
State of Wayne's Auckland: No easy fixes
Just ask the fixit mayor, Wayne Brown, whose city seems to be drifting lower against its international peer cities on important measures of productivity, opportunity, innovation and knowledge.
A new survey does show Auckland performing ahead of overseas centres on culture and experience, sustainability and resilience, although it is losing ground on the 'experience' factor.
The latest State of the City report from the Committee for Auckland, Deloitte and the Auckland Council finds the 'prosperity' measure has dropped the most this year of three years of monitoring. That equates to Brown's first term in office, although there are lags between political change and subsequent data.
It highlights a range of challenges that in reality would be beyond any individual mayor or council.
'While this reflects the cumulative effect of economic and pandemic headwinds that have hit Auckland, the gaps that have opened up also point to more long-standing and systemic issues that are now acting as a handbrake on progress,' the report says.
Brown accepts the findings, telling political, business and community leaders the report 'highlights an urgent need to lift Auckland's economic performance and competitiveness'.
But early in his speech he delivered a confronting reality about just how much of that improvement can be influenced by Auckland itself. He dropped the 'R' word and told his audience not to believe central government 'spin'.
'While the economy has improved over the last couple of years, it started off a pretty low base. Auckland like the rest of New Zealand is still recovering from core financial decisions made following the Covid thing by the previous government.
'Despite the spin from Wellington, the Reserve Bank's real time measure of economic activity shows GDP is already sliding back into recession.'
That stark prediction cannot have been a comfortable message for the Minister for Local Government, Simon Watts, who also spoke at the State of the City event.
Brown said at the heart of the problem was productivity. 'We're simply not producing enough with the resources we've got.'
The State of the City report focused hard on the P word. 'It is clear Auckland's own version of the productivity puzzle is long-running, multi-faceted, and requires both national and local focus to fully leverage Auckland as an escalator for productivity nationwide in the way other cities do for their nations.'
It says Auckland ranks 99th globally for productivity and last among the peer cities the report has compared it with over time. Peers were Copenhagen, Fukuoka, Vancouver, Austin, Tel Aviv, Dublin and Helsinki.
'Across different studies, Auckland's productivity – at least in terms of economic output per person – is now rated in the region of 15-20 percent lower than comparable cities. As Auckland is the engine of New Zealand's economy with a nearly 40 percent share of national GDP, this lower productivity seriously impacts overall national growth.'
On productivity, Brown did not duck the responsibility of Auckland to improve on behalf of all New Zealand.
'You fix Auckland, you fix New Zealand,' he said, quoting his own political slogan since assuming the office in 2022.
'The solution to New Zealand's productivity problem is right here.'
Brown said Auckland had made progress since his election on council costs, rate increases, reform of council-owned organisations and winning back transport policy functions from Auckland Transport. He had just announced an innovation taskforce to drive research, knowledge, entrepreneurship and jobs.
But he showed some sensitivity to challenges he faced to 'fix' issues faster and more broadly.
The mayor told the audience: 'You have to have the right direction, but nothing's easy.
'So when you put your hand up and say [adopts a whingeing voice] 'Why haven't you fixed that problem?' … Just think how difficult it is. How did it get to where it is now? That's an even bigger question.'
Brown believed the Government was trying its best, and praised RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and noted a good working relationship with Watts.
But his mission to get Wellington out of Auckland's affairs as much as possible remained. 'You've created a regional government. You've got to treat us like that, and don't expect it to be otherwise, not while I'm in charge, anyway.'
In true Brown style, there were some pithy put-downs of central Government officials – Ministry of Transport people 'weaselling away trying to find something negative' about the changes to Auckland Transport; other initiatives agreed at a high level in Auckland 'have to go down there and be fought through a multitude of morons'.
And the benefits of applying AI to transport, for example, was frequently countered by what he called NS – natural stupidity.
