logo
Elon Musk urges release of Epstein files weeks after accusing Trump of being named in them

Elon Musk urges release of Epstein files weeks after accusing Trump of being named in them

Independent03-07-2025
Elon Musk has again urged the release of the unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files, weeks after accusing President Donald Trump of being in them.
The tech billionaire issued a one-word reply to MAGA activist Scott Presler on X on Thursday, who wrote: 'Release the unredacted Epstein files.'
'Yes,' Musk responded.
Renewed calls to release files related to the disgraced financier's sex-trafficking case come just weeks after the explosive fallout between Musk and Trump, during which the Tesla CEO claimed the 'real reason' the documents remained sealed was because the president was implicated.
'Time to drop the really big bomb,' Musk tweeted on June 5. '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'
He followed up shortly after: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.'
About six weeks later, Musk said he regrets some of the posts about Trump, claiming they 'went too far.'
On Monday, Trump reignited his feud with Elon Musk, threatening to unleash the Department of Government Efficiency against the world's riechest man and suggesting he might have to 'go back to South Africa.'
The veiled threat was in response to Musk escalating his anti-Republican rhetoric and his scathing criticism of the president' showpiece tax bill.
'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump said.
'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE. Perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this? BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!'
This is a breaking story. More to follow.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Morning Joe says Trump 'holds the cards' over Putin
Morning Joe says Trump 'holds the cards' over Putin

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Morning Joe says Trump 'holds the cards' over Putin

A former Florida Republican who today is one of the left-leaning networks' leading voices, the host went on to outline why he believes Trump has little to worry about. 'He can just say, "Lindsey [Graham], go ahead - let's pass the sanctions bill and let's grind him down,' he explained, referring to the GOP senator from South Carolina. 'And the second thing is, well, you know, there was talk about a possible $90million military aide bill to Ukraine,' he went on. 'There's two things that would change the dynamics very quickly.' The comments continued Scarborough's surprise support for the president in recent weeks, and Geist, in turn, observed how Putin has continued to attack Ukraine despite the recent peace talks. Scarborough dismissed such talk as mere posturing. 'Vladimir Putin can huff and puff and say he's going to blow the house down all he wants,' he said. 'He's not the one holding the cards. Donald Trump's holding the cards right now. 'It will be very interesting to see if he'll play them over the next 10 days.' Just last week, he criticized Democrats for publicly complaining about Trump 's takeover of Washington, DC - where Morning Joe is based - while secretly pining for a crackdown behind closed doors. Without naming names, the host detailed how he'd received calls from his friends who quietly expressed support for the deployment of federal agents to DC. Their political allegiance? 'All democrats,' Scarborough said on-air August 12. A few days before, he said he agreed with Trump in his assessment that DC is now a dangerous city. 'Certainly don't need the National Guard in there, or certainly not Marines,' he said with wife Mika Brzezinski by his side. 'But you look at Washington, DC, and it's been dangerous for years. 'There have been, you know, a year, a couple of years here, a couple of years there, where it's been a bit better - but certainly over the past five years it has just been an absolute mess. 'Its quality of life has been terrible.' Earlier this week, Scarborough - who faced criticism for meeting with Trump in Mar-a-Lago after the election - revealed MSNBC would be changing its name to 'MS NOW'. The change, CEO Mark Lazarus said in a memo viewed by Daily Mail, represents the new company's focus on 'building our individual identity and vision for the future while laying a foundation for the continued growth and success of our businesses.' MSNBC will also lose the peacock logo long associated with NBCUniversal when the name change goes into effect later this year. MS NOW is an acronym for My Source News Opinion World, execs said - after previously promising the network would keep the 'NBC' in its its name as it prepares to spearhead a spinoff company that's been dubbed Versant. The firm, also based in 30 Rock, is comprised of Comcast channels like MSNBC that had been causing declines in the parent company's share price. The stars of Morning Joe, Brzezinski and Scarborough, are said to be in the midst of exploiting their power to 'leverage their stature within the network,' according to Mediaite's Colby Hall.

Judge denies DOJ's request to release Epstein grand jury docs
Judge denies DOJ's request to release Epstein grand jury docs

Daily Mail​

time3 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Judge denies DOJ's request to release Epstein grand jury docs

