logo
Ottawa sides with CRTC to boost competitor access to fibre networks

Ottawa sides with CRTC to boost competitor access to fibre networks

Yahoo07-08-2025
OTTAWA – Industry Minister Mélanie Joly has upheld the CRTC's wholesale regulatory framework for high-speed Internet services, giving Telus Corp. a victory after a long battle. But other telecom operators are furious.
In a landmark decision announced late Wednesday evening, Joly sided with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's (CRTC) after it decided to allow for greater competition on existing networks for high-speed Internet services across the country.
The CRTC authorized Canada's three major telecommunications companies to resell fibre optics to Internet service providers (ISPs) on their respective networks.
This decision means, for example, that Telus, which is strong in Western Canada, can use other providers' networks to attract thousands of customers in Ontario and Quebec instead of building its own infrastructure.
'By immediately increasing competition and consumer choice, the CRTC's decision aims to reduce the cost of high-speed Internet for Canadians and will contribute toward our broader mandate to bring down costs across the board,' said Joly in a statement.
The August 2024 decision, confirmed in June 2025 by the regulator, was based on extensive expert consultation, and the CRTC received more than 300 public comments.
'This decision… sends a strong signal to consumers, businesses and investors that the Canadian regulatory system is robust, transparent and effective in balancing the needs of stakeholders, and enabling government policy,' said Telus President and CEO Darren Entwistle.
The CRTC recently said that 'several thousand Canadian households' are already benefiting from new plans offered by 'dozens of providers that are using the access enabled by the Final Decision.'
'Changing course now would reverse the benefits of this increased competition and would prevent more Canadians from having new choices of ISPs in the future,' wrote the CRTC in its June 20 decision.
Telus has been lobbying lawmakers for over a year and even launched a petition that garnered over 300,000 signatures in support of the regulator's decision.
Entwistle signalled that his company is 'passionately committed to building national infrastructure and technology for the benefit of consumers, and the productivity and innovation of our private and public sectors.'
However, key players like Bell, Rogers and Cogeco aren't thrilled about it. Many companies had been challenging the decision and asked cabinet to review it.
A year later, they are 'dismayed,' 'shocked' and 'profoundly disappointed' by the federal government's decision.
'Virtually the entire industry, including small and regional providers, urged our elected officials to reverse the CRTC decision,' Rogers Communication said in a statement. 'The impact of this decision will include cuts to capital investment, a loss of network construction jobs, and reduced competition which will mean higher prices for Canadians.'
In an analyst call on Thursday morning, Bell Canada's CEO Mirko Bibic said he was 'disappointed' and urged the government and the CRTC 'to ensure that network builders are fully compensated for significant build costs and investment risks they take in building.'
Bell Canada's executive vice president, Robert Malcolmson, recently said that 'as a direct result' of the policy, his company has reduced its capital expenditures by $500 million in 2025 alone and by over $1.2 billion since the CRTC's initial decision in November 2023.
Rogers and Cogeco, for instance, are asking Ottawa to immediately reconsider this decision.
'The Federal Cabinet's inaction is unacceptable,' said Cogeco's President and CEO Frédéric Perron in a statement.
'The CRTC's current approach undermines choice and affordability, halting crucial innovation and investment vital for Canada's future,' he added.
According to Cogeco, smaller or independent providers that don't have their own facilities could very well be threatened by this policy.
The company said it would continue to challenge the CRTC's 'broken wholesale regime', including through the Federal Court of Appeal.
Cogeco and Eastlink, a property of Bragg Communications, filed an appeal in July asking the court to quash the decision.
National Post atrepanier@postmedia.com
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Accord Announces Second Quarter Financial Results
Accord Announces Second Quarter Financial Results

