
Church of England admits failure over 'sadistic' abuse of sisters
The Church of England has apologised to three sisters who say they were "fobbed off" after reporting historical child sex abuse claims.Jenny, Wendy and Christina Read said they were "frequently" abused as young children by their father, a female church warden and a male curate in night-time "sadistic rituals" at a north-east England church.An independent review commissioned by the Church found the institution's failure to take action "compounded" the women's trauma, while Cleveland Police "missed opportunities" to investigate for which the force apologised.Dr Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury when two of the reports were made, said he regretted how he handled the allegations.
This report contains distressing detailsThe sisters, who have waived their right to anonymity, said they reported the abuse three times to the Church and police years later but inadequate action was taken.The Church, which never investigated, acknowledged its response "fell short of today's standards".Meanwhile the police agreed they missed opportunities in their investigations, but said they would reinvestigate if new evidence came to light.
The women's father died in 1996, while church warden and family friend Mary Wairing died in 2015. The BBC is not naming the curate or the sisters' father for legal reasons.Wendy said she was raped by her father and the curate and then forced "to watch when they did the same thing to my sisters".Jenny said her memories were of violence while Christina recalled being subjected to physical, emotional and spiritual abuse by Ms Wairing.If you have been affected by any issues raised in this report, help and advice is available on the BBC Action LineAll three sisters have been diagnosed with several mental health conditions linked to childhood sexual abuse.They have also shown the BBC hundreds of documents detailing their correspondence with the Church of England since the early 1990s and said their attempt to get evidence of what action the Church took had been a "horrendous" experience.
'Dismissed and trivialised'
The sisters reported the allegations to three Bishops in the Church of England – in 1993, 2003 and 2005.The curate and Ms Wairing still had active roles in the Church at the time of those disclosures. In 1993 Wendy had sought the informal advice of the then-Bishop of Monmouth Rowan Williams, who she knew from university.She said he told her he had spoken to the relevant bishop "to support Wendy's approach and urge him to respond".Dr Williams told the BBC he also took steps to confirm the identity of the curate at the time.In 2003, a year after becoming Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Williams was formally informed in writing of the allegations when Wendy reported the claim to the Bishop of Whitby Robert Ladds.Wendy said Bishop Ladds left her feeling "dismissed and trivialised" when he "questioned the reliability of childhood memories".Bishop Ladds recommended at the time she contact the police, but she felt she had "been there and done that" after a criminal investigation 10 years earlier brought no charges."It felt like he wanted nothing to do with it," Wendy said.Bishop Ladds said the Church of England had responded on his behalf, he had cooperated fully throughout and he would be making no further comment.
Dr Williams told the BBC that Church structures made it difficult for him to take action."At the time this would have meant in practice that a local bishop would normally assess, with professional advice, whether action should be taken and of what kind," he said."There are some difficulties in overruling such a locally based process."I could not as Archbishop simply have suspended a priest in another diocese on my own authority."After learning Bishop Ladds was not going to investigate, Dr Williams said he "could and should" have pressed the local archbishop to take it up, adding: "I very much regret that I did not follow up in this way."He said he "may have misjudged what needed to be done".Wendy said the Church's failure to commission a formal investigation was "really disappointing and frustrating".The sisters reported their allegations to the Church again in 2005, but Dr Williams said he was not aware of that report.
'Church truly sorry'
An independent report commissioned by the Church – known as a Learning Lessons Review (LLR) – concluded the sisters "had been subjected to abuse based on the consistency of their testimonies, the graphic and detailed re-telling of their abuse, and therapy required".It concluded the "initial disclosures were poorly handled" and the response from the institution in 1993 and 2003 "compounded the harm" for the sisters.Jenny was shocked to learn the Church had no record of two of the sisters' reports being made."There's fobbing off," she said, adding: "It feels deliberate. I don't think they want to give me answers."They're either incompetent or they're covering up." Jenny also accused the Church of "a lack of transparency" and being "secretive".The Church of England said it "strongly" denies suggestions of a cover up.A spokesman said it was "truly sorry" for the response the sisters received when they made their initial reports.The Church said its "response to survivors who come forward today is very different" and it "would always seek" to put them at the centre of its response.The relevant Diocese said it had "worked closely" with the sisters since 2020 and ensured they received "ongoing therapeutic, specialist and financial support".The Church said the case was reviewed by its national child protection lead in 2003, but admitted the pastoral care initially provided "fell short of today's standards".It said it was "committed to listening to survivors and the individual needs of the sisters".The Church's interim leader, the Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell, had met the sisters and offered a "formal apology", the spokesman said.
'Police apologise unreservedly'
The LLR concluded the police response meant "opportunities have been missed" and the force's initial investigation appeared "to lack thoroughness".The force has also apologised to the sisters.Their father was arrested in 1992 when they first reported the abuse but neither the curate nor Ms Wairing were interviewed.Another complaint was made to police in 2003 but there was no investigation.In 2020, Cleveland Police investigated the allegations again and the curate was arrested but released due to insufficient evidence.Christina said the fact Ms Wairing was never formally investigated by the force was the "the biggest offending misconduct".Cleveland Police Assistant Chief Constable Richard Baker said the force "acknowledges it missed opportunities" in 1993 and 2003, adding: "For this, I apologise unreservedly."He said he was "satisfied" with the force's 2020 investigation and pledged to investigate any new evidence.
