Bitcoin nears R2m as crypto goes mainstream — but don't get too excited just yet
In case you missed it last week, bitcoin hit almost R2m. This wasn't just another crypto bro celebration moment either — it goes deeper.
Bitcoin's breakthrough last week to past $111,000 (R1,966,480 for those keeping track) has been hailed as a genuine turning point for digital assets, coming at a time when traditional tech stocks were having what can only be described as a tantrum.
'Bitcoin hitting a new all-time high above $111,000 marks a major milestone for the crypto industry,' said Hannes Wessels, the general manager of Binance South Africa.
'It reflects growing global confidence in digital assets, driven by strong institutional demand and regulatory progress.'
Translation for the rest of us: Big money is finally taking crypto seriously, and governments are starting to figure out how to regulate it without completely breaking it.
When trading goes nuclear
The bitcoin surge wasn't happening in isolation. On 19 May, crypto wallet platforms recorded the kind of trading volumes that would make the JSE weep with envy.
Binance Wallet alone hit over $5-billion in daily trading — that's roughly R88-billion changing hands in a single day on one platform.
To put it in perspective, that's more than the entire market capitalisation of Shoprite, and it happened in 24 hours on a platform most South Africans probably haven't heard of.
This trading frenzy suggests something fundamental is shifting in how people interact with cryptocurrencies. Gone are the days when crypto was just about buying bitcoin and hoping for the best.
Users are becoming more sophisticated, seeking out early opportunities and engaging with what the tech crowd calls 'Web3' — think of it as the internet's awkward teenage phase, where everything becomes decentralised and confusing.
The early bird gets the (digital) worm
Much of this activity revolves around platforms that let users get in on cryptocurrency projects before they hit the big exchanges. These early-access platforms have become incredibly popular by offering exclusive token generation events and airdrops.
Since December 2024, Binance Alpha has featured 18 tokens that eventually got listed on major exchanges — a 43% success rate that would make any venture capitalist jealous.
Here's where it gets interesting for regular investors: participants in these early events bought tokens at prices averaging eight times lower than their opening day values. That's the kind of return that makes property investment look like a savings account.
But — and this is a big but — this is also where things get properly risky.
Don't fall for the Fomo trap
Before you start liquidating your unit trust to chase crypto dreams, let's talk reality. Getting early access to cryptocurrency projects is like being invited to a high-stakes poker game where half the players are card sharks and the other half are algorithms.
Yes, the potential returns are eye-watering. But so are the risks:
Regulatory roulette: Governments worldwide are still figuring out how to handle crypto. Rules can change overnight, potentially making your investment illegal or inaccessible.
Hacker heaven: Crypto platforms are magnets for cybercriminals. When they succeed, your money disappears into the digital ether with zero chance of recovery.
Volatility on steroids: Traditional shares can be volatile, but crypto makes the JSE look like a lazy Sunday afternoon. Prices can swing 50% in a day just because someone influential tweeted something.
Liquidity nightmares: Sometimes you can't sell your tokens even if you want to, because there aren't enough buyers or the trading volumes are too low.
Technical meltdowns: When platforms crash or have bugs, your investments can be stuck in digital limbo.
When courts get crypto reality
The legal system is slowly catching up with crypto reality, and the results are sobering for investors who think digital assets are a guaranteed path to riches.
A recent UK Court of Appeal case involving Bitcoin SV investors provides a masterclass in crypto reality checks. These investors sued Binance and other exchanges for $13.4-billion (yes, billion), claiming that delisting their favourite token prevented it from becoming the next bitcoin.
The court's response was, essentially, 'Nice try, but no.'
The judges ruled that cryptocurrencies are 'by their nature, volatile investments' and should be treated like shares or other financial instruments. More importantly, they rejected the idea that investors could claim damages based on what their tokens might have been worth in some hypothetical future.
As the court put it: 'It would be unthinkable for the holders of freely tradeable shares, whose value had been reduced by tortious conduct, to be able to claim more than the current value of those shares to compensate them for the prospect that their value might have substantially increased in the future.'
This ruling could reshape how crypto disputes are handled globally, establishing that digital assets don't get special treatment just because they're digital.
