
‘Yellowjackets' Season 3 Is All Over The Place And Not In A Good Way
We are now eight episodes into the third season of Yellowjackets and I have decidedly mixed feelings. In some ways, I think this is a slightly better season than the previous one, but it's still such a far cry from the perfection of Season 1 that I'm having trouble really caring. In some ways, that's even worse than genuinely hating a show.
I've gone back and forth a bit on this season. There are some interesting and entertaining elements, but it feels like the writers continue to have no idea what to do with a lot of the characters, especially in the modern timeline. The events of the past timeline also make me question everything going on in the present, particularly when it comes to Shauna. Spoilers ahead.
One of the biggest mistakes this series has made, other than the massive tonal shift between Seasons 1 and 2, has been bringing back more survivors into the modern timeline. It began with just five: Shauna, Tai, Misty, Nat and Travis, who we know survived the wilderness but was found mysteriously dead from an apparent suicide, though with plenty of clues that it was something more nefarious.
At the end of Season 1, we learned that one other girl had made it out: Lottie, the mentally unhinged priestess of The Wilderness. The end of the first season ended with a cliffhanger. Nat had been kidnapped by what appeared to be Lottie's cult. It was incredibly frightening and exciting and I couldn't wait to learn just how diabolical a grown Lottie and her Wilderness cult would be.
Only, well, they weren't. Lottie was running a pretty milquetoast self-help retreat. Lottie herself, as an adult, was almost nothing like her teenage character. While every other adult version was a pretty perfect match, Lottie had an almost entirely new personality. It was jarring. Her cult was woefully bland. How we even went from boring cult to the hunt in the woods by the end of Season 2 remains a mystery. It certainly wasn't earned. Nat's accidental death by fentanyl was preposterous on so many levels, it makes me a little angry just to think about. And with Nat's death came an even bigger problem: The show lost its protagonist.
If anything, Season 3 is only driving that point home. Teen Nat and teen Travis are the closest thing this show has to a moral center. The closest thing we have to heroic figures we can root for. It's clear that Shauna is being set up as the Big Bad at this point also, but without an adult Nat in the modern timeline, there is no yin to Shauna's yang. The equilibrium is gone.
Back to what I was talking about before. By the end of Season 1, we had six survivors. Season 2 added adult Van who effectively becomes adult Tai's new (old) love interest. The writers pretty much just erased Tai's wife and child from the script and other than a brief moment in Season 3, that has remained the case. Tai and Van's adult relationship has been about 5% as interesting as Tai's family life in Season 1. When she was running for office and dealing with what appeared to be her son acting out, and lots of weird stuff was going on that we didn't understand (before learning that it was Other Tai), this was a really brilliant and compelling story. Simply dropping all of that so that Tai and Van could drive around and fret over Van's cancer was a huge mistake.
But bringing Van back creates other problems. Namely, it reduces the tension in the teen storyline because we have yet another main character who we know will survive. There aren't many of them left, especially after the latest episode when we learn that Melissa is still alive. Hilary Swank joins the cast and dons Melissa's teen signature backwards baseball cap, just so we in the audience know it's her. (As we all know, grown versions of teenagers wear the exact same clothes 25 years later).
Yellowjackets
Now we can check off yet another teen in the past storyline. We know for sure Melissa survives, so any future scenes with her character are a lot less interesting. The number of teens who could die before rescue has just dropped again (though the show is happy to just drop in new girls whenever it sees fit, despite how immersion-breaking that is). The number of girls who could be Pit Girl (the teen who died in the very first episode) has been reduced to basically two: Mari and Gen (the latter was recast for Season 3, which really confused me). These are the only light-skinned, dark-haired girls remaining that I can think of, though I suppose it could be the new addition, Hanna, though that would be a cheap trick since Pit Girl was very obviously a teenager in Season 1.
Speaking of the scientists, this feels very much like a plot twist they came up with when writing Season 3 rather than something planned out from the get-go. I could be wrong, of course, but it's just so out of left-field. And it adds yet another character with ties to the survivors in the form of Hannah's daughter. We know Hannah is dead based on what the survivors have talked about, but her daughter is alive and well and Shauna suspects her of doing all the nefarious things that have been happening to her, until she discovers that Melissa has married said girl under a false identity.
So this is quite the dark turn of events, no doubt. Melissa seems like a pretty normal person at first when Shauna confronts her. She tells her she lives a normal, boring life and would like to keep it that way, which is why she sent Shauna the tape and a note that Shauna never got (did Callie hide it? Was it Callie doing all this stuff to Shauna? Was it Callie who killed Lottie?) But there's nothing normal about changing your identity and marrying the daughter of a woman you killed and (presumably) devoured. In fact, it's super creepy and evil. Even though Shauna comes off as super unhinged by the end of Episode 8, there's little doubt in my mind that Melissa is also off her proverbial rocker.
