logo
Maxus Mifa 7 review: This MPV makes sense for one reason

Maxus Mifa 7 review: This MPV makes sense for one reason

Business Times13-06-2025
[SINGAPORE] Quentin Tarantino gave us The Hateful Eight, but if this Maxus were a movie, it would be The Sensible 7.
Like many electric cars sold here, the once-British-but-now-Chinese brand's Mifa 7 now comes in detuned form to duck under the Category A Certificate Of Entitlement bar. That brings its starting price to S$204,999, making it a good S$14,000 cheaper than the Category B version.
Under the floor sits a 90 kilowatt-hour lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery, which is happier at full charge than nickel manganese cobalt packs, so you can top it up to 100 per cent with less fretting about degradation. It delivers a claimed 480 kilometres of range, which works out to less than one plug-in a week for most drivers here.
As you might expect, unlike Inglourious Basterds, the Category A Mifa 7 isn't full of explosive action. But also unlike the movie, it actually makes sense. It's a seven-seat electric multi-purpose vehicle (MPV) that's big enough for a big family, but small enough to make easy work of our narrow roads and tight car parks. At 4,910 mm long and 1,885 mm wide, it's about the size of a Mercedes E-Class. If you can handle that, you can handle this.
And you can definitely handle the amount of excitement the Mifa 7 dishes out, given how it takes a leisurely 14.7 seconds to reach 100 kmh. That said, even though it sounds like driving the Maxus puts you at risk of being overtaken by the odd glacier, the car does get up to speed with a sense of duty.
The motor still biffs out plenty of torque, enough for you to chirp the front tyres if you floor it out of a slow corner, and in the city the Mifa 7 doesn't struggle to keep up with other traffic.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 2 pm Lifestyle
Our picks of the latest dining, travel and leisure options to treat yourself.
Sign Up
Sign Up
If it's no fun at all to drive, at least it's easy. Visibility is good, the steering is light, and it doesn't feel like a runaway stagecoach. Instead, its medium-sized footprint means that corralling it in a lane isn't a serious test of skill and concentration.
If you do need help, the car comes with lane-keep assist, blind spot monitors, adaptive cruise control and autonomous emergency braking. It also has a little camera that watches you vigilantly, then bongs at you if it senses distracted driving. Annoying? Yes, but admittedly useful.
It nagged me whenever I took my eye off the road for too long while looking for something on the 12.3-inch touchscreen. Yet, there are no zero-layer controls, meaning essentials like the climate panel or 360-degree camera view aren't always on screen. If you're bopping along to Spotify with Apple CarPlay, you'll need to exit it just to change the fan speed. And then you get bonged at.
While the driver is forced to stay alert, life on board for everyone else is reasonably cushy. At town speeds, the springs and dampers cope with the car's 2.2-tonne mass well, and the air-con system doesn't struggle to fill the vast cabin.
The rear has its own climate control panel, plus ceiling vents to keep everyone cool. There is a glass roof for those who love sunshine, and a roller shade for those who hate it.
You're meant to fit three people across the third row, and a compact suspension design leaves enough space back there to make it just about doable, although the available width works best for kids.
While the second row gets individual chairs, they're not the business class seats that bigger MPVs offer. In fact, the Mifa 7 comes without a flip-down entertainment screen, folding tables, a refrigerator, massaging chairs or flip-up leg rests, all of which are becoming standard fare in the world of Chinese luxury MPVs. To move or recline the middle row seats, you have to use your biceps.
Given how the Mifa 7 is much cheaper than bigger, plusher MPVs, the lack of frills is understandable. It's obviously more for family men than businessmen. Yet, the boot space is quoted at just 270 litres with all seats up, and there's no frunk.
There's enough capacity for some shopping, a stroller and, apparently, a wheelchair, but when you fold the third row seats you're left with the bench in place. That's one reason the car doesn't feel like it has a proper boot – just some room behind the passengers.
Ultimately, the Maxus is a solid people mover that has uniqueness on its side. It isn't as compelling as The Magnificent Seven, but the Mifa 7 is your only ticket to a seven-seat electric MPV with sliding doors in Category A.
Maxus Mifa 7 Luxury Motor power/Torque 145 hp / 350 Nm Battery type/Net capacity Lithium-ion / 90 kWh Charging time/Type 8.5 hours (11 kW AC), 40 minutes 5 to 80 per cent (120 kW DC) Range 480 km 0-100 kmh 14.7 seconds Top speed 170 kmh Efficiency 20.5 kWh / 100 km Agent Cycle & Carriage Maxus Price S$204,999 with COE Available Now
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bulk bids, influx of ultra-wealthy into Singapore exert upward pressure on COE
Bulk bids, influx of ultra-wealthy into Singapore exert upward pressure on COE

