
PTI denounces sentencing of Yasmin Rashid, 40 others in May 9 case
Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has denounced the verdicts issued by anti-terrorism courts, sentencing senior party leader Dr Yasmin Rashid and 40 others to 10 years in prison in connection with the May 9 riots case. The party labelled the decision politically motivated and a serious blow to judicial integrity.
PTI has called the ruling an attempt to disrupt its planned rally on August 5, intended to mark the anniversary of Imran Khan's arrest. Despite the setback, the party has vowed to continue with its political activities.
Dr Yasmin, 72, a former provincial health minister and cancer survivor, has been in custody for nearly two years. PTI highlighted footage from May 9, in which she can be heard discouraging demonstrators from entering the Corps Commander House, arguing that the evidence undermines the charges brought against her.
Party officials allege that the convictions are part of a broader campaign of political retaliation, pointing out that PTI leaders who publicly distanced themselves from the party were acquitted in similar cases. Those who remained loyal, they argue, are now facing disproportionate legal consequences.
PTI further questioned the credibility of witness testimony presented in the trial. According to the party, the sole witness—an on-duty police constable—initially claimed to have overheard PTI founder Imran Khan planning the May 9 events. However, during subsequent proceedings via video link, the witness reportedly declined to confirm that testimony under oath.
Read More: Shah Mahmood Qureshi acquitted, Yasmin Rashid sentenced to 10 years in May 9 riots case
"This inconsistent and allegedly coerced testimony raises serious concerns about due process," the party stated, adding that differing outcomes for similarly charged individuals call into question the impartiality of the judicial process.
The party also criticised ongoing restrictions on access to Imran Khan, who remains incarcerated. PTI claims that Khan's family members, legal team, and party leaders have been denied visitation rights, in violation of both Pakistani prison regulations and international human rights standards.
Under the Prison Act of 1894 and the Jail Rules of 1978, PTI argues that Khan, as a former prime minister and an A-Class prisoner, is entitled to designated legal and personal privileges. These include access to private quarters, medical treatment, consultation with personal physicians and attorneys, visitation rights, and adequate time for exercise.
The party maintains that these rights are legal entitlements, not discretionary benefits, and urged authorities to ensure compliance with national and international norms regarding the treatment of prisoners.
Also More: Punjab opposition leader, PTI supporters sentenced to 10 years in May 9 case
A day earlier, an Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) in Lahore acquitted six Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leaders, including Shah Mahmood Qureshi and Hamza Azeem, in connection with the May 9 riots.
The court delivered its verdict in the case concerning inflammatory speeches and vandalism at the Sherpao Bridge. The court, which had completed final arguments from both the defence and prosecution, reserved its decision before announcing the ruling.
The verdict stated that the ATC acquitted Qureshi, Azeem, and four other accused individuals due to insufficient evidence. However, the court found 10 others guilty and handed down 10-year prison sentences for their role in the violence that followed the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan.
ATC Sargodha also sentenced Opposition Leader in the Punjab Assembly, PTI's Malik Ahmed Khan Bhachar, and other party workers to 10 years in prison each. They were found guilty of involvement in creating law and order disturbances, anarchy, and arson during the May 9 riots, which erupted following the arrest of PTI founder Imran Khan.
May 9 Riots
The May 9 riots erupted nationwide following the arrest of former prime minister Imran Khan, after which PTI leaders and workers staged protests targeting both civil and military installations, including Jinnah House and the General Headquarters (GHQ) in Rawalpindi.
The military condemned the events as a "Black Day" and decided to try the protesters under the Army Act.
As a result of the unrest, many PTI members were arrested and tried in military courts. In December, a military court convicted 25 individuals, including Imran Khan's nephew, Hassan Khan Niazi, and later sentenced 60 more.
In January, 19 convicts had their sentences pardoned following successful mercy appeals, although PTI expressed dissatisfaction over the limited number of pardons.
