Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike
July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday.
The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6 per cent hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024.
Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5 per cent, which means fares could jump by 5.5 per cent.
Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, said 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much.
He added: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any.
'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.'
Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares.
He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway.
'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.'
Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel.
'Our survey found that 71 per cent of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper.
'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.'
GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation.
About 45 per cent of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments.
They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities.
The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year.
Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments.
A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them.
'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth.
'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Nicola Sturgeon making Alex Salmond claims because he cannot defend himself, niece says
Sturgeon's memoirs contained a series of criticisms against her one-time mentor. Alex Salmond's niece has criticised Nicola Sturgeon writing about her late uncle, saying she had only done so 'because he's not here to defend himself'. Christina Hendry said if the former first minister and Alba Party leader was alive today he would have defended himself. Sturgeon made several claims about her predecessor in her memoir Frankly, published last week. She accused Salmond of creating conspiracy theories over sexual harassment allegations and said he did not read the independence white paper before the referendum in 2014. Sturgeon also said Salmond 'wanted to destroy me' and would have rather seen the SNP fail than succeed without him. Appearing on the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme, Hendry criticised Sturgeon. She said: 'The way I see it is if my uncle was here today, these things would not be being said. I believe they are being said because he's not here to defend himself, as he would have done with every fibre of his being.' Asked what she thought had motivated Sturgeon to make the claims now, Hendry said: 'I'm unsure. I think there's been a few people questioning that. 'But I think the timing of these things being said – there's been a number of years where they've not been said, that these things could have been said, and the timing of it now, where she's released the book and is looking to publicise that. I think many people have thought that could be the case.' In her book, Sturgeon said Salmond had never produced a 'shred of evidence' that he was a victim of a conspiracy, adding that he admitted to her the substance of one of the complaints against him. A judicial review into the SNP Government's handling of complaints against Salmond found the investigation was tainted by apparent bias while a court cleared him of all charges. Hendry said: 'The bottom line is he was cleared in the highest court in Scotland and I think I'm unsure as to why it's being brought up. I do think there were people conspiring against him, and I think there's the truth will still come out. There are things to still come out in the public, and I think there are many people who should be thinking about their actions.' Hendry added that her family was united in pursuing legal action against the Scottish Government over its botched harassment probe. In December, she announced she would run to be an MSP in one of Mr Salmond's former seats. Hendry said she would contest the Banffshire and Buchan Coast seat for Alba that her uncle had planned to campaign in before his death in North Macedonia in October.
Scottish Sun
2 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
The REAL Nicola Sturgeon story – a world-leading smart-arse & PR pro, far from a great historical politician
IS it safe to come out yet? Has she gone away again? Sturgeonmania has gripped Scotland by the throat for the past week or so with the release of her memoir, and it's fair to say many folk won't have enjoyed it. 3 Sturgeonmani has gripped Scotland with the release of her new memoir, Frankly Credit: Alamy 3 Everything about her memoir and the soft-soap interviews to plug it have been carefully choreographed 3 Nicola Sturgeon's memoirs, Frankly, released last week Credit: Alamy We haven't been this exposed to Nicola Sturgeon since Covid, and there are plenty of people who will be sick of the sight of her. For all the talk of her reflecting and reinventing herself — and hints of olive branches to her critics, notably on gender self-ID — the book promo frenzy has seen Sturgeon circle back to where she started. As she now contemplates that possible move to London revealed in her memoir, we are left with the same old Sturgeon, as bitterly divisive and combative as she was when she took everyone by surprise and quit as First Minister in February 2023. And we are still no closer to any kind of admission that her resignation — three weeks after saying there was 'plenty left in the tank' and she was 'nowhere near' standing down — was maybe, just maybe, something to do with that SNP police probe coming to a head. Everything about her memoir, Frankly, and the soft-soap interviews to plug it, has been a carefully choreographed playing down of all that pesky real-world stuff that actually matters to the everyday lives of the people she served for 16 years in government, in favour of playing up the star quality of Nicola. Things to be avoided have included trivial issues like the NHS, schools, and those new ferries she promised which would allow people who live on islands to be confident they can get to places. The fact she departed government leaving Scotland's public services a near basket case is the very last thing Sturgeon has wanted to talk about over the past week. She couldn't get away quickly enough when representatives of the entire Scottish media corps were grudgingly given a slot to ask her questions at a brief press conference which was cut short by her guard-dog aides on Thursday evening. An hour earlier, she had been lounging in front of a gushing Edinburgh Book Festival