logo
It's a Thursday showdown over a new men's prison

It's a Thursday showdown over a new men's prison

Yahoo20-02-2025
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — The South Dakota Legislature's Joint Committee on Appropriations will receive a presentation on Thursday morning about the state Department of Corrections plan to construct a new men's prison in rural Lincoln County.
Gov. Rhoden takes new tack in fight for new male prison
What those 18 appropriators learn during the 11 a.m. CT meeting in room 362 at the South Dakota Capitol could, in turn, shape what the Legislature as a whole decides on whether to go ahead with the $825 million project and whether the site should instead be someplace else.
KELOLAND News will livestream the committee hearing at 11 a.m. You'll be able to watch the discussion Thursday morning in the video player above.
Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden used his weekly legislative-session news conference on Wednesday to talk about the need for the new prison. One of his senior aides, Ryan Brunner, told reporters that comparisons to a less-expensive proposed prison in Nebraska are based on prices that are four years old.
Lt. Gov. Tony Venhuizen also spoke at the news conference. Venhuizen, a former appropriator, said that every building project that went through the committee in recent years wound up costing more than the Legislature had initially authorized.
House Bill 1025 would authorize the construction and transfer from the state incarceration fund the final funding of $763 million needed for the project. A two-thirds majority — 47 in the House and 24 in the Senate — is needed in each chamber for the legislation to reach Rhoden's desk.
This comes as the Legislature is grappling with unexpectedly slow growth in state sales tax and other revenues. Former Gov. Kristi Noem recommended millions of dollars in spending reductions before she resigned last month to become the new federal Homeland Security secretary. Millions of one-time dollars would be freed up in the budget deliberations if the new prison is delayed.
Republican Sen. Kevin Jensen is leading the resistance to the new prison, which would be located in his legislative district. He has introduced two pieces of legislation that would halt, at least temporarily, the spending of money that was earmarked in 2023 and 2024 for the prison project.
FAQ about the planned new men's prison
Jensen's Senate Bill 125 calls for establishing an incarceration task force that would independently review the construction and improvement of state correctional facilities. The task force would issue a report no later than December 1, 2025.
The project's guaranteed maximum price of $825 million however expires at the end of March.
Jensen's Senate Bill 204 would prohibit spending any of the money that was set aside in 2023 and 2024 for the new prison until after the task force issues its report. How that money would be spent would have to align with the task force's recommendations.
Both of Jensen's bills are pending in the Senate State Affairs Committee. He serves on the committee. Hearing dates haven't yet been set.
Last week, Corrections Secretary Kellie Wasko surprised some House lawmakers when she said the estimated costs for operating the new prison would be approximately $20 million more than the current $30 million annual cost for the State Penitentiary and Jameson Annex complex in Sioux Falls. She had previously told appropriators about the increase during a January meeting.
Rhoden meanwhile told reporters on Wednesday he was planning to travel to the National Governors Association meeting on Thursday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Calif. court rejects GOP challenge to redraw state maps
Calif. court rejects GOP challenge to redraw state maps

UPI

time28 minutes ago

  • UPI

Calif. court rejects GOP challenge to redraw state maps

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a Republican challenge to Gov. Gavin Newsom's effort to redraw the state's congressional maps. File Photo by Jonathan Alcorn/UPI | License Photo Aug. 21 (UPI) -- The California Supreme Court has rejected a Republican challenge to Gov. Gavin Newsom's plan to redraw the state's congressional districts, a move the Democrat is pursuing as retaliation against Texas for approving maps that favor Republicans. The court issued its refusal Wednesday, the same day Texas state Republicans passed maps that are expected to produce five additional GOP seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. According to a note on the decision in the docket, "Petitioners have failed to meet their burden of establishing a basis for relief." The ruling was issued two days after four California state Republican lawmakers filed the lawsuit against Democratic lawmakers who had introduced legislation on Monday to initiate the state's redistricting. The litigation comes amid something of a congressional redistricting arms race that kicked off with Texas. Congressional maps are generally redrawn once a decade based on new Census Bureau data, with the next census scheduled for 2030. Democrats are accusing Texas Republicans of redrawing their maps now under pressure from President Donald Trump to help ensure the GOP maintains its control of the House following next year's midterm elections. Republicans currently hold a narrow majority in the congressional chamber. Newsom has been among the most vocal critics, and has vowed to redistrict California to neutralize those seats to be gained in Texas. Other states on both sides of the political aisle have suggested they might do the same. The lawsuit was filed by Republican state Sens. Tony Strickland and Suzette Martinez Valladares and Assemblymembers Tri Ta and Kathryn Sanchez, who have pledged to continue their fight despite the California Supreme Court decision. "We will continue to challenge this unconstitutional power grab in the courts and at the ballot box," they said in a statement. "Californians deserve fair, transparent elections, not secret backroom deals to protect politicians."

