Healthcare trumps stadium as top election issue for these Tasmanians
A YouGov poll asked 1,287 Tasmanians to rank their top three issues at the election, with 22 per cent listing "investing more in health" as their number one issue.
Your Say participant Deanna Kruup is speaking out about her experience with Tasmania's health system in the hope that the next government will address shortfalls.
After a complicated and high-risk pregnancy, Ms Kruup developed severe postpartum depression.
She wanted to be admitted to the three-bed mother and baby unit at the Royal Hobart Hospital, but was told she was not eligible.
After five months and a number of referrals, she managed to access help through the Perinatal and Infant Mental Health outpatient service.
"Even though I was accepted eventually that's lost time I'll never get back with my son where I was just so unwell."
She is concerned other women will not be able to access the help they need when they need it.
Ms Kruup said her experience has had a big impact on her life.
"It's something that's going to stay with me for a long time and I would love to have another baby, and now I am really worried about what's going to happen next time."
Earlier this year the state government announced it would transfer its three existing Royal Hobart Hospital beds and create an expanded mother and baby unit at St John's Park in New Town.
There were also plans to establish a new mother and baby unit in the north of the state.
Both are yet to happen.
Fiona MacFarlane said she and her family could "write a book about all the negative experiences that we've had with the Tasmanian health system".
Ms MacFarlane suffers from kidney failure and is approaching end-stage renal failure.
According to the 2021 Census, 37.5 per cent of people living in Tasmania had a long-term health condition, compared with 31.7 per cent of Australians.
These conditions include arthritis, diabetes, heart disease, cancer and kidney disease.
With the prospect of needing dialysis three days a week in the future, Ms MacFarlane decided to move from Tasmania to Brisbane.
Ms MacFarlane has anxiety and depression because of her chronic health condition.
She has spent time at the former St Helen's Private Hospital for mental health care. But after it closed in 2023, Ms MacFarlane felt there would be little support for her ongoing mental health needs.
Ms MacFarlane would like to see money invested in more urgent care clinics in suburban areas, a modern renal unit, and more beds in public and private mental health services.
"The government could prioritise health instead of utopian visions for the future which includes a sports stadium, which is a luxury item, it's frivolous, we don't need it," she said.
Mary from Tasmania's north-west agrees.
"My husband has cancer and has to travel to Hobart [four hours away]," she said.
But Vin from Hobart shared a different view with the ABC's Your Say:
"We need the stadium, health swallows $10 million per day, $370 million will be 37 days of health spend and won't fix the so-called health crisis."
The Rockliff government had said it would cap the state government contribution to the stadium at $375 million.
There are 65,939 Tasmanians waiting to see a specialist in the public health system.
The ABC has heard from people facing long waits to have conditions diagnosed and treated.
"Wife has been on waiting list to see a neurosurgeon for four years," one person wrote to Your Say.
"I have also been waiting to see a neurosurgeon for neck face and head pain for four years now. I receive a text every now and then to see if I want to stay on the list!" another wrote.
There are also shortages and long waits to see specialists in the private sector as some Your Say contributors have found.
"I want to see a massive change in the availability of paediatrics. My son has lived with ADHD his whole life," Allan said.
"It's been confirmed by a psychologist but they can't prescribe medication, and everyone's books are closed."
There are 8,990 Tasmanians on the elective surgery wait list as of May this year.
Ruth from Launceston said she has been "waiting over four years for major surgery."
Dan Geneste has physical and mental disabilities and spends a lot of time dealing with the health system.
She was taken to the Royal Hobart Hospital for mental health issues and waited 12 hours to see a psychiatrist.
"After that, I had to wait another 12-ish hours before I was transferred to the mental health ward."
Ms Geneste also struggled to get a diagnosis for ADHD, waiting two years to see a psychiatrist.
But she has been unable to continue taking medication for ADHD because she is still waiting for her next appointment with a psychiatrist to get a new prescription.
Health will be a big factor in deciding her vote at the upcoming July 19 election.
The ABC has heard from people struggling to access diagnostic screening services.
"All the diagnostic tests I need are either not available in the north of the state and only available in Hobart with extensive wait lists, or the machines are 'broken' or there is no trained personnel available to perform these tests," Lin said.
"It is such a sad state of affairs."
Carol shared with the ABC her month-long wait to have a contrast mammogram after being diagnosed with malignant invasive breast cancer.
"This is impacting on the surgery that I need and is adding extra stress which is a very stressful and frightening time that I am facing."
The Liberals have made a series of health pledges early on in the election campaign.
The big ticket item is 250 new hospital beds through a northern health complex linked to the Launceston General Hospital.
The Liberals have also promised install a CT scanner at St Helens District Hospital
If re-elected, the Liberals would provide four new free-of-charge breast screening clinics for those aged 50-74 years, living in Kingborough, Devonport, Triabunna and Glenorchy.
