
Opp confab slams 'hybrid fascism'
Opposition parties on Friday called for the immediate release of former prime minister Imran Khan, his wife Bushra Bibi and rights activist Dr Mahrang Baloch, while also demanding the dissolution of the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), restoration of constitutional supremacy and an end to "military interference" in democratic and judicial affairs.
The demands were laid out in a joint declaration at the close of the APC organised by Tehreek Tahaffuz-e-Aain Pakistan (TTAP), held from July 31 to August 1 in Islamabad.
The venue, initially arranged elsewhere, was abruptly cancelled by the Islamabad administration — a move participants condemned as a blow to the people's constitutional freedoms. The conference was then hosted at the residence of TTAP Vice Chairman Mustafa Nawaz Khokhar.
Another key demand in the declaration was the demand that Parliament be taken into confidence regarding a recent meeting between Chief of Army Staff (COAS) Field Marshal Asim Munir and US President Donald Trump.
The opposition noted that critical international developments, including the US-Pakistan trade deal, were now being disclosed by foreign leaders, undermining Pakistan's diplomatic credibility.
The participants expressed grave concern over the country's worsening constitutional, political, and economic crisis. They noted widespread public alienation with farmers in distress, the middle class experiencing a 58% decline in purchasing power and youth unemployment exceeding 30%.
The conference condemned what it called ongoing fascism and political victimisation. It rejected the sentences handed down by what it described as "kangaroo courts" against opposition leaders and PTI members and termed July 31 a dark day in the country's democratic history.
The APC said the fascism, political victimisation and sentences showed "the hybrid regime's agenda [is] to eliminate all opposition."
Calling for a new Charter of Democracy, the parties said the constitution, fundamental rights and parliamentary system had severely been undermined.
They called for a national consensus on key principles including constitutional supremacy, rule of law, judicial independence, electoral transparency, resolution of regional grievances, press freedom, protection of women's and minority rights.
The alliance rejected all constitutional amendments that diluted parliamentary authority and demanded the immediate dissolution of SIFC, calling its formation unconstitutional and a violation of the 18th Amendment. It also demanded revocation of a land lease agreement granting 4.8 million acres to the Green Initiative Company.
"This alliance and parties attending the conference declare the establishment of SIFC against the spirit of the 18th amendment and the Constitution and demand that SIFC be dissolved," the declaration read. "The July 8, 2024, agreement between the Presidency and Green Pakistan Initiative is unconstitutional and must be annulled," the statement read, demanding "full provincial status for Gilgit-Baltistan."
Participants voiced alarm over rampant corruption and interference in civil and judicial institutions, calling for legal reforms and a truly independent judiciary. They supported six Islamabad High Court judges who had raised concerns about judicial interference and demanded the repeal of the 26th Constitutional Amendment related to judicial appointments.
The declaration rejected the conduct of the 2024 general elections, calling them a disgrace to democracy. It called for a new, impartial election commission established through national consensus and immediate general elections under a neutral caretaker setup, which should be free from intelligence agencies' alleged interference.
Regarding Balochistan, the parties termed its crisis a national wound and demanded the return of local resource control to indigenous people, an end to extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances, disbandment of illegal militias and urgent support for the University of Balochistan.
They demanded the release of Dr Mahrang Baloch and withdrawal of false FIRs against BNP leader Sardar Akhtar Mengal and his family.
On Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and ex-FATA, the conference supported the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement, condemned the CTD's extrajudicial killings, demanded fair representation in the National Finance Commission, withdrawal of appeals against court rulings on unconstitutional regulations and the production of missing persons including, Ali Wazir.
The declaration proposed a South Africa-style Truth and Reconciliation Commission, calling for voluntary admissions of constitutional subversion since 1947. It criticised political parties that had abandoned their past commitment to democratic charters. Any changes to the National Finance Commission Award or violations of the 1991 Water Accord were described as attacks on federal unity.
The alliance condemned the use of political retaliation and called for mutual respect among political actors. It rejected all forms of media censorship and supported journalists facing legal threats or silencing.
Women's rights issues such as honour killings, forced marriages and inheritance denial were highlighted, alongside calls for protections of minority personal laws and prevention of forced conversions.
