Noble Donald
To set the record straight as to the real reason that President Trump has declared a tariff war against India, the White House gave a special interview to Second Opinion.
Second Opinion: Why are you so angry with India? Is it because India has high tariffs and refuses to buy your apples, and cheeses, and the discarded chicken legs Americans don't want to eat? Or is it because India persists in buying Russian oil? Is that why 'Howdy Modi' became Rowdy Modi, as someone you want to have a row with?
White House: Chicken legs, chicken feed! Oil, shmoil! Howdy Modi became Rowdy Modi 'cause he did that Operation Sundoor, or whatever, and refused to say that it was me who brokered a peace deal between India and Pakistan. That's the reason. Look at Pakistan. It said Yes sir, No sir, Three bags full sir, and did three backward somersaults for me in callin' me a peacemaker.
SO: Are you so keen on being seen as a peacemaker between India and Pakistan, between Russia and Ukraine, between Israel and Palestine, that you'll start trade wars to show what a peacenik you are?
WH: What a dumbass question. I want to be seen as a great peacemaker so that I can get the Noble Prize for Peace, like that Bomama fella did.
SO: I think it's a Nobel Prize, not the noble prize, and it's Obama, not Bomama.
WH: Obama, Bomama, whatever. And it'll become the Noble Prize, when I get it 'cause I'll rename it the way I renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.
SO: Why do you want to change the Nobel Prize into the Noble Prize?
WH: Another dumbass question. When I get it and change it to Noble, I'll become a Nobleman, like those Brit Sirs, and Lords, and Dooks, an' stuff. Heck, my son's already a Baron.
SO: Good lord!
WH: See? It's working already…
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
13 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro reminds India of America's exorbitant privilege & diktats
Synopsis Peter Navarro's op-ed reveals the US expectation that India, to maintain its strategic partnership and trade benefits, must align its economic policies with Washington's interests. This includes purchasing American weapons without technology transfer demands and ceasing the use of dollar surpluses to buy Russian oil for re-export. Agencies Without saying anything really new, Peter Navarro has revealed something important. If India wants to keep earning dollars by selling goods and services to America, it has to recycle them as per Washington's diktats. The White House trade adviser's op-ed in the Financial Times is aimed at critics who have been shocked by the summary disdain with which President Donald Trump has alienated an ally that past administrations have spent a quarter-century cultivating. Navarro's main message: 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one.' Also Read: Who is Trump's trade guru giving gyan to India? Basically, the White House expects the same level of loyalty as it got from the Germans in 1967. Back then, the Lyndon B. Johnson administration prevailed upon Chancellor Kurt Georg Kiesinger to not exchange any of the Bundesbank's dollar holdings for gold, even though they were well within their rights to do so under the prevailing Bretton Woods arrangement. Bonn made a public pledge to not join the rebellious French who were beginning to question what Valery Giscard d'Estaing called America's exorbitant relations in the 1960s were rooted in the calculus of the Cold War. Historically, New Delhi and Washington have never been as close, yet the latter is going to decide how the most-populous nation will use its trade dollars. That means Prime Minister Narendra Modi has to buy American weapon systems without insisting on technology transfers or local production. The US has no desire to gift cutting-edge military capabilities to a country cozying up to both Russia and China, Navarro says. The second constraint is on how dollar incomes are not to be used. Recycling greenbacks from its $43 billion trade surplus with the US to buy crude oil from Russia — only to sell refined petroleum products to other countries in Asia, Europe and Africa to earn yet more dollars — was 'deeply corrosive of the world's efforts to isolate Putin's war economy,' Navarro says. It has to stop. The tone of the piece suggests that the Trump administration is making a calculated bet. However much Modi tries to flex his muscles against US hegemony, he really can't afford to put $87 billion in annual exports to America at risk of a prohibitive 50% tariff from Aug. 27. Without dollars from its single-largest export destination, how will India pay for the $109 billion it spends on everything from power equipment to kitchen appliances from China? Or buy more from it, as Beijing is bound to insist?One way to square the circle may be to give the Chinese equity stakes in local joint ventures, so that some of their $91 billion bilateral trade surplus comes back as investment. This may well happen. According to a Bloomberg News report this week, India's biggest tycoons — from Gautam Adani and Mukesh Ambani to JSW Group's Sajjan Jindal — have been pursuing under-the-radar deals with Chinese firms that have the most mature and cost-efficient technology in renewable sectors like electric vehicles and lithium-ion Washington sending a natural ally into the arms of its biggest rival? Not really. At best the fraught relationship between the two Asian giants will normalize. After their border clashes five years ago, New Delhi actively suppressed investment proposals from the bigger economy next door. The Modi government announced, with some pride, that between April 2020 and December 2021, China's share in total foreign direct investments into the country had fallen to only 0.43%. Although that would change now, there's little risk of India moving into China's strategic sphere, not after Beijing's liberal defense assistance to Islamabad in the recent India-Pakistan military conflict. Washington's orbit is hard to escape. To see why, it's illustrative to look back at the early days of the India-Russia oil trade after the start of the Ukraine war. Back then, there was a great deal of chest-thumping in New Delhi that Moscow will agree to sell crude for rupees. Russian importers would then pay rubles to buy tea and other stuff from India. The rupee-ruble transactions were supposed to be relayed over SPFS, the Russian alternative to the SWIFT messaging system, the 'financial data panopticon' through which Washington surveils global trade and I noted in April 2022, any such deal wasn't in India's long-term interest. Bypassing SWIFT would help Russia, whose banks faced Western sanctions. New Delhi had nothing to gain. Ultimately, the rupees-for-oil trade didn't even work out. The Russian exporters got tired of holding funds in a non-convertible currency in Indian bank accounts. So refiners went back to buying crude with dollars and dollar-linked UAE dirhams, placing India squarely in the grip of the mighty greenback even as discounted Urals crude came to account for more than a third of its imports, from barely 1% before the Ukraine war. Had the benefits of cheaper oil flowed to local motorists, the middle class would have been all for standing up to Trump. That isn't the case, and Modi has to appease voters now with a long-overdue cut in consumption Chinese have done the same Russian oil trade, and yet the US has singled out India for exemplary punishment. That isn't hard to explain. Not all sides of this relationship are equal. While advanced economies like the US 'are more exposed to China as a supplier, China is becoming less reliant on them as a market,' concludes a new study by Federal Reserve economist Florencia Airaudo, and her coauthors. Control over hard-to-replace inputs, such as rare earths, graphite, and battery materials gives Beijing leverage, they note. New Delhi has no such bargaining chips. The dollars India garners from exporting textiles, carpets, gems and jewelry, shrimp, and software code are its to spend, but not entirely freely. As Navarro reminded the critics of the sudden US-India estrangement, America's exorbitant privilege comes in many hues.
