logo
Epson shows EpiqVision Mini projectors are ‘Designed for Every Moment'

Epson shows EpiqVision Mini projectors are ‘Designed for Every Moment'

Campaign ME6 days ago
To launch its EpiqVision Mini smart laser projectors, Epson has collaborated with JWI for a creative campaign that aims to redefine how projectors can add meaning to people's lives.
Challenging the stereotype that projectors are often thought of as functional devices for boardrooms or home cinemas, the brand saw an opportunity to reposition the projector as a lifestyle enabler.
The campaign, rolling out across the Middle East, Türkiye, Africa, and Central & West Asia, is built on a simple but powerful insight: people don't connect over pixels – they connect over moments.
'In this part of the world, shared experiences are the heartbeat of everyday life,' said Natalie Harrison, Marketing Director at Epson META-CWA. 'We knew that to create true emotional relevance, we had to show how our technology fits into the fabric of family, friendship and togetherness. That meant stepping away from the functional and leaning fully into the emotional.'
Designed for Every Moment centres on four unique, story-led films that aim to reflect different audience mindsets. Instead of product demos or spec-led messaging, the projector is subtly woven into real-life scenarios, always as the enabler of something more meaningful. The campaign showcases this in various scenarios from spontaneous couple time to family movie traditions.
'Too often, tech brands focus on what their products do, rather than what they create,' said Ben Thomas, Creative Director at JWI. 'For us, it wasn't about the lumen count or screen size. It was about the feeling. What does this product unlock? What does it allow you to experience? That's where the storytelling began.'
To align with Epson's reputation for forward-thinking technology, the team turned to AI to bring the campaign to life. The creative team said it used AI-generated visuals to develop the films, delivering high-quality content quickly and cost-effectively. JWI further claims it accomplished this without sacrificing craft or emotional depth.
'As a brand that leads with innovation, using AI to tell this story felt completely right for Epson,' Harrison added. 'It wasn't a gimmick, it was a smart, strategic decision that allowed us to be creatively ambitious and commercially agile.'
Thomas echoed this sentiment: 'We're always exploring new tools to push our ideas further. In this case, AI gave us the flexibility to tell multiple stories for the diverse META-CWA region without certain creative constraints.'
The campaign aims to bring a new approach to lifestyle tech marketing, moving away from product demos or spec-led messaging and leaning into what people actually value: spending time together, making memories and enjoying everyday moments.
By shifting the focus from functionality to feeling, Epson claims the campaign makes the EpiqVision Mini more appealing and creates a deeper emotional connection with customers.
'It's not just about projectors,' said Harrison. 'It's about bringing people together and reminding people of what really matters.'
Credits:
Client: Epson META-CWA
Creative & Production Agency: JWI
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption
Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption

Dubai Eye

time6 hours ago

  • Dubai Eye

Australia widens teen social media ban to YouTube, scraps exemption

Australia said on Wednesday it will add YouTube to sites covered by its world-first ban on social media for teenagers, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the Alphabet-owned video-sharing site and potentially setting up a legal challenge. The decision came after the internet regulator urged the government last month to overturn the YouTube carve-out, citing a survey that found 37 per cent of minors reported harmful content on the site, the worst showing for a social media platform. "I'm calling time on it," Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in a statement highlighting that Australian children were being negatively affected by online platforms, and reminding social media of their social responsibility. "I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs." The decision broadens the ban set to take effect in December. YouTube says it is used by nearly three-quarters of Australians aged 13 to 15, and should not be classified as social media because its main activity is hosting videos. "Our position remains clear: YouTube is a video sharing platform with a library of free, high-quality content, increasingly viewed on TV screens. It's not social media," a YouTube spokesperson said by email. Since the government said last year it would exempt YouTube due to its popularity with teachers, platforms covered by the ban, such as Meta's Facebook and Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok, have complained. They say YouTube has key similarities to their products, including letting users interact and recommending content through an algorithm based on activity. The ban outlaws YouTube accounts for those younger than 16, allowing parents and teachers to show videos on it to minors. "Teachers are always curators of any resource for appropriateness (and) will be judicious," said Angela Falkenberg, president of the Australian Primary Principals Association, which supports the ban. Artificial intelligence has supercharged the spread of misinformation on social media platforms such as YouTube, said Adam Marre, chief information security officer at cyber security firm Arctic Wolf. "The Australian government's move to regulate YouTube is an important step in pushing back against the unchecked power of big tech and protecting kids," he added in an email. The reversal sets up a fresh dispute with Alphabet, which threatened to withdraw some Google services from Australia in 2021 to avoid a law forcing it to pay news outlets for content appearing in searches. Last week, YouTube told Reuters it had written to the government urging it "to uphold the integrity of the legislative process". Australian media said YouTube threatened a court challenge, but YouTube did not confirm that. "I will not be intimidated by legal threats when this is a genuine fight for the well-being of Australian kids," Communications Minister Anika Wells told parliament on Wednesday. The law passed in November only requires "reasonable steps" by social media platforms to keep out Australians younger than 16, or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million. The government, which is due to receive a report this month on tests of age-checking products, has said those results will influence enforcement of the ban.