The GOP's big problem in selling the ‘big, beautiful bill'
The GOP's big problem in selling the ‘big, beautiful bill'

Politico

time28 minutes ago

  • Politico

The GOP's big problem in selling the ‘big, beautiful bill'

Asked if he was worried selling the bill would be harder than expected, Tuberville hedged. 'No — well again, you don't know until the end of the day, how this bill is going to be reacted to.' He predicted the next six months would determine the law's reception. Yet the GOP's efforts to preview the megabill's forthcoming perks come as Democrats are also using August to flood the zone — including visiting red states and typically safe GOP districts — to warn about the law's impending cuts to Medicaid and SNAP. 'House Republicans have betrayed their constituents in passing the Big, Ugly Law which benefits the wealthiest few and leaves everyday families behind,' Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chair Suzan DelBene said in a statement Wednesday. Republicans are well aware that they are facing a tidal wave of Democratic criticism heading into a midterm election cycle, when the party in power typically loses seats. While Republicans still have an edge in the Senate map, Democrats have managed to score major recruiting wins in key races and are cautiously optimistic about their chances of flipping the House in 2026. One House Republican, granted anonymity to speak candidly, said in a recent interview that the party has a good case to make on the GOP megabill but they need to hammer it harder. 'We have to do better,' the Republican said. 'We have to pound that over and over again: Constituents are going to feel it.' The House GOP's campaign arm circulated a memo late last month with guidance for how to message about the law, calling the congressional August recess a 'critical opportunity to continue to define how this legislation will help every voter and push back on Democrat fearmongering.' Since then, House and Senate Republicans have, indeed, fanned out across the country to tout state-specific benefits from their megabill they pledge will come soon. Republican Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, for instance, visited three Iowa manufacturers as part of a tour to highlight funding for workforce and trade school training.

The GOP has a megabill sales pitch problem
The GOP has a megabill sales pitch problem

