SAHRC says illegal foreigners CAN receive free healthcare in SA
This follows a series of clips posted on social media where political party members and non-profit organisations have blocked access to clinics and public hospitals.
According to the groups, they believe these services are strictly for South Africans.
On social media, clips have emerged of groups of South Africans blocking illegal foreigners from accessing clinics and public hospitals around the country.
In Gauteng, Operation Dudula barred undocumented migrants from entering a Diepsloot clinic.
Patriotic Alliance members also took up posts outside the Hillbrow clinic, turning away a large crowd of non-South Africans.
PA member Victoria Africa posted on TikTok: 'We dealt decisively with arrogant illegal foreigners. We are not playing here.' @victoria_africa1 Foreigners were not allowed to to enter Hillbrow Clinic. We dealt decisively with arrogant foreigners. We are not playing here. #WeWantOurCountryBack ♬ original sound – Victoria Africa
In Durban, members of March to March barred foreigners from seeking healthcare at Addington Hospital.
Addressing the crowd, many of whom were women and young children, a member of the organisation said: 'No foreigner inside, not even one. As of today, you don't go to any clinic in South Africa. Take your money, go to the doctor, or go to a private hospital.'
On Wednesday, 3 July, the SAHRC responded to the protest action against illegal foreigners around the country.
In a statement, it claimed that all people in South Africa, irrespective of nationality or legal status, had a 'universal right' to free healthcare.
This included, in particular, refugees and asylum seekers, documented and undocumented migrants, and stateless persons.
Citing Section 27(3) of the Constitution, the statement said: 'No one may be refused emergency medical treatment. This provision ensures that emergency healthcare must be provided unconditionally by both public and private health facilities.
The SAHRC stated that it was 'deeply concerned' about healthcare facilities that deny treatment to individuals on the basis of nationality or documentation status, which they believed was 'unethical and unlawful but also inconsistent with South Africa's obligations under both domestic and international human rights law'
The human rights organisation urged South Africans not to take the law into their own hands against illegal foreigners, as they had 'no legal authority to control access to public health facilities or to enforce immigration laws'
Instead, the SAHRC urged both the Department of Home Affairs and SAPS to intervene and enforce the law.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 .
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Operation Dudula's campaign against immigrants raises healthcare access concerns
In a controversial move that has sparked outrage and concern, the Operation Dudula Movement, led by Zandile Dabula, is intensifying its campaign against undocumented foreign nationals across South Africa. Image: Henk Kruger / Independent Newspapers With scores of undocumented foreign nationals currently being turned away at Addington Hospital in Durban and other health facilities in parts of the country this week, the leader of the Operation Dudula Movement, Zandile Dabula, has vowed to continue the movement's anti-foreigner healthcare campaign across the country. Eric Jean Butoki, who represents the Southern Africa Refugee Organisations Forum (SAROF), slammed the countrywide campaign, saying it is putting the lives of refugees, asylum seekers, and foreign nationals at risk. This comes as more than 50 patients, believed to be undocumented foreign nationals, have allegedly been turned away at Durban's biggest hospital since the start of the campaign outside Addington Hospital on Tuesday. "We are concerned about this operation, which has prevented foreign nationals, including asylum seekers and genuine refugees, from accessing medical help. Some of these people are on chronic medication and have made appointments to be treated on the scheduled dates. For us, we are disappointed by this Operation Dudula-sponsored campaign. As a result, Butoki has called on the government to establish permanent refugee camps to help resolve the matter. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading In various videos circulated on social media over the past week, scores of immigrants seeking medical attention have been turned away, resulting in the South African Human Rights Commission issuing a statement stating that the South African Constitution allows foreigners, including asylum seekers and refugees, the same rights to healthcare as South African citizens. "The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) reminds the public and all relevant stakeholders that the right to access to healthcare services in South Africa is a universal right afforded to anyone within the Republic of South Africa," the commission said. Citing Section 27 (1) of the SA Constitution 1996, the commission indicated that South Africa has a provision to give healthcare access to South African citizens, refugees and asylum seekers, documented and undocumented foreign nationals, including stateless persons. "The Constitution does not qualify or limit this right based on immigration status or citizenship. Furthermore, under Section 27(3), no one may be refused emergency medical treatment. This provision ensures that emergency healthcare must be provided unconditionally by both the public and the private healthcare facilities," it said. Responding to this statement, Dabula said: "We will not be bullied by the likes of the SAHRC, because firstly, they are advocating for people who are in this country illegally. When you come to this country, you must be properly documented, and if you are documented, then you need to have certain permits. For those who are here to work, they must have a work permit, and those permits must come together with medical insurance, but they do not do that. Even Section 17 of the Constitution says that." As a result, Dabula said South Africa cannot be expected to shoulder immigrants who do not have respect for the country's laws, which is why the ongoing campaign will be intensified. "We have always said life comes first, and we will not turn away someone we can see that they require emergency medical care and might lose their lives in the process. However, what needs to happen is that they need to be arrested for being here in this country, illegally, then they can access treatment," she added. ActionSA has also weighed in on the ongoing campaign, saying the SAHRC statement is promoting the abuse of South Africa's resources through the misapplication of Section 27 of the Constitution, which is why the party has recently called for the amendment of the Constitution. Reacting to the stand-off between Operation Dudula and the SAHRC, Dr Shadi Ganoe from the Wits School of Law, indicated that while students and other migrants are required to provide their medical care insurance, the Constitution insists that no one should be refused healthcare based on their citizenship. "For example, in terms of the Immigration Amendment Act 19 of 2004, any prospective international student must have medical cover with a medical scheme registered under the Medical Schemes Act 131 of 1998. This ensures that foreign students do not rely on public health services and can access private care. "This requirement is part of the visa process and is strictly enforced. This makes foreign students and other documented long-term visa holders easy to track and regulate health care costs. They are expected to carry the burden of their own medical needs, unlike undocumented persons or asylum seekers, who may have no formal coverage at all. Still, South Africa's Constitution remains firm: Section 27(3) says, 'No one may be refused emergency medical treatment.' This applies to everyone, citizen or not, documented or not," she said.