In the teen timeline, I don't understand the showdown between Nat and Shauna. Nat and the group is about to head off with Joel McHale's forest guide, Kodi, and Hannah and hike the six-day journey to the rescue point. Almost everyone wants to leave, but then Lottie says she's not going. I understand her reluctance to leave. She's found herself in the forest. Found her faith, her priestesshood, her calling. The world back home is one of pain, judgment, and quite likely institutionalization. Shauna's motivation for staying is murkier, but I suspect it's similar. Over the course of Season 3, she's harnessed all her anger into a kind of power. She wants to be queen. She keeps asserting her dominance. And Tai's decision to join the first two makes sense, since we know this is Other Tai, or at least that Other Tai is influencing her.
What I don't understand is Nat and the others just obeying Shauna when she tells them that nobody is going to leave. Nat says 'We're going' and everyone turns to leave and Shauna just says 'No. You're not.' And that's it, they stay. Maybe they'll go in next week's episode. They have the gun and the crossbow. But it sure looks like they'll just cave and buckle to Shauna and the other two. Why? It doesn't make sense.
All these complaints aside, I do like Shauna's turn to the dark side. I like her being set up as the villain, and I like the contrast that provides between her ruthlessness and Nat's goodness. Nat and Travis are, as I said, the moral center of the group. Travis was smart to try to take Kodi and Akilah to find help rather than go back to the group, and it's really disappointing to see Akilah undermine him.
But the problem with this dynamic is that it really muddies the entire adult storyline up to this point. Sure, Shauna has done lots of bad things. She's created chaos in her life in the adult timeline. She killed Adam, for one thing. And she bites Melissa's skin off and wants to force her to eat it in this last episode. The issue is the way the others have treated her since Season 1, not as the ruthless ringleader of the Bad Girls but as one of them. There was next to no real tension between Shauna and Nat in the adult timeline. Lottie was treated like the dangerous outlier. But if Shauna was this awful and domineering and scary in the teen timeline, why has she been treated like a normal housewife by her fellow survivors this whole time? And the widening gap between how teen Shauna acts and how adult Shauna acts makes them feel like two very different characters. It doesn't add up.
It makes me wonder if this was, yet again, a change the writers came up with for Season 3 rather than something they had planned the whole time. If nothing else, the relationship dynamics between Nat and Shauna in the first two seasons should have been wildly different and more strained. That this wasn't the case is the strongest evidence I have that they just changed course with Shauna's character this season. Either that, or they did a lousy job in the first two at creating a more realistic dynamic between the adult survivors.
Yellowjackets
My guess is that they had always planned for Lottie to be the Antler Queen and the leader of the Bad Girls in the teen timeline, but changed course after Season 2 basically ruined Lottie's character. I could be wrong, obviously, but that's the feeling I get. Shauna is clearly being prepped to become the Antler Queen. Mari is almost certainly Pit Girl. The big question is whether we get confirmation of this by the end of Season 3.
I'm still enjoying aspects of this show, but it's really lost so much of what made it greatin Season 1 that I'm finding it hard to care. I've said this before but it's been widely misrepresented and misunderstood by fans: I just don't like any of the characters anymore, except for maybe adult Misty. And I don't mean that I dislike them because they're bad. Plenty of bad characters are great fun to watch. Walter White, for instance. But in this show, I need to enjoy the bad characters. Tai used to be a really complex character who I enjoyed a lot, but the Other Tai stuff has just sort of fizzled. I still like Nat and Travis in the past timeline, but knowing both are dead in the adult timeline really takes the wind out of their sails. In the adult timeline, everyone is just kind of awful or flat except for Misty, and she's not a protagonist to root for so much as a source of constant comic relief (like Jeff, who I also like but who functions more as a running gag than anything).
Without anyone to root for, and without the interesting story hooks that Season 1 gave us with Other Tai and so forth, the show loses much of what once made it so great. I guess we'll see. Two episodes remain this season. I wonder if we'll get a fourth.
