Green Party launches petition after electorates Māori names removed
Photo:
RNZ / Angus Dreaver
The Green Party is demanding Māori names be reinstated to electorates in the capital.
It has launched a petition after the Rongotai electorate became Wellington Bays in boundary changes announced last week.
The Representation Commission confirmed
final boundary adjustments
ahead of next year's election.
"Rongotai means 'sound of the sea,' it has been the te reo name of our electorate for almost three decades and has been taken away with next to no consultation," MP Julie Anne Genter said.
"This was a decision based on the feedback of three people. This is not good enough and this must change," she said.
Genter and fellow Wellington-based Green MP Tamatha Paul are behind the petition.
"This is yet another attack on te reo, we have seen it with road signs,
passports
and now the name of an electorate," Paul said.
Boundary changes were largely in Auckland, Bay of Plenty, Christchurch and the lower North Island.
The changes included having one fewer electorate in the lower North Island to account for seven percent population growth in the South Island which, by law, can only have 16 seats.
In Auckland, the Rānui electorate also became Henderson.
Julie Anne Genter said the Rongotai name in Wellington "accurately and beautifully captured the geography and spirit of our electorate".
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
39 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Electricity Authority not 'chocolate teapot', Shane Jones says
Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii The Electricity Authority has proven itself not to be a "chocolate teapot", the associate energy minister says. In a bid to make energy more affordable, the authority will require generators to offer the same price to all retailers - and ban the bigger power companies from giving themselves discounts . The government said the change would increase competition, giving consumers more choices . Associate energy minister Shane Jones - who has previously been heavily critical of the authority and has threatened to end it unless it flexed its authority - was pleased. "The EA (Electricity Authority) have proved that they're not totally a chocolate teapot. Anything that shrinks the cost of energy and secures greater security, I think Kiwis should be happy." Jones accused big electricity companies of currently operating as if they had more power than Cabinet. He said the change was a surgical instrument - and in future he would like to see a sharper instrument taken to the gentailers' (companies that are both generators and retailers) corporate makeup. Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Meanwhile, Labour was also backing the move to level the playing field between big power companies and smaller outlets. Leader Chris Hipkins said he wanted to see what kind of enforcement there would be behind the new rule. "I think there probably needs to be more teeth behind it, and I think that they actually need to go further than that - but it is a good start." The change came out of the Energy Competition task force, which was set up last August in response to the winter power crisis . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Newsroom
42 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Greens go it alone with early policy promises
Analysis: On one level, the new Green Party initiative to protect children could be seen as business as usual – a political play to pressure an opposing government into action. Certainly, launching the party's new 'seven promises to tamariki' by way of an open letter to Children's Minister Karen Chhour of Act and urging the public to sign on to its message online meets that tactic. The petition preamble talks of Chhour 'taking some personal responsibility' for the safety of vulnerable tamariki. And timing it for the anniversary of when a range of community care providers lost state contracts under this Government carries its own message. But the 'For our Children' policy also represents another move by the Greens to set out political priorities and new thinking, out of government, well ahead of next year's election; to get out in front. The party had tried to arrange meetings with Chhour to lobby her directly for attention to its seven goals for child care and protection, but her schedule did not allow it. So, 14 months out from a likely election date, it made its goals into public promises and committed at a launch by co-leader Marama Davidson and children's spokesperson Kahurangi Carter that voters 'can hold us to this'. The Greens did not seek agreement or endorsement from Labour or Te Pāti Māori, its likely governing partners in any future administration, ahead of Friday's launch after months of consulting those in the child welfare sector. Instead, the party has struck out on its own to put the issue of care of tamariki to the front, and near the top, of its policy package for 2026. The seven promises are that: every child's whānau and whakapapa must be centred must be free from poverty must be supported every step of their journey must be heard, respected and placed at the heart of decision making must be protected must have a stable, nurturing home is cared for by a well-supported workforce Few would find much in those commitments to argue with. Who would oppose those standards or sentiments? But on the flip side these are pretty broad and challenging measures to say any politicians or government agency can guarantee to achieve. Promising that children 'must be free from poverty' and 'supported every step of their journey' goes beyond the aspirational. Each of the seven promises is expanded on in the policy package – for example, the first, on centring whānau and whakapapa would be achieved by two changes to the Oranga Tamariki Act and creation of a Māori Transition Authority as recommended in the past by the Waitangi Tribunal. Other specific changes would be to make early intervention and prevention core principles of the OT law, new top-up payments and increased Best Start funding for households, guaranteed and ring-fenced funding and enacting changes recommended by the Royal Commission into abuse in state care. The party's letter to Chhour is blunt. 'Right now, far too many tamariki are being failed by a care system that is under-resourced, disconnected from whakapapa, and lacking a focus on preventing harm before it happens. 'Social workers are overwhelmed, facing dangerously high caseloads. Community providers are dealing with funding cuts and funding uncertainty every year. Independent oversight recommendations are constantly ignored. Far too many children in our care system are not having their fundamental rights met. 'As Minister for Children, you hold responsibility to ensure this system upholds the rights and dignity of every child in Aotearoa. 