'3 Idiots' Fame School In Ladakh Gets CBSE Affiliation After Two Decades
New Delhi:
Druk Padma Karpo School, nestled in the cold desert of Ladakh and popularly known as "Rancho's school", has finally got CBSE affiliation more than two decades after it was founded. The affiliation was granted after several delays and rejections.
The school, which shot to fame after it featured in the Aamir Khan-starrer movie "3 Idiots" in 2009, was so far affiliated with the Jammu and Kashmir State Board of School Education (JKBOSE). Known for its innovative methods of teaching much before the new National Education Policy (NEP) proposed reforms to move away from traditional "rot learning", the school is now planning to expand till class 12.
"We have finally got the CBSE affiliation after delay of several years and our first batch of class 10 students is now waiting for their CBSE board exam results.
"Though we had all the required infrastructure in place, excellent result record and focus on innovative ways of teaching and learning, we didn't get the NOC from the JKBOSE despite several attempts all these years," school principal Mingur Angmo told PTI.
As per the affiliation norms of the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE), schools require a 'no objection certificate' from the respective state board. The foreign schools require a similar document from the embassy concerned or the Consulate of India in the country concerned.
The school has been trying to get the clearance since even before Ladakh acquired the Union Territory status.
"The infrastructure is already being expanded and we plan to start class 11 and 12 by 2028. We are conducting some training for our teachers to facilitate a smooth transition for students to the CBSE curriculum. Our methods of teaching were different from traditional classroom teaching and with the CBSE also reforming its pedagogy after the NEP, it will be easier for us to blend both," Angmo explained.
Even after the bifurcation, several schools in Ladakh continue to be affiliated to the Jammu and Kashmir board.
A committee had also proposed establishment of a new territorial board in Ladakh with an aim to fulfil the "realistic needs of the students as per the natural conditions of the region".
The 24-year-old school is named after Mipham Pema Karpo (1527-1592), who is revered as a great scholar, while Padma Karpo means 'White Lotus' in Bothi, the local language.
The school is now flocked by tourists, making it a 'must go' point on the itinerary. A wall of the school's building featured in the closing scene of the Bollywood film in which one of the characters, Chatur, tries to urinate but gets an electric shock as two kids throw at him a light bulb connected with wire from the first floor's window.
While the 'iconic idiotic wall' - part of a building which was damaged in the 2010 flash floods - still remains on campus, the first floor, earlier made of bricks, has been replaced with wooden structures typically used in Ladakh.
The school decided in 2018 to relocate the 'Rancho's wall' to ensure students don't get distracted due to inflow of tourists.
"Now the two areas are separate, the students do not get disturbed by the tourists. However, at times tourists get to attend some activities ongoing at the school. Like yesterday, we had conducted mock elections with the election commission here. The activity was done to give students a first-hand experience of the democratic process right from voting to the forming of a government.
"So, if there is such an activity going on, we sometimes allow visitors to attend or see," Angmo explained.
"With CBSE affiliation, the transition for higher education in the country and abroad will be easier for our students and we can set an example of blending traditional classroom learning with innovative and play-way methods of teaching," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Bros again? Elon Musk's posts spark buzz of 'big, beautiful' patch up with Trump
Months of bromance, a surprise resignation, social media rant, public fiery fallout and regret: Elon Musk's relationship with Donald Trump has been nothing short of a Bollywood drama. The duo once appeared inseparable, sharing stages at public events, Oval Office meetings, and joint press conferences. Then came Musk's shock resignation, and with it, an all-out public fallout. What followed was a no-holds-bar attack from both sides, with people and even Musk's father hoping that the frenemies would soon be back regret some of my posts on Donald Trump," said Musk in a humble post on Wednesday after a week of public rants against 'One Big Beautiful Bill'. Though unanticipated, Musk's walk-back didn't come out of nowhere. In recent days, he's been aligning with the Trump administration's stance on the violent protests in Los Angeles, publicly supporting the crackdown while dialling back his earlier attacks."This is not ok," Musk wrote on X just days after calling for Trump's impeachment and denouncing his signature legislation as a 'disgusting abomination.' MUSK DROPPED HINTS Before today's post, Musk softened his stance on Trump, deleted harsh criticisms, reshared US President's posts and re-followed key allies. He reshared posts from Vance, who declared that the 'president will not tolerate rioting and violence,' and included American flag emojis in his also went on a spree to delete his previous posts critical of Trump. In a now-deleted X post, Musk wrote: 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'Musk also deleted a post promising to apologise only 'as soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.' In another post, Trump had expressed support for Trump's impeachment. When a user suggested to replace him with Vance, Musk replied 'Yes.'These posts disappeared gradually, some overnight with the links to these post now showing a message that says, "Nothing to see here."Apart from deleting these posts, he re-followed Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff, after unfollowing him during their feud last NOT INTERESTED?On Friday, he told ABC News' Jonathan Karl that he was "not particularly" interested in talking with Musk."You mean the man who has lost his mind?" he Friday evening, Trump told reporters, "I'm not thinking about Elon Musk. I just wish him well."Earlier, Trump warned Musk of "very serious consequences" if the tech billionaire follows through on funding primary challengers against sitting Republican have to pay very serious consequences if he does that," Trump said while speaking to NBC News, adding that he has no intentions of reconciliation with the SpaceX CEO.
