New smartphone for children will automatically block nudes
A new smartphone has launched which will automatically block nude images from being seen or taken.
It offers another option from the 'brick' type phones many parents have turned to, allowing children to access social media and messaging if their parents agree, but with extra layers of safety inbuilt.
Finnish phone company Human Mobile Devices (HMD), which also makes Nokia handsets, developed the phone in response to widespread concerns from parents about standard smartphones.
Designed especially for children, creators said the Fuse handset, available with Vodafone and backed by the government, is not just a new model of phone but a whole new category.
It uses artificial intelligence to analyse the picture on screen, recognising if there is nudity and preventing it from being shown.
This is done on the handset itself, with HarmBlock+ AI from UK company SafeToNet analysing content in realtime, without the need to transmit data for processing elsewhere.
It was designed in response to a 'national crisis' of children being groomed into sending nude images of themselves, or sending images to peers.
An Ofsted report in 2021 found that there was an epidemic of sexual harassment in schools, with nearly 90% of girls and 50% of boys being sent explicit pictures or videos of things they did not want to see.
New research from Vodafone found that one in five secondary school aged children from 11 to 17 have felt pressured into sharing an explicit image of themselves.
The phone offers wide-ranging parental controls, and makers say it can 'grow with your child' as parents unlock more functions such as the camera or music apps.
Features include: Location tracking every 24 seconds
Parental control over which apps can be accessed (done from the adult's phone)
Screen time limits for individual apps
Default blocking of internet and social media apps
Ability to set safe zones for physical location and receive alerts when those zones are entered or exited
Contacts can be 'whitelisted' so only trusted people can be messaged
No data shared outside the device on Cloud (e.g. photos or browsing history)
Daisy Greenwell, mum-of-three and the co-founder of Smartphone Free Childhood, told Metro: 'For too long, parents have been left to shoulder the impossible task of keeping their children safe in a digital world that was never designed with them in mind.
'It's encouraging to see tech companies starting to respond with devices built specifically for children – phones that allow kids to stay connected without being dragged into the dangers of the adult internet.
'The Fuse looks like a step forward: starting out as a simple brick with location tracking, and growing with a child as they mature. Crucially, its automatic blocking of pornography will protect children from content they don't seek out, but which is pushed at them through algorithms or shared by peers – material that can warp their understanding of healthy relationships.
'At Smartphone Free Childhood, our community of 350,000 parents is demanding better for their kids – this phone shows the industry is finally beginning to listen.'
It will be available to buy from 5pm today in stores and online, exclusively from Vodafone UK and Three. The phone costs £33 a month with a £30 upfront cost.
In the coming months, it will roll out to other countries, starting with Australia.
HMD say they consulted over 37,000 parents and children globally to work out what was missing in the Better Phone Project.
Parents said the phones currently available for children, such as the Sage iPhone or the Barbie phone (also made by HMD), were either too risky, or too limited. Safety apps designed to make standard smartphones safer were 'often easy to bypass' so families wanted something more robust. More Trending
Richard Pursey, Founder of SafeToNet, said his software made the new phone 'incompatible' with pornography as the AI embedded within the operating system coud not be removed or worked around.
Dan Sexton, Chief Technology Officer at the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) said: 'Children and young people are increasingly being exposed to criminals and predators who can target them through their phones, putting them at risk of grooming, exploitation, coercion, and abuse.
'We know any device with the internet and a camera can, sadly, be an open door for criminals to access any home and inflict the most extreme abuse. This can cost lives.
'This is why proactive efforts to make children's devices safer are so important.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: 'I felt like a terrible parent': What to do if your toddler is biting other children
MORE: People say it's stealing, but I'll never stop using my holiday breakfast hack
MORE: London bars and restaurants are banning phones and diners can't stop flirting
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
We went out with the Evri parcel robot dog in Leeds - here's what people thought
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Evri parcels are being delivered by a robot this week, with one mum telling her toddler that postmen might not exist when she's older. Milo the metal dog is near the size of a Great Dane, and deposits parcels by squatting down and shaking its tush so that they fall on the ground. We followed as it did a round of deliveries in the Leeds suburb of Meanwood yesterday, asking customers what they made of it. Most seemed happy to see it trundle along the pavement, with mum-of-two Molly saying deliveries would be 'better than bin day' for kids watching out of the window. Speaking to her daughters, Elsie and Tammy, she added: 'When you're grown up, this is all you'll see.' Carolyn Dickinson, 54, was impressed, telling Metro: 'It looks like a little donkey or something. 'I like to see all these new inventions getting rolled out, but it does make me feel old. I never imagined it would happen in my lifetime.' But husband Ian, 63, who runs family business Termipest with her, was less excited, saying he was glad robots weren't yet able to do pest control. 'It's to get people out of jobs, like in supermarkets when you're scanning your own stuff,' he said. 'I can't see how it's going to work; it can't be cost effective. By the time that's got out of the van, the courier could have got out and delivered and been on their way.' He wasn't keen on calling it a dog either, correcting me: 'That's not a dog, it's a robot.' Parcel company Evri is testing out the machine for two weeks, before a longer trial of a more traditional delivery robot, which looks like a box on wheels. The quadruped got plus points for climbing stairs, but couldn't ring doorbells or open gates, and could be thwarted by a badly placed wheelie bin. Adrian Berry, the company's head of innovation, said: 'I think it's inevitable we'll use robots to deliver. 