logo
Highest, income groups be taxed at higher effective rates: WB

Highest, income groups be taxed at higher effective rates: WB

ISLAMABAD: The World Bank has recommended that highest-income groups be taxed at higher effective rates while income tax regime in Pakistan can be made more progressive by removing exemptions for high income groups and raising the income bracket of the highest tax rate.
The bank in its latest report, 'South Asia Development Update, Taxing Times', also noted that industrial output contracted, driven by high input costs, increased taxes, and lower government development spending, and services growth was dampened by spillovers from weak agricultural and industrial activity.
Pakistan, ranks among the Emerging Market and Developing Countries (EMDEs) with the widest range of tax rates and the widest range of income thresholds across personal income tax brackets, which makes its income tax regime relatively progressive.
Pakistan's poverty rate to stand at 42.4%: World Bank
In Pakistan, the government has committed to raising tax revenues by the equivalent of 4–5 percentage points of GDP, reforming the energy sector, and allowing the exchange rate to be flexible, it added.
Pakistan provides a guaranteed price for sugarcane production, while subsidizing its consumption of water. Such subsidies that encourage the wasteful use of inputs could be replaced by direct, targeted transfers, with higher transfers for farmers that adopt sustainable land management practices, the report noted.
Only Pakistan's tax buoyancy falls in the bottom quartile of EMDEs, suggesting a reliance on taxation of slow-growing economic activities. In all South Asian countries other than Bhutan and Pakistan, greater shares of tax revenues are generated by consumption taxes—such as sales tax, excise taxes, and VAT—and trade taxes than in the average EMDE, with smaller shares derived from income taxes. In Pakistan and Sri Lanka, consumption tax rates were well above the EMDE average in 2024.
The report further noted that Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh—the three South Asian countries with the lowest overall revenue-to-GDP ratios—also have much lower tax revenue-to-GDP ratios compared with other EMDEs with similar tax rates in all categories of taxes.
Since 2020, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka have had sizable shortfalls in direct tax revenue, ranging from 1.4 percentage points of GDP to 2.6 percentage points of GDP, compared with an average shortfall of 0.8 percentage point among all EMDEs. In these four South Asian countries, revenue shortfalls have been nearly evenly split between personal income tax revenues and corporate income tax revenues.
Among four countries including Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, with above-average tax revenue shortfalls, the country characteristics account for one quarter of the overall shortfalls in Bangladesh and Bhutan and one-third in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. In particular, widespread informality and lack of financial development account for one-half, one-third, and one-quarter of the shortfall in personal income tax revenues in Bhutan, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, respectively.
A large agriculture sector and lack of financial development together account for one-half of the shortfall in corporate income tax revenues in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, as well as one-third of the shortfall in consumption tax revenues in Pakistan and Sri Lanka. But even after controlling for these country characteristics, the four countries still have tax gaps that are larger than the EMDE average.
The assessment for Pakistan identifies compliance risk management, the timeliness of tax declaration filings, tax dispute resolutions, and tax payments, as well as the monitoring of inaccurate reporting as the main areas needing improvement.
In Pakistan, the introduction of electronic VAT filing and computerized risk analysis reduced refund claims by one-half and led to the detection of a significantly larger number of fraudulent claims than had manual assessments.
Responsiveness of revenues to changes in tax bases in Bangladesh and India is comparable to that in other emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs); in Nepal responsiveness is in the top quartile of EMDEs, and in Pakistan it is in the bottom quartile.
In Bangladesh and India, tax buoyancies are broadly in line with those of other EMDEs, whereas Nepal's tax buoyancy ranks in the top quartile of EMDEs and Pakistan's in the bottom quartile.
Below-average tax buoyancies, as in Pakistan, indicate that economic growth is disproportionately generated by under-taxed economic activities. In Pakistan, the agriculture sector accounted for about one -fifth of cumulative growth during 2010–19, compared with less than one-tenth in the average EMDE. In many parts of Pakistan, the agriculture sector faces considerably lower income tax rates than do non-agriculture sectors. A priority for raising tax revenues is therefore to increase taxation of agricultural activity.
The report also noted that in Pakistan, the economy continues to recover from a combination of natural disasters, external pressures, and inflation, and is expected grow by 2.7 percent in fiscal year 2024-25 and 3.1 percent in fiscal year 2025-26.
In Pakistan, GDP grew by 2.5 percent in fiscal year 2023-24, after a small contraction in fiscal year 2022-23. Robust remittance inflows supported private consumption, but private investment growth continued to be weak, dampened by double-digit real interest rates and political uncertainty. On favorable weather conditions, agricultural growth reached a 19-year high while industrial activity contracted and services growth remained muted. Weak growth has carried over to first half of fiscal year 2024-25. Output increased by an average of 1.5 percent y-o-y in the first half of fiscal year 2024-25, slower than the 2.1 percent expansion in the first half of the previous year.
After last year's surge, agriculture posted muted growth in the first half of fiscal year 2024-25 amid drought-like conditions and pest infestations.
The government achieved a primary surplus in the first half of fiscal year 2024-25, with fiscal consolidation efforts supported by an IMF program. The current account was in surplus at the end of 2024, helped by higher remittances, stemming from reduced political uncertainty and exchange rate stability, that more than offset the wider trade and primary income deficits.
With depreciation pressures on the currency subsiding, a robust agricultural harvest, and administrative prices stabilizing, inflation declined steadily to 0.7 percent in March 2025 from its peak of nearly 40 percent in mid-2023. This allowed the central bank to lower its policy rate by 10 percentage points since June 2024 to 12 percent in January.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Adviser to KP CM accuses federal govt of manipulating data, misleading public
Adviser to KP CM accuses federal govt of manipulating data, misleading public

