NYC voters torn over Zohran Mamdani's big plans to hike taxes on wealthy, corporations: poll
Some 48% of voters were in favor of increasing the corporate tax on Big Apple-based companies to pay for free public transit and affordable housing — while 42% were in favor of upping taxes on the five boroughs' wealthiest residents, according to the poll by Honan Strategy Group.
But support for corporate taxes plunged to 36% when voters were asked if they'd support a higher corporate tax if it meant chasing businesses out of Gotham.
4 New Yorkers are split on Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's plans to raise taxes on the rich and corporations, according to a new poll.
AFP via Getty Images
'Should the city consider increasing the corporate tax for NYC-based companies to finance affordable housing and free public transit?' participants were asked initially.
While 48% said yes, 42% said no, according to the poll.
The poll also asked, 'Would you support free public buses if funded by a wealth tax?'
Only 42% said yes, while 47% were opposed and 11% were unsure, the poll found.
Slightly more than half — 53% — backed Mamdani's proposal for city-run grocery stores aimed at lowering food prices, even if that requires moderate tax increases on high earners, according to the poll. But 35% were opposed to the government-run stores while another 12% said they were unsure, the poll said.
4 A Mamdani supporter holding a sign calling him a 'champion' for working people at a rally on July 2, 2025.
Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images
Meanwhile, 51% supported a rent-freeze on rent-stabilized apartments even if it meant increased
taxes on millionaires, while 28% opposed the proposal and 20% are unsure, according to the poll.
Mamdani has proposed a new 2% tax on millionaires, and shifting the property tax burden to wealthier, 'whiter' neighborhoods.
But voters are divided when asked what is the single most important issue facing today: 21% cite housing affordability, while another 21% say crime and violence.
Another 14% of respondents cited Donald Trump, 8% said corruption and 7% said quality-of-life issues.
As the Democratic nominee, Mamdani is considered the frontrunner in the mayor's race in deeply blue New York. He'll be facing incumbent Eric Adams and ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo — both running on independent ballot lines — as well as Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa and independent Jim Walden.
'While there is consensus about some of the financial burdens that New Yorkers are feeling, opinions are more mixed and divided about some of the proposed policy solutions,' pollster Bradley Honan said.
Mamdani's tax-the-rich proposals that would require approval in Albany and Gov. Kathy Hochul has so far seemed unwilling to support the measures. Still, voters overwhelmingly agree that the Big Apple is too expensive a place to live, according to the survey.
For example, 93% of respondents said the city is having an affordability crisis and 80% agreed with the statement that New York City is increasingly only affordable for the rich people of Manhattan.
4 Mamdani supporters with 'Freeze the Rent' signs in Coney Island on June 21, 2025.
Michael Nagle
The poll also found that 72% agree their family is struggling to achieve the American Dream despite their hard work and effort and 61% agree that their personal income has stagnated and are not sure whether they can get ahead or not, while 56% say they are struggling every month to pay their rent/mortgage.
Nearly two-thirds of voters said inflation had caused them moderate or significant hardship in the past year, while 25% said no hardship and 10% weren't unsure.
Many voters are concerned about the city's condition.
4 The Post's cover on Mamdani's plan to give 'white neighborhoods' higher property taxes.
Only 15% believe that the city is heading in the right direction, while 53% feel it is on the wrong track and 32% said they didn't know.