Business Times

time4 days ago

  • Business Times

Bulk bids, influx of ultra-wealthy into Singapore exert upward pressure on COE

LESLIE Yee's recent commentary in The Business Times (Jul 28) is both timely and incisive: Singapore's Certificate of Entitlement (COE) system is increasingly out of step with today's realities. What was once a mechanism to regulate vehicle ownership now risks becoming a barrier to fairness and transparency. A comprehensive reform is long overdue. The current COE framework lumps private hire operators, such as commercial rental firms, into the same bidding pool as individual car buyers. This is fundamentally flawed. These two groups operate with vastly different purchasing power and incentives. While individuals seek personal mobility, companies pursue fleet expansion and profit. Yet both are forced to compete under identical conditions, distorting the market and disadvantaging everyday consumers. For most individual buyers, the COE bidding process is a black box. Car dealers typically handle the bidding on their behalf, bundling the COE into the final vehicle price. Final bidding prices submitted by dealers depend on the sales figures. Dealers are most willing to lower the profit margin for each car when more orders are secured, thus bidding up the COE prices. Again, private hire firms often bid in bulk through dealers, who leverage economies of scale and submit aggressive bids, especially near the close of each exercise. These high-volume submissions artificially inflate COE prices, which then set the benchmark for subsequent rounds. The result? A relentless upward spiral in prices. This vicious circle erodes public confidence and undermines the system's integrity. If the COE is to remain a relevant and equitable tool, it must be recalibrated to reflect the distinct needs and capacities of its participants. Separate bidding categories, greater transparency, and tighter regulation of bulk submissions could be a start. And let's not ignore the broader economic shifts. The influx of family offices and ultra-wealthy individuals into Singapore will inevitably exert upward pressure on COE prices. Without intervention, the system risks becoming a playground for the privileged, leaving ordinary citizens priced out of car ownership. Chia Cheng Tiam

Amid BlueSG pause, how are car-sharing firms like Getgo, Tribecar faring?
Amid BlueSG pause, how are car-sharing firms like Getgo, Tribecar faring?

Business Times

time5 days ago

  • Business Times

Amid BlueSG pause, how are car-sharing firms like Getgo, Tribecar faring?