'So it takes a lot of strength, on both sides. We are trying to show we are trying to lead for the rest of New Zealand. There are some important messages we have to sell to the rest of NZ. There's a lot of votes in Auckland but there's a hell of a lot of votes elsewhere as well.'
He welcomed Auckland being one of the three first cities or regions to advance to the next phase of applications for the Government's City and Regional Deals – where a 10-year plan of development would be agreed with aligned planning and economic goals.
The Western Bay of Plenty, based on Tauranga, is expected to be the first to get the go-ahead later this year.
Brown: 'We've got to turn the city deals from a slogan into something that actually works. I'm not in a rush to be first, or second, or third, but we are the biggest.
'It does require a conversation of two grown-ups. It's not [a case] of a school teacher telling me as a pupil what you are going to get. It's got to be … serious grown-up conversations with the Government.'
Watts said there was a high degree of alignment between the Government and Auckland Council.
He cited his 'having architected the City Regional Deals while in opposition and now having them signed', the Government's water reforms, RMA reform, as being helpful but 'probably not starting to be felt until next year or the year after.'
Another benefit from Government could be to 'just get out of the bloody way. Get out of the way of business, get out of the way of local government, acknowledging that sometimes the biggest challenge is we get in the way and we are not the best party to be involved.
'It's just that maturity of perspective.'
Watts had lived in Vancouver, London and Singapore and recognised a global perspective was needed. 'Yeah we are great and there are so many things that make us better than so many of those other cities. But there are so many things that we could be and should be better than what we are.'
He challenged attendees to step up. 'It's not just the mayor or the minister. It's the people in here and sitting in these seats. You have more power to influence, to affect that change than anyone sitting up on the front stage.
'The concern in the report is that we might fall back. And that would be intolerable.'
Acknowledging the State of the City's concern about Auckland lagging in some areas and the risk of falling still further, the minister claimed 'we have got the pillars in place and now need to move into the delivery phase'.
'Auckland is the economic powerhouse of this country. It does drive our success or our failure. I think I would give [Auckland's performance in] the report a solid B, with room for improvement. That's not a bad place to be, where we are, but we shouldn't be satisfied with a B.'
The State of the City report summarises the implications of its findings.
Report author Tim Noonan, of the Business of Cities urban intelligence and policy group in the UK, said dozens of cities worldwide had held a mirror up to themselves and honestly asked what it would take to improve.
Auckland's issues were not insurmountable but were connected and needed an integrated response. It should be a national endeavour, private and public sector, corporates, institutions, and innovators, on behalf of existing and future citizens
The State of the City report indicated, through the three years of surveys, that Auckland found itself 'stuck'.
Auckland outperforms peers on what he called acquired attributes, things that take generations to develop like natural and physical capital – place and culture and resilience. But in pillars that really drive growth it is not doing well.
'Opportunities remain below par throughout this period of time. Other cities internationally have now moved in some cases quite substantially ahead on investment, business appeal, job outcomes, wages versus costs.
'On balance, more capital, more talent is consistently flowing out to larger and better places.
'Prosperity clearly stands out as the biggest drop across the three issues of the State of the City.'
Auckland's productivity problem was more 'vexing' than other cities and had both city-specific and national origins.
'Auckland's not performing as the escalator of productivity as other equivalent cities do for their nations.
'The concern is that the levers for turning the productivity tide are not yet ready to pull.'
Noonan said Auckland was now at an inflection point. 'There's a moment here. The ground being lost in important areas is too sizeable to be ignored.'