The mobile phone text survey of 817 likely voters was taken June 25-26 — right after Mamdani's primary victory. It has a margin of error of +/-3.42%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Rare trial to begin in challenge to Trump-backed deportations of pro-Palestinian campus activists
By Nate Raymond BOSTON (Reuters) -Groups representing U.S. university professors seeking to protect international students and faculty who engage in pro-Palestinian advocacy from being deported are set to do what no other litigants challenging the Trump administration's hardline immigration agenda have done so far: Take it to trial. A two-week non-jury trial in the professors' case scheduled to kick off on Monday in Boston marks a rarity in the hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed nationally challenging Republican President Donald Trump's efforts to carry out mass deportations, slash spending and reshape the federal government. In many of those cases, judges have issued quick rulings early on in the proceedings without any witnesses being called to testify. But U.S. District Judge William Young in keeping with his long-standing practice instead ordered a trial in the professors' case, saying it was the "best way to get at truth." The lawsuit was filed in March after immigration authorities arrested recent Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil, the first target of Trump's effort to deport non-citizen students with pro-Palestinian or anti-Israel views. Since then, the administration has canceled the visas of hundreds of other students and scholars and ordered the arrest of some, including Rumeysa Ozturk, a Tufts University student who was taken into custody by masked and plainclothes agents after co-writing an opinion piece criticizing her school's response to Israel's war in Gaza. In their cases and others, judges have ordered the release of students detained by immigration authorities after they argued the administration retaliated against them for their pro-Palestinian advocacy in violation of the free speech guarantees of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Their arrests form the basis of the case before Young, which was filed by the American Association of University Professors and its chapters at Harvard, Rutgers and New York University, and the Middle East Studies Association. They allege the State Department and Department of Homeland Security adopted a policy of revoking visas for non-citizen students and faculty who engaged in pro-Palestinian advocacy and arresting, detaining and deporting them as well. That policy, they say, was adopted after Trump signed executive orders in January directing the agencies to protect Americans from non-citizens who 'espouse hateful ideology' and to "vigorously" combat anti-Semitism. Secretary of State Marco Rubio in late March said he had revoked more than 300 visas and warned that the Trump administration was looking every day for "these lunatics." The goal, the plaintiffs say, has been to suppress the types of protests that have roiled college campuses after Israel launched its war in Gaza following the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023. Trump administration officials have frequently spoken about the efforts to target student protesters for visa revocations. Yet in court, the administration has defended itself by arguing the plaintiffs are challenging a deportation policy that does not exist and cannot point to any statute, rule, regulation or directive codifying it. "We don't deport people based on ideology," Homeland Security Department spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem "has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-American and anti-Semitic violence and terrorism - think again. You are not welcome here," McLaughlin said. The trial will determine whether the administration has violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment free speech rights. If Young concludes it has, he will determine a remedy in a second phase of the case. Young has described the lawsuit as "an important free speech case" and said that as alleged in the plaintiffs' complaint, "it is hard to imagine a policy more focused on intimidating its targets from practicing protected political speech." The case is the second Trump-era legal challenge so far that has gone to trial before Young, an 84-year-old appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan. While other Trump-era cases have been resolved through motions and arguments in court, the veteran jurist has long espoused the value of trials and in a recent order lamented the "virtual abandonment by the federal judiciary of any sense that its fact-finding processes are exceptional. Young last month after another non-jury trial delivered civil rights advocates and Democratic-led states a win by ordering the reinstatement of hundreds of National Institutes of Health research grants that were unlawfully terminated because of their perceived promotion of diversity, equity and inclusion.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Shell Warns of Weakness in Integrated Gas Business
