Potential changes to SNAP worry Kalamazoo food bank
KALAMAZOO, Mich. (WOOD) – A major legislative package outlining tax cuts and spending is making its way through Congress this week. H.R. 1, or the One Big, Beautiful Bill Act, also seeks to reform and cut back on several federal programs.
Kalamazoo Loaves and Fishes, along with other food banks across the country, are closely watching what that could mean for SNAP benefits or Supplemental Nutrition Assistance. Associate Director Greta Faworski said Loaves and Fishes has seen a sharp increase in people asking for help since 2023, with inflation being a main driver.
'We are really currently experiencing the highest demand for service we have in our history of our organization, which is a little bit concerning in the sense that if there are additional increases, we're going to have to really make sure we can stretch resources to help everyone,' Faworski said.
It's a concerning trend, but Faworski said her team is determined to meet the need as best as they can. Some of the people getting help make just enough not to qualify for federal assistance, but can't keep up with basic costs. Others are on SNAP.
While the program helps with food costs at stores, it does not cover all a household could need. That's why Faworski said she's concerned about hearing what's going on in Washington.
'It's always on the chopping block and we're watching that,' she said.
The program, among other federal programs, is in line for deep cuts and reform as part of the legislative package. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act is expected to slash $267 billion in federal spending for SNAP over nearly a decade.
Part of it comes from states having to cover 75% of administrative costs instead of 50%. The legislation also calls on states to match 5% of SNAP allotments. That rate would go up depending on the error rate of each state. It would also change general work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents. That requirement would apply to people who are not over 65 years old, instead of 55 years old.
The SNAP Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Grant Program would also be cut. The program supports SNAP-Ed, an educational arm aimed at promoting healthy eating habits through different state programs.
With Medicaid also facing cuts in federal subsidies, Faworski said she's concerned changes at the federal level will trickle down to people's budgets.
'People are living very, very thinly,' Faworski said. 'And if they have already stretched budgets, something that changes even a very small amount can really throw them into a financial crisis and have put them into a position of having to make choices.'
Some Congressional Republicans say the changes are needed to rein in a program that has been running unchecked.
'The provisions included in the One Big, Beautiful Bill will ensure that SNAP works the way Congress intended by reinforcing work requirements, rooting out waste, and instituting long-overdue accountability incentives to end executive and state overreach,' Republican Congressman Tim Walberg said in a statement to News 8.
Walberg said there's strong support even among Democrats for work requirements. But states have overused waivers.
'This commonsense reform will restore integrity to the program by closing loopholes and incentivizing states to enhance efficiencies and improve outcomes for recipients. These efforts will ultimately strengthen SNAP for those this program was intended to serve,' Walberg said.
If benefits are cut, Faworski said she anticipates seeing a larger number of people using the food bank. Despite losing a major source of support due to cuts at the USDA recently, she said her team will do their best to meet whatever demand comes through the door.
H.R. 1 has moved on to the U.S. Senate. If passed, it will move on to the White House to be signed into law by President Donald Trump.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California lawmakers, immigrant advocates denied entry to Adelanto ICE facility
A coalition of California lawmakers and immigrant advocates were denied entry to the U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement facility in Adelanto, where many immigrants detained during recent raids in Los Angeles are being held. U.S. Rep. Gilbert R. Cisneros Jr. (CA-31) traveled to the Adelanto ICE Processing Center with Rep. Judy Chu (CA-28) and Rep. Derek Tran (CA-45) and members of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Sunday morning, according to a media release from Rep. Cisneros' office. Heavy military presence seen in downtown Los Angeles after days of immigration protests 'I attempted to conduct Congressional oversight at the Adelanto ICE facility…they locked the gate, ignored our calls and denied us entry,' Rep. Cisneros said. 'At Trump's direction, ICE and DHS agents are harassing our community, questioning our neighbors and disregarding the law by preventing us from conducting oversight.' 'Trump is deliberately manufacturing chaos and inciting fear,' he added. 'I will continue to press for answers as our community is under attack.' Popular swap meet canceled due to possible ICE activity The 31st Congressional District under Rep. Cisneros' constituency encompasses much of the San Gabriel Valley and contains many of the area's predominantly Hispanic communities. Rep. Chu represents much of northeastern Los Angeles County in the 28th District, and Rep. Tran represents the 45th District, which covers parts of L.A. and Orange counties. Another local member of Congress, Rep. Jimmy Gomez (CA-34), told KTLA on Saturday that he was denied entry to the facility where detained immigrants were being held in downtown Los Angeles. Gomez, whose 34th District includes many of Los Angeles' most prominent ethnic enclaves, said the Trump administration was 'operating outside the bounds of the law' by not letting members of Congress into the detention facilities to conduct oversight. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UH program that helps struggling ʻohana on federal chopping block
