Thailand backtracks on legalising casino plans as political turmoil deepens
A motion to withdraw the so-called "entertainment complex' bill from the current session of parliament will be raised on July 9 when it was previously slotted for consideration, government whip Visuth Chainaroon told reporters on Monday.
The cabinet will likely approve the withdrawal plan when it meets on Tuesday, Visuth said. It's not clear yet whether the government will reintroduce the bill at some point in the future, he said.
The government had earlier indicated that it would delay the introduction of the bill - set to be the first major agenda after the House of Representatives reconvened last week - saying it needed more time to communicate with the public and address their concerns about problem gambling and money laundering.
"We're not pulling it out of fear or anything,' Visuth said. "We'd just like to communicate with the people first on the issue and clear any lingering doubts.'
PM Suspension
The move to pull the bill came after the ruling alliance was pushed to the brink by the exit of Bhumjaithai Party, which had opposed the bill, and the suspension of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra for an alleged ethical misconduct.
Paetongtarn also faces other legal challenges after coming under fire for a leaked phone conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen, in which she was critical of the Thai army's role in an ongoing border standoff with the neighboring country.
Without a clear majority, the government may face challenges in passing controversial or essential bills that have been lined up in the coming months. The budget bill for next fiscal year from October is also expected to be taken up for the second and third readings in August.
The move is likely to frustrate foreign investors interested in developing casinos in Thailand as part of big entertainment complexes. The proposed legislation promotes these projects as a means to attract investment and boost tourism - a sector that is crucial to the Thai economy, employing one in five Thais and contributing roughly 13% to the nation's gross domestic product.
Major operators such as Galaxy Entertainment Group Ltd., MGM Resorts International, Las Vegas Sands Corp., Wynn Resorts Ltd., and Melco Resorts & Entertainment have previously expressed interest in setting up integrated resorts in Thailand.
-- ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
21 minutes ago
- The Star
Australia 'urgently seeking' details on Trump drug tariff plan
A Chemist Warehouse store in Sydney, Australia, on Thursday, Feb. 13, 2025. Medicines and pharmaceuticals are among Australia's top exports to the US, with around A$2.1 billion (US$1.37 billion) in shipments last year. - Bloomberg SYDNEY: Australia is "urgently seeking more detail' on US President Donald Trump's threat to raise tariffs up to 200 per cent on pharmaceutical imports, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said on Wednesday (July 9). Trump announced plans to impose tariffs on pharmaceuticals, as well as a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports, during a cabinet meeting in Washington hours earlier. "These are obviously very concerning developments,' Chalmers told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on Wednesday. Chalmers said while the US accounted for less than one per cent of Australia's copper exports, the pharmaceutical industry was "much more exposed' to the impact of tariffs. "Much more concerning are the developments around pharmaceuticals,' he said. "And that's why we're seeking - urgently seeking - some more detail on what's been announced.' Medicines and pharmaceuticals are among Australia's top exports to the US, with around A$2.1 billion (US$1.37 billion) in shipments last year, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. Chalmers also said the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, a national programme that subsidises a wide range of prescription medicines for Australians, was "not on the table' as a bargaining chip to escape the threatened tariffs. "We're not willing to compromise the PBS. We're not willing to negotiate or trade away what is a really important feature of the health system,' he said. For months, US lobby groups have been pressuring Trump to retaliate against the PBS through tariffs, claiming the "egregious and discriminatory" pricing regime undermines American exports. - Reuters
The Star
22 minutes ago
- The Star
Thaksin confident Thai court will clear daughter's suspension as PM in ethics case
BANGKOK: Thaksin Shinawatra, the de facto leader of Thailand's ruling party, expects a court to ultimately clear allegations of ethical misconduct against his daughter, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra, who was suspended from office last month. "I'm confident in my daughter's good intentions, and I trust the court will consider the facts with reason,' Thaksin told local broadcaster Nation TV, when asked about the allegations against Paetongtarn. "Everything can be explained.' Paetongtarn is the youngest of Thaksin's three children and the third member of the influential Shinawatra clan to become Thailand's prime minister. She was suspended from office by the country's Constitutional Court until it ruled on a petition by a group of senators, who alleged she had violated ethical standards by blaming the Thai army for escalating a border dispute in a leaked phone call with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen. The premier's suspension was meant to cool the political temperature, Thaksin said, adding her government had adequate support in parliament to carry on business as usual. In the event that Paetongtarn gets ousted by the court, Thaksin's family-backed Pheu Thai Party will either nominate its last prime minister candidate Chaikasem Nitisiri for the top job, or dissolve the parliament to call an early election, he said. The uproar over Paetongtarn's leaked phone call pushed her government to the brink, with the departure of a key coalition partner leaving the ruling coalition with a narrow parliamentary majority. The political turmoil has raised concerns about government stability and added to investor jitters, while trade-reliant Thailand is in talks to avert a punitive 36% US tariff on its exports. Thaksin has wielded significant influence over the Thai government since his return to Thailand in 2023 after 15 years of self-imposed exile. He has shuttled from stage to stage, sharing views on how to fix the country's economy and pitching ideas that would later become government policies. Thaksin said he was "not worried at all' about the outcome of a royal defamation case that he's currently on trial for. If convicted he could potentially be jailed for a maximum of 15 years over comments he made in 2015, shortly after a military coup against his sister Yingluck Shinawatra's government. Thaksin has denied the charges. Separately, a court is investigating whether Thaksin had actually served his royally commuted one-year jail sentence for corruption at a police hospital after returning to the country. - Bloomberg.