Shell warned second-quarter Integrated Gas production and earnings to be lower than last quarter. The energy giant said Integrated Gas trading and optimization of would be "significantly lower" than in the first quarter. Shell explained that its Upstream production would also be down from last quarter, but said that was because of scheduled maintenance and the closing of a sale of operations in Nigeria.U.S.-listed shares of Shell (SHEL) declined when the energy giant warned about its current-quarter Integrated Gas operations. The London-based firm said Integrated Gas trading and optimization of would be "significantly lower" than in the first quarter, with production of between 900,000 and 940,000 oil-equivalent barrels per day (BOE/D) compared with 980,000 BOE/D a year ago and 927,000 in the first quarter. It expects Integrated Gas adjusted earnings of $1.4 billion to $1.8 billion, versus $2.68 billion in 2024 and $1.4 billion in Q1. The outlook for Upstream production was in range of 1.66 million to 1.76 million BOE/D, down from 1.78 million BOE/D a year ago and 1.86 million BOE/D last quarter, which the company noted reflected "scheduled maintenance and the completed sale of SPDC in Nigeria." Shell and other gas producers have been struggling with lower prices on higher U.S. output and relatively mild winter weather. Futures peaked in March and have dipped by about 25% since. Despite today's 2% declines, U.S.-listed shares of Shell are up about 12% year-to-date. Read the original article on Investopedia Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Don Davis eyes open North Carolina Senate seat
Republicans finally got their 'big, beautiful bill' across the finish line. Now they're turning to their next urgent tasks: codifying billions in spending cuts and avoiding a government shutdown. The Senate plans to vote no earlier than next week on President Donald Trump's request for lawmakers to scrap $9.4 billion in previously approved funding for NPR, PBS and foreign aid, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss the plans. That's running dangerously close to lawmakers' July 18 deadline to vote in favor of the rescissions package, or the administration will be forced to spend the money as Congress originally intended. GOP leaders have work to do to shore up votes for the package, which would formalize funding cuts previously sought by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency initiative. Among the wary Republicans is top Senate Appropriator Susan Collins, who helped tank Trump's unsuccessful rescissions request back in 2018. The Maine Republican said during a late-June hearing with White House budget chief Russ Vought that reducing support for the AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR would be 'extraordinarily ill-advised and short-sighted;' Collins later told Calen that she's looking at 'drafting an alternative package of rescissions.' Sens. Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan of Alaska and Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota have also echoed Collins' warnings about slashing money for public broadcasting, with Sullivan saying he's seeking an amendment for 'very rural' stations that would be affected by the White House proposal. Looming over the rescissions talks: appropriations. Senators will Thursday begin marking up their first batch of spending bills necessary to fund the government beyond the end of the current fiscal year on Sept. 30. Leaders are under immense pressure to allow votes on individual measures rather than seek to avert a shutdown with a massive omnibus, and more than anything else want to avoid having to pass another short-term stopgap. But the scheduled August recess will take away four weeks of time lawmakers would otherwise be in Washington to negotiate. The House has made some progress with its appropriations work, passing one bill so far and advancing four others out of committee. House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole (R-Okla.) says he wants to complete all 12 markups by July 30. Yet even the typically bipartisan bill to fund the Department of Veterans' Affairs garnered only two Democratic votes on the chamber floor. It underscores how a process that once relied on buy-in between the two parties has become a largely partisan exercise — a risky situation for Republicans who can lose only three votes on their side of the aisle for party-line legislation. What else we're watching: — How lawmakers respond to the deadly flooding in Texas: Some state officials are sharply criticizing the National Weather Service for severely underestimating the rainfall in its forecasts. The White House on Sunday pushed back against attempts to link the administration's NWS staffing cuts to its inability to warn Texas residents about the storms. At least two members have been directly affected by the catastrophe: GOP Reps. August Pfluger of Texas and Buddy Carter of Georgia. Pfluger's daughter and Carter's granddaughters were rescued from a camp affected by the flooding, with Carter also sharing that his granddaughters' cousin was killed. — More reconciliation bills ahead: Riding high on a legislative win, Speaker Mike Johnson is sketching out a timeline for potentially pushing two more party-line packages through the reconciliation process this Congress. Watch what policy areas they'll address — and whether they include the priorities of key hard-liners who claimed they got certain assurances to support the megabill last week. — NDAA to shake up the Pentagon: House Armed Services is aiming to make it harder to withdraw troops from Europe and change how the Pentagon buys its weapons as it heads toward a markup next Tuesday of the annual defense bill. Senate Armed Services will mark up its version of the defense bill this week; the full panel debate is slated to begin Tuesday afternoon and will likely take several days. Jordain Carney, Gregory Svirnovskiy, Mia McCarthy and Connor O'Brien contributed to this report.
