
How the Israel-Iran conflict could hit the economy
Presented by
As the U.S. weighs intervention in Israel's conflict with Iran, Wall Street has been skittish, eyeing the potential fallout for oil prices and inflation.
To get a better sense of what's driving the oil market and what economic risks might lie ahead, MM caught up with Rory Johnston, an oil market analyst at research service Commodity Context who's been following all of this closely.
A takeaway from that conversation: The price jump has been notably large for a market that has become desensitized to political risks after safely weathering multiple shocks over the last few years, including Covid and the Russia-Ukraine war.
Now, 'even a numb cynical oil market sees Israel bombing Tehran and says, 'OK, maybe worry a bit here,'' he said.
Conflict with Iran is the 'No. 1 risk scenario that people talk about, and now we're living in it,' he added.
A worst-case scenario would be if Tehran is driven to close off the Strait of Hormuz, a channel through which about a fifth of the world's oil passes. Experts including Johnston say it's unlikely Iran would do that unless pushed to the brink — such a move would run the risk of hurting its own economic lifeline, as well as antagonizing its neighbors in the region — but the shockwaves would be significant.
For now, what struck your host is that this conflict is helping prop up prices at a time when they'd really started to drop, and that could help boost U.S. oil production, which had previously been forecast to contract in 2026. But the exact trajectory of all this is highly unclear.
'This is usually the lead-up to summer driving season, so gasoline prices were set to rise anyway,' POLITICO's resident oil market expert Ben Lefebvre told MM. 'Because of the current Middle East situation, they'll rise further than they might have when oil was still around $60 a barrel. But when compared to what U.S. drivers experienced even last year, it won't be too far off recent norms … if there is such a thing as 'recent norms.''
'The interesting thing is whether this spurs U.S. oil companies to drill more,' he added. 'They might just see this as a temporary boost and not something they want to get too far ahead of.'
Rewind to before the current Israel-Iran conflict escalated. OPEC, the cartel of major oil-exporting countries, had been holding back production but then ramped up output earlier this year. That move was taken, in part, to get ahead of the effects of President Donald Trump's tariffs, which had raised fears that demand for oil would crater amid a global slowdown.
That was leading to forecasts of oversupply later this year, Johnston said, reducing incentives for oil companies to produce.
Now, Israel's attacks on Iran have likely led to fear-buying, as well as speculative trading, that has pushed up prices as much as 15 percent. Fighting so far has spared infrastructure that would significantly crimp the outflow of crude.
'While theoretically on its face, nothing that's happened so far has changed anything physical about supply and demand, part of the way … price formation has occurred is you have physical participants — a refinery, whatever — that's all of a sudden worried they're not going to be able to get cargos next month or the month after,' Johnston said.
For prices to stay high or go higher, there likely would have to be some actual damage to key oil infrastructure, he said. But in the meantime, the scope for economic disruption is still significant. The largest price increases have been for diesel, a key input for shipping and therefore a potential risk to inflation in many sectors.
'It might not seem as harsh at the pump, but your shipping and your route delivery is going to feel the pinch of diesel far more,' Johnston said.
More broadly, John Fagan, co-founder of Markets Policy Partners and the former markets head at the Treasury Department, said this oil price shock feeds the narrative that the U.S. is going to have slower growth and higher prices: stagflation.
'Demand is not collapsing, and oil prices are not unbelievably high, so you don't have that pop and drop kind of dynamic' when prices rise above where the market can support, he said. 'And if the dollar can't rally, that's supportive of [higher] oil prices.'
HAPPY FRIDAY — Hope many of you got to have a restful day off yesterday. Send thoughts about the economic outlook to vguida@politico.com, and as always, send MM tips and pitches to Sam Sutton, who is back next week: ssutton@politico.com.
Driving the day
Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender speaks at the Council on Foreign Relations at 12:30 p.m.