The regulatory maze
Meanwhile, regulators worldwide are creating a patchwork of rules that would make a tax consultant weep. The European Union's new crypto regulations are so strict that Tether — the company behind the world's most popular stablecoin — simply refused to comply.
This has led to major exchanges delisting USDT (a dollar-pegged cryptocurrency) for European users, creating a fragmented market where your access to certain digital assets depends entirely on your location.
In Nigeria, tensions have escalated dramatically, with authorities seeking $79.5-billion from Binance in alleged damages, plus another $2-billion in back taxes.
What this means for you
For South African investors watching this unfold, the message is clear: crypto is maturing, but it's maturing into something complex and regulated, not the Wild West of easy money that early adopters experienced.
The good news is that institutional money is flowing in, providing stability and legitimacy. The bad news is that with legitimacy comes regulation, compliance costs, and the kind of complexity that makes traditional investments look simple.
Bitcoin's march toward R2-million represents genuine progress for digital assets, but it's progress that comes with grown-up responsibilities and grown-up risks.
Keep it tidy
The cryptocurrency market is undoubtedly entering a new phase of maturation, with unprecedented trading volumes, institutional adoption and regulatory clarity. But this maturation cuts both ways — while it brings legitimacy and stability, it also brings complexity and risk that many retail investors aren't prepared for.
For South Africans considering crypto investments, the advice remains unchanged: only invest what you can afford to lose, understand the risks, and remember that past performance — even R2-million Bitcoin — is never a guarantee of future returns. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
Three financial literacy truths I wish I knew at 20
Steven Amey, head of intermediated distribution at Ashburton Investments, says he wishes his financial literacy was better when he was younger. The saying goes that hindsight is 20/20 vision, meaning that you will always think you could have done better later. This is even more valid when it comes to financial literacy. Do you ever wish that you knew what you know at the age of 50 about investments when you were 20? If you were 20 today and could learn about investing from scratch, you might be surprised to learn that it is not just a privilege reserved for people with a lot of wealth. It is, in fact, much more accessible than you might imagine, because it is all about three small things. 'Did you know that all people are genetically 99.9% similar, yet the 0.1% difference makes us all so unique? And did you know that if a plane incorrectly sets its course with a 1% error rate, it can have a dramatic impact on where it lands? 'A flight from Los Angeles to New York, with a 1% flight path deviation, would result in the plane landing 239 km off course. 'Lastly, and this one is close to home, did you know that in the 2024 Olympics, our very own super athlete, Akani Simbine, missed winning a medal by one hundredth of a second? Only 0.01 seconds was the difference between receiving an Olympic medal and not.' Amey says this makes it clear that the small things can have a profound impact on outcomes and shares these three lessons you can use to help your future self financially. ALSO READ: What to consider when deciding to invest locally or offshore Financial literacy lesson 1: Look at the small picture Sometimes you need to look at the small details to get ahead in life, he says. 'Many people complain about not having enough monthly income. To resolve this issue, you could search for a higher paying job, work a second job or play the Lotto, but these take time or may never materialise. 'Budgeting, on the other hand, is a much surer bet. Over two decades of experience have taught me that you can always find a place where you can cut back, be more financially free and start investing, even if just a little, for your future self.' Amey says the sooner you start to invest, the better. 'I love the old Chinese proverb, 'the best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second-best time is now.' 'Do not wait for the right time, because time is not waiting for you. If you feel overwhelmed, contact a registered financial adviser or visit an asset management website where you will find different funds to suit your needs.' His advice is to start by moving from a motivational to a disciplined mindset. 'Someone who is emotionally stunted uses motivation to do something difficult once, while an emotionally mature person uses discipline to do something difficult a thousand times. 'It may be difficult to start saving, but look at what the disciplined investor achieves over time. 'If you start at 25 and invest just R1 000 per month until you are 55, you will end up with an impressive R1.5 million if market growth over the period is 8%.' ALSO READ: Investing in JSE shares: What you need to know Financial literacy lesson 2: Go small or go home People usually start by adding bigger pebbles to fill a glass jar, but adding thousands of tiny granules of sand will ensure the jar reaches its true capacity. Amey says you should not wait until you have bigger chunks of money before you start investing. 