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Adviser to KP CM accuses federal govt of manipulating data, misleading public

ISLAMABAD: The adviser to the chief minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on finance, Muzzammil Aslam, on Monday accused the federal government of manipulating the data presented in the Economic Survey for 2024-25 and misleading the public about the state of the economy. In a video message released to the media shortly after the government unveiled its Economic Survey for 2024-25, Aslam accused Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's administration of misleading the nation through manipulated figures in an effort to sustain its narrative and hold on to power. He said that the government had used the so-called 'Form 47 approach' – a reference to alleged electoral manipulation – not only to form its administration but also to manage public perception, including during the recent release of the Economic Survey. He rejected government claims of economic stability and recovery, saying that inflation, unemployment and international isolation had worsened. Citing the government's own economic indicators, he said the country's GDP growth had fallen short of targets. 'This year's GDP stands at 2.7%, well below the 3.6% target set last year. I told the prime minister directly last week that this is not something to boast about – it's figure fudging,' he said, recalling a meeting with Sharif. 'Instead of misleading the nation, the government should face economic realities.' Referring to the World Bank, he said 110 million Pakistanis – out of a population of 240 million – were now living below the poverty line, arguing that the government had 'completely crushed the poor.' He also challenged the government's assertion of growth in the livestock and industrial sectors. Further citing official reports, he said agriculture had shrunk by 13.5%, with major crop yields in decline. 'There is no truth in the government's claims of recovery when key sectors are underperforming.' He added that core inflation stood at 11.6%, challenging the government's assertion that inflation had eased. 'Does this look like inflation is going down? Clearly not,' he said. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Why is this budget critical?
Why is this budget critical?

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Why is this budget critical?

