
Tesla slides as Musk's 'America Party' sparks investor worries
(Reuters) -Tesla shares fell nearly 7% in premarket trading on Monday after CEO Elon Musk's plans to launch a new U.S. political party raised investor doubts about his focus on the electric automaker's future.
The former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) unveiled the 'America Party' on Saturday, voicing his displeasure over President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill'.
This further escalates Musk's feud with Trump even as Tesla posted a second straight drop in quarterly deliveries. Their discord over the tax bill erupted into an all-out social media brawl in early June, with Trump threatening to cut Musk's government contracts and subsidies.
"Investors are worried about two things – one is more Trump ire affecting subsidies and the other, more importantly, is a distracted Musk," said Neil Wilson, UK investor strategist at Saxo Markets.
Investors had in May cheered Musk's decision to scale back political spending and remain Tesla CEO for another five years. He had spent nearly $300 million around Trump's re-election campaign last year.
"But now (they) are worried he's going to (get) sucked back in and take his eye off Tesla," Wilson said.
The first signs of investor unease surfaced soon after Musk's announcement, with investment firm Azoria Partners delaying the listing of a Tesla exchange-traded fund.
Trump on Sunday called Musk's plans to form the "America Party" "ridiculous", saying the Musk ally he once named to lead NASA would have presented a conflict of interest given Musk's business interests in space.
TESLA BOARD MOVES
Wedbush analyst Dan Ives, a Tesla bull, said many investors are feeling a "sense of exhaustion" over Musk's insistence on immersing himself in politics.
Azoria Partners CEO James Fishback posted several critical comments on X about Musk's new party, and called for the Tesla board to clarify Musk's political ambitions and evaluate if his political involvement is compatible with his obligations to Tesla as CEO.
The new party undermines the confidence shareholders had that Musk would be focusing more on the company, Fishback said.
Musk's latest political move raises questions around Tesla board's course of action. Its Chair Robyn Denholm in May denied a Wall Street Journal report that said board members were looking to replace the CEO.
Tesla's board, which has been criticized for failing to provide oversight of its combative, headline-making CEO, faces a dilemma managing him as he oversees five other companies and his personal political ambitions.
"This is exactly the kind of thing a board of directors would curtail - removing the CEO if he refused to curtail these kinds of activities," said Ann Lipton, a professor at the University of Colorado Law School and an expert in business law.
"The Tesla board has been fairly supine; they have not, at least not in any demonstrable way, taken any action to force Musk to limit his outside ventures, and it's difficult to imagine they would begin now."
Tensions with Trump, struggling sales and an aging vehicle line-up have hurt Tesla's stock, even as the company bets on growth from autonomous vehicles.
The stock, which soared to over $488 in December after Trump's November re-election, has lost 35% since then and closed last week at $315.35.
Tesla is the worst performing stock among "the Magnificent Seven" group of high-growth U.S. companies this year.
(Reporting by Joel Jose and Arsheeya Bajwa in Bengaluru and Amanda Cooper in London; additional reporting by Medha Singh; Editing by Saumyadeb Chakrabarty and Arun Koyyur)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
35 minutes ago
- The Star
Trump intensifies trade war with 30% tariffs on EU and Mexico
FILE PHOTO: A banner depicting an European Union flag is reflected in a window outside the EU Council headquarters in Brussels, Belgium March 18, 2025. REUTERS/Yves Herman//File Photo (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Saturday imposed a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico and the European Union starting on August 1 after weeks of negotiations with the key trading allies failed to reach a more comprehensive trade deal. The fresh tariffs were announced in separate letters posted on Truth Social on Saturday. Earlier this week, Trump issued new tariff announcements for a number of countries, including Japan, South Korea, Canada and Brazil, as well as a 50% tariff on copper. The EU had hoped to reach a comprehensive trade agreement with the U.S. for the 27-country bloc. The European Union had been bracing for the letter from Trump outlining his planned duties on the United States' largest trade and investment partner after a broadening of his tariff war in recent days. The EU initially hoped to strike a comprehensive trade agreement, including zero-for-zero tariffs on industrial goods, but months of difficult talks have led to the realization it will probably have to settle for an interim agreement and hope something better can still be negotiated. The 27-country bloc is under conflicting pressures as powerhouse Germany urged a quick deal to safeguard its industry, while other EU members, such as France, have said EU negotiators should not cave into a one-sided deal on U.S. terms. Trump's cascade of tariff orders since returning to the White House has begun generating tens of billions of dollars a month in new revenue for the U.S. government. U.S. customs duties revenue shot past $100 billion in the federal fiscal year through to June, according to U.S. Treasury data on Friday. (Reporting by Bhargav Acharya and Jarrett Renshaw; Julia Payne contributed reporting from Brussels; Editing by Don Durfee)


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Vietnam surprised by Trump tariff announcement at 20%, still seeking lower rate from its major trade partner
