
Rebalancing trade ties: India's path to reduced Chinese import dependence
Despite escalating geopolitical frictions and diplomatic tensions, India's merchandise trade with China has shown significant resilience, increasing by 81% to $128 billion in FY 2024-25 from $71 billion in FY2015-16.
iStock India's top imports from China in 2024 were concentrated in machinery and electronics, such as electronic integrated circuits, telephone sets and parts, automatic data processing machines, and photovoltaic cells. Over the past decade, India's merchandise trade with China has shown significant resilience, increasing by 81% from $71 billion in FY 2015-16 to $128 billion in FY 2024-25 (Figure 1), despite escalating geopolitical frictions and diplomatic tensions. However, this growth masks a significant imbalance for India. Although total trade has grown, this expansion has been largely driven by an 84% surge in imports. In 2024-25, imports from China accounted for about 16% of India's total import basket, totalling around $114 billion. This made China India's largest source of imports. The economic asymmetry has been further aggravated by the relatively sluggish growth in India's exports to China, leading to a widening trade deficit over the years. In 2024-25, this deficit reached a record high of $99.2 billion. China now accounts for nearly 35% of India's overall trade deficit, making it the country's biggest trade imbalance with another country. India's top imports from China in 2024 were concentrated in machinery and electronics, such as electronic integrated circuits, telephone sets and parts, automatic data processing machines, and photovoltaic cells. These items together accounted for 56% of total imports from China (Figure 2). Significant import volumes were also concentrated in critical sectors, such as chemical products (15%), which include pharmaceuticals, organic and inorganic chemicals, and fertilisers. Base metals, plastics, and rubber followed at 8% and 6%, respectively.Strikingly, 75% of India's imports from China comprised high- and medium-technology manufactures in 2024 (Figure 3). In terms of the industrial use, intermediate and capital goods accounted for 55%.China's dominance is further underscored by its overwhelming share in India's global imports in several products. In 2024, India imported 560 different products from China, with at least 80% of its total global imports originating from China alone. The combined value of these imports was approximately $19.5 billion.Such heavy dependence on Chinese imports raises critical concerns about India's industrial reliance and strategic autonomy. However, as highlighted in the Economic Survey 2023-24 and echoed by several prominent economists, a complete decoupling from Chinese supply chains may not be a viable option for India due to China's deep integration into global supply chains, particularly the large share of intermediate and capital goods sourced from China that are vital for sustaining India's manufacturing capacity. Hence, a more pragmatic approach would be to reduce overdependence on imports by encouraging greater Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in India's manufacturing sector, especially through the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. This approach holds particular promise for India's electronics and automobile sectors—areas where import dependence on China is high. Another key concern regarding the long-term sustainability of India's trade balance with China is the dominance of uncompetitive imports in India's import basket. A product imported from China can be considered uncompetitive when its per-unit import price is higher than that offered by at least one of India's top three alternative supplier countries for the same product. In 2024, of India's top 50 imported products from China at the HS-6-digit level, 23 were uncompetitive. For instance, penicillin, which India imports from China, is available from Hong Kong at a 15% lower price, and from the UAE, it is about 36% cheaper.
These uncompetitive products alone made up nearly $30 billion in imports, which is about two-thirds (64%) of the total value of India's top 50 imports from China, dominated primarily by machinery and electronics, followed by chemical goods, which include pharmaceuticals as well (Figure 4).The persistence of such uncompetitive imports despite available cheaper alternatives can, in part, be attributed to China's strategic export promotion practices. These include offering deferred payment options, low-interest financing, and technical cooperation arrangements for its exporters to make its exports more attractive to importing countries. Thus, the China Export and Credit Insurance Corporation—Sinosure, the country's official export credit agency (ECA), provides credit insurance to Chinese companies engaged in international trade, safeguarding them against the risk of non-payment. This protection encourages exporters to offer deferred payment terms to foreign buyers, enhancing trade turnover and benefiting both parties. Hence, these mechanisms significantly reduce payment risk, encourage higher trade turnover, and make Chinese products competitive.Nevertheless, reducing India's dependence on uncompetitive imports from China should remain a key strategic priority. This can be achieved by gradually diversifying towards more price-competitive suppliers and by seeking new source countries for imports. Simultaneously, India should make concerted efforts to encourage Chinese FDI into non-strategic sectors where the country faces high import dependence, as this could strengthen domestic manufacturing capacity along with paving the way for a more sustainable trade relationship with China.
The writers Nisha Taneja is Professor at ICRIER, and Vasudha Upreti is Research Assistant at ICRIER.