What do you think of Season 3 so far? Let me know on Twitter, Instagram, Bluesky or Facebook. Also be sure to subscribe to my YouTube channel and follow me here on this blog. Sign up for my newsletter for more reviews and commentary on entertainment and culture.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
2 days ago
- Forbes
Inside The $10 Million Artist's Home On The Montana Range
The unbridled parcel of wilderness on Lake McDonald in Glacier National Park lasted a single day on the market before philanthropic buyers pounced. Shutterstock The sale of Bull Head Lodge, the historical Lake McDonald shoreline studio and seasonal home of globally acclaimed 'cowboy' artist Charles M. (Charlie) Russell, officially closed at the end of July. But this was no ordinary residential property transaction. The significance of the sale goes well beyond a mere real estate success story—it is a means of cultural preservation for a piece of the Old West, underscoring the importance of this artist's work not just to Montana, but to America's socio-cultural fabric. Born in 1867, Russell spent most of his career in Montana, where the northern plains served as both studio and subject. Smithsonian Institute Charlie Russell created much of his work at Bull Head Lodge, the log home he and his wife Nancy built in 1906 that acted as his creative space and studio as well as summer residence for two decades. A talented painter and sculptor inspired by the Wild West and his dramatic, natural surroundings, Russell was also a gifted and humorous storyteller according to friends like fellow cowboy Will Rogers, who spent many nights in conversation seated near the Lodge's stone hearth. Prolific by any measure, Russell produced more than 2,000 works depicting cowboys, Indigenous life, and Western landscapes across the U.S. and Canada, earning the moniker 'the cowboy artist.' Shutterstock But what Russell is remembered for by many is how he immersed himself in this land of Indigenous peoples he called home, honoring them by advocating for Native American rights throughout his career, and capturing daily life in his oil and watercolor paintings. A peek into his body of work leaves one feeling as if you've seen this art before, and you very likely have. Russell created a look and a style that captured the essence and energy of cowboy culture that's been seen in film, in books and of course on the walls of many a gallery. Only two structures punctuate the property—Russell's hand-hewn log studio and a lodge. National Parks Realty Listing the property at $9,999,999, within 24 hours National Parks Realty's Michael Anderson had presented the seller with numerous offers for Bull Head Lodge, which sits on the protected lands of Glacier National Park as a rare inholding listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The buyers? A family with a history and reputation of quietly investing in the arts and culture, with intention to protect and preserve. 'It sold to the right people and this is a win-win for the Park, the arts and my clients,' said Anderson. 'A new chapter begins for a national treasure, and I'm honored to have represented a property of this magnitude within one of America's National Parks. With the right stewardship, these places can be protected and celebrated for generations to come.' To philanthropically invest in the arts at this level is a positive outcome. Private funds at work for the benefit of the public. Rob Akey, artist An etching by Russell on the hearth at Bull Head Lodge cements the painter's legacy in place. National Parks Realty Montana artist Rob Akey, an admirer of Russell's, had the rare opportunity to visit Bull Head Lodge just before it hit the market. 'It's encouraging to see private entities excited about the preservation of the arts,' said Akey. 'To philanthropically invest in the arts at this level is a positive outcome. Private funds at work for the benefit of the public.' Akey's experience inside Russell's home—which has remained untouched for decades—was deeply moving for him. The 16 priceless etchings at the fireplace remain intact. The dust, sifted slowly over time on the lodge's few pieces of furniture, is unmoved. The views from the front porch identical to what Russell shared in his many paintings. A sense of time standing still for Akey was no exaggeration. Thanks to the new owners' conservation ethos, Russell's 3.5-acre slice of Montana will stay wild. Shutterstock Anderson brought the buyer and seller together in like-minded negotiation, with the new owners committed to fully restoring Bull Head Lodge back to its original state and the desire to share the space as a preserved artifact with the arts community once that is complete. There are no plans to live in the home or build on the property. By means of this sale, a very special and vulnerable piece of American history is now safe and sound. The good intentions of this buyer affect so many and are an inspiration in a somewhat jaded world where this type of outcome is rarely expected. Charlie Russell would be pleased. National Parks Realty is a member of Forbes Global Properties , the invitation-only network of top-tier brokerages worldwide and the exclusive real estate partner of Forbes.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Ben Fogle promises 'moving' New Lives in the Wild series
