logo
Pembrokeshire school site to be transformed into motorcycle showroom

Pembrokeshire school site to be transformed into motorcycle showroom

A shock on the Carmarthenshire Farm
A FARMER from Carmarthenshire is at the centre of a growing legal storm over the UK Government's controversial 5G rollout policy – a policy critics say is slowing progress, not speeding it up.
In 2017, ministers promised a faster, cheaper path to mobile connectivity by changing the law to let telecoms companies pay landowners far less for installing masts. But instead of unleashing 5G, the new rules have triggered a wave of legal battles – and rural Wales is bearing the brunt.
Thomas Richards from Llangennech, who agreed to host a mast in 2016 for around £5,500 a year, was stunned when the new rules allowed the telecoms company to revise their offer to just £3.50 a year.
'Negotiations were very stressful. I felt we were taken advantage of as a family,' he said. 'I can't believe the government is allowing this to happen. Who is going to want a mast on their land now?'
His case is one of more than a dozen disputes across Wales, all stemming from the 2017 reforms to the Electronic Communications Code.
Wales is now a legal hotspot for telecom disputes, with more than 14 tribunal cases since 2021. These include disputes with Cardiff International Airport, South Wales Fire and Rescue Authority, and farmers in Snowdonia and Powys.
The number of mast-related legal cases across the UK has surged from just 33 in the 30 years before the code change to more than 1,100 since 2017.
Many site owners – from farmers and churches to care homes and sports clubs – have reported rent drops of 90 percent or more, often with little say in the matter. Campaign group Protect and Connect say some landowners feel bullied and cornered.
In one case, a hill farmer in North Wales saw his annual rent slashed from £5,500 to £3.50. A park visitor centre lost £9,800 a year in mast income, damaging their ability to operate. A church in mid Wales was left scrambling to pay heating bills after its mast rent collapsed.
In response, telecom companies argue that the changes were necessary to stop landowners charging what they call ransom rents that stalled network upgrades. The UK Government insists the reforms are about making digital connectivity affordable and universal.
The Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport said it wants fairer, faster and more collaborative negotiations, and introduced the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act in 2022 to encourage dispute resolution.
But critics, including the Farmers' Union of Wales, say the reforms have gone too far. One landowner was offered just £32 total for a 10-year lease – down from an earlier offer of £4,650 per year.
In Pembrokeshire, the battle over connectivity has a familiar ring. Residents in Tenby have been complaining about poor mobile signal for years, with tourists flooding in each summer only worsening the problem.
County Councillor Michael Williams said: 'All the providers are blaming visitor numbers, but that excuse doesn't justify the charges people are paying. It's the same problem every year.'
One resident told The Herald he had missed hospital appointments because of poor signal. Businesses relying on card machines and mobile bookings say the network failures cost them money and reputation.
Efforts to install a 20-metre mast in Tenby to ease pressure have stalled due to planning objections within the Pembrokeshire Coast National Park. Officials say it's a difficult balance between connectivity and conservation.
Another controversial mast plan in the Preseli Hills was recently rejected due to its visual impact. Despite the potential to improve rural signal, inspectors upheld objections that it would harm the landscape.
In Cardiff and other urban areas, rooftop masts are also facing disputes over low renewal offers, showing this issue is not confined to the countryside.
Official Ofcom figures show Wales lags behind on mobile coverage. Only 62 percent of land area in Wales has 4G from all four major networks. In some rural constituencies, that figure drops below 50 percent. Superfast broadband access in Pembrokeshire stands at around 93 percent, still below the Welsh average.
Broadband tells a similar tale of two Waleses. Overall, about 96 percent of homes in Wales can access superfast broadband via fixed lines or wireless solutions – roughly on par with the UK average. But rural counties lag behind. Powys has the lowest superfast availability at just 84 percent of premises. Ceredigion is at 86 percent. Pembrokeshire stands around 93 percent – better, but still below the Welsh average. When it comes to future-proofed networks, the gap is starker: only 40 percent of premises in Pembrokeshire have access to full-fibre broadband so far, compared to nearly 70 percent of premises in Cardiff.
Some relief for landowners has started to arrive via the courts. In a recent case, the Upper Tribunal increased the annual rent for a greenfield mast site from £750 to £1,750, after ruling that the earlier valuation was too low. Farming unions hailed the decision, but warned it was still far below the market rates common before 2017.
Campaigners and MPs are now urging a review of the policy before new rules expand the same approach to 15,000 more sites across the UK. Legal experts warn the number of tribunal cases could double again if this happens.
Telecoms industry representatives argue that the reforms were needed to break deadlock and reduce deployment costs. They say most landowners still agree terms without dispute, and that masts are essential national infrastructure, not just commercial equipment.
But for rural communities, that message is wearing thin. Many feel they are being asked to sacrifice land, income and peace of mind – all while still waiting for improved service.
In Tenby, local plasterer Ben Jones says poor signal is costing him work. 'I've missed bookings from clients because they couldn't get through,' he said. 'One customer said it took him five tries to make contact.'
Another resident, Paul, told The Herald he had missed hospital calls and emergency transport arrangements due to unreliable signal. 'It's ridiculous that in 2025, my phone signal is worse than it was in the 1990s,' he said.
Shops relying on mobile card machines also report frequent outages. One shop owner said: 'It's embarrassing having to explain to customers that we can't process a payment because the network's gone down again.'
There is growing consensus that progress on connectivity must be matched by fairness for those who host it. As the Carmarthenshire farmer put it: 'I want better signal too. But not if it means giving up my land for pennies.'
Bridging the digital divide in Wales may require more than telecom towers. It may demand trust, balance, and real partnership between the countryside and the companies trying to connect it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike
Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike