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com.)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
With new 40% tariff on transshipments, Trump takes aim at US dependence on China's factories
Ever since President Trump began raising tariffs on goods from China during his first term, Chinese companies have raced to set up warehouses and factories in Southeast Asia, Mexico and elsewhere to bypass US tariffs with indirect shipments to the American market via other countries. But on Thursday, Trump took aim at all indirect American imports, which he blames for part of the $1.2 trillion US trade deficit. Trump imposed 40% tariffs on so-called transshipments, which will take effect in a week. And a senior administration official who briefed reporters said work was under way that could broaden considerably the definition of indirect shipments. The new rules cover indirect shipments from anywhere, not just China. But China, with its massive factory infrastructure and expansive manufacturing ambition, has been the main country to develop a global network for such shipments. Trade experts were quick to predict that China would be the most affected - and the most executive order Thursday created a new category of imports: goods that are transshipped through other countries instead of coming straight from the country of origin. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Were So Beautiful Before; Now Look At Them; Number 10 Will Shock You Reportingly Undo The 40% tariffs on these goods will be on top of whatever tariffs would have applied if the goods had come directly from the country where they were originally made. The legal definition of transshipment is narrow: a good that did not undergo a "substantial transformation" in the country through which it was indirectly shipped. Countries in Southeast Asia have long denied that they allow a lot of transshipment. They contend that their soaring imports of Chinese components are being assembled into new and different products that can appropriately be labelled made in their countries, and not labelled "made in China. " Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025


Mint
4 hours ago
- Mint
Soy futures post weekly loss on expectations for big US crop
CHICAGO, - Chicago Board of Trade soybean futures finished flat on Friday but notched a second consecutive weekly decline as ample global supplies, favorable U.S. weather and weak Chinese demand hung over the market. U.S. farmers were expected to harvest bumper soybean and corn crops this autumn following non-threatening weather conditions. At the same time, they worried that President Donald Trump's latest wave of tariffs may hurt American farm exports at a time when soy and wheat sales have struggled. The United States faces stiff competition for global soy sales from Brazil, the world's biggest exporter of the oilseed. "Expectations of a robust U.S. harvest, alongside a second consecutive record Brazilian crop, are expected to weigh on prices for the remainder of the year," analysts at BMI, a unit of Fitch Solutions, said in a note. CBOT November soybeans ended unchanged at $9.89-1/4 a bushel after falling earlier to the lowest level since April 9. The contract lost about 3.1% for the week. China, the world's biggest soy buyer, faces an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with Trump's administration. The United States believes it has the makings of a trade deal, but it is "not 100% done," Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Thursday. A Chinese buyer signed a deal this week to import 30,000 metric tons of Argentine soymeal, as feed producers move to lock in cheaper supplies from South America, two trade sources said. In CBOT wheat, September futures ended down 6-1/2 cents at $5.16-3/4 per bushel. The contract set a low of $5.16-1/4 a bushel earlier in the session and tumbled 4% for the week as in the Northern Hemisphere brought in new supplies. CBOT corn also slumped, with the December contract closing 3 cents lower at $4.10-3/4 a bushel. It lost about 2% for the week. Export sales of corn have been brisk as buyers take advantage of low prices. The U.S. Department of Agriculture reported exporters sold a total of 352,160 metric tons of U.S. corn to unknown destinations via its daily reporting system. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Economic Times
5 hours ago
- Economic Times
Tigers are not out of the woods yet
Synopsis India faced a severe decline in its tiger population post-independence. Project Tiger helped increase the numbers significantly. Now, the tiger population is over 3,700. Balancing tourism and conservation is a key challenge. Protecting villagers' interests is also important. The threat of poaching and the Chinese market remains. India needs innovative solutions for tiger conservation. Agencies The figures speak for themselves. In 1947, India's human population was 340 million and there were an estimated 40,000 tigers; when Project Tiger was launched in 1973, there were just 268 of them left although humans in India had nearly doubled to 584 million by then. So, since Independence 1,600 tigers had been killed per year, more than during the British Raj actually, although it was the white sahibs who had made large-scale hunting of the big feline a fashionable "sport".Till it was banned in 1972, people may recall that shikar was a tourism draw in India, with "game hunters" coming to shoot these magnificent animals, much as they kill lions in Africa now. That was probably justified then (as it is in some countries in Africa even now) as a legitimate economic activity, as there's such a "surplus" of them. What is a surplus? Surely if any species is "surplus" right now, it's humans but sport is not considered a way to remedy for "sport" or pleasure not food was always a pastime for Indian monarchs. But in the 19th century it became so democratised that every burra sahib, feudal and local notable worth his khidmatgars shot tigers, leopards and even the cheetah (the latter to extinction) by the mid-20th century. And to this day, hundreds of stuffed animals or their skins and heads adorn old forts, palaces and mansions. But people cringe at the very idea of displaying human skulls. Why?The human population of India has quadrupled from the 1947 figure to a whopping 1.4 billion now, but the tiger population has also increased over 10 times from 1972's abysmal three-figure to over 3,700 now. That we have managed to do this is nothing short of amazing even though there are alarming photos all the time of hordes of noisy, camera-wielding desi tourists in our tiger reserves and national parks. And that highlights a piquant to retired Forest Service stalwarts speaking on World Tiger Day at the Tollygunge Club in Kolkata last week, it was clear that unless people feel invested in tigers, they will not be motivated to protect them. The official focus, of course, is on villagers who live next to tiger reserves and often feel sidelined in favour of the endangered species. Their concerns-especially regarding compensation for families of those killed by tigers-are being addressed so that they do not regard the animals as enemies or harbingers of death and financial ruin. But what about the millions of tourists? Roads cutting through core areas, more vehicles accessing sanctuaries and staying longer hours inside, hotels hemming in the jungle and the sheer pressure of human interest in tigers and other large wildlife like lions, rhinos, elephants, gaud (bison) are scary developments. But the monetary lure of the insatiable Chinese market for wild tiger parts is also a perennial threat. So, could curtailing public access in order to protect tiger habitats then actually aid poaching?India's human population growth has slowed hugely; we now have to continue to demonstrate to the world the efficacy of our different approach to "managing" wildlife too. When India banned the fashionable "sport" of hunting and decided to save the tiger, the world sniggered. Seeing 268 become 3,700, they cannot deny the success of Project Tiger. With the Chinese spectre always looming, India also needs to think imaginatively now to resolve the current tiger-tourism conflict too.