
Odisha to probe use of leftover wood from Puri at Digha's Jagannath temple
Odisha law minister Prithiviraj Harichandan on Friday told the Shree Jagannath Temple Administration chief Arabinda Padhee to investigate claims that surplus sacred neem wood from the 2015 Nabakalebara ceremony at Puri's 12th-century Jagannath Temple was used to create idols for West Bengal's Jagannath temple opened in Digha this week.
The Nabakalebara ritual involves the renewal of the wooden idols of Lord Jagannath, Lord Balabhadra, Goddess Subhadra, and Sri Sudarshan using sacred neem wood (Daru).
Harichandan said the probe seeks to uncover the truth about a claim that was made and that 'appropriate action' will be taken against those found guilty.
Odisha's probe was triggered by reports that Ramakrushna Dasmahapatra, a senior Daitapati servitor from Puri who attended the Digha temple's inauguration, claimed he transported surplus Daru from the 2015 Nabakalebara to craft the Digha idols.
According to reports from Bengal, Dasmahapatra reportedly told reporters that the wood was leftover from the sacred trees collected under the guidance of Devi Mangala of Kakatpur.
But after an adverse reaction in Odisha, Dasmahapatra denied having made the claim at a news conference convened in Puri on Friday. He said the video clips of his statement were 'morphed or intentionally edited.'
The idols for the Digha temple, he said in Puri, were made from ordinary neem wood and said he was invited to perform rituals at the temple by West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, whom he described as a disciple.
The Jagannth temple in Digha, constructed by the West Bengal Housing Infrastructure Development Corporation (WBHIDCO) on a 24-acre coastal site, mirrors Puri's temple in design, and stands at 213 feet—nearly identical to Puri's 214-foot height.
There is concern in Odisha that the Digha temple, backed by Banerjee's government, could threaten Puri's tourism-driven economy. The naming of the temple as 'Jagannath Dham' and its promotion as a cultural and religious hub have fuelled fears that it could divert pilgrims from Puri.
Except former Bengal BJP president Dilip Ghosh, other BJP leaders stayed away from the consecration of the temple in Digha while Banerjee camped in the district for the event.
On Friday, Trinmool Congress (TMC) also hit back at the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its ministers in Odisha, accusing them of trying to malign Bengal's efforts to build a Hindu temple.
'The BJP calls itself a Hindutva party but tries to tarnish a temple dedicated to Lord Jagannath. This exposes their hypocrisy,' said TMC spokesman Jay Prakash Majumdar, framing the temple as a cultural milestone rather than a rival to Puri. He said the BJP's criticism reflects frustration over their inability to counter Banerjee's initiatives.
The Odisha government and Puri's servitor community said the alleged use of sacred wood and the temple's 'Jagannath Dham' branding was an affront to Puri's unique spiritual and cultural identity.
Several Nijogs (servitor associations) in Puri had previously barred members from participating in Digha's rituals. But Dasmahapatra still went, despite being the secretary of a Nijog, and has drawn sharp criticism.
Senior Daitapati Binayak Dasmahapatra questioned how Ramakrushna could access the securely stored Daru, while former Nijog chief Durga Charan Dasmahapatra condemned his actions, promising a discussion at the next Nijog meeting.
On Thursday, sand artist Sudarsan Pattnaik expressed his concerns about Digha being called Jgannath Dham.