Politico

time37 minutes ago

  • Politico

The GOP has a megabill sales pitch problem

IN TODAY'S EDITION:— Vance heads to GA to pitch the megabill— Jeffries: Strengthen the VRA in New York— Lawmakers sell off UnitedHealth stock amid scrutiny Republicans are spending August making their sales pitch for the 'big, beautiful bill' — and countering Democratic attacks against it. But amid the noise, voters are waiting to see what the bill actually does, Jordain Carney reports this morning. The GOP megabill, which extended President Donald Trump's 2017 tax cuts and implemented some of his campaign promises like 'no tax on tips,' was signed into law less than two months ago. Yet key components won't go fully into effect until 2026, putting Republicans in a tricky messaging spot. 'It's hard for people to realize anything that they haven't seen yet – all they are doing is hearing it,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville told reporters this week. 'There's going to be a lot of substance to this, it just all has to go into effect.' Republicans want to avoid what happened to their colleagues across the aisle: Democrats tried to sell their signature climate legislation ahead of the 2022 midterms and the 2024 presidential election, only for most Americans to say they either never heard of it or only heard Republican countermessaging. The latest megabill sales pitch will come today from Vice President JD Vance, who's headed to Georgia to praise the law's 'working family tax cuts.' But many new and expanded tax cuts — and other pieces of the bill like new savings accounts for children under 18 — won't be felt for months. At the same time, Democrats are flooding the zone with their own narrative about the bill, such as spotlighting its impending cuts to food assistance and Medicaid. One House Republican, granted anonymity to speak candidly, acknowledged Republicans need to make a stronger case than Democrats if they want to win the midterms. 'We have to do better,' the Republican said. 'We have to pound that over and over again: Constituents are going to feel it.' GOOD THURSDAY MORNING. Your Inside Congress authors are asking to try oysters from Senate candidate Graham Platner … for reporting purposes. Email us: mmccarthy@ and crazor@ And congratulations to Rep. Rob Bresnahan who got married to Chelsea Strub, a former anchor and producer at WNEP-TV 16, over the weekend in Scranton, Pennsylvania. THE LEADERSHIP SUITE Jeffries leads call to strengthen VRA in New York House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries led the New York congressional delegation in calling on state officials to strengthen the New York Voting Rights Act amid GOP efforts to undermine the national law. 'In light of the nationwide assault on the Voting Rights Act of 1965, it is imperative that the protections of the NYVRA extend to every single congressional district in New York,' the members wrote to Gov. Kathy Hochul, state Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and state Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins. 'Absent such action, the people of our state are vulnerable to the nationwide effort to disenfranchise communities of color and rig the congressional map.' The lawmakers cited the Supreme Court's requirement that a case concerning a majority Black district in Louisiana be reargued, as well as a recent Justice Department argument that Texas may have unconstitutionally used race to draw majority-minority districts. 'The toxic effort to obliterate what remains of the VRA threatens to disenfranchise millions of people in our state and requires an immediate response,' the members wrote. Senate Dems keep the Epstein pressure on The Justice Department missed a deadline this week to turn over Jeffrey Epstein-related files imposed by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Democrats on Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The lawmakers used an obscure federal law to force Attorney General Pam Bondi to provide 'the full and complete Epstein files.' Lawmakers said in a letter to Bondi this week they were unsatisfied by DOJ's response that the department is evaluating 'whether' it may provide documents and is already requesting courts unseal other grand jury transcripts. The agency could hand over the files 'in the possession of the DOJ or FBI,' senators countered. Panel Democrats want the documents no later than Sept. 2, as well as a staff briefing. POLICY RUNDOWN LAWMAKERS SELL UNITEDHEALTH STOCKS — Lawmakers with financial stakes in UnitedHealth Group have been selling their stocks as rising costs and legal scrutiny plague the company, Kelly Hooper reports this morning. Most of the stock sales happened between April and July this year. Members of both parties and Trump administration officials sold more than they bought during this time — putting more than $1.1 million up for sale, while collectively purchasing around $950,000. It's happening as Congress and the Trump administration probe the health care giant over its billing practices and how often it denies care. GOP megabill cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act have also brought some uncertainty to insurers' financial stability and bottom lines. The sales also come amid an effort in Congress to ban members from trading stocks to prevent conflicts of interest — a crackdown some lawmakers say they support and cite as justification for their decisions to sell. HEINRICH EYES PERMITTING MOVES — As the House looks to tackle bipartisan permitting reform this fall, per Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Sen. Martin Heinrich said an overhaul of the federal process for approving new energy projects is an 'ongoing conversation' between the two chambers. 'I think it's still fairly nondescript and amorphous right now,' the Senate Natural Resources ranking member told Mia in a brief interview about the status of bicameral negotiations. 'But it's definitely an ongoing conversation.' The New Mexico Democrat, who has worked in the past on unsuccessful bipartisan permitting efforts, said he is optimistic a deal is now possible 'but time will tell.' 'This is an issue where both sides can win, so long as they both get something meaningful,' Heinrich said. 'So it's the kind of space that we ought to be able to legislate.' HOUSE TO TAKE UP ENERGY-WATER BILL — The House is looking to take up legislation to fund the Department of Energy and water infrastructure projects when Congress returns in less than two weeks. The $57.3 billion bill is slated for floor debate during the first week back from August recess, as lawmakers attempt to make a dent in the 'regular order' appropriations process before the Sept. 30 deadline to avoid a government shutdown. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: THE BEST OF THE REST 'I Can Still Win': Thomas Massie Is Enjoying This, from Haley Byrd Wilt at NOTUS Senate Adds Guardrails in an Effort to Force Trump to Obey Spending Bills, from Carl Hulse at The New York Times THE CARRYOUTA recess spotlight on lawmakers' Capitol Hill food recs Sen. Katie Britt had a lot of thoughts on Senate GOP Conference lunches, telling Katherine Tully-McManus they sometimes 'feel like when your grandmother cleans out the refrigerator.' 'None of it goes together or makes any sense at all,' she said. When she was chief of staff for her predecessor, then-Sen. Richard Shelby, her go-to lunches included the lunch boxes from Kyoto and Mexican food from Tortilla Coast (spots that no longer exist). 'I have an old school approach and I'm sad they're gone. But Kyoto was great,' Britt said. What Capitol meal do you love? Email mmccarthy@ and crazor@ CAMPAIGN STOP REDISTRICTING UPDATE — The Texas House approved a redrawn congressional map Wednesday that will give Republicans a bigger advantage in 2026, intensifying a national gerrymandering battle across the country. The new maps now head to the GOP-controlled state Senate and Gov. Greg Abbott. Meanwhile, the California legislature is set to begin working on its revised map to add Democratic leaning congressional seats. JOB BOARD Phillip Berenbroick is now a senior strategist at the American Economic Liberties Project. He previously was chief counsel for the Senate Judiciary antitrust subcommittee under Sen. Amy Klobuchar. Emma Weir is now comms director for Rep. Pete Aguilar and the House Democratic Caucus. She was previously comms director and a senior adviser for the New Democrat Coalition and is a Schumer and DPCC alum. Natalie Turner is joining Rep. Juan Ciscomani's office as comms director. She most recently was a public affairs specialist at the Kansas Bureau of Investigation and is a Roger Marshall alum. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Former Sen. Jon Tester … The Atlantic's Elaine Godfrey … Ryan McCormack of the Transportation Department … Manuel Roig-Franzia … Ken Mehlman of KKR … Arkansas AG Tim Griffin … Joe Minges … Stephen Neuman of American Airlines … Mary Ann Naylor … Ben Howard of the Duberstein Group … Bloomberg Government's George Cahlink … Pamela Engel … David Heifetz of Breakthrough Energy … Alex DelPizzo of Thorn Run Partners … Jack Kelly … Richard Eddings of HB Strategies … Francine McMahon TRIVIA WEDNESDAY'S ANSWER: Eric Sapirstein correctly answered that Ulysses S. Grant was the first sitting U.S. president to visit Cape Cod. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Eric: Which president received 1,400 pounds of cheese as a gift from a New York dairy farmer that was left to age in the White House for two years? The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store