logo
Celebi calls Centre's move 'violation of rules', Delhi High Court reserves order

Celebi calls Centre's move 'violation of rules', Delhi High Court reserves order

India Today23-05-2025
The Delhi High Court on Friday reserved its order on a petition filed by Turkish firm Celebi Aviation Services India Pvt Ltd, challenging the government's decision to revoke its security clearance. The cancellation, initiated by the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS), has stirred legal and diplomatic ripples amid heightened tensions between India and Turkey.Appearing on behalf of Celebi, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued that the BCAS action violated established legal procedure under Rule 12 of the Aircraft Security Rules. "This unilateral action is a complete violation of Rule 12 and renders the cancellation order both invalid and meaningless," Rohatgi submitted before the bench.advertisementRohatgi maintained that the government is required to present a factual basis for revoking a company's security clearance. "Even if you make rules related to security at the airport, you are bound by the rules. The government cannot say that if we have made the rule, we can violate it," said Rohatgi in court.
He further urged the court to ensure that reasons behind the cancellation are clearly recorded in writing, to establish transparency and legal accountability."They will have to follow the law and the court should record the reasons in writing so that it becomes known under which rule the action has been taken," he added.Meanwhile, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the government, informed the court that he would file written submissions by Saturday.During an earlier hearing on Wednesday, Rohatgi emphasised that Celebi had operated in India for 17 years without any allegations or lapses. He described the revocation as arbitrary and contrary to principles of natural justice. advertisementHe also pointed out that the legal framework governing aviation security had evolved, noting that earlier judgments were based on outdated regulations under the Aircraft Rules of 1937, whereas the current case falls under Rule 12 of the 2011 guidelines."Justice Kurian Joseph's judgment dealt with the Aircraft Rules of 1937, which are no longer applicable. There were new rules in 2011, and the current position is governed by Rule 12," he argued.The controversy began on May 15, when India revoked Celebi's security clearance citing national security concerns. The move followed a Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) press briefing on May 9, which pointed to the use of Turkish-origin drones in a cross-border attack by Pakistan.According to official statements and preliminary forensic analysis, debris from drones used in the May 8–9 overnight assault on Indian military and civilian targets confirmed they were Turkish-made "Asisguard Songar" models, designed for surveillance and precision strikes.Sources further claimed that Turkey not only supplied armed drones to Pakistan but also provided operational assistance, with Turkish operators reportedly guiding the strikes.Must Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Karnataka HC Pushes State Govt To Act On Bike Taxi Ban, Citing Livelihood And Precedent
Karnataka HC Pushes State Govt To Act On Bike Taxi Ban, Citing Livelihood And Precedent

News18

time37 minutes ago

  • News18

Karnataka HC Pushes State Govt To Act On Bike Taxi Ban, Citing Livelihood And Precedent

Last Updated: The High Court acknowledged the gravity of the situation, recognising that the ban has a direct impact on the earnings and sustenance of the operators In a major development that can bring back bike taxis on Bengaluru roads, the Karnataka High Court has issued a firm directive to the state government, urging it to decide its stance on formulating rules for these conveyances within four weeks. The court's action comes in response to a petition filed by bike taxi operators who are challenging the government's complete prohibition on their services. This legal battle highlights the growing tension between traditional transport regulations and the evolving gig economy, with the livelihoods of thousands of drivers hanging in the balance. During the hearing, the legal representatives for the bike taxi operators presented a compelling case against the ban. They underscored that a majority of Indian states—specifically, 13 of them—have already successfully formulated and implemented a policy framework for bike taxis. This fact, they argued, makes Karnataka's decision to enforce a blanket ban an outlier and an unjustified measure. The operators also pointed to the unique operational benefits of their services, noting that two-wheelers can easily navigate congested urban areas and reach locations inaccessible to cars and auto-rickshaws, thereby offering a crucial last-mile connectivity solution that doesn't significantly worsen traffic. The High Court acknowledged the gravity of the situation, recognising that the ban has a direct impact on the earnings and sustenance of the operators. Granting the government a period of four weeks to craft a clear policy, the court emphasised that a decision must be made, as 'there are lives at stake". In response, the state's advocate general, Shashikiran Shetty, assured the court that the government would comply with the directive and provide its official position within the given timeframe. The High Court has set a firm deadline of September 22 for the government to present its official stance. This directive marks a significant moment in the struggle for the formal recognition of bike taxis in Karnataka. It places the onus squarely on the government to either justify its complete ban or follow the lead of other states and create a regulatory framework. The outcome of this decision will not only impact the future of ride-sharing in the state but will also serve as a precedent for how governments approach the regulation of innovative, app-based services that are reshaping urban mobility and employment. view comments First Published: August 21, 2025, 04:46 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...

How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist
How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist

The Dhams of the Amtek Auto not just duped Indian banks of more than INR33,000 crore but trapped scores of global investors in a bewildering 'pump and dump' stock price manipulation game that bruised institutional and laymen investors alike. In what could help solve a 10-year-old securities market manipulation complaint, ED has traced back a money trail. The probe unearthed how funds worth at least INR100 crore loaned by public sector banks were

How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist
How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist

Economic Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

How an auto giant trapped global investors in an INR1,000 crore heist

The Dhams of the Amtek Auto not just duped Indian banks of more than INR33,000 crore but trapped scores of global investors in a bewildering 'pump and dump' stock price manipulation game that bruised institutional and laymen investors alike. In what could help solve a 10-year-old securities market manipulation complaint, ED has traced back a money trail. The probe unearthed how funds worth at least INR100 crore loaned by public sector banks were

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store