
Musk versus Trump: A case of mutually assured destruction
Relationship status: It's complicated. The simmering feud between US President Donald Trump and tech titan Elon Musk went public last week, sending Tesla's stock tumbling (before rebounding), calling his government contracts into question and leaving Trump possibly in a more commanding position over the world's richest man.
But really, who knows what to make of this always-odd pairing between two erratic men? Late last Thursday, Musk signalled that he was open to a détente. Reports of a Friday phone call surfaced, which were dismissed by Trump.
Where this goes and how it ends is anyone's guess, but what's clear is that the political friendship that saw two of the world's most powerful men attached at the hip at the beginning of Trump's presidency has now become an unstable mess.
Also Read: X factor: The rise and fall of Elon Musk as a political figure
This, of course, is no way to run a country. The day-long brawl starkly revealed what had always been plainly obvious: This relationship is transactional and has always smelt of corruption, with Musk's $270 million campaign contribution seeming to buy him a powerful foothold in the US government, including billions in contracts and access to data and the inner workings of federal agencies.
It was only last week that Trump gifted Musk with a golden key to the White House, saying his 'service to America has been without comparison in modern history" and commemorating his final day as a special government employee. But that send-off couldn't paper over the increasing cracks in the friendship. Musk had become a political liability to Trump, even as the president became a business liability to the world's richest man.
The union has cost Musk billions, damaging his brand and leading him to suggest he was done with politics. 'I think I've done enough," Musk said in a Bloomberg interview last month when asked about his political spending on Trump and the Republican cause. The billionaire, who operates the Building America's Future PAC, had vowed to spend $100 million on midterm polls, though that's now in doubt.
And in ceding such power to Musk, Trump marred the first 100 days of his presidency with erratic cuts, mistakes and walk-backs that led to infighting among staff and cabinet members who couldn't control Musk. His Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was largely a failure, with costs likely outweighing savings, federal spending continuing to rise and the Trump administration now undoing some of DOGE's firings of government workers. In the days after his official tenure wrapped up, Musk then proved just how uncontrollable he was, training his fire on Trump's massive reconciliation bill, calling it an 'abomination."
'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," Musk threatened on X last Tuesday.
Also Read: Electric debacle: Tesla's troubles started before Musk wore the MAGA cap
But the feud has the potential to be as damaging to both men as their unlikely friendship proved to be. At stake for Trump is the kind of muscle, megaphone and money that only Musk can bring, given his status among the powerful techno-right bros who fuelled Trump's campaign and the Republican party more broadly.
Most of Trump's political alliances have had a sell-by date, but his relationship with Musk has been like no other. For Trump, Musk was a force multiplier, magnifying his stature and bringing other billionaires, tech bros and regular bros along with him.
But in challenging Trump, and particularly by bringing up his alleged connection to the late Jeffrey Epstein [a convicted paedophile who faced charges of running a vast child sex trafficking ring], Musk tests his power over MAGA and puts himself—and his companies—at risk of cancelled contracts and potentially even federal government investigations.
Trump holds tremendous power over Musk's vast wealth. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts," Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!" This was scorched earth, revealing Trump's strong hand and Musk's big weakness.
Also Read: Trump's presidency has only seen federal spending rise so far
Ultimately, MAGA belongs to Trump. As for the massive bill, it will still likely pass in some form, though Musk has now put a spotlight on the worst parts of it—it adds $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade and is hardly MAGA.