Debt warnings fall on deaf ears — Republicans are largely ignoring a host of reports warning that their bill would worsen the nation's fiscal trajectory in a serious way, our Ben Guggenheim reports.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates Tuesday led to an unusual finding. Usually tax cuts tend to cost less under so-called dynamic scores that include economic effects. Not so here: The $2.8 trillion figure released Tuesday outstripped the CBO's prior $2.4 trillion estimate that did not include economic analysis — mostly because the bill would increase interest rates. But the GOP is relying instead on estimates from the White House that Kyle Pomerleau of the American Enterprise Institute called 'outrageous' and 'way higher than everyone else's.'
Your MM host chatted last week with Joe Lavorgna, who joined the Treasury Department this month as a counselor to Secretary Scott Bessent, and he had thoughts on CBO's projection that the economy would grow at an average rate of 1.8 percent over the next 10 years.
'Once the One Big Beautiful Bill passes, it's going to lock in the gains that we saw in the first Trump administration, when we were growing at nearly 3 percent,' he told your MM host. 'Then, you could make a case because of AI,' productivity growth will be much higher. 'The trailing 10-year growth rate of GDP is 2.5 percent. Why aren't we using that? .. 1.8 is unbelievably pathetically slow.'
On the pods: Hear from CBO Director Phillip Swagel himself on Bloomberg's Big Take podcast.
Sober news on entitlements — The longterm financial health of Social Security and Medicare worsened last year, our Michael Stratford reports.
'Annual reports released by the Treasury Department on Monday show that Social Security's reserve funds, if combined, would run out of money to fully pay beneficiaries in 2034 — a year sooner than projected last year,' Stratford writes. 'And the trust fund that pays Medicare's hospital bills would be depleted in 2033 — three years earlier than expected.'
Trump calls for 'clean' Senate crypto bill to pass — Late Wednesday, Trump called on House Republicans to move 'LIGHTNING FAST' to send Senate-passed stablecoin legislation to his desk, dialing up pressure on GOP lawmakers in the lower chamber to adopt the measure without any changes, our Jasper Goodman reports.
The Economy
ICYMI: Fed holds rates steady — Federal Reserve officials announced Wednesday that they will hold interest rates steady, ignoring repeated calls from President Donald Trump to dramatically lower borrowing costs.
In fact, projections from the central bank's policymakers suggest they're less confident they will be able to significantly decrease rates than they were in March.
Vibe check: Here was Trump's response on Truth Social Thursday morning: ''Too Late' Jerome Powell is costing our Country Hundreds of Billions of Dollars. He is truly one of the dumbest, and most destructive, people in Government, and the Fed Board is complicit. Europe has had 10 cuts, we have had none. We should be 2.5 Points lower, and save $BILLIONS on all of Biden's Short Term Debt. We have LOW inflation! TOO LATE's an American Disgrace!'
Jobs report
Carolyn Davis is now director of comms at Better Markets. She previously was director of external comms at Leadership for Educational Equity.
Mike Spratt has joined the ICI as an associate general counsel. He previously was assistant director in the Division of Investment Management Disclosure Review office at the SEC. He also served as counsel to former SEC Commissioners Kara Stein and Elisse Walter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Chinese Media Issues Trump-Iran Tensions Warning—'Sliding Into the Abyss'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Chinese state media is warning U.S. President Donald Trump to wade carefully into the Iran-Israel conflict, writing in a new editorial that stoked tensions could trigger an aftermath that makes the previous Iraq and Afghanistan wars pale in comparison. Why It Matters White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Wednesday that Trump, who has called for Iran's "unconditional surrender," is weighing U.S. military involvement in the Middle East over the next two weeks. Indeterminate numbers of casualties have occurred in both Iran and Israel, though Israel's intentions to destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities may require U.S. artillery aid in the form of multi-ton bunker buster bombs. What To Know Whether or not the U.S. employs its precision-guided "bunker buster" bombs, the nation's direct involvement in the region "will leave a complicated aftermath that might take it longer than the Iraq War or the Afghanistan War to deal with," reads the editorial by China Daily, an English-language daily newspaper owned by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). "The international community, especially influential major countries, should uphold a fair position and a responsible attitude to create the necessary conditions for promoting a ceasefire and returning to dialogue and negotiation so as to