audience, where she was gently massaged with question after question about how bloody brilliant she was. Once again, the London liberal elite have embraced the worship of Sturgeon, much as they did during Covid when she presented the opportunity to be cast as the anti-Boris in the English media. As with those pandemic TV briefings, where changes to social restrictions were teased almost-daily with groan-inducing cliffhangers, we have seen cat-and-mouse games from Sturgeon with her book — the will-she-wont-she, is-she-isn't she, and ruse of almost saying things but not quite. Five of the biggest BOMBSHELL moments from Nicola Sturgeon's new memoir The initial memoir extracts we saw were about her sexuality, with that line: 'I have never considered sexuality, my own included, to be binary.' Ms Sturgeon is as calculating as a Casio and the only reason you write a sentence as clunky and oblique as that is to keep people guessing, prompt searching questions in interviews, and to get people to spend £28 on your book to see if you reveal any more. I don't know about you, but I don't want to dwell too much on Nicola Sturgeon rolling around with another human, be that a man, a woman, a woman who thinks they're a man or a man who thinks they're a woman. So let's move on. There are many eye-rolling moments in her memoir as she dwells on how amazing she is — her 'Midas touch', how she knew as a youngster it was her 'destiny' not to be 'ordinary' in life. But the book is not without its merit. For political geeks, it's an interesting glimpse at her thinking — or at least what she says her thinking was — and what was happening behind the scenes during a key period in Scottish political history. You'd have to have a heart of stone not to sympathise with her over personal turmoils described vividly in sections, notably her miscarriage. But what is most striking is not what is in the memoir — the Salmond character assassination, the suggestion that she was right and everyone else was wrong — but what is not in the book. There are only passing mentions of issues which dogged her, such as Scotland's record drug deaths and her failed, flagship promise to eliminate the poverty-related educational attainment gap. Laughably, Sturgeon also suggested she hadn't realised how much poverty would be a factor, despite a pretty big clue being in the name. To plead ignorance to this is to admit to being an idiot — or that the pledge was not thought through, and just for show. Find out what's really going on Register now for our free weekly politics newsletter for an insightful and irreverent look at the (sometimes excruciating) world of Scottish Politics. Every Thursday our hotshot politics team goes behind the headlines to bring you a rundown of key events - plus insights and gossip from the corridors of power, including a 'Plonker' and 'Star' of the Week. Sign up now and make sure you don't miss a beat. The politicians would hate that. SIGN UP FOR FREE NOW And whatever she may be, Sturgeon is not an idiot. As the past week and memoir underlines, she is an expert at the political and PR game, especially when it comes to self promotion. Page upon page is dedicated to making herself look good, and intrigue around political stagecraft like TV debates and independence tactics. But if you're looking for big ideas about improving public services, you won't find much of that either in her time in high office, or the book. So, after a whirlwind week, we are where we were — even if Sturgeon now wants to be in London. Well, they do say that if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. As for her legacy, little has changed. Will she go down as one of history's great leaders who changed their country for the better? No chance. Is she one of the most smart-arsed politicians and political game-players of the 21st century? Certainly. That's the story of Nicola Sturgeon. No self-glorifying memoir or stream of cosy interviews will change that.
Daily Mirror
2 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP confirms date as bank accounts to be checked
DWP has confirmed the start date for powers it is calling 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation' Banks will be ordered to trawl through millions of accounts from April 2026 in a sweeping crackdown designed to root out benefits cheats. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has confirmed the start date for powers it is calling 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation'. The new system, created under the Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill, will let banks flag up accounts that appear to breach benefit rules, such as holding more than the £16,000 savings limit for Universal Credit. Officials will not see detailed transactions, but will be alerted if accounts raise suspicions. The DWP claims the scheme will save taxpayers £1.5 billion over five years after losses from benefits fraud and error hit a record £7.4 billion last year. A fact sheet released by ministers stressed: 'Any information shared through the Eligibility Verification Measure will not be shared on the presumption or suspicion that anyone is guilty of any offence.' It insisted the department will not have direct access to people's bank details but banks will be obliged to pass on alerts. At the same time, the law gives the Government tough new powers to recover money from fraudsters, including taking funds directly from bank accounts and, in cases of persistent refusal to repay, banning offenders from driving for up to two years. The measures were unveiled as Labour's Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall attacked the current system. She said: 'The social security system that we inherited from the Conservatives is failing the very people that it is supposed to help and is holding our country back. 'The facts speak for themselves. One in 10 people of working age are now claiming a sickness or disability benefit. Almost one million young people are not in education, employment or training – one in eight of all our young people.' Critics, however, warn the plans risk ushering in 'mass financial surveillance' of claimants and could wrongly penalise vulnerable households. The DWP insists the focus is on clamping down on fraudsters who cost honest taxpayers billions - but campaigners argue the changes mark a dangerous step towards banks acting as watchdogs over private finances. Silkie Carlo, Director, Big Brother Watch, said: 'These powers are a disaster for financial privacy and the presumption of innocence... This is a completely unprecedented regime of intrusive generalised financial surveillance across the population.'