[SINGAPORE] Electric car sharing firm BlueSG announced a pause of its current operations last Monday (Aug 4) and laid off most of its staff. Yet, the company is set to launch a new service from 2026 onwards. Some of Singapore's characteristics make it suited for car sharing, such as the high cost of car ownership, increasing disposable income and growth of the population. In recent years, car sharing has been boosted by the convenience of app-based platforms and high Certificate of Entitlement prices. According to Land Transport Authority statistics, the number of self-drive private hire cars has grown to 31,022 in 2024 from 17,238 in 2014. This includes both conventional long-term rental cars and car sharing vehicles. Industry estimates that the car sharing fleet population has grown to around 5,000 vehicles from less than 1,000 in the same period. The car sharing landscape in Singapore is estimated to bring in US$182.8 million in revenue by the end of 2025 with an average revenue of S$479 per user, according to research firm Statista. Revenue is projected to increase to US$236.4 million by 2030. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Keith Kee, CEO of BlueSG, said that car sharing will continue to be a growth industry in the near future, citing Singapore's high barriers to car ownership. 'I think it's important that services like BlueSG enable people who have a driving licence, but do not want to have the heavy commitment of owning a car, to be able to still drive. It's a different experience from other services like public transport or ride hailing. It complements public transport as part of the transport ecosystem in Singapore.' GetGo CEO Toh Ting Feng concurred, saying he believes that 'car sharing continues to grow and deliver more impact and access' in Singapore. 'The cost of living is going up, the cost of labour, land, and cars. At the same time, public transport is getting better, which addresses daily transport needs. So the need for accessible and flexible transport options will grow,' he added. Shared destiny? However, car sharing also has challenges here with many past attempts ending in failure. Car sharing has been around since 1997, when NTUC Income Car Cooperative began operating. Yet, BlueSG's troubles are not new. Despite the rosy outlook, there have been many failed attempts at car sharing in Singapore as car sharing firms grappled with high capital expenditure on fleet size and struggled to maintain service convenience for users. Honda Diracc, from the Japanese mass-market car brand, closed in 2008, unable to maintain profitability, service standards and vehicle availability amid fluctuating vehicle prices. CitySpeed Car Sharing by ComfortDelGro wound down in 2007, citing lower Certificate of Entitlement and car prices as usership plunged. Startup Smove launched in 2011 and became Singapore's biggest car sharing fleet by 2018. But it went into liquidation in 2020, due to disruption from the pandemic and was acquired by Drive lah. In 2008, Honda closed its car sharing service Diracc in Singapore. PHOTO: BT FILE Luxury German carmaker introduced Audi On Demand, a car-sharing/short term rental service in 2018 as part of a global programme, but ended it in 2024. Walter Theseira, associate professor of economics at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, said that the fundamental economics of car sharing in Singapore are challenging, with most firms that have been in the space over the last few decades being unsuccessful. 'My long-term outlook (on car sharing) has always been negative, as structurally the aim of public transport policy in Singapore is to reduce car use as much as possible by providing better public transport connectivity,' he said. He added that in Singapore, capital expenditures on vehicles are high, thus a certain amount of utilisation or revenue is needed to overcome depreciation. 'Currently, it seems easiest to do that through taxis and ride-hailing. Even in the future, that's likely to be the case through robotaxis. not through self-drive,' he said. Car sharing in Singapore: the players GetGo CEO Toh Ting Feng says the appeal of car sharing will continue to grow in Singapore as the cost of living increases. PHOTO: BT FILE Here's an overview of the firms currently offering car sharing services in Singapore. GetGo GetGo is the largest car sharing platform in Singapore with over 400,000 subscribers. Commenced operations: 2021 Fleet size: More than 3,000 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$3 per hour and S$0.39 per kilometre Locations: More than 1,700 Beyond car sharing, the team behind GetGo launched a long-term car leasing service called ZipZap at the end of July. It will have a minimum rental period of six months, compared to a range of one hour to five days for GetGo. BlueSG BlueSG is an electric-only car sharing platform, but will be pausing operations until 2026 as part of a major upgrade to its tech platform. Commenced operations: 2017 Fleet size: About 1,000 Subscription: Free, S$8, or S$18 per month Rates: From S$0.36 to S$0.58 per minute, depending on subscription level and car Locations: About 1,500 charging points In a response to The Business Times queries, BlueSG said it had about 250,000 subscribers currently. Goldbell Group had promised an investment of S$70 million over five years in 2021 when it acquired BlueSG from Bollore Group. The platform was also unique in that rented cars did not need to be returned to their pick-up locations. Tribecar Tribecar was the largest car sharing service in Singapore in March 2022, shortly after its acquisition of the oldest car sharing company Car Club (formerly NTUC Income Car Cooperative) and further expanded its fleet in 2022 with the acquisition of Popular Rent a Car. While no longer the largest, it is still one of the major players in the Republic. Commenced operations: 2016 Fleet size: About 1,400 Subscription: Optional, S$139 per month for two hours of driving per weekday Rates: From S$2.18 per hour, depending on subscription level and car Locations: More than 750 Tribecar also offers motorcycles, from as low as S$0.55 per hour, or vans from S$4.36 per hour. Shariot While GetGo is the largest car sharing platform, Shariot claims to be the largest van sharing platform in Singapore. It also offers car rentals, but has carved out its niche within vans. Commenced operations: 2020 Fleet size: More than 250 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$5.90, S$7.90, or S$9.90 per hour depending on vehicle type Locations: More than 300 Car Lite Carlite is a slightly older platform which, like Tribecar, allows probation plate holders to rent its vehicles. Commenced operations: 2018 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$1 per 15 minutes Locations: More than 150 According to Seedly, Car Lite in 2023 had a fleet size of more than 200 cars, though it does not otherwise publicly disclose its figures. Drive lah Drive lah is a unique car sharing service in the list, as it offers a peer to peer sharing. That means that private car owners rent out their own cars to hirers, instead of the cars all being owned by the company. Commenced operations: 2019 Fleet size: More than 1,300 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$1 per 15 minutes The company also acquired Smove, another car sharing platform, in 2020 and integrated its customers and some staff into Drive lah. In 2023, it secured S$2.7 million in funding from ComfortDelGro for its expansion in Australia, with that operation known as Drive mate.