In a letter to Odisha chief minister Mohan Charan Majhi, Pattnaik said the statement had hurt sentiments of millions of Jagannath devotees. 'According to our sacred scriptures, there exists only one Jagannath Dham, which is located in Puri. Associating any other temple with the title may lead to confusion and contradict long-standing spiritual and Hindu cultural traditions,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
36 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Indians have high confidence in Trump, US image declines globally: Pew study
Indians have higher confidence in United States President Donald Trump than those in several other countries surveyed by the Pew Research Centre, the think tank said in its findings published on Wednesday. This came even as favourable views about the US declined in 15 of the 24 countries where the survey was conducted. There was no significant change in the views about the US in six countries including India, the survey found. The views about the US had become more favourable in three countries: Israel, Nigeria and Turkey. Among the surveyed countries, the median level of confidence in Trump as a world leader was 34% and no confidence was 62%. However, in India, 52% of the respondents expressed confidence in Trump and 23% said that they were not confident, the Washington-based think tank found. Israel, Nigeria, Hungary and Kenya were the other countries where Trump enjoyed high confidence. In India, 54% of the Hindu respondents said that they were confident about Trump, as compared to 39% Muslims. India, Kenya and Nigeria were the only countries where at least half of the adult respondents said that they found Trump to be honest. Respondents in less than one-third of the surveyed countries said that 'honest' does not describe the US president. A median of 80% respondents – and majorities in almost every country surveyed – perceived Trump to be 'arrogant'. A median of 65% respondents viewed him as 'dangerous'. Across a range of characteristics, including 'able to understand complex problems', 'strong leader', 'well-qualified to be president', 'diplomatic' and 'honest', men tended to have more positive views about Trump's leadership qualities than women. In India and five other countries, the confidence in Trump to do the right thing in world affairs was higher than that in his predecessor Joe Biden. The confidence in Trump to handle major global issues such as Russia's war on Ukraine and climate change was low in most polled countries. However, the trust among Indian respondents on such matters was higher than the global average. Forty-five percent of the Indian respondents said that they had confidence in Trump on the matter of US immigration policies. The Trump administration has tightened immigration regulations. One thousand and eighty Indians have been deported from the US since January, when Trump's second term in office began. Forty-five percent of the respondents from India also said that they were confident about Trump dealing with the Russia-Ukraine war, 41% about US-China relations, 50% on global economic problems, 42% on Israel's war on Gaza and Tel Aviv's tensions with other West Asian countries, and 53% when it comes to climate change. More than 28,300 respondents in 24 countries participated in the survey conducted between January 8 and April 26. Fieldwork in all countries except Indonesia began after Trump assumed office on January 20, the think tank said. The surveyed countries were: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United Kingdom.


The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
What Happens When Opposition Parties Subscribe to Hindutva?
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Politics What Happens When Opposition Parties Subscribe to Hindutva? Suman Nath 6 minutes ago Their strategies risk diluting ideological clarity and alienating minorities, and underscore the enduring tension between electoral pragmatism and ideological purity in an RSS-BJP-dominated political landscape. From left, Arvind Kejriwal, Uddhav Thackeray, Mamata Banerjee and Rahul Gandhi. Photos: Official X accounts. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has profoundly influenced India's public sphere by integrating marginalised communities into its Hindutva narrative. This is not merely an electoral strategy but a long-term social reconstruction project. Far from being static, the RSS employs technology and a language of inclusivity, compelling opposition leaders like Mamata Banerjee, Arvind Kejriwal, Uddhav Thackeray, and Rahul Gandhi to adopt elements of Hindutva to suit regional, electoral, and ideological needs, while balancing their secular credentials. Mamata Banerjee Mamata Banerjee, leader of the Trinamool Congress (TMC), practices a 'soft Hindutva' to counter the Bharatiya Janata Party's (BJP) aggressive Hindu nationalism while preserving her secular image. Her approach is rooted in Bengali cultural identity, particularly through prioritising and promoting Durga Puja by funding