A Church document showed the institution did not investigate following advice from Cleveland Police in 2003, the same year the force now admits it missed opportunities."It's incomprehensible that the Church takes direction from the police," said Wendy, who was "speechless and "enraged" by the development.The Church of England said, "in 2003 the accepted practice was to follow the advice of statutory services".Jenny thinks "the whole institution [of the Church] is in danger" and nothing less than "a profound reformation" will "solve the problems they've got themselves into".The Church admits it "must build future foundations" to ensure it's "as safe as it can be".Christina is demanding a change in attitude from Church leaders."Too often I've heard 'that was in the past, you need to forget about it'," she said, adding: "That's somebody who doesn't understand the impact of trauma."You can't just forget about it."
Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Northamptonshire officer fired for predatory conduct, says panel
A former special constable would have been dismissed after he had "predatory" sexual contact with two intoxicated women, a police misconduct panel Lynam, who resigned from the Northamptonshire Police in 2024, was found to have engaged in sexual activity with two females in circumstances "where he knew that they had been drinking".It also found he "knew that neither had met him before and [he] took deliberate steps to be left alone with them".Mr Lynam did not attend the hearing which determined he had committed gross misconduct. The hearing, which took place on 4-5 June, heard the incidents happened in February 2022 when the officer was on a night out with colleagues at Bar Rumba in Northampton town to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the panel's report said he met two women, and walked them to their hotel room in company with other was alleged he had sexual intercourse with one and sexual contact with the other when he was left in their hotel room alone with them. The panel found that Mr Lynam knew that both women were intoxicated due to their difficulty walking on the way back to the hotel and one being added the former officer would have known that one of the women was vulnerable, as she informed him of her mental health condition and that she lived in supported former officer maintained the sickness was faked and all of the sexual activity was the panel said Mr Lynam "acted in a predatory way that was discreditable and lacked integrity".It added it "found the former officer's misconduct to be deplorable".Northamptonshire Police conducted a criminal investigation into the matter, but the Crown Prosecution Service decided that no further action would be taken. Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Louise Casey to appear before MPs after major review of child grooming failures
The author of the major review into grooming gangs which found authorities have 'shied away' from the ethnicity of sex offenders will face questions from MPs. Baroness Louise Casey will appear before the Commons Home Affairs Committee on Tuesday morning, after the Government set out plans to launch a new nationwide inquiry into grooming gangs following her rapid review of the scandal. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper claimed officials have dodged the issue of ethnicity among the groups of sex offenders for fear of being called racist, even though available data showed suspects were disproportionately likely to be Asian men. Speaking in the Commons on Monday as the review was published, the Home Secretary said 'much more robust national data is needed' on the ethnicity of offenders, adding that the authorities 'cannot and must not shy away from these findings'. Doing so would allow 'the criminality and depravity of a minority of men to be used to marginalise whole communities', she added. Lady Casey's report found that: 'The appalling lack of data on ethnicity in crime recording alone is a major failing over the last decade or more. Questions about ethnicity have been asked but dodged for years.' It added: 'We found that the ethnicity of perpetrators is shied away from and is still not recorded for two-thirds of perpetrators, so we are unable to provide any accurate assessment from the nationally collected data.' Multiple convictions of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds should have 'warranted closer examination', it said, adding: 'Instead of examination, we have seen obfuscation. In a vacuum, incomplete and unreliable data is used to suit the ends of those presenting it.' Former Tory government adviser Dominic Cummings meanwhile claimed in an interview with Sky News that officials from the Department for Education were supportive of Rotherham Council's suggestion of going to court in 2011 to prevent the Times' initial reporting of the scandal in Rotherham. Lord Michael Gove, then the education secretary, rejected the request for a judicial review on Mr Cummings' advice, the broadcaster reported. Ms Cooper said the Government would take action 'immediately' on all of Lady Casey's recommendations, after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer committed to launching a national inquiry into the abuse. The recommendations included: – Making it mandatory to collect ethnicity and nationality data of all suspects in child sexual abuse cases – A new national inquiry into child sexual abuse with statutory legal powers, which will co-ordinate the efforts of local investigations led by councils and set out 'strict timescales' for them to follow. – A nationwide National Crime Agency operation, targeting people who have sexually exploited children, and following up on an estimated more than 1,000 cold cases where no one was convicted. – A change in the law so that all adult sex with under-16s is considered rape. – A review of criminal records held by victims of child sexual exploitation. In the Commons, Ms Cooper 'unequivocally' apologised for the failings which had led to grooming and child sexual abuse. The Home Secretary also pledged to exclude convicted sex offenders from the asylum system, while the report warned 'a significant proportion' of live investigations into grooming gangs 'appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals and/or who are claiming asylum in the UK'. In her report, Lady Casey said it is time to draw a line in the sand and take action over the issue, which she called 'one of the most heinous crimes in our society'. She also urged opposition politicians not to use the scandal as a 'political football', adding there was a chance to 'create a national reset'.