Business Wire

time2 hours ago

  • Business Wire

Accord Announces Second Quarter Financial Results

TORONTO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Accord Financial Corp. (TSX – ACD) today released its financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The financial figures presented in this release are reported in Canadian dollars and have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. The Company's President and CEO, Mr. Simon Hitzig, commented: 'Following successful initiatives in 2024 to streamline the business and reduce leverage, we recorded modest portfolio growth over the first half of 2025. However, the Company's balance sheet, with its primary and other debt obligations maturing in the near term, is an obstacle to realizing potential growth opportunities. Throughout the first half, working closely with our financial advisors, the Company has continued to focus on strategic initiatives to repay its outstanding debt and further simplify the business.' On July 25, 2025, the Company announced a short-term extension of the Credit Facility, followed by a second extension on August 8, 2025, extending the maturity date to August 15, 2025. The Company expects to execute an amendment to the Credit Facility which will extend the maturity date to December 15, 2025 and amend other terms. 'The anticipated extension provides time for the Company to continue to actively pursue a broad range of strategic initiatives, including potential divestitures of portfolio assets or business units as well as other financing alternatives, to address its maturing debt obligations (with $217.6 million as at June 30, 2025 due by January 31, 2026) and maximize shareholder value. The Company continues to work with its financial advisors to support its pursuit of strategic initiatives and debt repayment or refinancing, but there is no assurance that such initiatives will yield a successful result,' said Mr. Hitzig. 'While we focus on these initiatives, profitable operating performance and growth will continue to be a challenge.' The Company does not plan to provide updates on the status of its strategic initiatives until material developments emerge. Accord's finance receivables and loans ('funds employed') closed at $398 million on June 30, 2025, up 9.0% from $366 million at the start of the year, but down from $431 million on June 30, 2024 (impacted by the sale of the AEF portfolio). Despite modest portfolio growth over the first half, average funds employed during the quarter slipped to $395 million compared to $428 million in the second quarter of 2024. Reflecting the year-over-year decline in average funds employed, and lower average yields, second quarter revenue was $16.2 million compared to $20.0 million in the same period last year. Along with the year-over-year decline in revenue, the Company has reduced overhead, with second quarter general and administrative expenses coming in at $6.7 million versus $8.2 million in the same period last year. For the second quarter in a row, the Company earned a pre-provision operating profit, however, the $1.9 million provision for credit losses pushed the Company to a second quarter net loss attributable to shareholders of $876,000, an improvement from the $1.3 million loss in the first quarter. The loss of 10 cents per common share caused book value per share to slip to $9.19. Within the second quarter provision, actual net write-offs of $1.0 million represented an improvement over the same period last year ($2.3 million) and the first quarter of this year ($1.1 million). The provision also includes a $848,000 non-cash increase in the allowance for expected credit losses. Commenting further, Mr. Hitzig noted, 'Our excellent management team remains focused on successful execution of strategic initiatives to strengthen the business, but challenges remain over the balance of 2025.' About Accord Financial Corp. Accord Financial is one of North America's most dynamic commercial finance companies providing fast, versatile financing solutions including asset-based lending, factoring, inventory finance, equipment finance (in Canada), trade finance and film/media finance. By leveraging our unique combination of deep experience and independent thinking, we craft winning financial solutions for small and medium-sized businesses, simply delivered, so our clients can thrive. Note: Non-IFRS measures The Company's financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS. The Company uses a number of other financial measures to monitor its performance and believes that these measures may be useful to investors in evaluating the Company's operating performance and financial position. These measures may not have standardized meanings or computations as prescribed by IFRS that would ensure consistency between companies using these measures and are, therefore, considered to be non-IFRS measures. The non-IFRS measures presented in this press release are as follows: 1) Adjusted net earnings, adjusted net loss and adjusted EPS/LPS. The Company derives these measures from amounts presented in its IFRS prepared financial statements. Adjusted net earnings (loss) comprise shareholders' net earnings before net single account loss (in 2023 and 2024), professional fees related to bank negotiations (2024 and 2025), stock-based compensation, business acquisition expenses (primarily amortization of intangible assets) and restructuring expenses. Adjusted EPS (basic and diluted) is adjusted net earnings (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (basic and diluted) in the period. Management believes adjusted net earnings is a more appropriate measure of operating performance as it excludes items which do not relate to ongoing operating activities. The following table provides a reconciliation of the Company's net earnings to adjusted net earnings: Expand 2) Book value per share – book value is shareholders' equity and is the same as the net asset value (calculated as total assets minus total liabilities) of the Company less non-controlling interests. Book value per share is the book value or shareholders' equity divided by the number of common shares outstanding as of a particular date. 3) Funds employed are the Company's finance receivables and loans, an IFRS measure. Average funds employed are the average finance receivables and loans calculated over a particular period. Expand Forward-Looking Statements This news release contains certain "forward-looking statements" and certain "forward-looking information" as defined under applicable Canadian securities laws. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "may", "will", "expect", "intend", "estimate", "anticipate", "believe", "continue", "plans" or similar terminology. Forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements, management's beliefs, expectations or intentions regarding the financial position of the Company and the ability of the Company to repay or refinance its outstanding debt obligations. Forward-looking statements are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions that, while believed by management to be reasonable, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties including the Company's overall liquidity and capital resource position and its ability to repay its debt obligations when due and those risks are identified in the Accord's periodic filings with Canadian securities regulators. If any or all of the Company's outstanding debt obligations are not renewed or replaced upon expiration of their terms, and if the Company is unsuccessful in its ability to generate additional capital from sales of portfolio assets and/or business units and additional alternative financing arrangements to repay same on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all, the Company may not be able to continue to finance its operations and operate as a going concern. See Accord's most recent annual information form and most recent management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition for a detailed discussion of the risk factors affecting Accord. Such forward-looking information represents management's best judgment based on information currently available. No forward-looking statement can be guaranteed and actual future results may vary materially. Accordingly, readers are advised not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information.