'True success is not about chasing big wins, it is about getting the small things right so that the big things can follow. Some of the biggest success stories in the world started small.' He uses these examples from well-known people on starting small and growing from there: Madiba tended herds of cattle in Qunu but went on to go to university and become the leader of the ANC and South Africa's first democratically elected president, a true world icon. Legendary businessman Raymond Ackerman was fired from his retail job in the late 1960s when he bought four Pick n Pay stores and grew them over the years into what is today one of South Africa's premier retail chains. 'These stories all teach us that even from humble beginnings, greatness can follow if you just persevere. Ultimately, it is all about putting one small foot in front of the other.' ALSO READ: South Africans optimistic about investing in residential property — survey Financial literacy lesson 3: Be a small deal In our consumer culture, we often feel the pressure to stand out and flaunt status, Amey says. 'But what if there was more value in rejecting status anxiety to pursue our best life? What if real success was more about quiet self-reflection to see where our innate vulnerabilities and biases may be tripping us up?' He points out that success is not about big gestures but about the consistent care and attention to every small detail. 'It is not about how much wealth you can display but about how financially literate you can become. Do not let your anxiety about current success stop you from putting the small things in place to achieve bigger success one day. 'One of the best small things you can do is to become aware of inherent behaviour biases that affect your decision-making. The three most common mind traps are the herding, anchoring and recency biases. 'Herding refers to doing what the herd is doing out of fear of missing out. If all your friends are spending freely and not saving, is it wise to simply follow? Anchoring means relying too heavily on the first piece of information you stumble across. 'Take a more holistic approach, do your research on reputable investment sites and if you can, engage with a qualified financial advisor and increase your financial literacy. 'Thirdly, do not get trapped by the recency bias. This is when we tend to focus more on recent events than long-term trends.' He emphasises that markets are currently volatile, and while some of your family and friends may have lost money over recent months, longer-term investing, with exposure to equities, creates long-term wealth despite short-term market downturns. Amey points out that instant gratification is celebrated in our culture. 'We have information at our fingertips through Google, social media and AI, and we can instantly order transport or food on our mobile devices. 'Investing, on the other hand, is counterintuitive to this programming, because it requires patience. 'Materialism and compulsivity erode our monthly income and trap us in debt cycles, leading to short-term gain and long-term pain. 'I have learnt that it is better to start off small, even if that means your house or car is not as smart as that of your friends. 'Be wise and use some of your income to provide for future capital growth over time. Your future-wise self will thank you in years to come for focusing on the small things that reap meaningful long-term rewards.'
The Citizen
13 hours ago
- The Citizen
You may not be able to get a Lotto ticket after today
'I do not accept that the sky will fall' says judge The National Lotteries Commission (NLC) has failed in its bid to change a recent court ruling limiting the temporary licence to operate the lottery to five months. This means ticket sales may stop before Sunday, 1 June. The current licence, held by Ithuba Holdings, expires on Saturday. After that, their sister company, Ithuba Lottery, was supposed to take over the licence for a period of twelve months. But after last week's Gauteng High Court ruling that the issuing of the temporary licence is unconstitutional and can only be issued for five months, Ithuba Lottery said a five-month licence is financially unfeasible and may not continue operating the lottery after Saturday. And the new licence holder, Sizekhaya Holdings, which is set to take over from Ithuba Lottery for a period of eight years, will need at least nine months to set up its operations. The NLC therefore applied to change the court order to allow a twelve-month licence. But Judge Omphemetse Mooki ruled against them on Friday. Will funding stop? A source at the NLC told GroundUp that the board is in emergency meetings to discuss the way forward. If lottery ticket sales do stop after Saturday, the National Lottery Distribution Fund does still have about R4.3-billion in reserves to continue issuing grants to good causes. The NLC's application, which was heard urgently on Thursday at the High Court in Pretoria, was opposed by Wina Njalo, one of the companies that bid on the lottery licence tender. Wina Njalo argued that the NLC was seeking to relitigate the same issues that had already been heard by the court. If it was found that five months was not enough time, it argued, then the NLC could approach the court at that stage. It said the application to vary the order was yet another example of how the NLC was seeking to favour the Ithuba companies and they were not entitled to insist on making a profit, given that Ithuba Holdings had already made 'huge profits' by operating the lottery for the last 10 years. In his ruling, Judge Mooki said the issue was whether it was just and equitable to extend the period that the temporary licence can operate before it is declared invalid and, in doing so, interfere with the discretion exercised by another court. Such interference was 'very sparingly exercised'. He said he was not persuaded that the NLC had made out a case. 