prevent the regional situation from sliding into the abyss and triggering a greater disaster," the editorial published on Friday reads. Chinese President Xi Jinping (2nd-L) attends a meeting with Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (not pictured) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on May 13, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping (2nd-L) attends a meeting with Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (not pictured) at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on May 13, 2025. TINGSHU WANG/POOL/AFP via Getty Images Rajan Menon, a senior research scholar at the Saltzman Institute of War and Peace Studies and professor at City College of New York, told Newsweek on Friday that China "has come out squarely" against Israeli attacks and been especially critical of Israel's targeting of Iran's nuclear infrastructure. "Yet it has also offered its services as mediator," Menon said. "In 2023, Beijing brokered a rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia and has now once again presented itself as a peacemaker. "This, in part, reflects its increasing ambitions to project political influence worldwide but, in this instance, also to highlight a constraint between itself and the Trump administration, which it has painted as bent on increasing the likelihood of a wider conflict. "That said, I would be surprised to see this war end with a China-mediated deal." The editorial also questions whether Israel and/or the U.S. would be "held responsible" for war escalation, or more serious consequences emanating from a potential nuclear leak triggered by bombs. "It is partly through projecting his administration as a peacemaker and accusing his predecessor of being the opposite that Trump won the presidential election in the U.S. in November," the editorial continues. "Yet people's hopes that he can fulfill his promise of ending both the Gaza and Ukraine crises have yet to be fulfilled. "With the Israeli leader relentlessly trying to convince the U.S. that its interests overlap with Israel's in the Middle East, the U.S. president should be clearheaded that the U.S.' direct participation in a conflict between Israel and Iran might prove to be the tail wagging the dog." Chinese President Xi Jinping has expressed deep concern for the unfolding situation, saying during a meeting with Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev at the China-Central Asia Summit in Astana, Kazakhstan, that escalation is "not in the common interest of the international community." "We oppose any act that infringes upon the sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity of other countries," Xi said. Also on Thursday, Xi spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin specifically about the Middle East conflict. Xi reportedly laid out a four-point proposal with the following intentions: a ceasefire must be an urgent priority; ensuring civilian safety as a top priority; employing dialogue and negotiation as fundamental solutions; and utilizing the "indispensable peacemaking efforts" of the international community, according to Global Times, a daily Chinese tabloid under the CCP's flagship newspaper, People's Daily. Along with the announcement of a dozen cooperation agreements spanning green mining, trade, connectivity, personnel exchanges, and customs, Xi also called on Central Asian countries to deepen cooperation under China's "Belt and Road" infrastructure initiative. What People Are Saying Eric Olander, editor-in-chief of the China-Global South Project (CGSP): "This conflict—China came out very quickly and did not pretend to try and be a neutral arbiter, did not pretend to be kind of nonpartisan at all. They came out very quickly, backed Iran in this, framed the Israelis as the aggressor, and then also positioned the United States as manipulating all of this, which is par for the course in a lot of these types of incidents." President Donald Trump earlier this week wrote on Truth Social: "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there - We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in a national address, in part: "We warn America of the consequences of engaging in war, because it will suffer severe damage if it decides to do so. War is met with war, bombing with bombing, and strike with strike." What Happens Next Russia has discouraged the U.S. from direct involvement in the Middle East, saying it would spark a wider regional conflict.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Addressing oil market turmoil from Iran-Israel