As BlueSG pauses amid troubles, here is how car-sharing in Singapore is faring
As BlueSG pauses amid troubles, here is how car-sharing in Singapore is faring

Business Times

time6 days ago

  • Business Times

As BlueSG pauses amid troubles, here is how car-sharing in Singapore is faring

[SINGAPORE] Electric car sharing firm BlueSG announced a pause of its current operations last Monday (Aug 4) and laid off most of its staff. Yet, the company is set to launch a new service from 2026 onwards. Some of Singapore's characteristics make the city suited for car sharing like the high cost of car ownership, increasing disposable income and growth of the population. In recent years, car sharing has been boosted by the convenience of app-based platforms and high Certificate of Entitlement prices. According to Land Transport Authority statistics, the car sharing vehicle population (classified as a sub-type of private hire cars) has grown to 31,022 in 2024 from 17,238 in 2014. The car sharing landscape in Singapore is estimated to bring in US$182.8 million in revenue by the end of 2025 with an average revenue of S$479 per user, according to research firm Statista. Revenue is projected to increase to US$236.4 million by 2030. Keith Kee, CEO of BlueSG, said that car sharing will continue to be a growth industry in the near future, citing Singapore's high barriers to car-ownership. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'I think it's important that services like BlueSG enable people who have a driving licence, but do not want to have the heavy commitment of owning a car to be able to still drive. It's a different experience from other services like public transport or ride hailing, it compliments public transport as part of the transport ecosystem in Singapore.' GetGo CEO Toh Ting Feng concurred, saying he believes that 'car-sharing continues to grow and deliver more impact and access' in Singapore. 'The cost of living is going up, the cost of labour, land, and cars. At the same time, public transport is getting better, which addresses daily transport needs. So the need for accessible and flexible transport options will grow,' he added. Shared destiny? However car sharing also has challenges here with many past attempts ending in failure. Car sharing has been around since 1997, when NTUC Income Car Cooperative began operating. Yet BlueSG's troubles are not new. Despite the rosy outlook, there have been many failed attempts at car sharing in Singapore as car sharing firms grappled with high capital expenditure on fleet size and struggled to maintain service convenience for users, Honda Diracc, from the Japanese mass-market car brand closed in 2008, unable to maintain profitability, service standards and vehicle availability amid fluctuating vehicle prices. Cityspeed Car Sharing by ComfortDelGro wound down in 2007, citing lower Certificate of Entitlement and car prices as usership plunged. Start-up Smove launched in 2011, became Singapore's biggest car sharing fleet by 2018. But it went into liquidation in 2020, due to disruption from the pandemic and was acquired by Drive lah. Luxury German carmaker introduced Audi On Demand, a car-sharing/short term rental service in 2018 as part of a global programme, but ended it in 2024 Walter Theseira, associate professor of economics at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, said that the fundamental economics of car sharing in Singapore are challenging, with most firms that have been in the space over the last few decades being unsuccessful. 'My long-term outlook (on car sharing) has always been negative, as structurally the aim of public transport policy in Singapore is to reduce car use as much as possible by providing better public transport connectivity,' he said. He added that in Singapore, capital expenditures on vehicles are high, thus a certain amount of utilisation or revenue is needed to overcome depreciation. 