Meanwhile, some Democrats have suggested that Musk is a potential free agent and should be courted and brought into their fold. But that would be a mistake. An alliance with Musk is akin to having a tiger by its tail in a very small and crowded tent. There are no good choices and the only certainty is chaos. ©Bloomberg
The author is a politics and policy columnist for Bloomberg Opinion.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
25 minutes ago
- News18
Bruce Springsteens Berlin concert echoes with history and a stark warning
Last Updated: Berlin, Jun 11 (AP) Veteran rock star Bruce Springsteen, a high-profile critic of President Donald Trump, slammed the US administration as 'corrupt, incompetent and treasonous" during a concert on Wednesday in Berlin. He was addressing tens of thousands of fans at a stadium built for the 1936 Olympic Games that still bears the scars of World War II and contains relics from the country's dark Nazi past. 'Tonight, we ask all who believe in democracy and the best of our American experiment to rise with us, raise your voices, stand with us against authoritarianism, and let freedom reign," he said. Springsteen, long a political opponent of the president, has made increasingly pointed and contentious public statements in recent concerts. He denounced Trump's politics during a concert last month in Manchester, calling him an 'unfit president" leading a 'rogue government" of people who have 'no concern or idea for what it means to be deeply American." Springsteen is no stranger to Berlin. In July 1988, he became one of the first Western musicians to perform in East Germany, performing to a ravenous crowd of 1,60,000 East Germans yearning for American rock 'n' roll and the freedom it represented to the youth living under the crumbling communist regime. An Associated Press news story from that period says 'fireworks steaked through the sky" and hundreds of people in the audience waved handmade American flags as they sang along to 'Born in the USA." Almost four decades later, Springsteen issued a stark warning, 'The America that I love, the America that I've sung to you about, that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years, is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent, and treasonous administration." (AP) RUK RUK


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'keeping Americans safe, both at home & abroad': Why US is pulling staff from the Middle East as nuclear talks with Iran stall
The United States is reducing its diplomatic and military footprint in parts of the Middle East amid rising tensions with Iran, as nuclear negotiations appear to stall and regional instability looms. The State Department on Wednesday ordered the departure of all nonessential staff from the US Embassy in Baghdad, citing a commitment 'to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad.' The embassy had already been operating with limited staff. Additionally, the State Department is authorising the optional departure of nonessential personnel and family members from diplomatic posts in Bahrain and Kuwait. The US military is also following suit, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth approving the voluntary departure of military dependents from multiple locations across the region. US Central Command said it is 'monitoring the developing tension.' White House spokesperson Anna Kelly noted that the decisions came after a regular review of American personnel abroad. 'This decision was made as a result of a recent review,' she said. The move comes as efforts to revive the stalled US-Iran nuclear negotiations face fresh setbacks. Talks aimed at curbing Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanction relief have reportedly reached a deadlock, with the next round—originally planned for this weekend in Oman—now in doubt. Two US officials, speaking anonymously, said it was increasingly unlikely the talks would go ahead. President Donald Trump offered a pessimistic assessment in a recent interview, saying he is 'getting more and more less confident about' reaching a deal. 'They seem to be delaying, and I think that's a shame,' he told the New York Post podcast Pod Force One. Iran, meanwhile, rejected threats of force. 'Iran is not seeking a nuclear weapon, and US militarism only fuels instability,' its mission to the UN wrote online. Defence Minister Gen. Aziz Nasirzadeh added that if war were imposed, 'the opponent's casualties will certainly be more than ours,' warning the US that its regional bases 'are within our reach.' Separately, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors is considering a censure resolution against Iran, which could trigger the reimposition of UN sanctions under the still-active 2015 nuclear deal. The US withdrew from that deal during Trump's first term. Amid the growing risk of conflict, the UK's Maritime Trade Operations Centre warned ships to exercise caution in the Persian Gulf, Strait of Hormuz, and Gulf of Oman—areas where Iran has previously seized or attacked vessels.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US orders partial evacuation of Iraq Embassy, says dependents of troops can leave locations across Middle East
US missions in Baghdad and Erbil started evacuating most of their diplomats in response to unspecified security threats Wednesday, reports claimed. 'President Trump is committed to keeping Americans safe, both at home and abroad. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now In keeping with that commitment, we are constantly assessing the appropriate personnel posture at all our embassies. Based on our latest analysis, we decided to reduce the footprint of our mission in Iraq,' the State Department said in an emailed statement. Defense secretary Pete Hegseth authorized the voluntary departure of US military dependents across the Middle East, Politico reported. The sudden move came after Iran's defense minister threatened to strike American based in the region if negotiations over Iran's nuclear program fail. Iran has repeatedly said its nuclear ambitions are focused on peaceful purposes like energy production. But Nasirzadeh said on Wednesday that "if a conflict is imposed on US bases are within our reach." The Baghdad embassy has already been on limited staffing, and the order will not affect a large number of personnel, according to the AP. The State Department is also authorizing the departure of nonessential personnel and their family members from Bahrain and Kuwait, giving them the option to leave the country.