Why the smartest creators are building studios
Why the smartest creators are building studios

Fast Company

time2 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Why the smartest creators are building studios

If the last 10 years were about creators building audiences, the next 10 will be about them building infrastructure. We're entering the era of the creator-led studio. It's already happening. Creators are turning themselves into multi-dimensional entertainment businesses. They're not just building content pipelines; they're building worlds, structuring teams, developing IP, launching products, and curating and hosting IRL experiences. They're weaving content, community, and commerce into something bigger with the mindset of founders and the ambition of studio executives. Creators are becoming studios Not in the traditional sense…not high rises, backlots, or broadcast slots, but in a way that's native to the internet and modern-day technologies: fast-moving, audience-first, built around trust and consistency. It's a shift from: 'I make content' → 'I build programming' 'I do brand deals' → 'I own the formats' 'I am the brand' → 'I build brands' The best creator-led studios aren't just launching formats, they're building systems for turning creative point of view (POV) into repeatable output. Moreover, the creators who scale aren't just building content engines; they're building emotional frameworks. Call it voice, POV, or DNA, it's what everything else ladders up to. And at the very bleeding edge, those doing it the best are expanding those frameworks beyond content into commerce, community, courses, products, and live experiences. They are building full-stack media businesses, looking to own the audience, the formats, and the infrastructure. What's driving it? 1. Creators are maturing into operators Creators who have the desire to go after this opportunity are no longer solo acts. They're founders. They're hiring. Building teams. Thinking in pipelines, product-market fit, and distribution economics. They're not chasing virality, they are building staying power, and it's working. I explored this previously, when I discussed the shift from creator to entrepreneur. Now, it's evolving again, from entrepreneur to studio builder. One important callout, though. This isn't for every creator and isn't to diminish the incredible value to come from remaining small and mighty. There will be a thriving segment of creators who stick to what they're doing. However, I believe that the biggest share of audience and money will be held in the relatively few who become studio builders 2. Trust is becoming the most valuable signal As AI floods platforms with synthetic content, trust becomes the premium. As Doug Shapiro put it: ' Trust is the new oil. ' Audiences won't just want content; they'll want curation, context, and a point of view. The creators who earn and sustain that trust won't just be personalities. They'll be institutions. 3. Audience expectations are shifting We're now in an era where consistency is currency. People want formats they can return to. They want creators they can rely on. They want editorial judgment, recurring presence, and recognizable rhythms. That's not just a creative instinct; it's reinforced by platform algorithms and audience psychology. Recurring formats increase watch time, retention, and subscriber loyalty. When content appears reliably and feels familiar, audiences are more likely to form habits around it. Creators who think in seasons, franchises, and formats won't just gain attention, they'll earn mindshare. 4. Metrics over meaning The traditional media and advertising worlds, in their obsession with hyperperformance, data precision, and efficiency, left behind something essential: emotional connection. In that creative and cultural vacuum, creators stepped in. Not with metrics, but with meaning. Creators are value driven. They're plugged into the nuances of pop culture. And they're intimately connected to their communities through access, respect, and trust. They didn't just inherit the audience. They earned it. Not just as content creators, but creative directors of a new era. Bringing the kind of relevance, emotion, and resonance that modern culture wants. We're still in the early stages of this movement. But this shift is real. The creator economy isn't just growing faster, it's growing up. Over the next few years, I believe we'll see more and more creators evolve from individual success stories into collective media companies. Studios. Networks. Brand ecosystems. Institutions in their own right. Because the future of media isn't just creator-led. It's creator-built.

