Lam trial hears "abusive" mother spent three days in nursing home
Article content
But 88-year-old Kieu Lam lasted only three days in the nursing home before her son, Minh Huynh, brought her back to Bowmount Street.
Article content
Article content
Testifying through a Cantonese interpreter Tuesday at the first-degree murder trial of his two sisters, Minh told court he did not want his mother to die unhappy in a nursing home, where she had difficulty communicating. Kieu spoke only Cantonese. Huynh told court he loved his mother despite her history of abuse, and sometimes, violence.
Article content
Article content
'She is my mother,' he told court.
Article content
Article content
Minh said he thought his mother's behaviour would change after living in the nursing home, but that didn't happen. He told court her behaviour returned to normal after a few days, then became worse.
Article content
Sisters Chau Kanh Lam, 59, and Hue Ai Lam, 62, have pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder in the death of their mother. Court has heard their mother was killed in her bed just after midnight on Oct. 31, 2022 — just months after she left the nursing home.
Article content
The Crown contends the Vietnamese-born sisters struck their defenceless mother in the head with a hammer as she was sleeping, then strangled her to death.
Article content
The jury has heard Hue told police she struck her mother with a hammer and then gave the weapon to her sister. Hue said they had planned the attack for days because they could no longer live with their mother's verbal and physical abuse.
Article content
Article content
'Everything was collecting to the point where it broke the dam,' Hue told police interrogators through an interpreter.
Article content
Article content
Under cross examination Tuesday from defence lawyer Paolo Giancaterino, Minh told court he lived in the Bowmount Street house with his mother and sisters for nine years, until 2001. Minh said he saw his mother control every aspect of his sisters' lives, and nag, scold and hit them.
Article content
Minh said he did not escape his mother's approbation.
Article content
'Sometimes, when there's anything she doesn't like, she can be nagging and nagging the whole day,' Minh told court.
Article content
She would often insult them, he said, and say they weren't listening or were not smart. She complained about her food and the fact her daughters were unmarried, Minh said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
29 minutes ago
- CTV News
Elliot Lake woman admits drugs, gambling led her to steal from her employer
A woman from Elliot Lake, Ont., admits that her drug and gambling addictions led her to steal at least $60,000 from her employer, but denies claims from the Crown that her theft was closer to $800,000. (File) A woman from Elliot Lake, Ont., admits that her drug and gambling addictions led her to steal at least $60,000 from her employer, but denies claims from the Crown that her theft was closer to $800,000. Her lawyer wants to call witnesses to back her claims, but the Crown argued that such testimony could stray into areas that affect solicitor-client confidentiality, since her former employer is a lawyer. In a decision released last month, the judge in the case ruled the questions could proceed, provided the defence was careful in the way she crafted her questions. The case itself dates back several years. Stephenie Chevis worked for a law firm in Elliot Lake, with duties that included bookkeeping. She was hired in 2007 and was fired in 2017 when her theft was discovered. Transaction details Her defence lawyer wants to raise details of transactions handled by the firm in an effort to prove that some of the thefts were, in fact, legitimate transactions, while others were the responsibility of someone else. Chevis pleaded guilty in December 2024 to one count of fraud over $5,000. The court heard that she often worked at night, explaining that she said she 'found it easier to do her accounting software work at night when no other employees were using the computer.' By 2016, the lawyer she worked for started getting suspicious. 'Despite working full-time, he found he was unable to draw personal funds from the business, as the firm's general account was dipping into the negative,' the court decision said. So he installed security cameras and told Chevis to stop working at night. 'In April and May 2017, Ms. Chevis was surveilled entering the office after midnight and she was terminated from employment in June 2017,' the decision said. Traced back to her An investigation uncovered a number of irregularities that were traced back to her. When her lawyer contacted her, she quickly confessed. 'Ms. Chevis broke down and told him she had stolen some money the previous year, in the amount of $60,000 to $70,000,' the court said. 