The military trials had initially been halted following a Supreme Court ruling but were resumed following the court's instructions to finalise pending cases and announce judgments for those involved in the violent incidents.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Global economies reel from Trump's tariffs punch
Listen to article US President Donald Trump's latest wave of tariffs on exports from dozens of trading partners sent global stock markets tumbling on Friday and countries and companies scrambling to seek ways to strike better deals. Pakistan, which exported about $4.1 billion worth of apparel to the United States in the 2024 fiscal year, secured a tariff rate of 19%, but industry figures were cautious about the immediate impact. "Considering India's lower production costs and the likelihood of it negotiating reduced tariffs in the near term, Pakistan is unlikely to either gain or lose a meaningful share in the apparel segment," Musadaq Zulqarnain, founder and chair of Interloop Limited — a leading Pakistani exporter. "If the current reciprocal tariff structure holds, significant investment is likely to flow into DR-CAFTA countries and Egypt," he said, referring to a trade agreement between the US and a group of Caribbean and Central American countries. Elsewhere in South Asia, Sri Lanka also secured a 20% tariff rate from the US, which accounted for 40% of its apparel exports of $4.8 billion last year. "The devil will be in the details as there are questions over issues such as trans-shipment, but overall it's mostly good," Yohan Lawrence, secretary general of the Joint Apparel Associations Forum, a Sri Lankan industry body, told Reuters. Bangladesh has negotiated a 20% tariff on exports to the US, down from the 37% initially proposed by US President Donald Trump, bringing relief to exporters in the world's second-largest garment supplier. The new rate is in line with those offered to other major apparel-exporting countries such as Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Pakistan and Indonesia. India, which failed to reach a comprehensive agreement with Washington, will face a steeper 25% tariff. As Trump presses ahead with plans to reorder the global economy with the highest tariff rates since the early 1930s, Switzerland, "stunned" by 39% tariffs, sought more talks, as did India, hit with a 25% rate. New tariffs also include a 35% duty on many goods from Canada, 50% for Brazil, 20% for Taiwan, which said its rate was "temporary" and it expected to reach a lower figure. The presidential order listed higher import duty rates of 10% to 41% starting in a week's time for 69 trading partners, taking the US effective tariff rate to about 18%, from 2.3% last year, according to analysts at Capital Economics. US stocks took an immediate hit. By early afternoon on Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had dropped 0.96% to 43,708.00, the S&P 500 1.21% to 6,262.88 and the Nasdaq Composite 1.65% to 20,773.64. Markets were also reacting to a disappointing jobs report. Data showed US job growth slowed more than expected in July while the prior month's data was revised sharply lower, pointing to a slowdown in the labor market. Global shares stumbled, with Europe's STOXX 600 down 1.89% on the day and 2.5% on the week, on track for its biggest weekly drop since Trump announced his first major wave of tariffs on April 2. Trump's new tariffs have created yet more uncertainty, with many details unclear. They are set to take effect on Aug 7 at 0401 GMT, a White House official said. Trump administration officials defended the president's approach. "The uncertainty with respect to tariffs ... was critical to getting the leverage that we needed to create the circumstance in which the president could create the trade deals we've seen over the last few weeks, which have been nothing short of monumental," Council of Economic Advisers Chair Stephen Miran said on CNBC. The European Union, which struck a framework deal with Trump on Sunday, is still awaiting more Trump orders to deliver on agreed carve-outs, including on cars and aircraft, EU officials said, saying the latest executive orders did not cover that. Also, it is unclear how the administration intends to define and police the transshipment restrictions, which threaten 40% levies on any exporter deemed to have tried to mask goods from a higher-tariffed originator, such as China, as their own product. Trump's tariff rollout also comes amid evidence they have begun driving up prices. US Commerce Department data released Thursday showed prices for home furnishings and durable household equipment jumped 1.3% in June, the biggest gain since March 2022. NO WINNERS? Countries hit with hefty tariffs said they will seek to negotiate with the US in hopes of getting a lower rate. Switzerland said it would push for a "negotiated solution" with the US "It's a massive shock for the export industry and for the whole country. We are really stunned," said Jean-Philippe Kohl, deputy director of Swissmem, representing Switzerland's mechanical and electrical engineering industries. South Africa's Trade Minister Parks Tau said he was seeking "real, practical interventions" to defend jobs and the economy against the 30% U.S. tariff it faces. Southeast Asian countries, however, breathed a sigh of relief after the US tariffs on their exports that were lower than threatened and leveled the playing field with a rate of about 19% across the region's biggest economies. Thailand's finance minister said a reduction from 36% to 19% would help his country's economy. "It helps maintain Thailand's competitiveness on the global stage, boosts investor confidence and opens the door to economic growth, increased income and new opportunities," Pichai Chunhavajira said. Australian products could become more competitive in the US market, helping businesses boost exports, Trade Minister Don Farrell said, after Trump kept the minimum tariff rate of 10% for Australia.