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Proposal to set up IIM in Telangana on the table, says Dharmendra Pradhan
HYDERABAD: Disclosing that proposals to set up an Indian Institute of Management (IIM) in Telangana are under consideration, Union Minister for Education Dharmendra Pradhan on Tuesday said that the southern states are leading the country in the field of education. Speaking at a press conference held at the BJP state office, Pradhan said that the Union government has been increasing the number of universities and establishing new Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs), IIMs and central universities. He stated that the NDA government was implementing the National Education Policy (NEP) to improve the growth of the Indian education system. Admitting that southern states play a major role in India's economic growth, Pradhan stated that there was no cause for concern regarding the delimitation process, which was yet to begin. He said that the delimitation of constituencies would take place only after considering all relevant factors. He recalled that Union Home Minister Amit Shah had also clarified on several occasions that no state would lose out in the process.
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Anurag Behar: CBSE's first-language approach to teaching is spot on
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) issued a directive on 22 May. A few newspaper editorials and opinion pieces criticized this directive, but these were profoundly misleading. Since the criticism was levelled at the CBSE directive to introduce teaching in the mother tongue of students in primary classes, let's first examine what the notice actually says. It states that the first language of literacy—denoted as R1 or the language in which the child first learns to read and write—should be the child's mother tongue. If that is impractical due to the presence of children with different mother tongues in the same classroom, the children's next most familiar language—often the most widely used local language—should be used. In short, children should learn to read and write first in a language they already know. Also Read: Implement educational reforms in honour of Dr Kasturirangan (1940-2025) The CBSE circular further clarifies that R1 should naturally serve as the medium of instruction for other subjects, including literacy in a second language (R2). It adds that once a child gains literacy in both R1 and R2, either language could be used for teaching other subjects. Even those misguidedly criticizing the directive acknowledge what global research, experience and common sense affirm: Children learn to read and write far more effectively in a language they already know. This way, teachers leverage their existing linguistic and social knowledge, making it easy for students to connect known words with written symbols. Conversely, teaching literacy in an unfamiliar language compounds the difficulty, as children must simultaneously learn a new language and develop the capacity of reading and writing. The directive's critics conceded this fundamental principle, but their analysis still went wrong. Why? The error lies in making assertions such as the following: application of the same logic uniformly across our multilingual education system creates complexities; this makes it hard to choose the language of teaching in classrooms in cities and towns where students from different linguistic backgrounds are present. Also Read: India's consensus on school education makes space for optimism Such arguments suggest that criticism was aimed at the directive without full comprehension of it—or that it was driven by outrage at the idea of English being displaced. The CBSE directive addresses the complexities of multilingual environments rather than introducing them. Its logic leads to locally appropriate language choices for R1, which resolves—but does not create—multilingual challenges. On the other hand, the logic implicit in the arguments of critics is perverse: it advocates the uniform imposition of English in multilingual settings, which is a deeply flawed and dysfunctional approach because English is the most unfamiliar language for the vast majority of children in any of India's multilingual settings. In looking at this issue, one must not conjure up the image of one's own children or grandchildren—who likely represent 2% of the country. For 98%, English is alien, particularly in early childhood. A simple example illustrates this. Consider a Class 1 classroom in Mangalore, where the mother tongues of students may include Kannada, Malayalam, Urdu, Tulu and Konkani. Since these children live in Mangalore, most would have reasonable familiarity with Kannada, regardless of their mother tongue. It's highly unlikely any would know English. Thus, Kannada would be the most effective R1: for some, it would be their mother tongue; for others, a familiar language. English, by contrast, would be unfamiliar to all. Also Read: Three-language formula: Chhattisgarh offers an education case study This scenario repeats across India. Even in large metropolitan cities with migrants from other states, children are far more likely to know the local language than English. The CBSE directive, therefore, is the most educationally sound approach to literacy in the context of our multilingual is aimed at addressing one of our deepest systemic issues: how to enable the achievement of literacy, the foundation of all learning and subsequent education. The use of a familiar language alone is insufficient to tackle this task but is central and necessary. We need not reiterate the scale of India's literacy crisis or the urgency of addressing it—for improving education and making it more equitable and inclusive. The vice-like grip English holds on our elite imagination manifests in editorials and opinion pieces that seem reflexive, with inadequate thought devoted to them on technical matters of education. There is a good reason that we do not see such misguided takes on, say, hospital cardiac care protocols. It's too technical for shallow lay analysis. Yet, in education, even the most technical issues are dissected loosely. Also Read: Focus on foundational literacy and numeracy to improve educational outcomes No doubt, English remains socially and economically aspirational. So, many want every Indian child to learn the language. But critics fail to recognize that the CBSE's approach will be far more effective for both literacy and teaching English. Gaining literacy in a familiar language is more efficient; English can then be learnt afterwards. This is vastly different from forcing literacy in an unfamiliar English. The approach advocated by the directive's critics would not only make literacy goals difficult to achieve, but make learning English even more so. Visit so-called English-medium schools and you'll see children struggling with reading, writing and English itself. We should laud the CBSE for its educationally correct and brave approach, not condemn it. The author is CEO of Azim Premji Foundation.