Shortly before Eid, our defense forces, valiantly and with tactical brilliance, established our territorial security. Soon after Eid, Finance Minister Aurangzeb will present the federal budget today and the expectation is that it will put us on the path to economic security. Thus, this auspicious Eid-ul-Adha would be the harbinger of enduring National Security. Economic vulnerabilities have accumulated over the last three decades leading to balance of payments crises, disruption of growth and poor job creation. This has reversed our excellent achievements in improving living standards and poverty reduction. It is time to correct this. The core vulnerabilities are: a chronic fiscal deficit financed with expensive and unsustainable domestic and foreign borrowing; and an economic structure that produces a surge in imports as growth recovers. Together, they cause repeated balance of payments crises. We should expect the budget to address these vulnerabilities. Fiscal consolidation must remain a top budget priority. The IMF programme hinges on this. On the expenditure side, we should expect no untargeted, underfunded subsidies and see continued reduction in waste. On revenue, we should expect fairness, i.e., more untaxed and undertaxed activities brought into the tax net and treated on par with those already paying taxes. This should reduce undue burden on the corporate sector, including on salaries. The strategic shift we should expect in the budget is a credible programme to address the most damaging structural weakness of the economy: declining productivity and loss of international competitiveness in both manufacturing and agriculture. This is documented well in national and multilateral research. It is the primary reason for poor employment creation and our boom-and-bust cycle of growth and balance of payments crises. There are multiple reasons for declining productivity; the most frequently mentioned are high energy cost, high taxes, regulatory burden, etc. To compensate for the high cost of doing business, well connected business houses successfully lobbied the government to give them protection from international competition in the shape of high tariffs on imports. The government was a willing partner for three reasons. High import tariffs (that include regularity duties and 'additional' customs duties, also known as para tariffs) brought in additional revenue to plug the fiscal deficit. Import tariffs rewarded the favoured business houses with protection (according the World Bank, Pakistan is the second most protected economy in the World after Egypt), and they remained well-disposed to the elected government. The politically difficult problem of fixing the energy sector, bringing the untaxed/undertaxed (retail, real estate) into the tax net and improving governance could be postponed to another day/government. The protection route to solving the problems of low profits of business houses has inflicted a heavy cost on the economy. In the production chain (for example, plastics), it raises the cost of inputs for the entire downstream industry rendering it uncompetitive. Consumers pay higher prices for poor copies of the same product available in the global market (for example, motor vehicles). Importantly, protected local manufacturers producing for the local market have no incentive to invest in processes and technologies to make them efficient. This approach to doing business has rendered key government ministries partners in perpetuating inefficiency and low productivity. They see their job as ensuring that business houses remain protected to enjoy high profits rather than incentivizing them to become internationally competitiveness and export. The media campaign of business houses benefitting from protection claims that they create jobs that would be lost if protection is removed. The reality is that the protected firms have created a tiny fraction of the jobs needed, given the growth in labor force. Most jobs are still created by small informal firms. Thus, in the absence of protected profits in the auto sector, the small auto parts manufacturers would create far more jobs selling to internationally competitive local or global firms, producing for the much larger global market. The textiles chain is a good example. More protected yarn and gray cloth manufacturers use capital intensive technologies and produce far fewer jobs than less protected readymade garments producers who create a lot of employment producing for the global market. Therefore, high protection tends to undermine the ultimate policy goal of creating productive jobs via exports and thus contribute to strengthening national security. The budget is expected to announce many measures focused on the supportive pillars that reverse productivity decline viz., competitive energy and tax regime, reduced regulatory burden, strengthened agriculture, adaptation to climate change, and robust social protection. The bottom line, however, is this: we should thus expect to see in this budget a credible programme of reduced protection. A medium-term horizon for making the transition would be needed, but we should see a resolute commitment to the direction of change. We should be confident (based on international experience, our own past experience of liberalization, and rigorous modeling) that this is the path to economic recovery. The smart business houses will adapt successfully to become export oriented and will emerge as players in the global market. Many will team up with strategic foreign investors to take advantage of our core factor of comparative advantage: our workers producing for the global market. Let us seize the moment and partner with our defense forces towards rock-solid national security! Dr Ijaz Nabi (The writer is Executive Director, CDPR and former Dean and Professor of Economics, Lahore University of Management Sciences) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Analysis: Economic Survey
Analysis: Economic Survey