Express Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
The people's mandate cannot be censored: why PTI still stands strong
Barrister Dr. Muhammad Ali Saif In the shadows of an increasingly autocratic political landscape, the people of Pakistan are witnessing a dangerous paradox. A political party which is silenced across traditional media, relentlessly demonised, legally persecuted, and institutionally cornered is somehow still standing and perhaps even stronger than ever in the hearts and minds of Pakistanis. That party is Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI). The more it is targeted, the more it grows. The more it is censored, the louder its voice echoes through every corner of this country and even abroad. And the question that is getting under the skin of the political mafia and haunting its sponsors is why don't people just let go of PTI? Over the last two years, the scale and intensity of the crackdown against PTI have exceeded even the darkest chapters of our political history. From midnight raids and enforced disappearances to mass disqualifications, party defections under coercion, media blackouts, social media throttling, and dozens of politically engineered court cases, the message has been loud and clear, this party must be erased at all costs. Yet the public response has been equally resolute, not without a fight, not without our vote. If we examine this unique phenomenon of political resilience of PTI from a sober and analytical lens, it becomes clear that you cannot convince people to start loving the leaders they themselves rejected. In any functional democracy, media plays the role of a mirror. In Pakistan, that mirror has been shattered. In a desperate attempt to marginalise PTI after toppling their elected government, a campaign was initiated to erase PTI and Imran Khan. Mainstream television networks were instructed to erase Imran Khan's name, blur his image, or pretend he does not exist. Anchors were taken off air, columnists silenced, and editors summoned for "guidance." The campaign continues to get viscous and ruthless with every passing day. Communication experts believe that propaganda is only as effective as the public's willingness to believe in it. People listen to what they want to listen. This has been the first flaw in the state's strategy i.e. you cannot convince a population to hate the very leader they themselves chose, defended, and trusted especially when the alternative is riddled with incompetence and corruption. Following the ouster of Imran Khan from the government, he was replaced with an alliance of almost 12 opposition parties. As inflation spiked, governance collapsed, and the public lost hope in the alliance, the tailored media narrative began to collapse under its own weight. Instead of tarnishing PTI, censorship transformed the party into a symbol of resistance. Another key variable that was drastically underestimated was the internet. The architects of this repression didn't anticipate the rise of digital resistance. When one screen went dark, thousands of phones lit up. YouTube, TikTok, X (Twitter), and Instagram became the new battlegrounds and the people showed up in large numbers. No big studios, no funding, no instructions, just young men and women, volunteers at home, students, overseas Pakistanis, everyone adding their voice. Each telling the truth. Each refusing to accept silence. Despite attempts to throttle the internet and arrest online activists, this digital resistance lives on. And through it, PTI stayed connected with the people instantly, honestly, and unfiltered. Perhaps the most misunderstood aspect of PTI's resilience is that its supporters do not see it merely as a political party. They see it as a moral cause. In their view, this is not a fight for power, it is a fight for dignity, justice, and national independence. Imran Khan's political narrative, whether you agree with it or not, is the voice of many Pakistanis. The narrative that the Pakistani citizen is not a subject of dynastic families or foreign dictates, but a stakeholder in this nation's future. This idea struck especially deep in the youth, the middle class, and professionals. These segments were historically disengaged from politics but are now fully activated. This moral dimension i.e the belief that PTI is standing for truth against tyranny, is what makes it unshakable, even in the face of brutal repression. Purge, inquisitions, arrests , bans, and smear campaigns only validate their belief that the system is corrupt, and the struggle is righteous. Nowhere is this political loyalty more visible than in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, where PTI has governed with consistency and transparency for over a decade. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's political relationship with PTI is one of trust. Even in the face of federal neglect, financial strangulation, and security threats, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa under PTI demonstrated better service delivery, cleaner administration, stronger anti-corruption measures, and more responsive leadership. In tribal districts, FM radio network, public outreach programs, and developmental efforts built a bond of trust with communities that had long been ignored by the state. When the people of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa re-elected PTI with a landslide in the 2024 provincial elections, despite all odds and with zero establishment support, it was a message to the rest of Pakistan, "This is not about propaganda. We have seen results. We have lived under your governance. And we choose PTI again." Authoritarian strategies often fail not because they are weak, but because they are blind to human psychology. When the state resorts to visible injustice i.e. parading handcuffed leaders, dragging women into courts, slapping terrorism charges for tweets, it may silence some, but it radicalizes others. The crackdown after 9th May only deepened the divide between ruler and ruled. Instead of crushing PTI, it gave birth to questions that radicalised people's thinking and gave rise to one basic question: Is this a crackdown on criminals or a punishment for challenging the status quo? The answer for most Pakistanis has become crystal clear. Attempts to brand an entire political party as anti-Pakistan has backfired. It has revealed interests in control rather than constitutionality. Currently, Pakistan stands at a critical juncture. The institutions that were meant to protect democracy are being used to manipulate it. The courts are struggling between conscience and coercion. The media is wounded. The economy is crumbling. And the people's voice is being suffocated. But in this darkness, the continued popularity of PTI is not just a reality, it is a beacon for hope. It proves that the Pakistanis are neither ignorant nor indifferent. That despite censorship, economic pain, disillusionment, and inquisitions, they are paying attention and they remember Imran Khan's economic performance. They remember the dignity of a leader who refused NROs, who returned IMF money with honor, who spoke for national sovereignty on global platforms. And most importantly, they remember what betrayal looks like and who orchestrated it. What PTI represents today is more than a party. It is an idea whose time has come and ideas do not fade away with television bans or court cases. You can jail leaders, you can confiscate properties, you can censor speeches but you cannot jail a consciousness that has already awakened.