'There is no substantive support that Ithuba Lottery will suffer a loss of R51-million unless it is granted a temporary licence for 12 months. There was complete silence from Ithuba Lottery. It did not file any affidavits,' the Judge said. He pointed to the fact that the NLC on 22 May 2025, when it was aware of Judge Potterill's order, had written to Ithuba Lottery requesting it sign a licence to operate for 12 months. 'It was thus inviting the Ithuba Lottery to sign an agreement that would breach the order made on May 21.' While the NLC had disclosed the response from Ithuba Lottery, it had not disclosed its own letter. ALSO READ: Big change to Lotto operations: Will tickets be on sale next week? 5 months could be long enough Judge Mooki said the NLC had also not put up any evidence that Sizekhaya needed more than five months to set up operations. In fact, as Wina Njalo had pointed out, a condition of the fourth licence was that the successful bidder must be able to operate within five to six months of being awarded the licence. He said in claiming that its reserves would be significantly depleted should there be no operator after 1 June, the NLC had 'over-egged the pudding'. 'I do not accept that the sky will fall after 1 June should Ithuba Lottery refuse to sign an agreement to conduct lottery operations as determined in (Potterill's) order,' he said. The request for proposals for the temporary licence was issued when it became apparent that Minister Parks Tau would not meet the strict deadlines to announce the new lottery licence holder, giving it time to take over operations. He only made the announcement on 28 May, just three days before the expiration of Ithuba's licence. He has yet to provide reasons for the delay. This article originally appeared on GroundUp and was republished with permission. Read the original article here. NOW READ: SIU is not done with NLC yet, as more corruption allegations emerge
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
‘We have a National Treasury problem': Fuel levy hike defended amid criticism over tax strategy
At least R3.5 billion in revenue would be lost by not increasing the fuel levy, according to National Treasury. Petrol pumps are pictured at a filling station in Melville on 20 January 2021. Picture: Tracy Lee Stark The National Treasury has defended its decision to increase the general fuel levy in the budget 3.0 amid criticism over its broader tax policy. On Friday, officials from the Treasury and the South African Revenue Service (Sars) appeared before Parliament in a joint meeting of the Standing Committee on Finance and the Select Committee on Finance. They were responding to public submissions on the fiscal framework and revenue proposals, which outline South Africa's economic policies, revenue projections, and government expenditure limits. This follows the tabling of Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's third national budget for the 2025/2026 financial year, after months of political impasse. The budget includes a fuel levy increase of 16 cents per litre for petrol and 15 cents for diesel, effective from 4 June. However, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) are challenging the hike in court. National Treasury's revenue projections Treasury's head of tax and financial sector policy, Christopher Axelson, addressed the committee on the revised revenue outlook. Axelson noted that revenue projections had decreased by R61.9 billion compared to the budget tabled in March. This decline was driven in part by the withdrawal of proposed increases to value-added tax (VAT) and adjustments to zero-rated items. 'That increase was reduced slightly, but it still required a large amount of additional revenue to make sure we have a fiscally sustainable trajectory for our debt and debt-service costs, and because of that, this May 2025 budget does include R18 billion in additional revenue for 2025/2026 and has R1 billion in tax relief in 2026/2027,' the Treasury official said. He also indicated that a further R20 billion in unspecified tax policy adjustments is anticipated for the 2026 budget. To fund expenditure priorities, Treasury has opted for a range of tax measures, including no changes to personal income tax brackets or rebates, an inflationary increase in the fuel levy, and above-inflation hikes in excise duties on alcohol and tobacco. Diesel refund relief for primary sectors was also announced. ALSO READ: Budget 3.0: Fuel levy replaced VAT hike but is it the better option? Axelson pointed out that past personal income tax increases had failed to raise the intended revenue, while corporate income tax remains 'highly volatile'. 