Tragic end to Maharashtra business family's long-cherished Char Dham yatra as chopper crashes in Uttarakhand
Rajkumar Jaiswal, 41, his wife, Shraddha Jaiswal, 35, and their two-year-old daughter, Kashi, were on a Char Dham pilgrimage that they began on June 12, fulfilling a long-standing religious vow. Their six-year-old son, Vivaan, however, survived only because he had stayed back in Pandharkawda in Maharashtra with his grandparents.
Locals described the Jaiswals as a 'devout and deeply spiritual family,' known for their involvement in both religious and social life in Vani, while also running a successful business.
In Vani, news of the Jaiswal family's death sparked deep mourning. Rajkumar Jaiswal, described as 'soft-spoken and devout,' had long wished to undertake the Char Dham yatra with his family, according to locals.
Last year, the couple hosted a Shiv Mahapuran Katha to mark daughter Kashi's naming ceremony, a well-attended event led by spiritual preacher Pradeep Mishra. Village residents say the Jaiswal family lived a life rooted in faith, and now, the survival of their son is the only solace.
The family also ran a successful retail business and was active in community affairs. Authorities are arranging to bring the bodies back for last rites in Pandharkawda.
The other four killed in the chopper crash were identified as Captain Rajbir Singh Chauhan from Jaipur (https://indianexpress.com/article/india/uttarakhand-chopper-crash-pilot-indian-army-veteran-10067487/?ref=hometop_hp), who was the pilot, Vikram Rawat from Ukhimath in Uttarakhand, Vinod Devi and Trishti Singh from Uttar Pradesh.
According to a Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) press release, the Bell 407 helicopter (VT-BKA) took off from Guptkashi at 5.10 am, landed at Kedarnath at 5.18 am, and departed again at 5.19 am. It crashed shortly after, near the forested slopes of Gaurikund. All five adult passengers, one infant, and the pilot were killed.
'As a precautionary measure, DGCA has already reduced the frequency of helicopter operations to Char Dham, is carrying out enhanced surveillance, and reviewing operations for any further action,' the aviation regulator said.
The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) will lead a formal probe. Rescue teams from National Disaster Response Force (NDRF) and State Disaster Response Force (SDRF) were deployed immediately but found no survivors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
DGCA issues notice to IndiGo over ‘non-qualified' simulator use to train pilots
Aviation regulator Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) has issued a show cause notice to IndiGo for using 'non-qualified simulators' to train 1,700 pilots operating to three airports, citing scrutiny of records and email replies from the airline. IndiGo did not respond to a request for comments on the notice. (HT PHOTO) '...it has been found that Category C (Critical) airfield training for flight crew (approximately 1700 (PIC & First Officers) was conducted using non-qualified simulators,' said the notice, a copy of which HT has seen, issued on Monday. It said the review of the simulator training data showed several Full Flight Simulators (FFSs) used for training, testing, or checking for airfields such as Kozhikode, Leh, and Kathmandu were not qualified or approved for the specific airport models, as required under mandatory Civil Aviation Rules (CAR). The notice referred to non-qualified airfields and detailed the location where they were used to train the pilots in command and first officers. It added that issues were recorded in 20 simulators. The notice said two each in Delhi, Chennai, and Hyderabad, five each in Greater Noida and Gurugram, and four in Bengaluru were not qualified to operate on the three airports. The notice said the IndiGo director (training) was responsible for ensuring compliance with all applicable civil aviation requirements. '...it has been observed that you have failed to ensure the use of appropriately qualified simulators for training related to Class III (critical) airports, in violation of provisions,' the DGCA said. '...show cause within 14 days of receipt of this notice as to why action should not be taken against you for the lapse under the provisions of the Aircraft Rules and CAR.' The regulator said that it would presume that the airline had nothing to submit in defence in case it fails to respond within 14 days. '..ex parte action shall be initiated against you as per rules.' IndiGo did not respond to a request for comments on the notice.
Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Technical snags led to 10 emergency landings since January 2024: Civil Aviation Ministry
Advt Airport structural safety By , ETInfra The Civil Aviation Ministry on Monday informed Parliament that 10 incidents of emergency landings of aircraft due to technical snags have been reported since January 2024, reports a written reply to the Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for Civil Aviation Murlidhar Mohol said that two incidents of turbulence were also reported during the period. 'In addition to the above, on June 12, 2025, Air India aircraft VT-ANB declared MAYDAY and eventually met with an accident,' he Air India flight from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick crashed on 12 June, killing 260 2020 to June 2025, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) conducted 171 regulatory audits , the minister a separate written reply, Mohol said that structural audits of Delhi Airport 's Terminal 2 and Terminal 3, conducted by IIT-Madras , found both structures to be said that on 28 June 2024, the forecourt canopy at Terminal 1D of Delhi Airport collapsed during heavy rain. On 25 May 2025, there was no incident of roof collapse. However, a small portion of the tensile fabric in the forecourt area tore due to high-intensity thunderstorms, strong winds and heavy rainfall over a short duration. 'The incident had no impact on airport operations,' Mohol said.A thorough inspection of the canopy structure at Terminal 1D was conducted by Cortex Construction Solutions Pvt Ltd, with the results validated by IIT-Banaras Hindu University, which found the structure safe. Larsen & Toubro's Engineering, Design & Research Centre also undertook a structural study before reconstruction works, with prior approval from minister said that all the airport operators have been directed to carry out a thorough evaluation of all civil, electrical and technical aspects of the building, including the design, specifications and workmanship of the roof sheeting structure before the onset of monsoon every year.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Tech snag diverts AI's Thiruvananthapuram -Delhi flight to Chennai
CHENNAI/NEW DELHI: At least 140 passengers, including MP KC Venugopal and a few other MPs, on an Air India Thiruvananthapuram-Delhi flight experienced a terrifying 3.5-hour journey on Sunday after a technical fault forced pilots to divert the aircraft to Chennai. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Flight AI 2455 circled over the Bay of Bengal for nearly two hours, began its descent for a landing, then ascended again before safely landing on its second attempt. In a detailed statement, the DGCA said AI 2455 'encountered moderate turbulent conditions during flight. Crew observed that weather information depicted on the weather radar was not accurate. Suspecting weather radar malfunction, they diverted to Chennai.' 'After (hovering to burn fuel) the aircraft was cleared (to land) at Chennai. (Crew) was instructed to carry out a missed approach by ATC as a departing Gulf Air flight, GFA 53 (Chennai-Bahrain), reported debris on the left side of the runway,' it said. A runway check found nothing. The AI aircraft landed safely at 10.39 pm. 'During engineering inspection no deficiency was observed. However, as a precautionary measure, the weather radar transceiver was replaced with a serviceable one,' the DGCA said. A combination of multiple factors, including a slightly delayed departure from Thiruvananthapuram, bad weather, announcement of the flight diverting due to a snag, hovering over Chennai, and then a go-around added to passengers' anxiety. Minutes after landing, K C Venugopal, a former junior civil aviation minister, posted on X about the "frighteningly close to tragedy' experience. 'Shortly after take-off, we were hit by unprecedented turbulence. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now About an hour later, the captain announced a flight signal fault and diverted to Chennai. For nearly two hours, we circled around the airport awaiting clearance to land, until a heart-stopping moment during the first attempt — another aircraft was reportedly on the same runway. In a split second, the captain's quick decision to pull up saved every life on board. The flight landed safely on the second attempt,' he said, urging the civil aviation ministry and DGCA to 'investigate the incident and fix accountability.' Air India denied that AI 2455 was asked to go around because there was another aircraft on the runway. An AI spokesperson said: 'The flight crew of AI2455 … made a precautionary diversion to Chennai due to a suspected technical issue and given the weather conditions en route. The flight landed safely in Chennai, where the aircraft will undergo the necessary checks. We regret the inconvenience caused to affected passengers…. At AI, safety of our passengers and crew remains top priority.' In reply to another post on X, AI said: '…diversion to Chennai was precautionary, due to a suspected technical issue and poor weather conditions. A go-around was instructed by Chennai ATC during the first attempted landing, not because of the presence of another aircraft on the runway. Our pilots are well-trained to handle such situations, and in this case, they followed standard procedures throughout the flight…' Air India arranged another Airbus A320neo to fly the passengers from Chennai to New Delhi as AI 2455. The usual flying time of AI 2455 (TRV-Delhi) is 3.5 hours with a scheduled departure time of 7.15 pm. According to flight tracking sites, it took off on Sunday at 8 pm, after a slight delay, and landed in Chennai at 10.39 pm. The alternate aircraft took off from Chennai at 1.40 am and landed in New Delhi at about 4 am. Captain Ranganathan, a former pilot and aviation safety expert, said it is normal for flights to go around while approaching the runway to land. "Even in cases where an aircraft occupies the runway for too long, the incoming flight, which was given clearance to approach the runway, would be asked to go around,' he said. Seasoned aviators say while AI 2455 had a routine suspected snag, passenger anxiety levels have expectedly been higher after the June 12 AI 171 crash in Ahmedabad and subsequent incidents.