On 13 June, Israel launched an unprecedented wave of airstrikes on Iran, to which Tehran responded with hundreds of ballistic missiles fired at Israel. Panic ensued, reflected in prices, as benchmark Brent crude oil prices jumped 10% to over $77 a barrel by the start of the next week, amid a plethora of potential supply risks and uncertainty. The GlobalData Oil & Gas Research team addresses the main concerns and calibrates the market's potential overreaction to the Israel–Iran hostilities, looking to understand the Strait of Hormuz closure risk, the impact on Iran's oil infrastructure, the collateral effects on Egypt and Jordan, Insurance premiums and proxy escalations The likelihood of a complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz remains very low. Currently, around 30% of global seaborne oil trade and 20% of liquefied natural gas (LNG) shipments pass through this strategic chokepoint. Approximately 80% of oil and LNG exports from Gulf countries are shipped to Asian markets via the Strait, and all of Iran's oil exports to China also rely on this route. For Iran, there is no practical incentive to block the Strait, as it is an economic lifeline for the country: about 80% of its imported goods transit through this passage. Any move to close it would therefore jeopardise Iran's trade flows, as well as broader regional exports. Most of Iran's crude oil exports are shipped from Kharg Island in the Gulf. At present, the risk of a direct attack on the island appears limited, and even if targeted, such an action would likely be insufficient to halt Iran's oil exports entirely, as the island hosts multiple export terminals. Moreover, Iran has alternative export routes, including other ports such as Bandar Abbas and Bandar Mahshahr. The most notable alternative is the Jask pipeline, which bypasses the Strait of Hormuz and connects the western oil-producing regions to an export terminal on the Gulf of Oman. This pipeline was used to ship Iran's first crude cargo via Jask in October 2024. However, its export capacity is significantly lower than Kharg's terminals and does not support blended exports, so it could only serve to stabilise temporary disruptions and meet key deliveries. Iran's exports, primarily headed to China, are controlled through unofficial channels, using ship-to-ship transfers and reflagging and are unlikely to be affected by further sanctions. In fact, the escalating US-China trade tension provides a solid offtake for Iran's oil production. Egypt and Jordan are among the countries most affected by the recent escalation between Israel and Iran. On 13 October, Israel ordered the operators of the "Leviathan" and "Karish" gas fields to halt production, disrupting gas supplies to both Egypt and Jordan. In response, both countries are taking emergency measures to prevent household power outages, including the temporary shutdown of industrial facilities connected to the national grid. Egypt's fertiliser plants have been particularly hard hit. Despite the resumption of gas flows to Egypt and Jordan on Thursday, the ongoing military tensions and the risk of attacks on gas platforms in the East Mediterranean may prompt Israel to halt production again. War risk premiums have steadily been increasing globally, particularly in the Middle East. After the Israeli strikes on Iran, maritime war risk premiums saw an increase to 0.3% of vessel value, an increase of 60% from 0.125%. Further escalation, even cyber, could raise the cost of doing business throughout the Middle East. Though physical supply will remain intact, it has the possibility of driving prices upward as inflated delivered crude is supplied to Asia and Europe. The recent surge in oil prices following the Israeli attacks last Friday was primarily driven by market panic over the risk of a broader conflict and potential disruptions to regional energy supplies. This price movement does not reflect any fundamental shift in underlying market conditions. While a complete loss of Iranian oil exports remains unlikely, any supply gap could be offset relatively quickly. China currently holds elevated crude inventories, and OPEC members have the capacity and willingness to step in and increase output if needed to stabilise the market. The recent escalation of hostilities between Israel and Iran has undeniably sent shockwaves through the global oil market, evidenced by the sharp rise in Brent crude prices. However, a closer examination reveals that the fundamental dynamics of oil supply and demand remain largely intact. The likelihood of a complete closure of the Strait of Hormuz is minimal, as such an action would be economically detrimental to Iran itself. Furthermore, Iran's diverse export routes and the resilience of its oil infrastructure suggest that any disruptions to its exports may be manageable. While neighbouring countries such as Egypt and Jordan face immediate challenges due to gas supply interruptions, the broader implications for the oil market appear to be more reflective of speculative panic than of actual supply constraints. As the situation evolves, it will be crucial for stakeholders to monitor developments closely, particularly regarding insurance premiums and potential geopolitical ramifications, while recognising that OPEC's capacity to stabilise the market remains a significant mitigating factor against prolonged price volatility. For a detailed analysis of energy developments, major disruptions and comprehensive data, stay tuned to GlobalData's Oil & Gas Intelligence Center insights. "Addressing oil market turmoil from Iran-Israel" was originally created and published by Offshore Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dollar and Gold Slide on Hopes of De-Escalation in Israel-Iran Conflict
