Israel-Iran conflict: What is Iran's Fattah missile capable of?
Also Read: A brief history of Iran and Israel's escalating conflict: Timeline
What is the Fattah missile?
The Fattah, meaning 'Conqueror' in Persian, is Iran's first domestically designed hypersonic medium-range ballistic missile. Developed by the IRGC Aerospace Force and unveiled on June 6, 2023, it features solid-fuel propulsion and a two-stage setup. Iran claims a range of approximately 1,400 km and terminal speeds between Mach 13 and Mach 15, allowing it to strike targets across the Middle East, including Israel.
How fast and far can Fattah reach?
Tehran asserts the missile achieves speeds up to 15 times the speed of sound and can travel up to 1,400 km, placing strategic targets, including US and Israeli military bases, within its striking range.
Has Fattah been used in combat before?
In October 2024, Fattah‑1 was reportedly employed during 'Operation True Promise II' against Israel, in retaliation for Israel's assassinations of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran. More recently, during escalating tensions in mid‑June 2025, Iran confirmed the launch of Fattah‑1 missiles at Israel amid nighttime barrage operations. While Iranian state media claims strikes caused fires in Tel Aviv and central Israel.
What is Iran's Fattah capable of?
Iran's state television reported that the missile could pass through any regional missile defence system, though it offered no evidence to support the claim.
The TV broadcast what appeared to be a model of the missile being unveiled by Iran's Revolutionary Guard before President Ebrahim Raisi. In November 2022, General Amir Ali Hajizadeh of the Revolutionary Guard claimed that Iran had created a hypersonic missile, without offering any evidence in support.
Iran positions Fattah as a high-speed, manoeuvrable missile platform capable of offsetting Western and Israeli air-defence systems.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Foreign NGOs say new Israeli rules keep them from delivering Gaza aid
JERUSALEM: New Israeli legislation regulating foreign aid groups has been increasingly used to deny their requests to bring supplies into Gaza, a joint letter signed by more than 100 groups said Thursday. Ties between foreign-backed aid groups and the Israeli government have long been beset by tensions, with officials often complaining the organisations are biased. The rocky relations have become even more strained since Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel triggered the Gaza war. "Israeli authorities have rejected requests from dozens of NGOs to bring in lifesaving goods, citing that these organisations are 'not authorised to deliver aid'," the aid groups said. According to the letter, whose signatories include Oxfam and Doctors Without Borders (MSF), at least 60 requests to bring aid into Gaza were rejected in July alone. UK-based Oxfam said that $2.5 million worth of its supplies, including food, were barred from entering Gaza, while another charity, CARE, said it had not been authorised to bring in aid since March. Another signatory, Anera, said it had millions of dollars' worth of supplies waiting just outside Gaza, in the Israeli port city of Ashdod. 'Anera has over $7 million worth of lifesaving supplies ready to enter Gaza – including 744 tons of rice, enough for six million meals, blocked in Ashdod just kilometres away," CEO Sean Carroll said in the joint letter. In March, the Israeli government approved a new set of rules for foreign non-governmental organisations working with Palestinians. The law updates the framework for how aid groups must register to maintain their status within Israel, along with provisions that outline how their applications can be denied or registration revoked. Registration can be refused if Israeli authorities deem that a group denies the democratic character of Israel or "promotes delegitimisation campaigns" against the country. "Unfortunately, many aid organisations serve as a cover for hostile and sometimes violent activity," said Diaspora Minister Amichai Chikli, whose ministry has been put in charge of NGO registrations. "Organisations that have no connection to hostile or violent activity and no ties to the boycott movement will be granted permission to operate," he added.