While supporting peaceful relations with all nations except Israel, it urged the parliament to refer Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the International Criminal Court over alleged war crimes in Gaza.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
an hour ago
- Express Tribune
India's double game with US
Listen to article At the turn of the century, it became abundantly clear that China was on its way to dethrone the US as the world's sole superpower. No superpower would let its adversary take its place easily. The US has long portrayed itself as a leader of the "free world" and considers the rise of China as a threat to the "rule based order". The US and its allies continue to advance this narrative that China, as a superpower, would be a disaster for the "free world". In order to contain China, the US decided to cozy up with India. For so long India maintained a non-aligned posture but leaned toward the Soviet Union. The US-India ties remained lukewarm. Relations between the two countries soured after India conducted nuclear tests in 1998, prompting US sanctions. However, in the early 2000s a strategic rethinking began in Washington. With China's rise looming large, the US saw India as a natural democratic counterweight in Asia. The big reset happened during President Bush's second term. His administration made a bold bet, integrating India into the global nuclear order despite its non-signatory status regarding NPT. The landmark US-India Civil Nuclear Deal in 2008 became the cornerstone of the new partnership. The US believed a strong India could help balance China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific region. There was bipartisan consensus in the US about deepening ties with India. After the Bush administration, Democrat leader President Barack Obama continued to pursue strategic partnership. In fact, the relationship between the US and India was taken to the next level. A number of agreements, signed between the two sides over the next two decades, left no ambiguity that India had finally abandoned its non-aligned posture. Some of the agreements include 2016 Logistics Exchange Memorandum of Agreement (enabling mutual use of military bases for refueling and logistics); 2018 Communications Compatibility and Security Agreement (allowing India to access encrypted US military communication equipment); and 2020 Basic Exchange and Cooperation Agreement (allowing shared geospatial intelligence and satellite data for defense targeting). India, which for long procured military hardware from Russia, began to buy defence equipment from the US, like Apache helicopters, P-81 surveillance aircraft, C-130/C 17 transport planes and MH-60R naval choppers. The current US Secretary of State Marco Rubio a few years ago introduced a bill in the Congress, seeking a status for India similar to the one being enjoyed by Israel. The sole purpose of the US warming up to India was to make sure India's support of US endeavours to contain China. But despite the deepening ties, US policymakers and analysts are increasingly disillusioned with India on several fronts. While India continued to take advantage of its strategic partnership with the US, it also maintained close ties with Russia. But the return of President Trump to the White House changed everything. Trump is no longer ready to tolerate India's pursuit of strategic autonomy. Rubio admitted that Indian ties with Russia were a source of "irritation" in the relationship. India continues to buy discounted oil and military hardware from Russia. The Trump Administration insists that India is funding Russia's war against Ukraine through these purchases. India is part of Quad, but resists any formal military alliance or joint patrolling. No appetite to take a strong anti-China stance that would resemble US expectations. The four-day military conflict in May between Pakistan and India also changed the equation. Pakistan's response to the Indian missile strikes shook the western world and the US. There were murmurs in Washington and other western capitals about the Indian military capabilities after its defeat at the hands of Pakistan. But above all, there is a growing realisation in Washington that India is playing a double game — taking full advantage from the US but not ready to align its strategic goals with Washington. India may remain an important player for the US but the relationship may never be the same again.


Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Police arrest former AJK premier Abdul Qayyum Niazi
Former Prime Minister of Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and a leader of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Sardar Abdul Qayyum Niazi, has been arrested by police from the Samahni area of Bhimber. He was 'illegally taken into custody' while he was heading to address a public rally in AJK on Sunday, the PTI said in a statement on its Facebook page. AJK Police arrested the former PM near Jhandi Juntra while he was travelling from Samahni to attend a rally in Bhimber. On this occasion, a scuffle also broke out between police and PTI workers. PTI launches 90-day 'do or die' movement Aaj News cited sources as saying that Niazi was participating in a public contact campaign to mobilise support for a rally to be held in Lahore on August 5, aimed at securing the release of PTI founding chairman Imran Khan. Sources said that after being taken into custody, the former AJK premier was transferred to Mirpur. The arrest of the PTI AJK President has increased concerns about the potential for further arrests of party leaders and the possibility of police blocking PTI convoys from travelling to Lahore. Police said arrest warrants were issued against Niazi two days ago in connection with the May 9 riots. The PTI leader was facing more than 11 cases, they added. Jailed Imran Khan's sons likely to join rally demanding his release On July 31, in a post on X, the ex-AJK PM wrote: 'The issuance of arrest warrants against the central and provincial leadership of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf before the August 5 protest is apparently a planned political revenge. 'Targeting dozens of leaders is a blatant insult to the Constitution, law, and democracy. This approach is a moment of reflection for the credibility of state institutions and public trust.' Niazi has served as the 13th prime minister of AJK from August 4, 2021, to April 14, 2022.


Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
PCB slams WCL ‘hypocrisy', bans players from future events
Listen to article The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has announced a blanket ban on all future participation in the World Championship of Legends (WCL), accusing the tournament organizers of hypocrisy and biased conduct. The decision came following the Board of Governors' (BoG) 79th meeting, held virtually on Sunday under the chairmanship of PCB head Mohsin Naqvi. In a strongly worded statement, the PCB expressed "considerable disappointment" over the WCL's decision to award points to a team that willfully forfeited a match, while also taking exception to what it called the 'hypocritical and biased' language in WCL press releases, particularly surrounding the cancellation of high-profile Pakistan vs India legends matches. Read More: Holder's last-ball heroics level series as West Indies stun Pakistan 'The contents of the said press releases highlight a duality where the narrative of 'peace through sport' is selectively applied,' the PCB stated. 'Sporting events are being held hostage to political expediency and narrow commercial interests.' It is noteworthy that on July 20, India Champions refused to play against Pakistan in the group stage match of the tournament, which led to the match's cancellation. The WCL management subsequently awarded shared points to both teams, a decision that eventually helped India qualify for the semi-final — only for them to again decline to play, allowing Pakistan to progress to the final. The governing body condemned the tournament's apparent disregard for the principle of sporting neutrality, calling the WCL's justification for the cancellation 'far removed from cricketing merit.' 'The WCL's apology for 'hurting sentiments', whilst being farcical, inadvertently acknowledges that the cancellation was not based on sporting grounds but rather on succumbing to a specific nationalistic narrative,' the statement read. 'This bias, masquerading as sensitivity, sends an unacceptable message to the international sporting community.' Also Read: Dubai to host Pakistan-India showdown as Asia Cup 2025 venues announced Emphasizing its long-standing stance on keeping sports and politics separate, the PCB said it found it 'deeply concerning' that even an event featuring retired, legendary players was now being influenced by external pressures. 'Our unwavering belief is that cricket, like other international sports, should serve as a platform for goodwill, healthy competition, and mutual respect,' the board reiterated. 'For a tournament involving legendary players to be dictated by sentiments that undermine this fundamental principle is not only regrettable but deeply concerning.' In light of what it described as 'a clear and intolerable pattern of external influence' and 'a disregard for fair play,' the PCB said it could no longer allow its players to participate in the WCL or any future editions of the tournament. 'The PCB can no longer condone participation in an event where the fundamental principles of fair play and unbiased administration are compromised by external pressures,' the statement added. Read: Babar, others reach Florida for WI ODIs Despite its criticism of the WCL, the PCB reaffirmed its commitment to promoting cricket globally and fostering healthy rivalries. 'We remain committed to promoting cricket as a vehicle for unity and sportsmanship,' the statement concluded. 'However, we cannot allow our players to be part of events where the spirit of the game is overshadowed by skewed politics that undermine the gentleman's game.' The virtual BoG meeting was attended by Sumair Ahmed Syed, Salman Naseer, Zaheer Abbas, Zahid Akhtar Zaman, Sajjad Ali Khokhar, Zafarullah Jadgal, Tanveer Ahmed, Tariq Sarwar, Muhammad Ismail Qureshi, Anwaar Ahmad Khan, Adnan Malik, Usman Wahla (special invitee), and Mir Hassan Naqvi.