'Corporate income tax increases are the most damaging to growth, and if you reduce growth, it reduces the tax bases as well, so it is not as effective.' Axelson pointed out that a VAT increase was the most efficient revenue-raising option but had to be scrapped due to opposition. As a result, a bulk of the revenue shortfall was addressed by not adjusting personal income tax and rebates for inflation. He also explained that Treasury has aimed to avoid increasing taxes over the last five years in an effort to support economic recovery, adding that the country's tax system was 'progressive'. National Treasury defends fuel levy hike Moreover, Axelson responded to comparisons between the fuel levy hike and a VAT increase. 'The quantum is very different. The VAT increase over three years would have raised about R75 billion. Increasing the fuel levy by inflation is closer to around R12 billion.' He defended the levy hike, arguing that it had not been raised in the previous three budgets. 'Part of that was due to the very high oil, petrol and diesel prices [but] those have been coming down lately. The recent non-adjustment in the March budget was to provide relief for VAT.' READ MORE: VAT reversal overshadowed by fuel levy hike Axelson emphasised that the fuel levy is a significant source of state revenue, contributing about 5% to total tax revenue. 'This is a specific tax, a cents per litre, so these kinds of specific taxes, which are the same as excise duties, they need to be adjusted by inflation; otherwise, the real value of that tax will go down over time.' He warned that Treasury would lose about R3.5 billion in revenue by failing to increase the fuel levy. 'The vast majority of the tax revenue increase is all on the personal income tax side. Around R16.7 billion of the R18 billion in increases is all on personal income tax.' Watch the meeting below: Axelson told the committee that various alternative revenue proposals – such as eliminating the employment tax incentive (ETI), increasing corporate income tax, introducing a wealth tax, and partially adjusting tax brackets – will be considered in the 2026 budget. 'A lot of them are very good and interesting proposals which we are going to have to consider very carefully and hopefully have a more consultative process before the next budget.' He added that although the finance minister has the authority under the Customs and Excise Act to implement an interim fuel levy adjustment via a notice in the government gazette, Parliament has the right to intervene. 'We do hope the notice will be published quite soon [but] Parliament may decide to intervene [as] there is legislative oversight.' Tax policy criticised Civil society and political parties reacted strongly to the Treasury's presentation. The Budget Justice Coalition, one of the organisations that made submissions, rejected claims of a progressive tax system. 'Our tax system can look progressive on paper, but it doesn't actually work that way, and we know that all too well in a country that is marked by some of the highest levels of inequality,' the organisation's chairperson, Matshidiso Lencoasa, said. She argued that South Africa's tax policy burdens the poor, while wealthy individuals and corporations continue to exploit loopholes to their advantage. READ MORE: Fuel levy pain: Brace for possibility of petrol price hike in June Lencoasa further criticised the proposed VAT and fuel levy increases, describing them as 'blunt instruments' that would place a heavier financial strain on the country's most vulnerable populations. Pieter Faber, senior executive of taxation at the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants (Saica), also expressed concern. Faber said the institution cannot support further tax increases in an already high-tax environment, especially amid rising national debt and ongoing concerns about the lack of government accountability, as highlighted in the Auditor-General's report on local government this week. Fuel levy increase under scrutiny MK Party MP Des Van Rooyen criticised the delayed implementation of alternative proposals. 'My expectation was that most of the inputs would be accommodated in this budgeting cycle,' Van Rooyen said. He asserted that the fuel levy increase was more regressive than the scrapped VAT hike. 'There should be a thunderous response against this proposal.' Democratic Alliance (DA) MP Pieter Britz called for a fairer distribution of the tax burden. READ MORE: EFF files urgent interdict to stop proposed fuel levy hike EFF MP Omphile Maotwe strongly disagreed with Treasury's position on the fuel levy. 'National Treasury refuses to increase corporate income tax for ideological reasons and not practical ones. They oppose a wealth tax because their underlying assumption is that the state must serve those who already have wealth.' She also challenged the narrative of a progressive tax system. 'The claim that our tax system is progressive cannot be taken seriously,' Maotwe said, accusing the department of ignoring alternative proposals. 'It is clear that we have a National Treasury problem,' she added.