The party has also promised to allow GPs to diagnose, treat and manage ADHD.
Labor has promised to quarantine $120 million in funding for digital health upgrades.
But the party is yet to release its full list of health policies and promises.
Among the Greens pledges is a plan to increase funding for community nurses by 50 per cent and expand the renal unit in the Launceston suburb of Kings Meadows.
View the Tasmanian health system dashboard for data about wait times, admissions and other information
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Artificial eye maker Jack McDonald ordered to stop providing services while investigation underway
Artificial eye maker Jack McDonald has been ordered to stop operating while the Health Complaints Commissioner in Victoria continues an investigation into him. The ABC has heard from clients of Mr McDonald who have been unhappy with the artificial eyes he has made for them. The Health Complaints Commissioner, Adjunct Professor Bernice Redley, said she had published the Interim Prohibition Order against Mr McDonald. "An Interim Prohibition Order (IPO) is a measure I can put in place if I reasonably believe a general health service provider has contravened the code of conduct applying to general health services, and I am satisfied that an IPO is necessary to avoid a serious risk," she said. The IPO prevents Mr McDonald from providing or advertising health services for 12 weeks, but it could be extended if the investigation is ongoing and deemed to be needed to avoid a serious risk to the public. "I take any alleged breach of the General Code of Conduct in respect of general health services very seriously and will take the necessary action against providers who put the public's health, safety or welfare at risk," Commissioner Redley said. Previously, Mr McDonald's website stated he was operating out of offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Dandenong, Hobart, Adelaide, Brisbane, Perth, Geelong and Auckland. The Victorian Health Complaints Commission IPO is mutually recognised in New South Wales, Queensland and South Australia. Head of the Ocularists Association Peter Knowles has previously raised concerns about Mr McDonald's work. He has welcomed the decision by the commissioner. "It clearly shows that government departments such as the health complaints commission continue to play a vital role in ensuring that health services are provided in a manner that places patient care and wellbeing first," Mr Knowles said. "My concerns also remain for those many patients who … have outlaid a considerable amount of money and time and received nothing suitable or fit for purpose in return." There are no government regulatory hurdles to clear before being able to act as an ocularist in Australia and no requirement to be a member of the Ocularists Association. Mr McDonald is not a member of the Ocularists Association of Australia, nor is he required to be. Mr McDonald has been contacted for comment. Clients of Mr McDonald have previously shared their grievances against him with the ABC. Ron Clark in Sydney said the eye made for him by Mr McDonald "bulged out of the socket". He said the situation became intolerable after the eye fell out while he was out for dinner. "I was actually chasing [it] around the restaurant floor and the back of the eye was white and so was the tile flooring of the restaurant," he said. Mr Clark spoke to the ABC because he did not want others to "suffer through like I have". Jenny Miller lost her eye to cancer. She told the ABC the eye made for her by Mr McDonald was "hideous" and like a "fish eye". Ms Miller described the process of having an eye made by Mr McDonald as "quite harrowing". She made a complaint with the Health Complaints Commissioner in Victoria. "I just don't want people to go through this," she said. "I am old and weathered and quite resilient, but if you're young and this is something that's happened, it's not a nice thing." The Health Consumers Forum of Australia has previously called on the federal government to bring the sector together with clients and clinicians to talk about how best to improve the situation.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Rosemarie Campbell's post-surgery deterioration score miscalculated at The Wesley Hospital, inquest into her death hears
A Brisbane nurse who miscalculated a surgery patient's deterioration score the day before her death has told an inquest she was "genuinely surprised" she got it wrong. In February 2022, Gold Coast woman Rosemarie Campbell died at her home of complications after gastric bypass surgery. The procedure was carried out three days earlier by Dr Vahid Reza Adib, the partner of former Queensland premier Annastacia Palaszczuk, at the Wesley Hospital in Brisbane. Dr Adib was quizzed heavily on the first day of a coronial inquest being held into the 62-year-old's death, and on Tuesday registered nurse Teresa Formiatti, took the witness stand. The inquest has already heard Ms Formiatti, who worked in the bariatric ward, had assessed Ms Campbell against the Queensland Adult Deterioration Detection System (Q-ADDS) on the day of her discharge. She determined Ms Campbell was at a score of 0 which does not require escalation to a supervisor before a patient is discharged. However, it was later determined Ms Campbell should have been recorded a level 2 in the morning of her discharge, and at a 1 at the time of her discharge some hours later. Ms Formiatti told the court when she assessed Ms Campbell, she had no temperature, her respiratory rate was normal, her pain was being managed well, she was passing urine, and her blood pressure had improved from the morning. "We take into consideration more than just a single observation, you assess them holistically," she said. When asked about Ms Campbell's oxygen saturation being at a level of 93 to 94, Ms Formiatti disagreed it was concerning. She told the court it was "not abnormal" for a bariatric surgery patient due to how