Munambam Land Protection Council meets Jose K. Mani, seeks government intervention
The delegation, comprising Fr. Antony Xavier (patron of the council), chairperson Joseph Rockey and convener Joseph Benny, held a 45-minute discussion with Mr. Mani. They urged him to push for a permanent resolution to the land dispute and sought his support to bring the matter to the attention of the State government.
Speaking after the meeting, Fr. Rockey said Mr. Mani had been approached in his capacity as a representative of the community. He also acknowledged the supportive stance Mr. Mani had taken in the Rajya Sabha in favour of the protesting families in Munambam.
To expediate action
'Now that the judicial commission has submitted its report, we have requested Mr. Mani's help in expediting government action. It has been 268 days since our protest began and it will complete one year on October 13. We are hoping for an early and lasting resolution,' he said.
Mr. Mani, for his part, assured the delegation that he would raise the issue with the State government.
'The matter is under the consideration of both the tribunal and a judicial commission. The concerns raised by the delegation will be brought to the attention of the Chief Minister and the relevant departments. We will do everything possible to address their grievances,' Mr. Mani said.
The Kerala Congress (M) regards the meeting as a positive outcome of its ongoing efforts to reach out to the predominantly Catholic families protesting in Munambam.
With Munambam residents
Earlier, during the discussion on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Rajya Sabha, Mr. Mani had made a pointed effort to align himself with the people of Munambam, who are locked in a legal dispute over land ownership before a Waqf tribunal. While he expressed partial support for certain provisions in the Bill, Mr. Mani ultimately voted against it.
In his speech, Mr. Mani had backed key clauses such as the provision allowing court challenges to Waqf Board rulings and another revoking the board's unilateral power to designate land as Waqf property. At the same time, he voiced strong opposition to the Bill's controversial provisions allowing non-Muslim members in the Central Waqf Council and State Boards.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
14 minutes ago
- India Gazette
AIBA urges PM Modi to ensure lifelong housing for former PMs, CJIs, and Lok Sabha speakers
New Delhi [India], July 7 (ANI): The All India Bar Association (AIBA) has urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to initiate legislation that guarantees lifelong government accommodation to former Prime Ministers, former Speakers of the Lok Sabha, and former Chief Justices of India (CJIs), according to the official statement. This appeal was formally made through a detailed letter written by Adish C Aggarwala, Senior Advocate and Chairman of AIBA. According to an official statement, Aggarwala expressed concern over recent developments, highlighting the housing struggles faced by retired Chief Justice DY Chandrachud. Although the Supreme Court Judges (Amendment) Rules, 2022, provide retired CJIs with rent-free housing for up to six months, Chandrachud reportedly had difficulty finding suitable private accommodation in Delhi. Consequently, he requested an extension to remain in his official residence. According to the official statement, the government accommodated this request in good faith, yet it inadvertently caused a delay in the handover of the designated bungalow to Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Even now, more than a month into his tenure, the current Chief Justice of India, Justice BR Gavai, has not moved into the residence. In the letter, Aggarwala--who previously served as President of the Supreme Court Bar Association and Vice Chairman of the Bar Council of India--advocated for a dignified and lasting solution, according to the release. He argued that similar to the privileges granted to the President and Vice-President, lifelong housing should be offered to individuals who have served in the highest positions across the three pillars of Indian democracy: the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary. In an official statement, he cited examples of previous CJIs whose terms were exceptionally brief--some lasting just 29 or 36 days--due to the seniority-based appointment system. Despite the short tenures, these individuals shoulder immense responsibility in safeguarding the Constitution and its values. According to the release, the letter emphasised that, unlike the fixed-term appointments of other top offices, the unpredictable and often truncated nature of judicial service necessitates a stable post-retirement arrangement. In a statement, Aggarwala's appeal concluded with strong praise for Prime Minister Modi's leadership and a call to preserve and honour India's democratic institutions by supporting those who have upheld them. Such a move, he suggested, would not only resolve a practical concern but also represent a collective tribute to the distinguished roles these officials have played. (ANI)
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
15 minutes ago
- India.com
Trump Claimed Iran's Nukes Are Gone; Experts Say They Are About To Explode