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Analysis: Economic Survey

Economic Survey 2024-25, with most data limited to nine months as all previous surveys, emphasized progress 'underpinned by effective macroeconomic management, improved fiscal and external account balances and a significant reduction in inflation' while ignoring dangerously high poverty levels - 44.7 percent estimated by the World Bank though independent economists place it at 2 to 3 percent higher - and accusing those who raise concerns as a deliberate attempt to fuel public discontent. Federal Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb on 9 June 2025 released the Survey for the current year which epitomized even more of a non-event than previous years on two counts given that up to date data was available and uploaded on government and State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) websites. First, there was an addition of a key statistic - quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP) - launched by Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) on 28 November 2023 with World Bank technical support to enable short term policy responses by the government. Divide between nominal vs real GDP The PBS has so far been off the mark for the first two quarters of the current year – as the July-September rate was revised upwards by 0.3 percent (from 1.34 to 1.37 percent) and downwards by 0.2 percent in the next quarter (from 1.73 percent to 1.53 percent). The correction provides little comfort level in the accuracy of the third quarter's estimate (July-March 2025) of 2.4 percent and even less for the 2.68 percent growth rate projection for the entire fiscal year as the last quarter must show a rate higher than the sum of the first three quarters but the third quarter rate may also have to be revised upward to reach the annual projection. Sadly, the 1.8 percent lower GDP growth than the budgeted projection of 3.5 percent in the current year did not lead to any timely pro-growth policy decisions or as the Survey claimed effective macroeconomic management as the government continued its contractionary policies on both fronts: (i) monetary, in spite of what the Finance Minister correctly pointed out was a massive decline in the discount rate to 11 percent from 22 percent the year before though this rate remains double the average of regional competing countries; and (ii) fiscal with the one trillion dollar lower tax collection than was budgeted that led to a cut in development expenditure disbursements with negative repercussions on growth and a rising reliance on petroleum levy (an indirect tax itemized under other taxes so as not to share the revenue with the provinces) that reduced take-home pay further pushing many more below the poverty line. Aurangzeb praised the Prime Minister's personal engagement in ensuring the rise in tax to GDP ratio – a rise that is largely premised on the 1.8 percent reduction in the growth rate as the shortfall in the budgeted tax revenue for the current year was as noted above estimated at one trillion rupees. Next year's tax targets may also be compromised as the IMF has stipulated in its first review report dated May 2025 to 'substantially streamline and reduce tariffs (customs and regulatory duties) and reduce non-tariff barriers and move away from special duties applied to imports for particular industries.' These measures are expected to increase reliance on withholding taxes in the easy to collect sales tax mode (currently accounting for 75 to 80 percent of the 40 percent of all direct tax collections) with major negative implications on the value of each rupee earned on the income of the poor relative to the income of the rich. And secondly, IMF noted in its staff level agreement documents dated October 2024 that 'important shortcomings remain in the source data available for sectors accounting for around a third of GDP, while there are issues with the granularity and reliability of the GFS. The authorities are prioritizing addressing these weaknesses, supported by Fund TA on the Government Finance Statistics and a new PPI index, and the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics will soon begin fieldwork for four major surveys ahead of the upcoming NA rebasing to FY26.' The analysis of the Survey, as in previous years, presents as positive a macro-picture as possible, focusing this year on foreign exchange reserves (less than the sum total of roll overs by friendly countries but higher than last year), a narrowing of the trade deficit (due to administrative measures targeted to reduce imports ) and a low inflation rate (less than the 2 percent considered necessary to oil the wheels of industry) while understating the rise in negativity of the large scale manufacturing sector this year (July-March) as opposed to the same period last year – negative 1.47 percent as opposed to 0.22 percent. Aurangzeb praised the professionalism of Discos' boards which he claimed was the reason behind the remarkable increase in recoveries as well as the expected Cabinet approval to borrow from commercial banks to reduce the circular debt (a proposal that was rejected last year as the discount rate at the time was too high). Electricity rates have declined on the expectation that the savings from the successful contract renegotiations with Independent Power Producers as well as the reduction in the circular debt repayments meet costs however in case costs rise the IMF has warned that government to uncap Debt Service Surcharge which is currently at 10 percent of power sector revenue. To conclude, the Survey leaves one with the distinct impression that there is little empirical evidence in the claim that 'the foundational elements for economic recovery are becoming increasingly robust and investor confidence is re-emerging' though one would fully support the Survey's contention that it is critical to transition 'from short term stabilisation measures to comprehensive structural reforms'- stabilisation defined as increased reliance on external borrowing with associated harsh upfront conditions while structural reforms are required to show empirically positive results in the tax and power sectors and state owned entities before declaring them as steps in the right direction. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store