'That is why we are asking you to commit to a 'Duty of Care'. A set of seven core promises that speak to the fundamental system change required to protect tamariki, put them at the heart of government decision making and deliver a system that truly serves children.' Carter told Newsroom the Greens would make themselves accountable for those seven promises when in government. Better still, it wanted Chhour to recognise their value and adopt them now, ahead of any change of administration. But she wouldn't be holding her breath. 'This Government has put a real focus on punishment rather than prevention, slashing of safety and care organisations' funding and a move away from prevention. We've got to get back to getting support for children, parents and communities.' Carter said the coalition Government had failed to take up numerous recommendations from the commission, and in her view had taken actions against the spirit of the commission report by introducing and continuing boot camps and allowing third parties to use force on young people. Making a big commitment on child protection and poverty is not new in NZ politics. Labour's Jacinda Ardern put these issues at the centre of her government from 2017, taking the child portfolio, setting up the Royal Commission and with Grant Robertson putting child poverty reports into the suite of wellbeing measures in Budgets. Carter says things have gone backwards under this Government and, while it might be debatable if prioritising child protection automatically wins votes for a party at an election, it's important the Greens did the work now. 'What's important is that we're ready to go into our first 100 days with policies that will protect children and keep families together. 'For me, it's about having a mandate from the community and people we are serving to go through and do this work. Polls and votes are important but doing the work and having the foundations is what's behind this campaign.' She acknowledged the seven promises would come with possibly substantial costs – in reducing social worker caseloads, as one example – but said the funding would largely come from re-prioritising other spending, away from this coalition's centralised systems and 'back into the community'. As just one MP, Carter couldn't say if the Greens would make the seven promises a bottom line in governing talks with Labour or Te Pāti Māori. 'But we are going hard on ensuring our kids are safe.' A good response from Chhour to the letter would be to say 'this is awesome, let's see how we can implement the seven promises' and adopt them as their own. On the other hand, if the minister remained silent and ignored the Greens' proposals, that would reject the work of people in the sector who had contributed. 'It's the mandate of the people out there doing the mahi and the kids who have been through the system. They want to see action. 'I think New Zealanders want politicians to work together to put New Zealand first and our children first.'
Newsroom
42 minutes ago
- Newsroom
Who's afraid of Aotearoa
Across Aotearoa – or New Zealand, depending on the speaker – resistance to te reo Māori and calls to roll it back from public life are growing louder. In Parliament, lawmakers are pushing a growing number of policies that critics say erode Māori culture and put New Zealand at risk of losing its cultural identity. Among the policies, cuts to te reo Māori teacher training, mandating English first in public service naming and communication, the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority), reversal of co-governance reforms, and undermining local Māori representation. The coalition also supported the Treaty Principles Bill, pushed by Act, which aimed to enshrine fixed principles of the Treaty and extend these to all New Zealanders, effectively diluting Māori-specific rights. The bill was ultimately rejected by Parliament. Just last week, it was revealed that Education Minister Erica Stanford stopped the printing of new editions of a series of books designed to teach Year 1s how to read, which included te reo words, while last month in Parliament, Foreign Minister Winston Peters refused to call New Zealand 'Aotearoa'. Together, these measures signal a retreat from decades of progress toward biculturalism, says associate professor Awanui Te Huia, who teaches Māori studies at Victoria University. 'The issue that these policies have created is it emboldens those [racist] positions and it treats the irrational as rational,' she tells The Detail. 'When we're hearing these anti-Tiriti or Waitangi statements, when we hear these anti-Māori, anti-te reo Māori statements, and they are being put forward as rational and considered arguments, this is when we have some of the trouble … it platforms particular perspectives that are harmful for our community, harmful for cohesion.' She says the revival of te reo is one of our greatest national achievements – proof of a country willing to confront its past and weave its two founding cultures together. But she worries the Government's policies will stall momentum. 'It's not a zero-sum game. If te reo Māori is doing well, that does not take anything away from another person; it's additive.' And she says the cost of the rollback of Māori rights and culture is damaging. 'There is considerable racism that happens in our communities, and that has multiple implications across the spectrum – on economics … on our socio-political spectrums.' Māori journalist Ella Stewart has been covering the policy changes for RNZ's in-depth department. She tells The Detail that the Māori community is hurting, but also pushing back. 'I have spoken to a raft of people, in my personal life but also just in reporting … I remember speaking to Tureiti Moxon a couple of weeks ago, and she said that this partnership that's been forged many years ago, over decades and decades, to get to a point where Māori are actually at the decision-making table – she said that's all been taken away. 'You have also got Māori legal scholars, Te Tiriti/Treaty experts, like Carwyn Jones, who said to me, 'We are seeing that this Government has a clear strategy of removing Māori rights and removing the ability of Te Tiriti to have any impact in our law.' She says, from her conversations, people would prefer if the Government focused on big-picture issues, rather than stripping te reo Māori from agency names and books. 'I think they are mainly upset because there are some issues that are being focused on that arguably the Government could be spending time doing something more important … on more pressing issues for our people rather than 'Should the name of New Zealand be New Zealand or Aotearoa', maybe focus on how you can further our people.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