'Currently, it seems easiest to do that through taxis and ride-hailing. Even in the future, that's likely to be the case through robotaxis. not through self-drive,' he said. Car sharing in Singapore: the players GetGo CEO Toh Ting Feng says the appeal of car sharing will continue to grow in Singapore as the cost of living increases. PHOTO: BT FILE Here's an overview of the firms currently offering car sharing services in Singapore. GetGo GetGo is the largest car sharing platform in Singapore with over 400,000 subscribers. Commenced operations: 2021 Fleet size: More than 3,000 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$3 per hour and S$0.39 per kilometre Locations: More than 1,700 Beyond car sharing, the team behind GetGo launched a long-term car leasing service called ZipZap at the end of July. It will have a minimum rental period of six months, compared to a range of one hour to five days for GetGo. BlueSG BlueSG is an electric-only car sharing platform, but will be pausing operations until 2026 as part of a major upgrade to its tech platform. Commenced operations: 2017 Fleet size: About 1,000 Subscription: Free, S$8, or S$18 per month Rates: From S$0.36 to S$0.58 per minute, depending on subscription level and car Locations: About 1,500 charging points In a response to The Business Times queries, BlueSG said it had about 250,000 subscribers currently. Goldbell Group had promised an investment of S$70 million over five years in 2021 when it acquired BlueSG from Bollore Group. The platform was also unique in that rented cars did not need to be returned to their pick-up locations. Tribecar Tribecar was the largest car sharing service in Singapore in March 2022, shortly after its acquisition of the oldest car sharing company Car Club (formerly NTUC Income Car Cooperative) and further expanded its fleet in 2022 with the acquisition of Popular Rent a Car. While no longer the largest, it is still one of the major players in the Republic. Commenced operations: 2016 Fleet size: About 1,400 Subscription: Optional, S$139 per month for two hours of driving per weekday Rates: From S$2.18 per hour, depending on subscription level and car Locations: More than 750 Tribecar also offers motorcycles, from as low as S$0.55 per hour, or vans from S$4.36 per hour. Shariot While GetGo is the largest car sharing platform, Shariot claims to be the largest van sharing platform in Singapore. It also offers car rentals, but has carved out its niche within vans. Commenced operations: 2020 Fleet size: More than 250 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$5.90, S$7.90, or S$9.90 per hour depending on vehicle type Locations: More than 300 Car Lite Carlite is a slightly older platform which, like Tribecar, allows probation plate holders to rent its vehicles. Commenced operations: 2018 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$1 per 15 minutes Locations: More than 150 According to Seedly, Car Lite in 2023 had a fleet size of more than 200 cars, though it does not otherwise publicly disclose its figures. Drive lah Drive lah is a unique car sharing service in the list, as it offers a peer to peer sharing. That means that private car owners rent out their own cars to hirers, instead of the cars all being owned by the company. Commenced operations: 2019 Fleet size: More than 1,300 Subscription: No subscription Rates: From S$1 per 15 minutes The company also acquired Smove, another car sharing platform, in 2020 and integrated its customers and some staff into Drive lah. In 2023, it secured S$2.7 million in funding from ComfortDelGro for its expansion in Australia, with that operation known as Drive mate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store