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
BIG trouble for Benjamin Netanyahu as ‘Greater Israel' remark triggers backlash from Muslim nations; Saudi, Qatar, Egypt issue warning, say Israel should…
(File) Israel-Hamas war: Amid mounting global pressure to end Israel's brutal military campaign in the Gaza strip, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has triggered a severe backlash from Arab nations, including allies like Jordan, for his remarks on Israel's alleged plan to build the contentious 'Greater Israel'– an alleged plan to absorb neighboring Arab countries into a greater Jewish state. What did Netanyahu say? In an interview with i24News, Benjamin Netanyahu said he feels 'very much connected' to the vision of a Greater Israel, sparking anger and disappointment among Israel's Arab Muslim neighbors including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt and Jordan, who strongly objected to the Israeli PM's comments. How Arab world responded? Condemning Netanyahu's remarks, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League warned Israel's expansionist policies pose a major threat to regional and global stability. In a statement, the Jordanian Foreign Ministry called Netanyahu's comments as 'extremely dangerous and provocative', while Egypt has expressed anger, and sought an explanation from Tel Aviv. Similarly, Qatar said that the Israel PM's 'arrogant language' could trigger fresh conflicts in the region. The Saudi Arabia Foreign Ministry also expressed displeasure over Netanyahu's comments, while the Palestinian Authority and the Arab League called the statement a violation of the sovereignty of Arab nations. Why 'Greater Israel' is controversial? Greater Israel is an idea popular among Israel's extreme right-wing, which proposes the contentious plan of absorbing neighboring Arab countries, including Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Iraq and a large part of Saudi Arabia, into a greater Jewish state. The idea proposes the use of military might to occupy Israel's Arab neighbors and absorbing their territory to expand the state of Israel. Meanwhile, the backlash over Benjamin Netanyahu's comments over Greater Israel comes days after Israel Defense Forces (IDF) chief Eyal Zamir opposed the Israeli Prime Minister's plan to occupy parts of the Gaza Strip which are not already under the control of Israel.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Human Rights Watch says Israeli airstrike on Iranian prison apparent war crime
Beirut, Aug 14 (AP) Human Rights Watch alleged Thursday that an Israeli airstrike on a notorious Iranian prison was 'an apparent war crime", while also accusing Tehran of harming and disappearing prisoners after the attack. Israel struck Evin Prison in Tehran, one of Iran's most notorious detention facilities for political activists and dissidents, on June 23, during its 12-day war with the Islamic Republic. The strikes during visiting hours hit Evin Prison's main southern entrance, another northern entrance and other areas of the complex, destroying buildings that had medical facilities and prison wards. The Iranian authorities initially said at least 71 people were killed during the airstrike, among them civilians including inmates, visiting relatives, and prison staff. Iranian media later raised that number to 80. It was unclear why Israel targeted the prison. Human Rights Watch said the attack was 'unlawfully indiscriminate" and that there was no evidence of an advance warning or a military target before striking the prison complex, which it estimates holds over 1,500 prisoners. 'To make matters worse, Israeli forces put at grave risk prisoners who were already victims of Iranian authorities' brutal repression," said Michael Page, the rights group's deputy Middle East director. Human Rights Watch says prisoners were subject to 'ill-treatment and violence" both as they were being taken out of the prison following the attack and as they were returned. After the attack, Iranian authorities evacuated and transferred the prisoners to two other facilities in Tehran province and said on August 8 that they were gradually returned. Iranian state media said the prisoners were transferred peacefully and without any conflict. But relatives and Human Rights Watch said some political prisoners were beaten with batons and 'electric shock weapons" for resisting wearing handcuffs and protesting prison guards separating death-row inmates. The group said some of the prisoners have disappeared, including Swedish-Iranian doctor, Ahmadreza Djalali, who is at risk of execution. The rights group says Iran had refused to give them any information about his whereabouts. 'Iranian authorities should not use Israel's strikes on Evin prison as another opportunity to subject prisoners, including those who should never have been in prison in the first place, to ill-treatment," said Page. The war in June, which killed about 1,100 people in Iran and 28 in Israel, started after Israeli jets struck key nuclear and military facilities. Iran then launched a barrage of missiles over Israel. (AP) SCY SCY view comments First Published: August 14, 2025, 17:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