Donald Trump was handed another blow on Wednesday when a federal judge denied his administration's attempts to release grand jury testimony from the Jeffrey Epstein case. U.S. District Judge Richard Berman deemed Trump's Justice Department did not provide adequate reasoning to unseal the highly-protected materials. He also said that the grand jury motion was likely a 'diversion' coming from the Trump administration. '[T]he court denies the government's motion to unseal the Epstein grand jury transcripts and exhibits,' the Clinton-appointed judge wrote in his Wednesday decision. It comes after Attorney General Pam Bondi moved at the direct of the president this summer to request the documents be unsealed in attempts to satisfy Americans who were enraged over the lackluster review of the Epstein files. The request came only after weeks of bemoaning from the MAGA base claiming there was a 'cover-up' and that Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel were not being as 'transparent' as Trump promised they would be. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account last month amid the backlash. On July 18, Bondi filed motions in the Southern Districts of New York and Florida to have judges grant release of grand jury testimony from the [sexual] trafficker's cases in the respective states. Florida swiftly denied the request, while SDNY requested the government send their reasoning for requesting the years-old documents be drudged up. Trump's government argued in its reasoning that 'the passage of time has not dulled the public's interest in these cases.' It also revealed that there were only two witnesses in the case – an FBI agent and New York Police Department officer, both of whom are still alive. But Judge Berman claimed that the reasoning was not sufficient for him to grant the request to unseal the grand jury testimony. 'The Government is a logical party to make comprehensive disclosure to the public of the Epstein files,' Berman wrote in the Wednesday decision. 'By comparison, the instant grand jury motion appears to be a 'diversion' from the breath and scope of the Epstein files in the Government's possession.' He also said that Trump's administration did not exhibit there were any 'special circumstances' that would justify unsealing the documents. Berman has come under fire from Trump and his supporters in the past for being a partisan judge. Bill Clinton appointed Berman to the bench in the Southern District of New York in 1998, where he has worked ever since as a judge and then a senior judge starting in September 2011. It's widely known that Clinton and Epstein had personal, professional and philanthropic connections. Epstein donated $1,000 to Clinton's presidential campaign in 1991 and two years later contributed $10,000 to the White House Historical Association for a redecoration project. This got him and longtime girlfriend and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell a ticket to a White House donors' reception hosted by Bill and Hillary Clinton. Maxwell is still serving out a 20-year sentence in relation to the child [sexual] trafficking crimes. She even spoke for nine hours over the course of two days with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in Florida last month to answer questions about Epstein's crimes. She was transferred to a prison in Texas days after the interviews and appears to be angling for pardon from Trump. Flight logs for Epstein's private plane the Lolita Express show that Clinton took at least 17 flights between 2002 and 2003, often with staff, Secret Service agents and Clinton Foundation supporters. Trump also has links to the disgraced financier and appears on his flight logs. Epstein attended Trump's wedding to his second wife Marla Maples in 1993. The deep connections to those most influential in political and business circles is what Americans think is stopping the release of files related to his crimes and his sketchy death. Conspiracies still float online claiming that Epstein was killed in prison in August 2019 and that it was made to look like he took his own life – even though Trump's DOJ concluded that Epstein did [kill himself].

‘Boom or bust' – how extreme weather impacts farmers
‘Boom or bust' – how extreme weather impacts farmers

Channel 4

time5 minutes ago

  • Channel 4

‘Boom or bust' – how extreme weather impacts farmers

Farmers have always been reliant on the weather . Colin Chappell, an arable farmer in Lincolnshire, even says 'mother nature is my business partner'. In that context, it's unsurprising that the driest start to the year in the UK since 1976 has played havoc with harvests. Chappell's challenge on his farm is usually flooding but, after last year was wet, this year has brought the opposite extreme. Fields he owns were underwater in January, then by May were so dry they had cracks in the soil. Production of his pea crop is a third of what it usually would be. And his harvest is earlier than ever. 'We've finished a week now already. That's four weeks ahead of schedule.' – Colin Chappell 'We've finished a week now already. That's four weeks ahead of schedule. This is just unique in my lifetime. My wife's birthday is early September. I've only ever finished once in my lifetime for her birthday.' Extreme weather is creating extreme outcomes for farmers . While some have had their worst harvests, others have had their best. Although even in the most positive circumstances, cash flow is tough. Alan Sutcliffe runs an organic dairy farm in West Yorkshire. There's been a drought there as well, and it is the driest year he can remember. He may have to reduce his cattle numbers due to feed shortages. He says the changing weather conditions will impact consumers as well, particularly when it comes to vegetables, fruit and British dairy products. 'Everybody expects everything to be on the supermarket shelf just when they want it. And I think some things may become either very expensive or they're going to not be available all year round.' A lack of rainfall in 1976 drove food prices up by 12 percent. The Drought Act was passed to ration water and conserve supplies. But half a century later, many farmers feel not enough has changed to improve resilience against the extremes of climate change. That's despite the government committing £5 billion to the sector. Rachel Hallos is Vice President of the National Farmers' Union. 'Even if you're making good returns, for instance, like the livestock industry is doing right now, any margin that you're making is being swallowed up with immediate effect by the fact you're having to go and buy additional feed to feed your animals. My real concern is that farmers start making decisions and actually cease to produce.' 'My real concern is that farmers start making decisions and actually cease to produce.' – Rachel Hallos If some farmers do abandon their farms due to the difficulties of working in an ever-changing climate, it could lead to increased reliance on imported food and undermine national food security. Farmer who took his own life was plagued by inheritance tax fears Tariffs 'better in long run', says Trump-voting farmer Farmers rally against government reforms to inheritance tax

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store