The dollar index (DXY00) today is down by -0.16%. The dollar is under pressure today on an easing of safe-haven demand as stocks rose after Reuters reported that the Iranian government said it is ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment levels. Also, President Trump said he is willing to give diplomacy more time and won't decide to strike Iran for another two weeks. In addition, dovish comments today from Fed Governor Waller weighed on the dollar when he said, "I think we have room to bring interest rates down as early as July." The dollar remained lower on the weaker-than-expected Philadelphia Fed business outlook report. Dollar and Gold Slide on Hopes of De-Escalation in Israel-Iran Conflict Markets move fast. Keep up by reading our FREE midday Barchart Brief newsletter for exclusive charts, analysis, and headlines. The US June Philadelphia Fed business outlook survey was unchanged at -4.0, weaker than expectations of an increase to -1.5. US May leading economic indicators index fell -0.1% m/m, right on expectations, and the sixth consecutive month that the LEI has declined. Fed Governor Waller said, "I think we have room to bring interest rates down as early as July, and then we can see kind of see what happens with inflation." The markets are discounting the chances at 15% for a -25 bp rate cut after the July 29-30 FOMC meeting. EUR/USD (^EURUSD) today is up by +0.10%. The euro is moving higher today due to weakness in the dollar. However, gains in the euro are limited after the Eurozone's June consumer confidence index unexpectedly fell and after German May producer prices posted their biggest decline in eight months, which were dovish factors for ECB policy. The Eurozone June consumer confidence index unexpectedly fell -0.1 to -15.3, weaker than expectations of an increase to -14.9. German May PPI fell -1.2% y/y, right on expectations and the biggest decline in 8 months. Swaps are discounting the chances at 7% for a -25 bp rate cut by the ECB at the July 24 policy meeting. USD/JPY (^USDJPY) today is up by +0.31%. The yen gave up overnight gains and fell to a 3-week low against the dollar today as an easing of Middle East tensions curbed safe-haven demand for the yen. Reuters reported that the Iranian government said it is ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment levels, and President Trump said he's willing to give two weeks to see if diplomacy will work before attacking Iran. Higher T-note yields today are also weighing on the yen. The yen initially moved higher today after Japan's May national CPI excluding fresh food and energy rose more than expected, the most in 16 months, a hawkish factor for BOJ policy. Also, comments from BOJ Governor Ueda were positive for the yen when he said the BOJ will raise the benchmark interest rate if its economic outlook is realized. Japan's May national CPI rose +3.5% y/y, right on expectations. May national CPI ex-fresh food and energy rose +3.3% y/y, stronger than expectations of +3.2% y/y and the largest increase in 16 months. BOJ Governor Ueda said Japan's real interest rate is significantly low, and the BOJ will raise the benchmark interest rate if its economic outlook is realized. August gold (GCQ25) today is down -21.00 (-0.62%), and July silver (SIN25) is down -0.923 (-2.50%). Precious metals are retreating today, with gold sliding to a one-week low and silver falling sharply to a two-week low. An easing of Middle East tensions sparked long liquidation in precious metals after President Trump signaled he wants to give diplomacy a chance and will wait two weeks before deciding if the US would strike Iran. Precious metals also fell on today's report from Reuters that the Iranian government said it is ready to discuss limitations on its uranium enrichment levels, a sign that Iran may want to negotiate its way out of war with the US. In addition, hawkish comments from BOJ Governor Ueda undercut precious metals when he said the BOJ will raise the benchmark interest rate if its economic outlook is realized. Today's dollar weakness is supportive of metals prices. Also, dovish comments today from Fed Governor Waller boosted demand for gold as a store of value when he said, "I think we have room to bring interest rates down as early as July." In addition, Thursday's report from Bloomberg that said senior US officials are preparing for a possible strike on Iran boosted safe-haven demand for precious metals. Industrial metals demand concerns also weighed on silver prices due to the weaker-than-expected US Jun Philadelphia Fed business outlook survey and the weaker-than-expected UK May retail sales report. Fund buying of silver continues to support prices as silver holdings in ETFs rose to a 2-1/4 year high Thursday. UK May retail sales ex-auto fuel fell -2.8% m/m, weaker than expectations of -0.7% m/m and the biggest decline in nearly 1-1/2 years. On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data