And he had a telling caution: 'The risk that other cities' experience tells us that Auckland has to avert is the slow drip in opportunities elsewhere, a waning of visibility, a softening if you like of ambition and appeal.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Financial Complaint Numbers Show No Sign Of Easing, Says The Financial Ombudsman Service, FSCL
Complaints about financial services remain at historically high levels, according to new annual statistics from the Financial Ombudsman Service, Financial Services Complaints Limited (FSCL) — reflecting ongoing financial pressure on small businesses and households. For the year ending 30 June, FSCL received 1,469 complaints, up from 1,426 in the previous year, and double the amount recorded five years ago. "We're not yet seeing signs of complaints reducing since increasing rapidly two years ago in the wake of Covid-19," says Financial Ombudsman, Susan Taylor. "What's changed is the spread. Complaints are now more evenly distributed across a broader range of financial services, rather than being concentrated in just a few areas like non-bank lenders." Lenders accounted for the largest share of complaints at 38%, but many of these were resolved before escalating to a dispute needing formal investigation. Dispute numbers rose by 4% overall, with a noticeable shift in the types of issues and sectors involved. Of the 366 cases that were formally investigated, complaints about financial advisers — including mortgage and insurance brokers, as well as wealth advisers — made up the largest proportion at 23%, followed by complaints about lenders at 20%, and insurers at 17%. One emerging trend is a rise in complaints from small businesses, especially about loans and insurance products. "This likely reflects the tough trading environment many small business owners are facing," says Ms Taylor. "They're under pressure — and we're seeing that come through in the disputes they bring to us." In a recent case, a woman discovered she had been added as a guarantor on her husband's business loan, without her knowledge or consent. The business later defaulted on the loan, and she faced the consequences of a guarantee she never agreed to give — including putting the family home at risk of a mortgagee sale. In this case, the lender offered to put the matter right for the woman by agreeing to extinguish her guarantee and release their security from the woman's half share of the family home. 'The case highlights the importance of giving clear explanations and proper disclosure to all parties to a loan, including guarantors of business debt, especially when small businesses are borrowing under stress. "Many of these issues could be prevented altogether with clearer and personal communication by the lender to the guarantor. "We're here to help when things go wrong — but also to feed insights back into the system so things go better next time,' concludes Ms Taylor. About FSCL – a Financial Ombudsman Service FSCL's role is to resolve consumer complaints about financial service providers who are participants of the FSCL scheme. This includes non-bank lenders, credit unions, insurance companies, financial advisers, including mortgage brokers and insurance brokers, corporate trustees, fund managers, transactional service providers, and card issuers. FSCL was established in 2010 following the approval of the then Minister of Consumer Affairs under the Financial Service Providers (Registration and Dispute Resolution) Act 2008 (FSP Act). It is not-for-profit.


NZ Herald
9 hours ago
- NZ Herald
How investors can stack the odds in their favour in uncertain times
Despite all this, global share markets remain remarkably resilient – hovering at, or near all-time highs. Investor optimism has been fuelled by fiscal stimulus in Europe (mainly Germany) and the unstoppable rise of artificial intelligence, which just saw Nvidia become the first company to be valued at US$4 trillion. With a constant barrage of headlines and a wall of worry to climb, yet equity markets near all-time highs, investing in the share market can feel a bit like a gamble. Much like a roulette wheel – black you win, red you lose. But is this really true? Is the share market a casino? While it's tempting to see markets as games of chance, the evidence tells a very different story. Unlike the casino, where there is only one winner, the share market is not a zero-sum game. History suggests that patient, long-term investors – rather than lucky punters – stand to win, as share markets tend to rise over time. The house always wins Casino games are typically win or lose affairs, with the probabilities skewed in favour of the house. That's why they say, 'the house always wins'. Take roulette, for example. The wheel, in most instances, has 38 numbers: 1 to 36 in either red or black, plus 0 and 00 in green. The dealer spins the wheel and the ball falls on one of the numbers. The simplest bet is on whether the ball will fall on a red or black number, which has odds just over 47%. If you put $5 on red, and the ball lands on black or green, you lose your entire $5. The win-win game In contrast, for patient investors, the share market tends to be a win-win game. History has shown that share markets have risen through time. $100 invested in the US at the beginning of this century – just before the Dotcom bust – would now be worth around $580, despite the global financial crisis and the Covid pandemic. Data from J.P. Morgan Asset Management underscores the power of a long-term mindset. The worst drop in the US S&P500 stock market index over any year since 1950 is -37%. Yet for those who stayed invested, the lowest annualised return over any 20-year rolling period since then was still +6% a year. All about the long-term Investors should avoid treating the share market like a casino by trying to predict what will happen in the next week, month or even year. Shifting away from long-term investing into short-term speculation pushes investors closer to gambling. Even if an investor could accurately predict an event, they would still need to anticipate how other investors might react. Sometimes bad news is already priced in, causing markets to rise rather than fall. Then comes the challenge of timing both entries and exits to maximise returns. That is four decisions to get consistently right to generate healthy returns – even before considering random or unforeseeable shocks like Covid – an almost impossible feat. Click to trade, easy to gamble As it has become easier to trade shares in companies, more people are approaching investing with a short-term mindset, blurring the lines between stock market investing and gambling. In the 1950s, the average holding period for US shares was around eight years. By the 1980s, that fell to two to three years. Today, the average holding period for retail investors is just six months or even less. It can be hard to sit on your hands and do nothing during volatile times, even though that is exactly the right approach to take, according to history. But please, don't just take my word for it. Listen to Warren Buffett, recently retired, and arguably the greatest investor of all time. 'If you own your stocks as an investment – just like you'd own an apartment, house or a farm – look at them as a business,' he says. 'If you're going to try to buy and sell them based on news or something your neighbour tells you, you're not going to do well. Find a good bunch of businesses and hold them.' Long-term investing is just the opposite of gambling. May the odds be always in your favour.


Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Woman added to husband's business loan without her consent
By Susan Edmunds of RNZ A woman who discovered she had been added as a guarantor on her husband's business loan without her knowledge or consent complained to Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL) when the business defaulted and she was called on to repay it. It was one of 1469 complaints received by the scheme in the year to 30 June. That is up from 1426 the previous year but almost double the number of five years earlier. In the case of the business loan, the lender offered to extinguish the woman's guarantee and release their security for her half share of the family home. FSCL chief executive Susan Taylor said it highlighted the importance of giving clear explanations and proper disclosure to everyone involved in a loan, including guarantors of business debt. "Especially when small business are borrowing under stress." FSCL was one of the external dispute resolution providers that helped with complaints that cannot be resolved directly between the customer and financial service provider. Taylor said complaints about lenders were the largest share, at 38 percent. Of the 366 cases that were formally investigated, complaints about financial advisers - including mortgage and insurance brokers, as well as wealth advisers - made up the largest proportion at 23 percent, followed by complaints about lenders at 20 percent, and insurers at 17 percent. Taylor said there had been a rise in complaints from small businesses, particularly about loans and insurance products. She said the increase in complaints over the years was partly because people were more aware of their opportunity and right to complain. "But I think it's also a reflection of the wider economic environment, we know that many New Zealanders and small businesses are struggling financially and when people are living with financial stress, they are more likely, I think, to complain. "Also, I think there's still a little bit of a hangover from Covid times in terms of the debt burdens some people are dealing with, particularly small businesses. And I also think there is a lot less tolerance now for when something goes wrong. Some years ago, people might have been prepared to chalk that up to a bad experience, but now they're more likely to want to complain and to have their complaint heard." She said sometimes complaints would alert FSCL to a possible systemic problem that needed to be taken further and referred to a regulator. Taylor said while financial providers' processes had improved, there was still room for more. Some people had to do a Google search or talk to a lawyer or friend before they knew they could take a complaint to FSCL, she said. Providers were meant to refer people to their third-party dispute provider when relevant. Taylor said complaining was difficult for some people. "Often the people have got lots of other things that they're struggling with in life. They're juggling so many balls that making a complaint is just one thing too many and that's difficult… which is where third-party support like financial mentors plays such a vital role."