Around 20% of license plate reader database searches did not have case numbers
Ahead of Tuesday's Austin City Council work session, where ALPRs would be discussed, city staff asked APD via email for more information about the technology. That email was shared with KXAN.
Many have been critical of the technology, concerned that data could be shared with law enforcement agencies that target women seeking abortions or undocumented immigrants. APD said on Tuesday that the department does not intend to use ALPRs for those reasons.
'The Austin Police Department recognizes the importance of transparency in the usage of the ALPR system. With this in mind, the Austin Police Department is working with the vendor to mandate that the user input a case number prior to [a] search as well as a reason for the search that is in line with the resolution,' APD wrote in the email to city staff.
APD said that when the ALPR pilot program went live in March 2024, the resolution did not explicitly require officers to provide a reason for a database search. However, it acknowledged that the department was only permitted to use the technology to help with investigations.
APD told city staff that in the second quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025, around one in five searches did not have a case number listed. In quarter three of 2024, only 11% of searches did not have an identified case number, and in quarter four, 16% did not have one.
Austin's year-long pilot program began in March 2024, and on March 27, the Austin City Council voted 8-3 to extend the program for another three months. The city council will decide on Thursday whether to extend the program again.
During the work session, APD explained to the Austin City Council why it finds the technology beneficial.
'This police department is 300 officers short. Currently, we do not have enough officers to [perform] the job that we would prefer to do without the use of technology to supplement [our] work,' said Assistant Austin Police Chief Sheldon Askew.
'We're just better [and] more successful when we have technology such as ALPR,' he continued.
The pilot required that the system only hold data captured by the cameras for seven days, down from 30 days. APD officers must train before being able to access the system. Officers must undergo training annually.
APD said on Tuesday that data collected by the cameras belongs only to the department and that it is not shared with any other agency.
'There are some agencies throughout the country [that] will share that data with their partner agencies or with agencies across the nation. We do not do that,' Askew said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former Austin mayoral candidate sues over TRE ballot language
AUSTIN (KXAN) — A former Austin mayoral candidate is challenging the city over how it is presenting a tax rate election to voters in November. Last week, Austin City Council approved its budget for next fiscal year and set a property tax rate, which is high enough that it triggers a tax rate election, or TRE, in November. Council members also approved an ordinance ordering that special election to be held on Nov. 4. Austin signs off on $6B+ budget, triggering property tax rate election If voters approve the new tax rate, the average homeowner's property tax bill will go up by a total of $302.14 annually. The ordinance council members passed, ordering the TRE, lays out the rules of the election and what will appear on the ballot for voters. According to the ordinance, the TRE will be under Proposition Q on November's ballot, and it will say, 'this is a tax increase,' and describe what the money will go toward. However, Jeffery Bowen, a candidate in the 2024 Austin mayoral race, filed a lawsuit this week claiming that the ballot language as described in the ordinance doesn't make it clear that the property tax hike would be recurring, and that the ballot's description of what taxpayers would get out of the increase is not clear enough. Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, who defeated Bowen for the seat of city mayor last November, provided KXAN with the following statement: 'The City of Austin is confident the ballot language is appropriate and meets all legal requirements. We also have confidence in the court system and will respond in that venue.' The full lawsuit can be viewed below. Original Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus with App_1755530250Download According to the ordinance, the ballot will be prepared to permit voting 'FOR' or 'AGAINST' Proposition Q, which will state the following: CITY OF AUSTIN PROPOSITION QTHIS IS A TAX INCREASE Approving the ad valorem tax rate of $0.574017 per $100 valuation in the City of Austin for the current year, a rate that is $0.05 higher per $100 valuation than the voter-approval tax rate of the City of Austin, for the purpose of funding or expanding programs intended to increase housing affordability and reduce homelessness; improve parks and recreation facilities and services; enhance public health services and public safety; ensure financial stability; and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025 -2026 budget as approved or amended by City Council. Last year, the ad valorem tax rate in the City of Austin was $0.4776 per $100 valuation. According to Bowen's lawsuit, Bowen hand-delivered a letter to the city council on Aug. 13 that outlined the deficiencies in the ballot language, and demanded that the council 'fulfill its nondiscretionary duty to adopt ballot language for the tax increase election that does not mislead voters about the tax increase proposition.' The lawsuit alleged that, 'instead, the Austin City Council