'Ms. Chevis was arrested on Sept. 7, 2022. During a video interview with the North Bay OPP, she explained that her conduct was the result of drug and gambling addictions. She admitted to taking $60,000. That remains the extent of Ms. Chevis's admission and the basis for her plea of guilt.' She admitted to issuing checks to her benefit or that of her former spouse. She used some of the money to pay her personal bills, while other cheques were deposited into her accounts at various financial institutions. During a video interview with the North Bay OPP, she explained that her conduct was the result of drug and gambling addictions. She admitted to taking $60,000. — Superior court decision The lawyer she worked for was left in dire straits and was forced to remortgage his home, use his line of credit and cash in more than $300,000 in RRSPs. During a hearing Dec. 10, 2024, Chevis's lawyer was cross-examining a former employee from the law firm when she paused to raise an issue. She wanted to ask questions about three transactions, but was concerned about whether the answers would raise 'potential issues of solicitor-client privilege,' the court decision said. 'It is important to note that Ms. Chevis explicitly waived any solicitor-client privilege she may have had in respect of any of these transactions … The privilege concerns were with respect to (the law firm's) other clients as potential privilege-holders.' The 'Lottery Winner' Specifically, the defence wanted to raise the case of a client of the firm dubbed 'the Lottery Winner,' who won a large amount of money and left it in a trust with the firm. Other cases involved private mortgages given to Chevis using other unnamed clients' funds. 'Ms. Chevis proclaims to have knowledge of these transactions already,' the decision said. 'She is not seeking production. She is simply seeking to elicit the evidence.' The Crown argued that these cases involve solicitor-client privilege, something that can only be breached in specific cases, such as when it's the only way to prove someone's innocence. 'To engage the exception, the Crown submits, an accused must show that she is otherwise unable to raise a reasonable doubt as to her guilt and that there is a risk of wrongful conviction,' the decision said. 'The Crown emphasizes that a finding of guilt has already been made in this case and the proceedings before the court involve sentencing.' Public documents However, Justice Graham Jenner ruled that once something like a mortgage or a will has been executed, it becomes a public document. 'I have difficulty … with the notion that a legal instrument such as a will, a power of attorney, or a private mortgage, could possibly remain covered by solicitor-client privilege once the instrument is acted on, and enters the public sphere,' Jenner said. 'Indeed, when this question was put to the parties, they agreed that it would seem illogical to protect the existence of such public-facing instruments within the scope of the privilege.' As long as the questions were limited in scope to cases no longer covered by privilege, the judge ruled that questions would be allowed to be put to witnesses. I 'instruct counsel to apply that vigilance in the formation of their questions to be put to witnesses,' Jenner wrote in his decision. 'Care must be taken not to pose questions that could tend to elicit evidence that remains covered by the privilege.' Read the full decision here.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Motorist charged year after woman's death, daughter seeks answers
The family of a woman struck and killed on the Harry Lazerenko Bridge last August continue to seek answers, despite police arresting and charging a motorist in connection with her death. 'What happened beforehand, before her getting hit?' said Britney Porter, whose mother, Doris Porter, died in the Aug. 10, 2024, collision. Police were sent to the bridge at about 1:45 a.m. that morning and found the 49-year-old grandmother critically injured. SUPPLIED / FREE PRESS FILES Doris Porter was struck and killed on the Harry Lazerenko Bridge on August 10, 2024. Investigators determined the woman was lying on the road when she was hit by a driver headed west. The motorist stayed at the scene and spoke with officers, police said. On Friday, just over one year after the incident, police announced they had charged a 28-year-old woman with careless driving causing death. She was arrested Monday and released on an appearance notice. Police did not name the woman and were unavailable to provide further information Friday. Porter said she knows little about what the police investigation uncovered. Footage obtained by police and viewed by Porter's sisters showed the moment Doris was struck by the vehicle, Porter said, but she still questions how her mother was lying on the ground in the first place. Some of Doris' belongings, including articles of clothing, were strewn on the roadway on the opposite end of the bridge from where she was found injured, Porter said. Porter said she has asked officials to provide the results of a toxicology report that determined if her mother was impaired by drugs or alcohol at the time of her death. That request has been denied, she said. 'She never had a problem with walking, so I really just think something happened beforehand,' Porter said through tears. 'She needed help, she really needed help and I think her body just gave up on her.' Porter is meeting by phone with a representative from the Crown on Tuesday to go over the case. She hopes some of her questions are answered, she said. She continues to grieve the loss of her mother, whom she described as a 'loving person.' NIC ADAM / FREE PRESS FILES Britney Porter, a daughter of Doris Porter, yells 'Justice for my mom' and 'We want answers' at the Harry Lazarenko Bridge at a protest held after her mother was struck and killed on August 10, 2024. 'She cared and she was always there for everyone,' Porter said. 