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
An expert chemist's guide to brewing the perfect cup of tea
When it comes to crafting the perfect cup of tea, lovers of the brew know it's as much about flavour and ritual as it is about comfort and connection. From black to green, oolong to herbal, every cup tells a story. But what if we told you that behind the soothing steam and fragrant leaves lies a world of chemistry – one that can actually help you brew a better, more flavourful cup? According to Michelle Francl, professor of chemistry at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania, USA and author of Steeped: The Chemistry of Tea , brewing tea is a rich chemical process involving hundreds of compounds that influence the colour, aroma, taste and even health benefits of every cup. 'Tea is the world's most popular beverage. What many people don't realise is how complex the chemistry behind it truly is,' she said. While most South Africans reach for red Rooibos, the green, unfermented version actually has higher antioxidant levels. 'Fermented Rooibos has fewer antioxidants, because the fermentation process is essentially an oxidation process. Antioxidants act like little sponges soaking up oxygen. Once they've reacted, they can't function as antioxidants anymore,' Francl,added. Green Rooibos retains more aspalathin, a rare and potent antioxidant unique to the plant, but one that degrades with time and oxygen. Her advice? 'Drink it fresh.' Francl also cautions against using mineral-heavy water. In teas made from Camellia sinensis, it can result in 'tea scum' – a layer of compounds floating on top of your brew. She suspects something similar may occur with Rooibos if the water is particularly hard. 'These mineral-polyphenol interactions can dull flavour, while filtered water can help preserve the taste profile.' Many Rooibos drinkers report that longer steeping enhances sweetness. Though there's no formal analysis to confirm this, Francl says it's plausible. 'Longer steep times increase the presence of maltol, a natural flavour enhancer and vanillin, the same compound that gives vanilla its signature sweetness.' To brew the ultimate cup of Rooibos, Francl recommends the following: Use green Rooibos if your goal is to maximise antioxidant intake Choose fresh Rooibos to retain aspalathin content Use boiling water (100°C) Steep for 10 minutes If possible, opt for filtered water to avoid flavour-dulling minerals Whether you're sipping Rooibos to unwind after a long day or seeking its health benefits, knowing the science behind the steep can elevate your tea ritual. As Francl so elegantly puts it, 'Brewing tea is not just an art. It's a beautifully balanced act of chemistry.' So next time you brew a cup, give it the full ten minutes and let science do the rest.
TimesLIVE
6 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Should the constitution be amended to deny illegal foreigners access to public health care?
The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has received backlash after raising concerns over the growing trend of illegal foreigners being denied access to public health-care services. The SAHRC said all South Africans, including documented and undocumented migrants, have a right to access health-care facilities, citing section 27(1) of the constitution, which states that: 'Everyone has the right to have access to health-care services, including reproductive health care.' The commission emphasised denying foreigners access to clinics and hospitals is unlawful and unethical, despite challenges faced by the public health system. This sparked outrage among social media users. ActionSA condemned the 'abuse' of South Africa's public health-care system by illegal foreigners, citing stricter laws in other countries that require proof of medical insurance before entering. It said the constitution must be rebalanced to put South Africans first while honouring basic humanitarian obligations in a lawful manner. 'It is unconscionable that a public clinic in Johannesburg can report that more than 70% of its patient records belong to foreign nationals,' ActionSA MP Lerato Ngobeni said. 'South Africa's constitution must reflect the reality of our limited capacity and place the wellbeing of its citizens at the centre.'