clubs, organising a carnival, and substantially supporting local fairs and festivals – positioning her as a defender of Bengali culture in contrast to the 'outsider' narrative spun against the BJP. During the 2021 West Bengal elections, she recited the Chandi Path, visited temples, and patronised lesser-known festivals to gain grassroots legitimacy. Unlike the BJP's confrontational Hindutva, Mamata blends Hindu symbolism with secular rhetoric, visiting both temples and mosques to avoid alienating minority voters. She countered the BJP's 'Jai Shri Ram' slogans by emphasising Bengal's Durga worship tradition, even linking it to the deity Ram. After the 2019 Lok Sabha election losses, the TMC organised Brahmin meets, announced allowances to Sanatan Brahmins, and continued supporting Durga Puja committees, all to appeal to Hindu voters, without alienating her Muslim base, for whom she announced a stipend for Imams. This strategic balancing act helped neutralise the BJP's claim that she leans towards Muslims, and contributed to TMC's decisive 2021 victory. The construction of the Jagannath temple in Digha, located in opposition leader Suvendu Adhikari's stronghold, further exemplifies her culturally diverse and inclusive Hindutva. Critics, including BJP leaders, call this 'adulterated' Hindutva, and her approach risks alienating Muslim voters – though her inclusive rhetoric has largely mitigated this. Arvind Kejriwal Arvind Kejriwal of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has adopted soft Hindutva since 2019 to expand beyond the party's anti-corruption and governance roots, aiming to neutralise the BJP's monopoly over Hindu voters while maintaining a secular image. His public displays of Hindu devotion include reciting the Hanuman Chalisa, visiting temples, and describing himself as a ' Hanuman bhakt.' AAP's schemes – such as free pilgrimages to Ayodhya for seniors and plans to make Uttarakhand a 'global spiritual capital ' – align with Hindu sentiments but lack the BJP's aggressive rhetoric. Kejriwal avoids anti-minority messaging, emphasising constitutional values in AAP's manifestos to solidify his position as an opposition figure. This shift became more pronounced after AAP's defeat in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections in Delhi. Kejriwal's use of Hindu symbolism contributed to AAP regaining ground in the 2020 Delhi assembly elections, decisively defeating the BJP. In states like Gujarat and Punjab, his soft Hindutva, combined with promises of free electricity and education, expanded AAP's footprint, though the party's organisational strength remains limited. Critics note that Kejriwal's silence on issues like the Citizenship Amendment Act has alienated Muslim voters and compromises AAP's secular ethos. The 2025 Delhi result perhaps reflects the cost of this gamble: the BJP, along with the NDA, won 48 seats, and AAP was reduced to 22. His approach lacks the ideological depth of the BJP's Hindutva or the cultural rootedness of Mamata's strategy, reflecting political opportunism more than conviction. Uddhav Thackeray The Shiv Sena, a regional party in Maharashtra, has historically embraced a hardline Hindutva distinct from the BJP's nationalistic version. Under Bal Thackeray, the party was aggressively anti-Muslim and tied to Marathi identity, notably during the 1992 Babri Masjid demolition. Under Uddhav Thackeray, the party has moderated its stance, aligning with secular parties in the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) coalition since 2019. Uddhav's 'inclusive Hindutva' focuses on Marathi pride and Maharashtra-specific Hindu traditions, such as Vitthal worship, rather than anti-minority polarisation. This localised Hindutva, however, is less adaptable outside Maharashtra. The 2019 split, when Eknath Shinde's faction aligned with the BJP, weakened Uddhav's Shiv Sena (UBT). The party now balances its Hindu voter base with its secular allies, diluting its Hindutva narrative. Electoral losses in 2024 and 2025 have forced it to rely more heavily on coalition partners, tempering its rhetoric. Secular allies like the Congress criticise Shiv Sena's Hindutva legacy, while the BJP and Shinde's faction accuse Uddhav of betraying Hindutva, highlighting the party's pragmatic oscillation between hardline and moderate stances. Rahul Gandhi Many feel that Rahul Gandhi, a Congress leader long associated with secularism, adopted soft Hindutva during the 2017 Gujarat assembly elections to counter the BJP's dominance. His temple visits, including to Somnath and Dwarkadhish, and public display of his janeu emphasised his Hindu identity, marking a departure from Congress's minority-focused secularism. This approach aimed to appeal to Gujarat's Hindu majority while also addressing economic concerns such as GST and demonetisation. Rahul balanced this with outreach to Dalits, tribals, and Muslims, maintaining inclusivity. His opposition to the RSS-BJP's divisive Hindutva remained firm, positioning Congress as a defender of constitutional secularism. This