Malaysian Reserve
3 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Mahathir at 100: The Man Who Built Malaysia's Tomorrow, Yesterday
By RADZI RAZAK & NURUL NAJMIN ABU BAKAR TUN Dr Mahathir Mohamad has turned 100. And with it, Malaysia is once again reminded of its modern story. The ones of highways, digital corridors, grand dreams and contested legacies that cannot be separated from the man who has now lived a century. He remains, for better or worse as the most influential Malaysian of the post-colonial era. A towering political figure whose belief in rapid industrialisation, social engineering and physical infrastructure reshaped the landscape — literally and ideologically — of an entire nation. In public imagination, Dr Mahathir is often remembered for his combative politics, economic nationalism and tight grip on power. But the physical and economic architecture of Malaysia — the roads, cities, institutions and even national ambitions — still bears his stamp, two decades after he first stepped down. Throughout his first 22-year tenure as prime minister (1981–2003), Dr Mahathir pushed for infrastructural development not as an optional policy area, but as the spine of national transformation. One of his most recognisable achievements is the North–South Expressway, completed in the mid-1990s. At 847 kilometres, it effectively linked the country from the Thai border to Johor Bahru, catalysing the growth of small towns, industrial zones and logistic networks. The highway wasn't just a road — it was a vision of what connectivity could do for nationhood. The project allowed Malaysians to see themselves as part of something bigger than just a region or state. Geostrategist and political commentator Dr Azmi Hassan considers the expressway, along with the new flagship airport — the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) — to be emblematic of Dr Mahathir's foresight. 'These two projects undertook a lot of criticism at the time. Critics said we didn't need a new airport or a long highway. 'But we know the result now…we desperately needed both. Dr Mahathir had a 10, 20, 30-year vision. If we had waited, the cost would've been astronomical,' he told The Malaysian Reserve (TMR). Other landmark developments followed: the first Penang Bridge (1985), which transformed the island's relationship with the mainland; KLIA (1998), developed in sleepy Sepang and now a major aviation hub; and Putrajaya, a federal administrative capital carved out of plantations and launched as a showcase of modern urban planning. Often mocked at their inception, be it 'too costly, too far, too excessive' but these projects now form the foundation of Malaysia's economic infrastructure. In hindsight, they were long bets that paid off. Journalist and former officer to Dr. Mahathir, Shamsul Akmar Musakamal, argued that these projects were part of a broader strategy to pull Malaysia out of its agrarian past. 'To my mind, Infrastructure development is one of his economic strategies to take the nation out of its agrarian economy. 'These infrastructure projects encompassed not only high rise buildings but included comprehensive communication networks (such as) roads, airports and seaports,' he told TMR. Shamsul said that even the idea of such an approach causing deeper regional or class-based divides is an incongruous thought and irrelevant as he said that today, it is proven that these infrastructures are key components in Malaysia's efforts to move forward. He added that in fact, some are already insufficient to meet present day demands. 'Despite critics questioning the need for such infrastructure when the nation was in some parts still struggling to develop basic infrastructure, the underlying philosophy is that a civilisation is always associated with infrastructural wonders,' he said. In 1991, Dr Mahathir unveiled his most ambitious proposal yet: Vision 2020. A roadmap to make Malaysia a fully developed nation by the year 2020, it combined economic targets with social and cultural aspirations of that of national unity, technological innovation, democratic maturity, and a high-income economy. It was sweeping and audacious. And although the goal was never fully met, it changed how Malaysians thought about their future. The vision gave birth to the Multimedia Super Corridor (MSC) and Cyberjaya, launched in the late 1990s as part of a high-tech push to leapfrog Malaysia into the digital economy. While early momentum waned in the 2000s, both initiatives remain relevant — particularly today, as Cyberjaya repositions itself as a regional data centre hub amid a global AI and cloud computing boom. Malaysia Country Lead for the Asia Group Advisors (AGA) Kamles Kumar noted that Vision 2020, the national car project, and heavy industrialisation were more than economic policies. They were ideological blueprints. 