they breathe, and "because she is dry". "[The level] can be a little bit softer, her baseline oxygen saturation was 98," she said. When asked whether the increase in Ms Campbell's blood pressure was cause for concern she also said no, telling the court it was "a little elevated", but still within in normal range. "Her blood pressure was not unexpected," she said. Ms Formiatti told the court, according to her assessment Ms Campbell's observations were "stable" and she was "otherwise well" and was asking to be discharged. "A patient who is very unwell or deteriorating doesn't say they're going to feel better at home … they're saying something doesn't feel right, something feels off," she said. The inquest has already heard on the second night after her surgery Ms Campbell began vomiting and continued to do so up until her discharge. Ms Formiatti told the court although this was "not uncommon" she had decided to escalate it to her supervisor, as current anti-nausea medication was not working. The inquest has already heard Ms Formiatti and her supervisor spoke with Mr Adib about this, and he prescribed her with another anti-nausea medication and approved her discharge. Ms Formiatti told the court this was the only reason she escalated it, "to give her something else" to try and assist with the vomiting at home, not because vomiting was a sign of not being clinically stable. "It's not any unusual presentation," she said. "I was concerned from the dehydration perspective." When asked about the chart error, Ms Formiatti told the court "I was genuinely surprised when I had calculated the Q-ADDS (score) incorrectly". "I'm normally very accurate," she said. Ms Formiatti said regardless, she was of the understanding that a score of 1 did not prevent a patient from being discharged "based on those observations", just that it needed to be escalated to a supervisor. "This is not an abnormal presentation," she said. The inquest has already heard at the time of Ms Campbell's discharge Brisbane was experience a flooding event. Ms Formiatti acknowledged she had been asked to do a 24-hour shift as other staff could not get to the hospital but denied there was pressure to discharge patients due to rising flood waters. "No, we followed due process," she said. The inquest continues.
ABC News
3 hours ago
- ABC News
Queensland Supreme Court judge rules 11-year-old girl should be allowed to have abortion
A Queensland judge has ruled an 11-year-old girl should be allowed to have an abortion after weighing up her "physical, psychological and social circumstances". In the latest anonymised decision published by the Supreme Court of Queensland, an unnamed hospital and health service (HHS) brought an application for legal orders to terminate the pregnancy of the child, referred to as 'C'. The decision from April, released today, said the HHS believed, based on the treating medical team's evidence, the girl had some understanding of her pregnancy, but there was concern as to whether it was only a superficial understanding. Under the law, a child is capable of giving informed consent when they achieve a "sufficient understanding and intelligence to enable him or her to understand fully what is proposed". If the child is not "Gillick competent" to give consent to the termination of a pregnancy, there is a risk the medical procedure "may be an assault or trespass to the person and unlawful in the absence of a court making appropriate orders," the court said. Parents are also unable to provide consent on behalf of a child to a termination of pregnancy. In her decision, Justice Frances Williams said the girl's treating adolescent psychiatrist provided some evidence that the girl "may have low cognitive functioning, but has formed the view that there is no mental health issue which forms the basis of [her] being unable to understand". "Ultimately, it is for the court to consider the evidence and undertake its own assessment of the [girl's] competency," Justice Williams said. "In all of the circumstances, I am satisfied that the evidence supports the conclusion that C does not have Gillick competency. However, Justice Williams also said the court needed to determine whether it was in the child's "best interests" to have a medical or surgical termination, considering factors such as C's views, her age and level of maturity, and also the medical evidence. The court heard the girl has "repeatedly" expressed the view that she does not want to continue with the pregnancy. Her mother's preference was also for her daughter to undergo a termination. There was medical evidence that continuing the pregnancy "poses significant risks to the [girl's] short and long-term physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing," the decision said. "The overwhelming medical evidence is that the risks involved in continuing C's pregnancy are higher than the risks involved in termination," the decision said. Justice Williams said the court's "jurisdiction is in relation to the [girl], but not to her unborn child," which has been the clear position in Queensland since 1983. In her decision, she said she had reached the conclusion it was in the girl's "best interests" to make an order, allowing her to have the termination. "This takes into account a number of factors including the increased physical risk to the [child] by continuing with the pregnancy; and the increased mental or psychological risks of continuing with the pregnancy," Justice Williams said. "This is balanced against the risks and impacts of the termination procedures themselves. "I consider that it is appropriate to declare that the termination of C's pregnancy by the therapeutic administration of the drugs … or by surgical operation is necessary having regard to her current and future physical, psychological and social circumstances, and is lawful." It comes almost a month after the Supreme Court published a decision about another case where it ruled a 12-year-old girl could have a surgical abortion.