prescribed its own ballot language for the tax increase proposition that will grossly mislead voters and promote its passage.' The first issue the lawsuit alleged was that city council violated Texas law that was set forth by the Texas Supreme Court in Dacus v. Parker (Tex. 2015) because the ballot language does not explain the 'purpose' of the tax increase in definite and clear terms. The lawsuit specifically pointed out the phrase of the ballot that states, 'and provide for other general fund maintenance and operation expenditures included in the fiscal year 2025-2026budget as approved or amended by City Council,' alleging that several parts of the phrase 'mislead' voters. It also said the ballot language fails to meet Dacus standards because 'several of the program descriptions are misleading for vagueness and non-neutral advocacy.' The other issue the lawsuit alleged was that the ballot is also too vague to establish an enforceable 'contract with the voters,' because it does not describe exactly how the current council and future councils could spend the money. The lawsuit said that because the tax increase would be a 'forever tax,' the ballot language should be 'definite and clear and become the foundation on which voters and taxpayers can rely—if the proposition passes—for how this huge tax increase will be spent, not only by this City Council but by all City Councils in the future.' Bowen's suit, which was filed in the Third Court of Appeals in Austin, asks the court to 'issue a writ of mandamus ordering and compelling the Mayor and City Council of the City of Austin to promptly hold a validly called meeting of the Council to adopt ballot language that corrects each the deficiencies in the Council-adopted ballot language noted above so as to have accurate language on the November 4, 2025 ballot.' In other words, Bowen is asking the court to force the mayor and city council to change the ballot language for the proposition. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Police release name of Wylie ISD employee who died at district transportation facility
An employee was killed Tuesday at the Wylie Independent School District Transportation Facility, according to a release from the Abilene Police Department. The pedestrian, Lupe Garcia, 64, was pronounced dead at the scene after he was injured by a bus in the facility, police said. No students were on board the bus at the time of the accident and Garcia's family was notified of his passing. While APD will conduct a death investigation, preliminary information indicated this is an accidental death, police said. More: Texas Tech system, ASU partner with FBI in efforts to boost national security More: Texas Democrats return home, ending redistricting standoff against GOP This article originally appeared on Abilene Reporter-News: Wylie ISD employee dies after bus strikes him at district's bus barn Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Kick Streamer XenaTheWitch Arrested After Shooting Innocent Bystander With Paintball Gun
What should've been a harmless, free-for-all $30,000 Lady Bird Lake scavenger hunt in Austin turned into an actual crime scenario after Kick streamer Amaris 'XenaTheWitch' Sampson allegedly shot an innocent person in the thigh with a paintball gun. Yep, you read that correctly: the 29-year-old social media personality confused an onlooker with a participant, pulled the trigger, and found himself cuffed. Police verified the altercation took place sometime about 5:55 p.m. on August 9th along the Ann and Roy Butler Hike-and-Bike Trail. Sampson was booked into Travis County Jail as of Wednesday and now stands charged with two Class A misdemeanors: assault with bodily injury and deadly conduct. If convicted, she would face up to seven years in jail for a paintball splat. The Viral Video That Got Her Arrested The entire incident has been live-streamed and has gone viral since. During the course of the montage, pandemonium broke out: 'Adriana! That's a live worker you nearly killed.''Huh? Yeah, that's a work!''I don't give a f***.' Seconds later, one can hear the injured bystander utter: 'Yes, she f***** shot me. It was one of those girls.' As opposed to apologizing or even stopping, Sampson purportedly uttered more defiantly: 'I don't give a f**.' A Pattern of Recklessness If you are one who is used to XenaTheWitch's antics, this is far from breaking news. Her streaming career has been controversial: Her cameraman was accused in January of taking an Uber driver's phone while live on stream and tossing it under the driver's car. She stunned everybody in November of 2023 by pissing out of her bedroom window on camera, yes, for views. So the paintball debacle appears more like a predictable overextension of a streamer attempting to outdo herself from her previous prank instead of an accident. Community Reaction and Fallout The streaming community is split. Some are running to her defense, labeling it a 'misunderstanding in the course of an event,' while others are saying shooting unarmed civilians in public is not 'content,' it's against the law. The victim reportedly told police that she had been injured and in agony, and APD was extremely adamant that Sampson's actions were reckless and endangered others in the park. Salt in the wound, the event was even hosted by fellow streamer Paul 'Ice Poseidon' Denino, who is himself known for controversy. The scavenger hunt was set up as wild and high-stakes fun, but the 'stakes' ended up being a police record. The post Kick Streamer XenaTheWitch Arrested After Shooting Innocent Bystander With Paintball Gun appeared first on Where Is The Buzz | Breaking News, Entertainment, Exclusive Interviews & More.
