncompetitive products alone made up nearly $30 billion in imports, which is about two-thirds (64%) of the total value of India's top 50 imports from China, dominated primarily by machinery and electronics, followed by chemical goods, which include pharmaceuticals as well (Figure 4).The persistence of such uncompetitive imports despite available cheaper alternatives can, in part, be attributed to China's strategic export promotion practices. These include offering deferred payment options, low-interest financing, and technical cooperation arrangements for its exporters to make its exports more attractive to importing countries. Thus, the China Export and Credit Insurance Corporation—Sinosure, the country's official export credit agency (ECA), provides credit insurance to Chinese companies engaged in international trade, safeguarding them against the risk of non-payment. This protection encourages exporters to offer deferred payment terms to foreign buyers, enhancing trade turnover and benefiting both parties. Hence, these mechanisms significantly reduce payment risk, encourage higher trade turnover, and make Chinese products reducing India's dependence on uncompetitive imports from China should remain a key strategic priority. This can be achieved by gradually diversifying towards more price-competitive suppliers and by seeking new source countries for imports. Simultaneously, India should make concerted efforts to encourage Chinese FDI into non-strategic sectors where the country faces high import dependence, as this could strengthen domestic manufacturing capacity along with paving the way for a more sustainable trade relationship with China. The writers Nisha Taneja is Professor at ICRIER, and Vasudha Upreti is Research Assistant at ICRIER. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of
