
How to choose the best short-term investments for your needs
As you sift among the various options for your short-term investments, keep these key items on your dashboard: yield, guarantees, liquidity and your individual situation.
The short-term investments that promise the highest yields often come with at least some risk and/or constraints on your daily access to funds. It may be that you're just looking for the highest safe yield and don't care that much about liquidity. Or maybe having ready access to your funds is the name of the game.
Also think through whether you value an ironclad guarantee or are willing to go without in exchange for a potentially higher yield. Some cash instruments are fully FDIC-insured, while others are not. On the short list of FDIC-insured investments are checking and savings accounts, CDs, money market accounts (not to be confused with money market mutual funds), and online savings accounts.
Certificates of deposit
CDs will typically offer the most compelling yields of all cash instruments, and they're also FDIC-insured.
Yet there are a couple of caveats. One is that minimum deposits for the highest-yielding CDs might be $25,000 or even higher. There's also a trade-off on the liquidity front: You'll usually pay a penalty if you need to crack into your holdings before the maturity date. The longer the term of the CD, the bigger the penalty for cashing out early.
Online savings accounts
If you want daily liquidity, a decent yield, and FDIC protection, your best bet will tend to be a high-yield savings account through an online bank or a savings account through a credit union. The former offers FDIC protection, up to the limits, whereas credit union accounts are insured by another entity, the National Credit Union Administration.
Money market mutual funds
Money market mutual funds also offer daily liquidity and the convenience of having those funds live side by side with your long-term investments. But money market fund yields are still generally below those of online savings accounts today. Additionally, money market mutual funds aren't FDIC-insured, though in practice most funds have done an excellent job of maintaining stable net asset values.
Don't confuse money market mutual funds with brokerage sweep accounts, though both are offered by investment providers. Interest rates on brokerage sweep accounts, which hold investors' cash that hasn't yet been invested, have ticked up a bit recently but are still well below other cash options.
Stable-value funds
Stable-value funds are another example of an investment that offers an often-decent yield in exchange for not checking the liquidity and guarantee boxes.
Stable-value funds are only accessible inside of company retirement plans. They invest in bonds, so they're not FDIC-insured; to protect investors' principal, they employ insurance wrappers to help maintain a stable net asset value. Just bear in mind that stable-value funds carry drawbacks. Because you can only own such a fund within a 401(k), you'll pay taxes and penalties to withdraw your money before retirement unless you meet certain criteria. So don't think of a stable-value fund as an emergency fund unless you're already retired or close to it.
Honorable mention: I Bonds
In contrast with the preceding investment types, I bonds are the only safe investment vehicles that will guarantee to make investors whole with respect to inflation. I bonds are Treasury bonds that pay a fixed rate of interest as well as another layer of interest that varies with the current inflation rate, as measured by the Consumer Price Index.
As attractive as that is, it comes with a few asterisks. If you redeem an I bond within five years of buying it, you'll forfeit three months' worth of interest. Purchase constraints are another drawback for large investors.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


E&E News
23 minutes ago
- E&E News
New reconciliation text spares forest program from cuts
A program that protects privately owned forests for timber and other uses has survived in a megabill being put together in the Senate, after falling victim to House budget cutters in May. The Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee saved the Forest Legacy Program in its piece of the big tax-cut and spending bill, refusing to cut off $100 million in Inflation Reduction Act funding. 'This is a victory not only for forests, but for the families, economies, and ecosystems that depend on them,' said Lesley Kane Szynal, chair of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Coalition, an advocacy group, in a news release Thursday. Advertisement The Forest Legacy Program pays for conservation easements and land purchases that prevent privately owned forests from being converted to other uses. In many cases, they've been used to keep timber operations in business while protecting forest watersheds and allowing for recreational access.


E&E News
23 minutes ago
- E&E News
Washington state pollution prices rise amid struggle to cut emissions
The price of pollution allowances in Washington state's carbon market hit its highest level in more than two years, signaling that polluters are increasingly paying for the excess emissions instead of reducing them. Regulated polluters paid $58.51 for each pollution allowance at a Washington auction in June, according to data released Wednesday. The price was $50 at the previous auction, in March. Washington, through its carbon market, sets yearly limits on total greenhouse gas emissions in the state and gives regulated polluters a choice between cutting their emissions under a certain level or purchasing pollution allowances for each ton of excessive emissions. Washington spends the revenue from pollution allowances on climate-focused projects, such as infrastructure for electric vehicles. Advertisement The program requires deep cuts in greenhouse emissions, and most regulated entities haven't been able to reduce their pollution that rapidly, said Mitul Kaushal, associate at cKinetics, a Delhi, India-based financial advisory firm.


E&E News
23 minutes ago
- E&E News
House Republicans try again on water permitting bills
Republicans on the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee introduced 15 water-related bills Thursday, targeting everything from the length of federal permitting to the types of water resources protected by the Clean Water Act. The bills would benefit oil and gas companies, farming interests, homebuilders, water utilities and others who say that environmental reviews and long permitting timelines are stifling development. They were introduced by Water Resources and Environment Subcommittee Chair Mike Collins (R-Ga.) and Reps. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), David Rouzer (R-N.C.), Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.), Pete Stauber (R-Minn.), Burgess Owens (R-Utah), Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), Jeff Hurd (R-Colo.), Jefferson Shreve (R-Ind.), Dave Taylor (R-Ohio) and Jimmy Patronis (R-Fla.). Advertisement 'The Clean Water Act was intended to protect water quality, support healthy communities, and balance the demands of economic growth across the United States,' Graves said in a statement.