'His successors inherited the machinery but lacked the momentum. Many defaulted to piecemeal reforms or leaned into populism without a grand unifying narrative,' he told TMR. Kamles added that Dr Mahathir's approach was unapologetically top-down, rooted in a belief that political stability, industrialisation, and national pride had to move in tandem. 'His infrastructure push didn't just modernise our skyline — it changed how Malaysia saw itself. Legitimacy came from delivery, not ideology,' he said. As Malaysia stumbled into 2020 — with political upheaval, sluggish reforms and widening inequalities — some revisited the 'what if' question: Would Vision 2020 have been realised if Dr Mahathir had remained in charge uninterrupted? He retired in 2003, passing the baton to successors who diverged significantly from his playbook. A short-lived return to power in 2018 under the Pakatan Harapan coalition was marked more by political turmoil than policy continuity. Supporters argue that the original momentum behind Vision 2020 was lost after his first retirement. Detractors say Dr Mahathir himself bears blame for centralising too much, suppressing dissent, and ignoring structural weaknesses that eventually caught up with the system. But even critics acknowledge his singular ability to drive long-term development. In 2018, at age 92, Dr Mahathir did the unthinkable. He returned — not through Umno, but by leading a new party, Bersatu, into the opposition coalition Pakatan Harapan (PH). Together, they stunned the world by toppling Barisan Nasional in the 14th General Election, ending 61 years of uninterrupted rule. His return was driven by a promise to restore democratic governance, clean up corruption, and bring institutional reform, especially after the fallout of the 1MDB scandal under Datuk Seri Najib Razak. It was, in some ways, a full-circle moment for Dr Mahathir, whose previous rule was often criticised for undermining those very same institutions. Initially hailed as a political masterstroke, his second stint as prime minister (2018–2020) quickly ran aground. Key reform promises stalled. Power struggles resurfaced. Discontent brewed within the coalition. The end came suddenly in February 2020, through what became known as the 'Sheraton Move' — a political realignment that collapsed the PH government and sent Dr Mahathir into political wilderness once more. Bersatu, the party he founded, was seized by factions aligned with Muhyiddin Yassin. The coalition he helped build fragmented. The mandate he reclaimed was lost. For many Malaysians, it was not just the fall of a government that it was the fading of an ideal. The reform moment evaporated, leaving behind cynicism and fatigue. Even into his 90s, Dr Mahathir remained one of the few Malaysian leaders unafraid of spontaneous encounters with the press. Doorstop interviews outside Parliament or at events were routine. No handlers. No press officers cutting off questions. Just Dr Mahathir — sometimes curt, often blunt, but always willing to engage. For journalists, it was equal parts thrill and frustration. 'He'd argue, he'd scold, but he never ran. 'Unlike some who hide behind statements, Dr Mahathir would stop, look you in the eye and say his piece. You don't get that anymore,'said a senior political reporter. It's a small, telling detail — but one that says much about a man whose political stamina often outpaced those half his age. As he reaches 100, Dr Mahathir remains deeply paradoxical. The doctor who preached self-reliance, but created a highly centralised government. The moderniser who reigned in the media. The democrat who detained opponents without trial. The nationalist who welcomed foreign investment — on his own terms. Yet few can deny his lasting impact. His legacy is visible on maps, in policy, and even in the national psyche. He didn't just change the country. He rewired how it saw itself. In an era of risk-averse leadership and short-term thinking, Dr Mahathir's century stands as a reminder of a time when Malaysian politics was about big ideas, for better or worse. And even now, as his influence fades and the nation moves on, Malaysia is still walking the roads he built. Quite literally.