Telegraph

time18 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike

A potential 5.5 per cent rise in England's train fares next year has been described by public transport groups as 'outrageous'. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6 per cent hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5 per cent, which means fares could jump by 5.5 per cent. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, said 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He added: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71 per cent of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation. About 45 per cent of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'

Alex Salmond's Strichen widow suing Scottish Government over sexual harassment probe
Alex Salmond's Strichen widow suing Scottish Government over sexual harassment probe

Press and Journal

time2 hours ago

  • Press and Journal

Alex Salmond's Strichen widow suing Scottish Government over sexual harassment probe

Former first minister Alex Salmond's Strichen widow is suing the Scottish Government over its botched handling of an investigation into sexual harassment allegations levelled against him. Moira Salmond, 88, has appointed a team of lawyers to restart Mr Salmond's case against the government he once led. Mr Salmond had been in the process of suing the government over its handling of an investigation into sexual harassment complaints against him. The Alba Party founder died of a heart attack in North Macedonia in October last year, aged 69. He previously lodged a claim in the Court of Session alleging misfeasance – the wrongful exercise of lawful authority – by civil servants. 'With this court action, that evasion of responsibility ends,' Mr Salmond said at the time. Nicola Sturgeon and Alex Salmond. Image: PA. Moira Salmond's determination to proceed is said to be driven by the publication of ex-first minister Nicola Sturgeon's memoir, Frankly. Alex Salmond was acquitted of 13 charges in 2020, including an accusation attempted rape. It came after a successful legal case against the Scottish Government when a judge ruled its initial probe into Mr Salmond's conduct had ben 'tainted by apparent bias'. Ms Sturgeon's book includes several references to her former mentor. Central to these is her denial of a 'conspiracy' to destroy the former first minister – an accusation repeatedly levelled by Mr Salmond prior to his death. Alex Salmond's widow Moira Salmond (centre) at the public memorial service for the former first minister. Image: PA 'He impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy – government, police, Crown Office. 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all,' Ms Sturgeon wrote. Alex Salmond's widow 'distressed' by Nicola Sturgeon memoir Moira Salmond said the comments had caused her distress. She said: 'Attacks by the living on the dead will seem to many as deeply unfair. My wish, and sincere hope, is that these attacks will now stop.' A family friend told the Sunday Mail: 'Moira is upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book – much of which is ridiculous and inaccurate. 'It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure that the full truth comes out and that Alex's name is cleared.' They added: 'Her case against the Scottish Government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. 'Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him. Moira Salmond is said to be 'determined' to defend the former first minister. Image: PA 'There is an adjustment period ongoing until September where updates can be made by either side to their paperwork, it takes time but the ball is rolling. Anyone who thinks this is just going to go away is wrong.' Friends of the former SNP leader say the stress of the case was a factor in his death. The Scottish Government has been approached for comment.