tactical pivot improved Congress's performance, yielding 77 seats in 2017 (up from 60 in 2012), though it still fell short of defeating the BJP. After 2017, Rahul reverted to more conventional secular rhetoric, focusing on economic and social justice during his Bharat Jodo Yatra, indicating that his soft Hindutva stance was context-specific. The strategies of Mamata Banerjee, Arvind Kejriwal, Uddhav Thackeray, and Rahul Gandhi reflect the complex interplay between Hindutva and secularism in Indian politics. As the RSS reshapes the public sphere with its adaptive Hindutva, opposition leaders strategically adopt Hindu symbolism to counter the BJP's nationalist narrative. Mamata's culturally rooted approach secured her 2021 victory; Kejriwal's pragmatism aided AAP's 2020 success in Delhi; Uddhav's moderated Hindutva reflects coalition imperatives; and Rahul's tactical temple visits improved Congress's 2017 performance in Gujarat. These strategies risk diluting ideological clarity and alienating minorities, yet they underscore the enduring tension between electoral pragmatism and ideological purity in an RSS-BJP-dominated political landscape. Suman Nath is a political anthropologist and teaches anthropology at Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Government College, Kolkata. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Rahul Gandhi Points to 'Industrial-Scale Rigging', Alleges EC Role in Maharashtra Assembly Polls Are Election Malpractices Undermining India's Claims of Being 'the World's Biggest Democracy'? 'Narendra … Surrender': Rahul Gandhi in Swipe at Modi on Trump's Claims of Mediating Ceasefire Beyond the Ballot: Institutional Integrity in the Shadow of Executive Overreach Karnataka Government Plans to Conduct Caste Census All Over Again Mamata Accuses Modi of 'Political Holi' with Op Sindoor, Asks 'Why Not Give Sindoor to Your Mrs?' Four Times Narendra Modi Showed That Criticising the Union Government on National Security is Okay 'Prove it': Rahul Gandhi Doubles Down on Rigging Allegations After ECI's Unsigned Rebuttal 'Only Saying What Trump Has Said 11 Times', Says Rahul As He Repeats Claim of Modi's 'Surrender' About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Enemies of Telangana': Revanth Reddy hits out at KCR family amid chaos over Kaleshwaram project
Amid ruckus over the alleged irregularities in the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project, Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy launched a scathing attack against the family of former CM K Chandrasekhar Rao, accusing them of being the "true enemies" of the state. The CM said that he would present detailed facts and documents related to the Kaleshwaram Project within two days. He also ruled out the possibility of anyone from the KCR family being inducted into the Congress. "As long as I am in power, there will be no entry for KCR's family into Congress," Reddy said. He further accused Union Minister G Kishan Reddy of obstructing Telangana's development, calling him "the biggest hurdle to the state's progress." "Kishan Reddy is the biggest hurdle to Telangana's progress," Revanth Reddy said. Speaking about BRS MLC Kalvakuntla Kavitha's letter to her father, KCR, the Telangana CM labelled it a "film-style drama" for attention. Earlier, Kavitha took potshots at the leaders of her party. Without naming anyone, she said that when her father, KCR, received notices in relation to the Kaleshwaram probe, no plan of action was set up. "When KCR is given notices, there is no action plan. Instead of teaching me, tell me what is your action plan. Twitter tweets are not enough. Shouldn't we be on the ground?" Kavitha said, adding, "During the Delhi liquor policy, when I went to KCR and wanted to resign, he said that they can't face me, and that's why the case has been filed against you." The BRS MLC further criticised people in her party, labelling them "converts." "Is it okay to say there are converts? Coverts should be controlled, and KCR should be protected," Kavitha said, adding, "If BRS is weak, BJP and Congress will become strong." Meanwhile, KCR on Wednesday appeared before the PC Ghosh Commission in connection with alleged irregularities in the Kaleshwaram project. Heavy police deployment was witnessed at Hyderabad's BRK Bhavan ahead of his appearance. Previously, BRS MLA and former Irrigation Minister Harish Rao and BJP MP Etela Rajender, who previously served as Finance Minister in the BRS government, appeared before the commission. Justice PC Ghose Commission on Tuesday issued summons to former Telangana CM K Chandrashekar Rao (KCR), former Minister Harish Rao, and BJP MP Etela Rajender, who also served as a minister during the BRS regime, in the ongoing investigation into alleged irregularities in the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project (KLIP). The Commission, which has been probing financial and procedural lapses in the multi-crore irrigation project, directed the three political leaders to appear for questioning in the first week of June.