New Delhi: Twelve days of war. Three direct U.S. strikes. One bill. One signature. That is all it took to change the tone in Tehran. Iran's parliament passed a new law last week. President Masoud Pezeshkian signed it into force. With that, Iran began cutting ties with the world's nuclear watchdog – the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). This is not merely another diplomatic rebuke. It is the beginning of a different phase. One that nuclear experts say could lead somewhere far more dangerous. After the United States dropped bunker-busting bombs on Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, Washington called it a success. President Donald Trump claimed Iran's nuclear infrastructure was obliterated. But those who have tracked nuclear programmes for decades are warning something very different. The blasts may not have stopped Iran. They may have hardened its resolve. The inspections are gone. The trust is thinner than ever. What comes next is anyone's guess, but signs are emerging. Iran Eyes the Same Path North Korea Took? Iran is now allegedly considering quitting the global nuclear agreement that is held since 1968 – the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). The last country to walk out of the NPT was North Korea. And everyone knows what happened next. Nuclear policy experts say Iran may be inching towards the same route quietly, carefully and possibly with more strategic clarity than before. The NPT allows countries to build peaceful nuclear programmes. But it also gives inspectors the right to enter sites, check materials and track enrichment. Without that, the line between energy and weaponry vanishes. The difference becomes technical, not moral. That worries nearly every neighbour in the region. John Erath, who works with the Centre for Arms and Non-Proliferation, explained it in simple terms. Iran can enrich uranium, spin centrifuges and do everything but attach a warhead while still claiming to follow the treaty. That is the loophole. And it' is big enough to drive a nuclear arsenal through. Now with inspections suspended and the IAEA kept at arm's length, the international community is left watching shadows. What Iran chooses to do behind closed doors might never be seen until it is too late. The JCPOA Is a Ghost of the Past There was a deal once. A real one. The JCPOA. Signed in 2015 between Iran and several world powers, led by the United States. It put restrictions on Iran's nuclear activities. It opened facilities to global monitoring. In return, Tehran got economic relief. Sanctions were lifted. Oil flowed. Diplomacy had a moment. Then came 2018. President Trump walked out of the agreement, calling it 'defective to its core'. The sanctions snapped back into place. Trust collapsed. Iran began stepping away from its commitments, one centrifuge at a time. Since then, talks have come and gone. None have led anywhere. The window that once looked open is now a wall. Trump himself tried to bring Iran back into talks again. Nothing moved. What Happens If Iran Goes Quiet? Nuclear experts say this is the moment to watch. Not when the bomb is built, but when the lights go off. The moment inspections stop. The moment legal frameworks are frozen. That is when programmes become invisible. Iran might keep enriching uranium. It might keep its scientists working. It might decide to stay just inches from assembling a weapon – close enough to frighten its rivals, but far enough to deny intent. Howard Stoffer, a former senior UN official, sees this as a turning point. He says Tehran could use this moment to cross into a 'grey zone'. Not peace. Not open war. A space where it can do everything except test a device and still deny nuclear ambitions. Iran has said it will 'act in its own interest'. That leaves the NPT in limbo. That leaves the IAEA in the dark. And that leaves the world guessing. The Message of the Bombs May Have Hit Policy What is unfolding now did not start with the war. But the airstrikes sped things up. Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan were symbols. The underground vaults, the uranium stockpiles and the spinning machines – all were part of Iran's long and complicated nuclear story. The attacks did not erase that story. They rewrote its next chapter. What the world sees now is a country wounded but defiant. Iran is tightening its fists, not opening its hands. Pulling out of global frameworks. Locking doors. Shutting windows. The programme may go underground. But the consequences could echo far above the surface. And as global powers watch Tehran drift from agreements and block access, the question lingers longer than before – how close is close enough?
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sikhs, Sindhis seek deathin forced conversion cases
Lucknow: Members of the Sikh and Sindhi communities in UP have expressed anger and demanded capital punishment for those involved in forced religious conversions of non-Muslim girls through deceit and manipulation. Calling it an 'anti-national conspiracy', community leaders urged CM Yogi Adityanath to take exemplary action against the accused. Parbinder Singh, a Sikh representative in the UP Minority Commission, condemned the conversion of girls in exchange for money and alleged that people like Chhangur Baba, arrested recently, deserved nothing less than death. Minister of state for agriculture Baldev Singh Aulakh called it a deep-rooted conspiracy aided by foreign agencies. "Sikhism protects, not converts. CM Yogi must crush these mafias," he asserted. From the Sindhi community, Nanak Chand Lakhmani said, "Our daughters are being systematically targeted. These criminals must hang." Another leader, Kishan Chand Tanwani, added, "Fixing conversion rates is inhuman. This is terrorism through deceit." TNN