What to know if your Air Canada flight gets canceled
What to know if your Air Canada flight gets canceled

The Hill

time4 hours ago

  • The Hill

What to know if your Air Canada flight gets canceled

Summer travelers are facing uncertainty as the clock winds down on a possible strike by Air Canada flight attendants, which the airline said would force it to cancel almost all of its scheduled flights as soon as Saturday. The Canadian carrier on Thursday began what it described as a 'phased wind down' of most operations that included multiple flight cancellations. Air Canada said it was suspending its schedule and trying to get passengers booked with other airlines to limit disruptions if members of its cabin crews walk off the job. Both the union that represents about 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants and the airline say disagreements over key issues, including pay raises, have brought contract talks to a standstill. A complete shutdown of the country's largest airline threatens to impact about 130,000 people a day. Here's what to know about the rights of passengers and airline consumer protections: Impacted passengers will be notified Air Canada said it would reach out via email or text to let customers know if their flights are canceled. The cancellations on Thursday included some long-haul overseas flights. By the end of Friday, the airline expects to cancel 500 flights. Flight attendants are threatening to strike at 1 a.m. EDT Saturday if they don't have a new contract by then. If the walkout happens, the airline said it would suspend all of its Air Canada and Air Canada Rouge flights, but not the regional Air Canada Express flights operated by Jazz Aviation and PAL Airlines. How long the airline's planes will be grounded remains to be seen. Air Canada Chief Operating Officer Mark Nasr said the decision to lock out the union members even if it meant halting flights would help facilitate an orderly restart, 'which under the best circumstances will take a full week to complete.' A complete grounding would affect 25,000 Canadians a day who traveled abroad and may become stranded. You have options if your flight is canceled Passengers whose travel is impacted will be eligible to request a full refund on the airline's website or mobile app, according to Air Canada. The airline said it would also offer alternative travel options through other Canadian and foreign airlines when possible. But it warned that it could not guarantee immediate rebooking because flights on other airlines are already full 'due to the summer travel peak.' Passengers with the flexibility to reschedule their travel plans can also rebook their flights for dates between Aug. 21 and Sept. 12 at no additional cost, Air Canada said. The airline says that under federal regulations, flight cancellations caused by a strike or lockout are considered outside the carrier's control, meaning customers are not eligible for compensation for food and lodging expenses incurred during the labor dispute. Most of the union voted to strike Air Canada and the Canadian Union of Public Employees have been in contract talks for about eight months, but they have yet to reach a tentative deal. By the end of July, the union put it to a vote, and 99.7% approved a strike. The union on Wednesday gave Air Canada a 72-hour strike notice. The airline responded with a so-called lockout notice, saying it would prevent the flight attendants from working on Saturday. The union said it rejected a proposal from the airline to enter a binding arbitration process that would have prevented flight attendants from walking off the job, saying it prefers to negotiate a deal that its members can then vote on. Arielle Meloul-Wechsler, Air Canada's head of human resources, said the company was weighing all of its options, including asking for government intervention. Negotiations break down over pay Both the union and the airline say they remain far apart on the issue of pay and the unpaid work flight attendants do when planes aren't in the air. The airline said its latest offer included a 38% increase in total compensation, including benefits and pensions over four years. But the union pushed back, saying the proposed 8% raise in the first year didn't go far enough because of inflation. Vancouver-based flight attendant Henly Larden, who has worked for Air Canada since 2017, said the union also won't back down on its goal to get flight attendants paid for the time they're on the ground. Larden, 33, called it a 'very archaic expectation' to work for free during the boarding process. 'Just because it's a past practice doesn't mean here in 2025 that it's OK or it's right, and we want to change that going forward,' she said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store