How Scotland's affordable homes budget is bankrolled by buyers
How Scotland's affordable homes budget is bankrolled by buyers

Scotsman

time2 hours ago

  • Scotsman

How Scotland's affordable homes budget is bankrolled by buyers

​David J Alexander says LBTT figures show the private sector is effectively funding a huge chunk of Scottish housing policy Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Homebuyers, landlords, property investors, and second homeowners should give themselves a round of applause. The latest figures show that these are the people paying property taxes which are now equivalent to the entire affordable housing budget allocated by the Scottish Government. These people – from the first-time buyer to the million-pound property owner – have supplied £714.2m through land and buildings transaction tax (LBTT) over the latest year from August 2024 to July 2025. This total is £110m higher than the previous 12-month period, when £604.2m was raised. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Whether revenue from LBTT is directly transferred to affordable housing is unknown but private buyers are now effectively funding a huge chunk of Scottish housing policy. The land and buildings transaction tax has raised £714.2m over the last 12 months (Picture: John Devlin) Last month recorded the highest ever figure for LBTT of £80.3m: the highest ever monthly charge from the additional dwelling supplement (ADS) paid by landlords, property investors and second home buyers at £28m; as well as the highest ever contribution from ordinary homebuyers with £52.3m. Almost all the residential taxes raised came from properties sold for more than £325,001. The 19,560 transactions above this threshold collected £388.8m, which is 78.9 per cent of the total £493m raised in LBTT (this is the figure for residential sales with the ADS figures removed). This means that the average tax levied per transaction was £19,877. Does anyone really believe that someone buying a property worth £325,001 is 'rich' and able to subsidise the rest of the Scottish economy? Are these really the people in Scotland with the broadest shoulders? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Meanwhile, landlords and property investors, while often vilified by politicians and others as the cause of the current housing emergency, paid £221.3m, which was almost a third of the LBTT total for the last year. This is a clear indication of just how crucial this group is in providing homes and substantial tax funding. David J Alexander is CEO of DJ Alexander Scotland Ltd (Picture: Laurence Winram) But it is questionable whether this is a sustainable, or even sensible, means of raising revenue. The Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) specifically criticised the policy this year stating that: 'Scotland's increase in the surcharge in land and buildings transaction tax (LBTT) on the purchase of second and rental homes, from 6 per cent to 8 per cent… continued a trend of increases in this 'additional dwelling supplement'', and 'the move makes an already highly economically damaging tax even worse'. It continued: 'It is not yet clear what the Scottish Government's vision for tax policy is – but increases to LBTT are not consistent with any economically sensible strategy.' The IFS, and many private investors, understands that the current LBTT policy is simply political posturing which makes little or no economic sense but plays up to the idea that punishing 'the rich' is the way forward. While these figures indicate just how resilient and lively the Scottish property market remains there needs to be a level playing field with our UK counterparts. We need – as the IFS and others point out – a proper tax strategy in which there is a reasonable explanation of why these taxes are so high and what benefits accrue from them. Regardless of the current market buoyancy there is little doubt that continued higher property and income taxes will start to deter individuals and companies from future investments in Scotland if this situation is not addressed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store