HONOLULU (KHON2) — A University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa program aimed at helping struggling ʻohana and kūpuna is on the federal chopping block as the U.S. Congress looks at cutting its funding. UH's SNAP-Ed program, which is run by the College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resilience, receives federal funding for its operations, which includes teaching ʻohana how to prepare healthy and affordable meals. Early morning vehicle collisions hospitalize two 'Our college has been working with local families and kūpuna through SNAP-Ed for more than 20 years,' SNAP-Ed Program Director Jean Butel said. 'Our SNAP-Ed program has become a trusted community partner that helps about 15,000 community members across Hawaiʻi every year. We meet people where they are: public schools, farmer's markets, senior care facilities and other community gathering places.' In addition to teaching people how to make healthy meals, the program also helps families budget for their groceries and even shows them how to grow their own produce. According to UH, 91% of participants in the program improved their diet, 83% learned how to budget better and 40% said they could afford more food for their ʻ for the SNAP-Ed program has been completely cut from the budget, which is currently being debated by the federal legislature, which puts local families at risk of losing a vital resource, UH said. 'We are grateful that Hawaiʻi's Congressional delegation fully supports SNAP-Ed,' said college Dean Parwinder Grewal. 'With our geographic isolation, high cost of living and ongoing food insecurity, full funding is essential for Congress to continue supporting Hawaiʻi's SNAP-Ed families and kūpuna.' Should the federal government approve of the cuts, the program will expire on Sept. 30, potentially further hurting already struggling locals. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
On the Record: Federal funding cuts threaten 1/3 of WTVP budget
PEORIA, Ill. (WMBD) — Local PBS affiliate stations like WTVP are sounding the alarm for their future after the Trump administration formally requested Congress to claw back funding for the next two years. WTVP President and CEO Jenn Gordon joined 'On the Record' and said the cuts will have a devastating impact on her station, which has just recovered from a financial situation of its own. 'So we're looking at an impact of about a third of our annual funding being immediately cut, if this rescission package goes through. So a lot is at stake here. More than 1.3 million people have already contacted Congress to voice their support [for public media],' she said. Gordon emphasized that public media differs from commercial media in that it's a private-public partnership. 'We're nonprofit organizations that rely in part on federal support to offer commercial-free programming to everyone. It was set up originally to receive some taxpayer dollars to get the ball rolling, but then also all of our local stations, we do quite a bit of fundraising to supplement that,' said Gordon. That federal funding could disappear in less than two months. The Trump administration, on Tuesday, sent Congress a rescission package, formally requesting the return of $1.1 billion already allocated for fiscal years 2026 and 2027 to fund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. That starts a countdown of 45 days for Congress to respond. If passed, Gordon said local stations like WTVP stand to lose nearly a third of their annual funding. 'This isn't just about national programming,' Gordon warned. 'Smaller stations will feel the cut even more sharply. At WTVP, we'd have to immediately shift into emergency fundraising mode to try to close the gap. It could slow or stop local and educational programming, and delay production for new shows.' The rescission package comes on the heels of another blow to public media. President Trump issued an executive order on May 1 to shut down PBS and NPR, citing bias and irrelevance. Both organizations have filed lawsuits in response, arguing the order is a violation of the First Amendment. Gordon said the ripple effects from the loss of funding will be felt everywhere, from fewer children's programs to potential job impacts at the local level. 'Some of that federal funding goes to actually producing programs. So you're going to see a shortening of production timelines. And then additionally, at the local level, it's going to immediately need us to move into a grassroots fundraising mode to try and make up for that difference,' she said. So, how can you help? Gordon said to call or send a message to your lawmakers voicing your support for public media. You can also visit 'It takes five minutes and could make a real difference,' she said. On June 3, PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger echoed Gordon's sentiments in a statement. 'The proposed rescissions would have a devastating impact on PBS member stations and the essential role they play in communities, particularly smaller and rural stations that rely on federal funding for a larger portion of their budgets,' she said. 'Without PBS member stations, Americans will lose unique local programming and emergency services in times of crisis. There's nothing more American than PBS, and we are proud to highlight real issues, individuals, and places that would otherwise be overlooked by commercial media.' PBS was created in by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting in 1969 to provide Americans with a non-commercial space for news, educational programming, and inspirational content. There are approximately 350 stations across the country. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
