‘The US severely undermined peace': China says it ‘drove away' US warship in South China Sea
The first known American military operation in at least six years within the shoal's waters came a day after the Philippines accused Chinese vessels of 'dangerous manoeuvres and unlawful interference' during a supply mission around the atoll.
In a statement, the Chinese military's Southern Theatre Command said the USS Higgins had entered the waters 'without approval of the Chinese government' on Wednesday.
'The US move seriously violated China's sovereignty and security, severely undermined peace and stability in the South China Sea,' it added, vowing to keep a 'high alert at all times'.
The US Navy's Seventh Fleet said the Higgins had 'asserted navigational rights and freedoms' near the Scarborough Shoal 'consistent with international law'.
The operation reflected the US commitment to uphold freedom of navigation and lawful uses of the sea, it told Reuters in an emailed statement.
'The United States is defending its right to fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows, as USS Higgins did here. Nothing China says otherwise will deter us.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
42 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Who is LanLan Yang? How a crash in Sydney's ritzy Rose Bay involving Kyle Sandilands' chauffeur sent Chinese social media into overdrive
From dinner tables in Box Hill, to bars in Beijing, the July 27 crash in Sydney's Rose Bay that left Kyle Sandilands' chauffeur seriously injured has made LanLan Yang a viral name. Headlines like 'Young woman totals her luxury vehicle' can become ragebait anywhere, but when it's a Chinese woman with a posh address and no digital records, the internet community is much more curious than usual. In this age of ubiquitous online tracks, the digital veil of privacy is perhaps the ultimate badge of privilege that points towards great power, not just wealth. Unlike in the West, in China you can be rich and not powerful, but you can't be powerful and not rich. China's masses have long known of the excesses of officialdom. From birth to death, they are in an elevated realm mere mortals cannot see, let alone hope to penetrate. The granddaughter of a former Chinese leader who went to school in Australia said her birth stopped Beijing traffic – with roads closing so her grandfather could visit her in hospital. Food for officials comes from "tegong" or "special supply" farms, produced with care the ordinary Chinese don't deserve. The Beijing compound where Chinese leaders live and work – Zhongnanhai, is heavily guarded and access extremely restricted. When officials get sick, they go to cadre hospitals with the best doctors and treatment that would bankrupt ordinary taxpayers. Officials enjoy privacy about their families and assets that western celebrities could never hope to get. Number plates of officials' cars can be of a special category that police will know not to trouble. When China's leaders depart this world, they go to the exclusive Babaoshan cemetery. How appropriate for a party with proletariat roots and a slogan of "serve the people". In Yang's case, the intrigue grew wings and turned into certain untruths - like her having $300 billion in wealth and that her bail was $70 million. The fact that some people are expected to believe that is telling. Her given name has been said to fit into the "double characters" pattern of Chinese princelings, which denotes they will not go into politics and are off-limits for political infighting. One netizen named 'Jonathan' supposedly experienced police pressure after answering a question about her identity on China's version of Quora. He had said that she was rich from selling iron ore quotas and involved with Western Australian miner Sinosteel. I haven't been able to find 'Jonathan' – which could mean the account was fake or has been made private. Yang's few photos outside Rose Bay Police Station have been pored over for any resemblance to Chinese leaders. She was said to have been wearing a Chanel jacket which costs upwards of $30,000, with a bodyguard who gossip artists claim was a prize-winning martial arts fighter. The official Chinese response has been limited, only one newspaper has dared to report it. The last big story that had Chinese people in arms was the protests that broke out after perceived unfair handling of a teenager bullying case in southwest China's Jiangyou. The comments online have been brutally self-aware, saying Yang is a "farmer" because she has "$1.4 billion in livestock", referring to Chinese people as cattle of the elite. Beneath the anger at gross inequality, there is also resigned helplessness. The cycle of injustice then anger then censorship/crackdown is familiar and seemingly unstoppable. It has been decades since China's elites' families have found shelter in countries like Australia and Canada for the relative anonymity and easy lifestyle. But in recent years, under Xi's tougher crackdowns on corruption and overseas influence, it has got harder for officials to transfer assets abroad and to find "white gloves" to hold them as proxies. The scandal-hungry public helped by the ease of internet searches has necessitated extra layers of protection and low-key living. Three weeks on, there has been no further information about the mysterious Yang. At least in Australia, the press can cover the story freely. The existence or activities of the families of the powerful are strictly hidden – those who make them publish are punished for "revealing state secrets". LanLan Yang appears before Downing Centre Local Court this Friday 15 August. But even when the internet gossip feast ends, the Chinese distaste for privilege will continue. Cheng Lei joined Sky News Australia as a TV news presenter and columnist at in December 2023. Prior to her role at Sky News Australia, she was a news anchor for Chinese-owned news channel CGTN and was CNBC's China correspondent. In August 2020, Cheng Lei was detained by Chinese authorities. She was released and returned to Australia in October 2023.