Express Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Opp confab slams 'hybrid fascism'
Listen to article Opposition parties on Friday called for the immediate release of former prime minister Imran Khan, his wife Bushra Bibi and rights activist Dr Mahrang Baloch, while also demanding the dissolution of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), restoration of constitutional supremacy and an end to "military interference" in democratic and judicial affairs. The demands were laid out in a joint declaration at the close of the APC organised by Tehreek Tahaffuz-e-Aain Pakistan (TTAP), held from July 31 to August 1 in Islamabad. The venue, initially arranged elsewhere, was abruptly cancelled by the Islamabad administration — a move participants condemned as a blow to the people's constitutional freedoms. The conference was then hosted at the residence of TTAP Vice Chairman Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar. Another key demand in the declaration was the demand that Parliament be taken into confidence regarding a recent meeting between Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Asim Munir and US President Donald Trump. The opposition noted that critical international developments, including the US-Pakistan trade deal, were now being disclosed by foreign leaders, undermining Pakistan's diplomatic credibility. The participants expressed grave concern over the country's worsening constitutional, political, and economic crisis. They noted widespread public alienation with farmers in distress, the middle class experiencing a 58% decline in purchasing power and youth unemployment exceeding 30%. The conference condemned what it called ongoing fascism and political victimisation. It rejected the sentences handed down by what it described as "kangaroo courts" against opposition leaders and PTI members and termed July 31 a dark day in the country's democratic history. The APC said the fascism, political victimisation and sentences showed "the hybrid regime's agenda [is] to eliminate all opposition." Calling for a new Charter of Democracy, the parties said the constitution, fundamental rights and parliamentary system had severely been undermined. They called for a national consensus on key principles including constitutional supremacy, rule of law, judicial independence, electoral transparency, resolution of regional grievances, press freedom, protection of women's and minority rights. The alliance rejected all constitutional amendments that diluted parliamentary authority and demanded the immediate dissolution of SIFC, calling its formation unconstitutional and a violation of the 18th Amendment. It also demanded revocation of a land lease agreement granting 4.8 million acres to the Green Initiative Company. "This alliance and parties attending the conference declare the establishment of SIFC against the spirit of the 18th amendment and the Constitution and demand that SIFC be dissolved," the declaration read. "The July 8, 2024, agreement between the Presidency and Green Pakistan Initiative is unconstitutional and must be annulled," the statement read, demanding "full provincial status for Gilgit-Baltistan." Participants voiced alarm over rampant corruption and interference in civil and judicial institutions, calling for legal reforms and a truly independent judiciary. They supported six Islamabad High Court judges who had raised concerns about judicial interference and demanded the repeal of the 26th Constitutional Amendment related to judicial appointments. The declaration rejected the conduct of the 2024 general elections, calling them a disgrace to democracy. It called for a new, impartial election commission established through national consensus and immediate general elections under a neutral caretaker setup, which should be free from intelligence agencies' alleged interference. Regarding Balochistan, the parties termed its crisis a national wound and demanded the return of local resource control to indigenous people, an end to extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances, disbandment of illegal militias and urgent support for the University of Balochistan. They demanded the release of Dr Mahrang Baloch and withdrawal of false FIRs against BNP leader Sardar Akhtar Mengal and his family. On Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and ex-FATA, the conference supported the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement, condemned the CTD's extrajudicial killings, demanded fair representation in the National Finance Commission, withdrawal of appeals against court rulings on unconstitutional regulations and the production of missing persons including, Ali Wazir. The declaration proposed a South Africa-style Truth and Reconciliation Commission, calling for voluntary admissions of constitutional subversion since 1947. It criticised political parties that had abandoned their past commitment to democratic charters. Any changes to the National Finance Commission Award or violations of the 1991 Water Accord were described as attacks on federal unity. The alliance condemned the use of political retaliation and called for mutual respect among political actors. It rejected all forms of media censorship and supported journalists facing legal threats or silencing. Women's rights issues such as honour killings, forced marriages and inheritance denial were highlighted, alongside calls for protections of minority personal laws and prevention of forced conversions. While supporting peaceful relations with all nations except Israel, it urged the parliament to refer Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court over alleged war crimes in Gaza.