HANOI (Bloomberg): Vietnam's leadership was caught off guard by US President Donald Trump's announcement last week that it agreed to a 20% tariff, and the South-East Asian nation is still seeking to lower the rate, according to people familiar with the matter. Straight after last Wednesday's call with Trump, Vietnam's party chief To Lam told his negotiating team to keep working to bring the tariff rate down, the people said, asking not to be identified as the talks are confidential. The 20% figure came as a surprise as Vietnam believed it had secured a more favourable tariff range, the people said. Before the call, Vietnam had been pushing for a tariff in the 10%-15% range. There's been little mention of the 20% tariff in Vietnam's state media. In a government memo seen by Bloomberg News, which was sent to the local press, it gives instructions not to post content that is unclear or speculative and without consensus between Vietnam and the US. Vietnam's Ministry of Foreign Affairs didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The South-East Asian nation, an export powerhouse that last year had the world's third-biggest trade surplus with the US, was only the second country after the UK that Trump has announced a trade agreement with. Trump has been issuing tariff letters to dozens of trading partners since then, slapping duties as high as 50% ahead of an Aug. 1 deadline. The day after Trump's Truth Social post on Vietnam, in which he called Lam "an absolute pleasure' to deal with, the country's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said trade negotiators were still coordinating with their US counterparts to finalize the details of the agreement. Since then, Vietnam's leaders have skirted the issue in official comments. Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh instead focused on Vietnam's efforts to diversify export markets and supply chains to adapt to the new tariff policy and his comments were echoed a few days later by a deputy trade minister. Trump's announced rate of 20% would replace the current 10% baseline, but still add on to some other pre-existing levies such as 'Most Favoured Nation' tariffs, according to a US official who requested anonymity to discuss the matter. That would push the typical total average effective rate above 20%. US sectoral tariffs, such as on automobiles and steel, are separate from the 20% rate but not cumulative - importers pay one or the other. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment sent outside of normal business hours. Vietnam is trying to navigate Washington's demands while keeping good relations with China, its biggest trading partner. Throughout the negotiations, the US demanded more action from Hanoi to prevent Chinese goods from being rerouted and repackaged through Vietnam to skirt higher tariffs. Beijing said it was examining the trade agreement and would retaliate if its interests were hurt. In parallel with the push for a lower rate, Vietnam's trade ministry is holding meetings with customs and trade industry groups on regulatory steps to further tighten the rules around origin-of-goods fraud and prevent illegal transshipments, the people said. More than a week after it was first revealed by Trump, neither side has published any kind of detailed outline, providing little clarity on how the 20% rate or the 40% levy on goods deemed to be transshipped through the country will be enacted or enforced. On Thursday, Trump told NBC News he's eyeing blanket tariffs of 15% to 20% on most trading partners who haven't been informed yet of their rates. The current global baseline minimum levy for nearly all US trading partners is 10%. The confusion has not deterred investors. Stocks rallied to a three-year high and the 20% tariff was interpreted by foreign investors as "a good deal for Vietnam,' said one leading fund manager at an investment summit in Hanoi Wednesday. While in Brazil for the BRICS summit, Chinh and China's Premier Li Qiang agreed to boost economic, trade and investment ties between the two countries during a meeting on the sidelines. They also agreed to prioritise the construction of a railway link connecting the two countries, one of many signs of closer cooperation between the two neighbours, underscoring Vietnam's need to keep Beijing on side. -- Reports by Francesca Stevens, Josh Wingrove and Nguyen Dieu Tu Uyen with assistance from Ramsey Al-Rikabi. -- ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.


The Sun
3 hours ago
- The Sun
Trump's stance on Russia sanctions sparks cautious optimism for Ukraine
WASHINGTON: A bipartisan US bill aiming to impose sanctions on Russia to encourage peace negotiations with Ukraine has gained momentum in Congress. However, it still lacks the crucial endorsement from President Donald Trump, leaving Ukraine's allies cautiously hopeful. Trump, who previously vowed to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine, has yet to fully back the legislation. He is expected to make a 'major statement' on Russia soon, raising speculation over his stance. Recent frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin over ceasefire delays and rising civilian casualties have hinted at a tougher US position. This week, Trump approved sending defensive weapons to Ukraine and edged closer to supporting the sanctions bill, though he has not yet signed off on the final text. Republican leaders, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, have expressed optimism about a vote this month. Senator Lindsey Graham, a key sponsor, stated that the bill would target not only Russia but also countries like China and India for purchasing Russian energy, which funds Moscow's war efforts. Despite this, concerns remain over whether Trump will prioritise diplomacy over sanctions. The White House seeks extensive veto power over sanctions, potentially weakening the bill's impact. Secretary of State Marco Rubio hinted at a 'new approach' discussed during talks with Russian officials but provided no details. The proposed sanctions would penalise Russian entities and third-party nations trading with Moscow, including 500% tariffs on Russian energy imports. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has repeatedly urged stronger sanctions to pressure Russia into ceasefire talks. Negotiations continue to refine the bill, addressing technical issues such as exemptions for US embassy operations in Moscow. However, time is tight, with Congress set to recess soon. Even if passed, Trump's broad authority to veto sanctions may limit its effectiveness. - Reuters