'My view is that we're where we were with lockers ten years ago, and look at lockers now.' He said the sticking point wasn't technology but legislation, with self-driving cars and delivery robots already common in China and California. By the end of the trial, the dog should be delivering 80 parcels a day, which is what a human can manage on average. Yesterday it only did 30, but we still racked up over 10,000 steps following it around, illustrating how physical the job is, and how the dog might help. It can be controlled remotely or via a handset, though it is learning to do more autonomously all the time and does most things by itself. If Evri decide to use the dog, it would be alongside a human, whereas the 'box on wheels' style robots could carry out deliveries alone. Roman Brierly, 17, said it 'caught me by surprise but it's very cool' after watching the dog drop a parcel at his door. He picked up a parcel for his dad, jumpers from Shein, in a package so big and squishy that at first the dog struggled to shake it out of its box. Despite him and his younger sister finding it intriguing, they were not sure what their nervy greyhounds would make of it. Patricia Smith, 43, watched the dog roll up a ramp to her shop, Meanwood Mobility. 'It was fun to watch,' she said. 'That's pretty clever; quite unique, isn't it?' Like many residents we spoke to, she is already used to seeing box-on-wheels robots deliver small grocery orders for Co-op locally, so wasn't too shocked. The dog uses a robot model from Unitree, programmed with AI from Swiss company Rivr. It uses cameras and sensors to navigate, and is linked with other dogs elsewhere so that whatever it learns about dealing with obstacles is also instantly learned by the others. More Trending Jan Johnson, 63, said: 'My only concern is I hope it isn't taking jobs from delivery drivers, but if it's safer in terms of saving their backs, and if it saves time, then it's a good thing.' Adrian said if Evri do use robots in future, they need to make sure parcels are left securely, such as allowing customers to book a timeslot and collect their package so it is not just left on the ground. 'It can't ring a doorbell, but it can send a text message when it's nearby with a parcel, which might work better for some people,' he said. Robots could also do more deliveries in the evening, when customers are home from work. The dog has a speaker so it could potentially alert people with a noise, but Adrian said: 'We did talk about barking, but we thought that was a bit too freaky.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The AI report triggering panic and fear on Wall Street
'When will the internet bubble burst?' the cover story of Barron's asked on March 20 2000. 'That unpleasant popping sound is likely to be heard before the end of this year.' In fact, that same day, one of the most high-profile tech businesses of the moment suffered a share price plunge of 60pc. A flood of other collapses followed, evaporating trillions of dollars. Now, some on Wall Street fear that 'unpleasant popping sound' may be imminent for the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. On Tuesday, tech stocks suffered a shock sell-off after a report from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) researchers warned that the vast majority of AI investments were yielding 'zero return' for businesses. 'Despite $30-40bn (£22-30bn) in enterprise investment into Gen[erative]AI, this report uncovers a surprising result in that 95pc of organisations are getting zero return,' MIT academics wrote. Shares in Nvidia – the $4tn company that has powered the AI boom – dropped by 3.5pc, while data giant Palantir fell by 9pc. MIT's findings threaten to be the pin that pops the tech stock market bubble, which has added trillions of dollars to the value of US stocks. Since the launch of ChatGPT in 2022, Silicon Valley has been evangelical that AI chatbots will transform the economy. Executives have spent billions on tools for their staff as a result and predicted massive cost-savings. But the promised AI revolution has stalled, MIT's report suggested. After surveying 150 business leaders and 350 employees, MIT found that 'just 5pc of integrated AI pilots are extracting millions in value, while the vast majority remain stuck with no measurable P&L [profit and loss] impact'.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Taxpayer used fake cases from AI chatbot to fight £13k HMRC bill
A taxpayer has been scolded by a judge for using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbot to fight his £13,000 tax case. Marc Gunnarsson appealed after HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) chased him for self-employment support payments totalling £12,918, which he had claimed during the pandemic. Mr Gunnarsson, who represented himself at the Upper Tribunal, used AI to help with his written submissions, but the chatbot 'hallucinated' non-existent cases. HMRC noticed the three fictitious tribunal decisions when reading through his skeleton argument, which was submitted the day before the hearing. 'A serious matter' Judge Rupert Jones said: 'The accuracy of AI should not be relied upon without checking, particularly when it comes to statements or arguments that it makes concerning the law. There is a danger that unarguable submissions or inaccurate or even fictitious information or references may be generated.' Judge Jones also said Mr Gunnarsson was not 'highly culpable' because he was not legally trained and 'may not have understood that the information and submissions presented were not simply unreliable but fictitious.' However, the judge warned that 'in the appropriate case, the Upper Tribunal may take such matters very seriously.' Mr Gunnarsson had claimed two coronavirus support payments under the Self-Employment Income Support Scheme but HMRC later decided he was not eligible for either of them. Mr Gunnarsson, who had been receiving employment income as a company director, said it had been his honest belief that he was self-employed and therefore eligible for the payments. The First Tier Tribunal (FTT) allowed Mr Gunnarsson's claim. However, HMRC then appealed to the Upper Tribunal which determined that the FTT had erred in its decision and HMRC was permitted to recover the money. 'Hallucinated' evidence Litigants are increasingly using artificial intelligence to back up their arguments in legal proceedings. However, AI can sometimes conjure up false information and present it as accurate – called a 'hallucination'. A junior barrister, Sarah Forey of 3 Bolt Court Chambers. was recently accused of using AI after citing fictional cases in her defence of a homeless man at the High Court. The court did not confirm whether AI was used; however, the judge said it was 'improper', 'unreasonable' and 'negligent' that she had presented fake cases to the court and ordered her and the solicitors who instructed her to pay wasted costs. In another case heard this year – Bodrul Zzaman vs The Commissioners for HMRC – a father appealing a £2,500 High Income Child Benefit Charge used AI to construct his defence at the First Tier Tribunal. But the AI spouted out irrelevant arguments and his appeal was dismissed. The judge said the case 'highlights the dangers of reliance on AI tools without human checks to confirm that assertions the tool is generating are accurate.'