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Russia Decimates Ukrainian Army Crucial ‘War Control Centre'
/ Aug 20, 2025, 09:50AM IST Russian forces carried out overnight strikes on Ukrainian military infrastructure, targeting a fuel refinery supplying troops, along with missile warehouses and a drone assembly site. The Russian Defence Ministry claimed high-precision weapons and drones were used, reporting heavy Ukrainian losses across multiple fronts. The escalation comes as peace talks remain stalled due to a dispute over the venue. President Putin proposed Moscow for a bilateral meeting, but Ukrainian President Zelensky rejected the offer outright, responding with a clear 'no' and refusing talks on Russian terms.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Oil diatribe by Navarro: Self-serving and narrow
Gift this article White House trade advisor Peter Navarro, once known by his books as a China hawk, has taken aim at India in a Financial Times op-ed published on Monday that reads like a diatribe. India funds Russia's Ukraine War, the article contends, by buying Russian oil, refining it, shipping refined products abroad and funnelling the dollars so earned back to Russia for yet more crude supplies. White House trade advisor Peter Navarro, once known by his books as a China hawk, has taken aim at India in a Financial Times op-ed published on Monday that reads like a diatribe. India funds Russia's Ukraine War, the article contends, by buying Russian oil, refining it, shipping refined products abroad and funnelling the dollars so earned back to Russia for yet more crude supplies. And where does India get these dollars to buy Russian oil? From unfair trade with the US, of course, liberally exporting goods to America while denying market access to American goods with high tariffs and non-tariff barriers, thus running up a bilateral trade surplus. He accuses Indian refiners of being profiteers with silent Russian partners. So, since we launder Russian crude for Russia's leader, in Navarro's view, we deserve the 25% tariff that US President Donald Trump said he would slap on our exports next week on top of his 'reciprocal' 25%. Our 'cozying up" with Russia and China also gets a glare. So too our insistence on tech transfers and local manufacture while shopping for arms in the West, even as we source over a third of our needs from Russia. With our oil imports portrayed as a 'financial lifeline" for Moscow's war machine, the op-ed ends with a finger wag: 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one." Navarro's selective outrage need not be taken all that seriously for reasons that go beyond his record as a writer, which includes such lapses as the invention of an economist called Ron Vara (an anagram of his name passed off as a joke) to validate claims in his 2011 book Death by China. The prime reason is his op-ed's disingenuous disregard for facts. Take Russia's exports. These are not just diverse, but to a variety of countries, including the US, which imports fertilizers, uranium and palladium from it. Apart from crude, Russia is a major exporter of coal, oil products and natural gas, both piped and liquefied. A look at its export data from December 2022 till the end of July 2025 reveals China as the biggest buyer of Russian crude (47%) and coal (44%). The EU has been its biggest buyer of piped gas (36%) and its liquefied form (51%). As for refined products, America's Nato ally Turkiye has been Russia's largest customer. India bought 38% of Russian crude exports, a share that's larger than the EU's or Turkiye's but clearly smaller than China's 47%. Yet, Navarro's article paints India's oil trade as fuelling a war that's essentially about Moscow's standoff with Nato—a distant dynamic in which we, as a neutral country, have played no role. Also Read: Kaushik Basu: India must not fall into Trump's tariff trap Is this a fear of dragons at work? Why such invective is directed at India, rather than Russia's 'no limits' partner China—or anybody at all for that matter—defies logic. Under Trump's plan for Nato, Europe must defend itself. Yet, the EU can't wean itself off Russian supplies of energy, an indication of why trade patterns that work cannot easily be undone. In any case, if the global market loses Russian supplies, energy prices would shoot up. This may tempt the Opec cartel to switch strategy and tighten its own supply. Various economies could be hurt, America's included. Ever since the Ukraine war erupted in 2022, our imports have helped keep crude prices cool. Navarro's prism may be too narrow to accept this, but fuel users of the world must. Topics You May Be Interested In