What you need to know about the latest series of Ben Fogle's New Lives in the Wild Ben Fogle has said the latest series of New Lives in the Wild is "unique and moving". The popular Channel 5 show is returning to TV on Thursday at 9pm after New Lives in the Wild aired earlier this year, with Fogle previously telling Yahoo UK to "prepare to be moved to tears." New Lives in the Wild tells the extraordinary stories of those courageous individuals who have quit their "normal" jobs to chase their dreams of living in the remote wilderness. Fogle said there are some "unique" stories in this upcoming series. There's Aleks, a Norwegian model who found happiness in Botswana. Yidan invited Fogle to see his simple life in Thailand after he left China. Then there's Rupert, who quit Yorkshire to transform his life and become a rice farmer in Japan. "It often takes years to organise [filming for New Lives in the Wild]," Fogle revealed on Instagram. Why Ben Fogle's New Lives in the Wild is so popular New Lives in the Wild has two fresh, shorter, series this year and it has been on TV since 2013. The presenter explained the secret to what makes the show so "enduring". Fogle wrote on Instagram: "New Lives in the Wild has such a rich variety of characters and locations. I have filmed nearly 150 over the last 13 years. In that time I have met homeless folk, preppers, hunters, communities and hermits. From the family that gave away their million pound wealth and moved to the desert of North Africa to penniless nomads. "I have met couples who bought plots of land for a few thousand euros to the moneyless man in Ireland. There are a mix of fortunes both financial, aesthetic and social. I suppose that is what makes the programme so unique and enduring. Ben Fogle: New Lives in the Wild (Channel 5) Ben Fogle's New Lives in the Wild series finishes on Tuesday with a trip to a poo expert. (Channel 5) "There are some people with whom each of us can relate on some level. The assumption and presumption that everyone is privileged is shortsighted and…….. presumptuous. The privilege comes not from where they came from but where and what they have found. "They are individuals who have chased their dreams and made it their own." What we know about Ben Fogle's New Lives in the Wild series 20 New Lives in the Wild has a lot of lessons for its viewers; Fogle said the show covers mental wellbeing, bereavement, insecurity, anxiety, sexual abuse, non-conformity, stereotype, PTSD, eco anxiety, poverty, financial insecurity, escape and redemption. Fogle's first adventure this series will see him travel to the African continent, Botswana where he will meet with a Norwegian model living in the desert. While there, Aleks introduces him to her adopted family, the Ju'/hoansi people, who have lived in Africa for hundreds of thousands of years. Fogle has come into her life at a time of change as Aleks has married the owner of a nearby safari camp. New Lives in the Wild has been moved to Thursday night slots but previously the programme has always aired on Tuesdays. Ben Fogle hits back at trolling New Lives in the Wild puts a spotlight on people who have chosen to go down a different path and live off-grid. However, the Castaway star shared he has to "block and delete a lot of angry comments" about the young women contributors on social media. Going forward Fogle has one request for this new series — that everyone doesn't judge and comes to the stories of the individuals with an open heart. He wrote on Instagram: "Young women who feature on my series always bare the brunt of online trollery. I have always tried not to judge a book by its cover. If ask you to do the same until you have heard the story." Ben Fogle's New Lives in the Wild airs at 9pm on Channel 5 on Thursday.


Boston Globe
5 days ago
- Boston Globe
At TD Garden, Katy Perry floats like a butterfly, stings like a B-lister
The days of unwavering support for Perry have dissolved like the cotton candy she once wrapped herself in during her seismic 'Teenage Dream' era — the sweet spot around 2010 that transformed her from a fresh face into an artist who could tie Michael Jackson for the most chart-topping songs from a single album. (Yes, by that metric, 'Teenage Dream' rivals 'Bad'). Carrying the combined weight of her diamond singles and myriad public criticisms at TD Garden Friday night, Perry insulated herself from the vitriol of the Internet, and performed her first show in Boston Advertisement The children and teens who attended Friday's show in droves felt like the target audience for Perry's current 'Lifetimes' tour. The kid-free adult fans? Not so much. Katy Perry performed in Boston for the first time in eight years on Friday. Matthew J. Lee/Globe Staff Children do not know the difference between a campy performance and an outright cheap one. They do not view an artist being strapped into a harness for multiple in-air tricks as someone falling back on distracting, often underwhelming gimmicks. They do not notice lackluster choreography or if an artist seems a little too reliant on her backing track. Advertisement And they do not question if a set is bloated with material from a poorly-received album — in Perry's case, last year's effort, '143' — while fan favorites like 'California Gurls' and 'Last Friday Night (T.G.I.F.)' get clipped short. They do lend their high-pitched voices to thunderous singalongs, which often threatened to overpower Perry's pipes when she performed her biggest smashes, 'Dark Horse' and 'Firework.' To be clear, Perry's hearty soprano still slices through her hits with incredible clarity, and certain moments from Friday's show felt ripe with bravado and vulnerability — a winning formula for staying power. When singing her breakthrough hit, 'I Kissed A Girl,' Perry put on an impressive Cirque du Soleil-esque display that involved spinning upside-down while suspended from the ceiling in a cage (quite the contrast to riding a giant, gaudy butterfly around the arena for 'Roar'). Her stripped-down rendition of 'Not Like The Movies' recreated a bittersweet unraveling that felt as fresh as it did in 2010, mid-split from first husband Russell Brand. But it's hard to imagine anyone who came of age during Perry's rise to fame (reader, that's me) could be satiated by Friday night's performance, where baffling creative choices often dimmed the brilliance of Perry's peak years. This is an artist who once cooked up confectionary hits by the batch; a woman who was the winking face of pop for an entire decade. Advertisement Perry's legacy deserves to be upheld with concerts that cement, not chip away at, her place in pop history. Until the legacy feels better preserved, Perry's career will continue to look like it's already jumped the (left) shark. KATY PERRY With Rebecca Black. At TD Garden, Friday Katy Perry performing in concert at TD Garden on her "Lifetimes" tour. Matthew J. Lee/Globe Staff