'She loved her grandkids a lot and that was one of her big things that were keeping her going in life. They made her so happy.' Wednesdays Sent weekly from the heart of Turtle Island, an exploration of Indigenous voices, perspectives and experiences. Doris, who had 13 grandchildren, was living with Porter when she died, she said. Protesters gathered on the bridge last August and held a vigil for Doris. They called for a full investigation into her death. Family members held a prayer and offered tobacco to the water before painting a red dress symbol with the words 'Justice for Doris' across both lanes of the bridge. 'It really meant a lot to us. Me personally, I didn't know how much support we actually had out there until that day when I saw everyone come together for my mom,' Porter said Friday. Tyler SearleReporter Tyler Searle is a multimedia producer who writes for the Free Press's city desk. A graduate of Red River College Polytechnic's creative communications program, he wrote for the Stonewall Teulon Tribune, Selkirk Record and Express Weekly News before joining the paper in 2022. Read more about Tyler. Every piece of reporting Tyler produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Brooklyn construction magnate gets probation for funneling illegal donations to NYC Mayor Eric Adams
NEW YORK (AP) — A Brooklyn construction magnate was sentenced Friday to a year of probation for working with a Turkish government official to funnel illegal campaign contributions to New York City Mayor Eric Adams, resolving one of two related federal cases after the mayor's criminal charges were dropped. Erden Arkan, 76, told Manhattan federal Judge Dale Ho that he regretted his 'poor judgments' in engaging in the straw donor scheme, which helped Adams fraudulently obtain public money for his 2021 mayoral bid under the city's matching funds program. Ho cited Arkan's age and otherwise clean record in imposing the sentence, telling the Turkish-born businessman that his immigrant success story 'exemplifies the American dream.' 'I hope that you don't let this one mistake define you,' Ho told Arkan. Arkan faced up to six months in prison under federal sentencing guidelines, but prosecutors and the federal probation officer agreed that no prison time was warranted. In addition to probation, he must also pay a $9,500 fine and $18,000 in restitution. Arkan pleaded guilty in January to a conspiracy charge in Manhattan federal court. Weeks later, President Donald Trump's Justice Department pressured prosecutors to drop their underlying case against Adams, ultimately getting it dismissed. In court Friday, Arkan's lawyer Jonathan Rosen blasted the government for continuing to pursue his case after getting Adams' charges dismissed. 'To put it mildly, this is a very unusual case. In fact, it is unprecedented,' Rosen argued. In February, Justice Department leadership ordered Manhattan federal prosecutors to drop Adams' case, arguing that it was hindering the Democratic mayor's ability to assist the Republican administration's immigration crackdown. Ho, who also oversaw the mayor's case, dismissed his charges in April. In a written opinion, he agreed it was the only practical outcome but also criticized what he said was the government's 'troubling' rationale for wanting the charges thrown out. While Adams was spared, prosecutors continued to pursue related cases against Arkan and a former aide to the mayor, Mohamed Bahi. Bahi, who served as City Hall's chief liaison to the Muslim community, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to soliciting straw donations for Adams' mayoral campaign from employees of a different Brooklyn construction company at a December 2020 fundraiser. Arkan acknowledged in his January plea that he knowingly violated the law by reimbursing employees of his construction firm for their donations to Adams' campaign. In brief remarks Friday, he apologized to city taxpayers who bankroll the matching funds program, telling Ho: 'I love this city. I dedicated my life to making it better. It pains me that I have harmed it.' According to prosecutors, Adams personally solicited donations from Arkan and a Turkish consular official at an April 2021 dinner. The following month, Arkan held a fundraiser at the headquarters of his construction company, KSK, in which 10 employees donated between $1,200 and $1,500 to the campaign. They were later reimbursed by Arkan, making them illegal straw donations. Adams then used those funds to fraudulently obtain public money under the city's matching funds program, which provides a generous match for small-dollar donations, prosecutors allege. A well-known member of New York's Turkish community, Arkan's ties to Adams first emerged in November 2023 after federal investigators searched the businessman's home, along with the home of Adams' chief fundraiser and his liaison to the Turkish community. Adams pleaded not guilty to bribery and other charges after a 2024 indictment accused him of accepting illegal campaign contributions and travel discounts from a Turkish official and others — and returning the favors by, among other things, helping Turkey open a diplomatic building without passing fire inspections. At a Feb. 19 hearing that precipitated the dismissal of his case, Adams told Ho: 'I have not committed a crime.' The first-term mayor, a former police captain, skipped the June Democratic primary and is currently running for reelection as an independent.