LLMs Fail to Deliver Real Intelligence Despite Huge Investment
LLMs Fail to Deliver Real Intelligence Despite Huge Investment

Arabian Post

time4 days ago

  • Arabian Post

LLMs Fail to Deliver Real Intelligence Despite Huge Investment

The trajectory of large language models like GPT and its counterparts has raised numerous questions in recent months. As companies such as OpenAI continue to pour billions into scaling these models, the fundamental issue of their cognitive limitations remains glaring. The hype surrounding LLMs, though widely praised for their fluency and utility, overlooks a critical flaw in their design. These models may perform tasks that mimic intelligent behaviour but do not actually possess the ability to think, reason, or understand. A growing chorus of AI researchers and experts argues that no amount of funding, data, or compute power will transform LLMs into entities capable of genuine intelligence. Despite ambitious plans from companies like OpenAI to expand the infrastructure behind LLMs to an unimaginable scale, their current model architecture continues to hit the same cognitive wall. At the core of this issue is the realization that LLMs are fundamentally engineered to mimic intelligence rather than to achieve it. OpenAI's recent announcements have been staggering. The company has unveiled plans to deploy up to 100 million GPUs—an infrastructure investment that could exceed $3 trillion. These resources would be used to enhance the size and speed of existing LLMs. Such efforts would consume enormous amounts of energy, rivaling that of entire countries, and generate vast quantities of emissions. The scale of the operation is unprecedented, but so too is the question: What exactly will this achieve? Will adding more tokens to a slightly bigger and faster model finally lead to true intelligence? ADVERTISEMENT The simple answer appears to be no. LLMs are not designed to possess cognition. They are designed to predict, autocomplete, summarise, and assist with routine tasks—but these are functions of performance, not understanding. The biggest misconception in AI development today is the conflation of fluency with intelligence. Proponents of scaling continue to tout that more data, more models, and more compute will unlock something that is fundamentally elusive. But as the limitations of LLMs become increasingly apparent, the vision of artificial general intelligence using current methodologies seems like a pipe dream. The reality of AI's current state is jarring: a vast, burning of resources with little to show for it. Companies like Meta, xAI, and DeepMind are all investing heavily in LLMs, creating an illusion of progress by pushing for bigger and more powerful systems. However, these innovations are essentially 'performance theatre,' with much of the energy and resources funnelled into creating benchmarks and achieving superficial gains in fluency rather than advancing the underlying technology. This raises important questions: Why is there so little accountability for the environmental impact of such projects? Where is the true innovation in cognitive science? LLMs, despite their capacity to accomplish specific tasks effectively, are essentially still limited by their design. The push to scale them further, under the assumption that doing so will lead to breakthroughs in artificial intelligence, ignores the inherent problems that cannot be solved with brute force alone. The architecture behind LLMs—based on pattern recognition and statistical correlation—simply cannot generate the complex, dynamic processes involved in real cognition. Experts argue that the AI community must acknowledge these limitations and pivot toward new approaches. The vast majority of AI researchers now agree that a shift in paradigm is necessary. LLMs, no matter how large or finely tuned, cannot produce the kind of intelligence required to understand, reason, or adapt in a human-like way. To move forward, a radically different model must be developed—one that incorporates cognitive architecture and a deeper understanding of how real intelligence functions. The current momentum in AI, driven by large companies and investors, seems to be propelled by a desire for immediate results and visible performance metrics. But it's crucial to remember that speed means little if it's headed in the wrong direction. Without a rethinking of the very foundations of AI research, the race to scale LLMs will continue to miss the mark. In fact, there's a real risk that the over-emphasis on the scalability of these models could stifle the kind of breakthroughs needed to move the field forward.

Meta to halt political advertising in EU from October, blames EU rules
Meta to halt political advertising in EU from October, blames EU rules

Zawya

time5 days ago

  • Zawya

Meta to halt political advertising in EU from October, blames EU rules

Meta Platforms will end political, electoral, social issue advertising on its platform in the European Union in early October because of the legal uncertainties due to EU rules targeting political advertising, the U.S. social media company said on Friday. Meta's announcement echoed Alphabet unit Google's decision announced last November, underscoring Big Tech's pushback against EU rules aimed at reining in their power and making sure that they are more accountable and transparent. The European Union legislation, called the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation and which will apply from Oct. 10, was triggered by concerns about disinformation and foreign interference in elections across the 27-country bloc. The EU law requires Big Tech companies to clearly label political advertising on their platforms, who paid for it and how much as well as which elections are being targeted or risk fines up to 6% of their annual turnover. "From early October 2025, we will no longer allow political, electoral and social issue ads on our platforms in the EU," Meta said in a blog post. "This is a difficult decision - one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation, which introduces significant operational challenges and legal uncertainties," it said. Meta said TTPA obligations create what it said is an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU. It said the EU rules will ultimately hurt Europeans. "We believe that personalised ads are critical to a wide range of advertisers, including those engaged on campaigns to inform voters about important social issues that shape public discourse," Meta said. "Regulations, like the TTPA, significantly undermine our ability to offer these services, not only impacting effectiveness of advertisers' outreach but also the ability of voters to access comprehensive information," the company added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store