Sydney Morning Herald
43 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Europe on edge as Trump risks his biggest TACO moment
There is no public shift in the core demands from Putin. First, Ukraine must withdraw from the eastern regions now under Russian control. Second, it must accept strict limits on the size and power of its military. Third, it must give up its dream of joining the NATO defence pact with the United States and much of Europe. There may, of course, be a signal from Putin in private that he may be willing to be flexible on some of these demands, and this might in theory allow Zelensky some scope to make concessions. There is no sign of this, at least so far. The emptiness in Anchorage was apparent in what was not said at the end. Trump did not mention 'severe consequences' for Russia, something he threatened just before the summit. Trump did not mention secondary tariffs on China, either. This move would place pressure on Russia and its key economic partner. Only later, when asked on Fox News, did Trump acknowledge the China question. And then he suggested this was a matter for a later date. Putin, in other words, gained more time. At no cost. He played the White House team and made them look like amateurs. Trump will be judged by his actions, not his words. He has reduced American support for Ukraine. US military supplies have slowed and US aid funding has also been scaled back. The claims about putting pressure on Russia are all in the headlines, not in the hard power on the ground. Europe was cut out of this negotiation. Leaders such as Sir Keir Starmer of Britain, Emmanuel Macron of France and Friedrich Merz of Germany tried to back Zelensky but were left watching from a distance as an American and a Russian held a summit to decide the biggest war in Europe in eight decades. This is humbling for European leaders and reminds them that they cannot rely on America – or, at least, America under Trump – to enforce any peace agreement with Putin. They will have to do that themselves. Western Europe is scrambling to rearm so it can face Putin in a world without American safeguards. It is late, of course. Starmer and Macron will hold a meeting on Sunday, their time, to discuss their willingness to enforce a peace deal in Ukraine. While Starmer is willing to put 'boots on the ground' to do this, few others send this message. The benign view of Anchorage is that Trump was 'feeling out' his Russian counterpart before getting a peace deal, and that he will hear from Zelensky on Monday before deciding the next steps. Nobody can be sure about the full story of the Anchorage summit until this happens. Loading Even so, there are good grounds to think that Trump's decision to shift focus from a ceasefire to a long-term peace agreement means he is open to Putin's demands. After all, the dynamic was clear in Trump's attempt to humiliate Zelensky in the White House in February, and then in his generous treatment of Putin in August. The US president would prefer Ukraine to give ground, not Russia. And he seems intent on pursuing this approach in his quest to secure the Nobel Peace Prize. Loading Trump hates the four-letter barb that is often used to mock his tough talk: TACO, for Trump Always Chickens Out. He countered the critics by bombing Iran in June, but there is no sign he wants to take genuinely firm measures with Russia. Trump said he could end the war. Now he discovers it is harder than he thought, and he tries to put the onus on others to make it easier for him. 'Now, it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Trump told Fox News. 'And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit.' The easy option for Trump is for Zelensky and the European leaders to nod in support as he trades away large parts of southern and eastern Ukraine. All the risks are on them if this simply emboldens Putin to start another war in a year or two. The Alaska summit may be remembered as Trump's biggest TACO moment. And he will not win the Nobel for that. Everything depends on whether he has the stomach to stand up to Putin and force a lasting peace in Europe.
The Age
43 minutes ago
- The Age
Europe on edge as Trump risks his biggest TACO moment
There is no public shift in the core demands from Putin. First, Ukraine must withdraw from the eastern regions now under Russian control. Second, it must accept strict limits on the size and power of its military. Third, it must give up its dream of joining the NATO defence pact with the United States and much of Europe. There may, of course, be a signal from Putin in private that he may be willing to be flexible on some of these demands, and this might in theory allow Zelensky some scope to make concessions. There is no sign of this, at least so far. The emptiness in Anchorage was apparent in what was not said at the end. Trump did not mention 'severe consequences' for Russia, something he threatened just before the summit. Trump did not mention secondary tariffs on China, either. This move would place pressure on Russia and its key economic partner. Only later, when asked on Fox News, did Trump acknowledge the China question. And then he suggested this was a matter for a later date. Putin, in other words, gained more time. At no cost. He played the White House team and made them look like amateurs. Trump will be judged by his actions, not his words. He has reduced American support for Ukraine. US military supplies have slowed and US aid funding has also been scaled back. The claims about putting pressure on Russia are all in the headlines, not in the hard power on the ground. Europe was cut out of this negotiation. Leaders such as Sir Keir Starmer of Britain, Emmanuel Macron of France and Friedrich Merz of Germany tried to back Zelensky but were left watching from a distance as an American and a Russian held a summit to decide the biggest war in Europe in eight decades. This is humbling for European leaders and reminds them that they cannot rely on America – or, at least, America under Trump – to enforce any peace agreement with Putin. They will have to do that themselves. Western Europe is scrambling to rearm so it can face Putin in a world without American safeguards. It is late, of course. Starmer and Macron will hold a meeting on Sunday, their time, to discuss their willingness to enforce a peace deal in Ukraine. While Starmer is willing to put 'boots on the ground' to do this, few others send this message. The benign view of Anchorage is that Trump was 'feeling out' his Russian counterpart before getting a peace deal, and that he will hear from Zelensky on Monday before deciding the next steps. Nobody can be sure about the full story of the Anchorage summit until this happens. Loading Even so, there are good grounds to think that Trump's decision to shift focus from a ceasefire to a long-term peace agreement means he is open to Putin's demands. After all, the dynamic was clear in Trump's attempt to humiliate Zelensky in the White House in February, and then in his generous treatment of Putin in August. The US president would prefer Ukraine to give ground, not Russia. And he seems intent on pursuing this approach in his quest to secure the Nobel Peace Prize. Loading Trump hates the four-letter barb that is often used to mock his tough talk: TACO, for Trump Always Chickens Out. He countered the critics by bombing Iran in June, but there is no sign he wants to take genuinely firm measures with Russia. Trump said he could end the war. Now he discovers it is harder than he thought, and he tries to put the onus on others to make it easier for him. 'Now, it's really up to President Zelensky to get it done,' Trump told Fox News. 'And I would also say the European nations, they have to get involved a little bit.' The easy option for Trump is for Zelensky and the European leaders to nod in support as he trades away large parts of southern and eastern Ukraine. All the risks are on them if this simply emboldens Putin to start another war in a year or two. The Alaska summit may be remembered as Trump's biggest TACO moment. And he will not win the Nobel for that. Everything depends on whether he has the stomach to stand up to Putin and force a lasting peace in Europe.