BBC News
4 hours ago
- BBC News
Church of England admits failure over 'sadistic' abuse of sisters
The Church of England has apologised to three sisters who say they were "fobbed off" after reporting historical child sex abuse Wendy and Christina Read said they were "frequently" abused as young children by their father, a female church warden and a male curate in night-time "sadistic rituals" at a north-east England independent review commissioned by the Church found the institution's failure to take action "compounded" the women's trauma, while Cleveland Police "missed opportunities" to investigate for which the force Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury when two of the reports were made, said he regretted how he handled the allegations. This report contains distressing detailsThe sisters, who have waived their right to anonymity, said they reported the abuse three times to the Church and police years later but inadequate action was Church, which never investigated, acknowledged its response "fell short of today's standards".Meanwhile the police agreed they missed opportunities in their investigations, but said they would reinvestigate if new evidence came to light. The women's father died in 1996, while church warden and family friend Mary Wairing died in 2015. The BBC is not naming the curate or the sisters' father for legal said she was raped by her father and the curate and then forced "to watch when they did the same thing to my sisters".Jenny said her memories were of violence while Christina recalled being subjected to physical, emotional and spiritual abuse by Ms you have been affected by any issues raised in this report, help and advice is available on the BBC Action LineAll three sisters have been diagnosed with several mental health conditions linked to childhood sexual have also shown the BBC hundreds of documents detailing their correspondence with the Church of England since the early 1990s and said their attempt to get evidence of what action the Church took had been a "horrendous" experience. 'Dismissed and trivialised' The sisters reported the allegations to three Bishops in the Church of England – in 1993, 2003 and curate and Ms Wairing still had active roles in the Church at the time of those disclosures. In 1993 Wendy had sought the informal advice of the then-Bishop of Monmouth Rowan Williams, who she knew from said he told her he had spoken to the relevant bishop "to support Wendy's approach and urge him to respond".Dr Williams told the BBC he also took steps to confirm the identity of the curate at the 2003, a year after becoming Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Williams was formally informed in writing of the allegations when Wendy reported the claim to the Bishop of Whitby Robert said Bishop Ladds left her feeling "dismissed and trivialised" when he "questioned the reliability of childhood memories".Bishop Ladds recommended at the time she contact the police, but she felt she had "been there and done that" after a criminal investigation 10 years earlier brought no charges."It felt like he wanted nothing to do with it," Wendy Ladds said the Church of England had responded on his behalf, he had cooperated fully throughout and he would be making no further comment. Dr Williams told the BBC that Church structures made it difficult for him to take action."At the time this would have meant in practice that a local bishop would normally assess, with professional advice, whether action should be taken and of what kind," he said."There are some difficulties in overruling such a locally based process."I could not as Archbishop simply have suspended a priest in another diocese on my own authority."After learning Bishop Ladds was not going to investigate, Dr Williams said he "could and should" have pressed the local archbishop to take it up, adding: "I very much regret that I did not follow up in this way."He said he "may have misjudged what needed to be done".Wendy said the Church's failure to commission a formal investigation was "really disappointing and frustrating".The sisters reported their allegations to the Church again in 2005, but Dr Williams said he was not aware of that report. 'Church truly sorry' An independent report commissioned by the Church – known as a Learning Lessons Review (LLR) – concluded the sisters "had been subjected to abuse based on the consistency of their testimonies, the graphic and detailed re-telling of their abuse, and therapy required".It concluded the "initial disclosures were poorly handled" and the response from the institution in 1993 and 2003 "compounded the harm" for the was shocked to learn the Church had no record of two of the sisters' reports being made."There's fobbing off," she said, adding: "It feels deliberate. I don't think they want to give me answers."They're either incompetent or they're covering up." Jenny also accused the Church of "a lack of transparency" and being "secretive".The Church of England said it "strongly" denies suggestions of a cover up.A spokesman said it was "truly sorry" for the response the sisters received when they made their initial Church said its "response to survivors who come forward today is very different" and it "would always seek" to put them at the centre of its relevant Diocese said it had "worked closely" with the sisters since 2020 and ensured they received "ongoing therapeutic, specialist and financial support".The Church said the case was reviewed by its national child protection lead in 2003, but admitted the pastoral care initially provided "fell short of today's standards".It said it was "committed to listening to survivors and the individual needs of the sisters".The Church's interim leader, the Archbishop of York Stephen Cottrell, had met the sisters and offered a "formal apology", the spokesman said. 'Police apologise unreservedly' The LLR concluded the police response meant "opportunities have been missed" and the force's initial investigation appeared "to lack thoroughness".The force has also apologised to the father was arrested in 1992 when they first reported the abuse but neither the curate nor Ms Wairing were complaint was made to police in 2003 but there was no 2020, Cleveland Police investigated the allegations again and the curate was arrested but released due to insufficient said the fact Ms Wairing was never formally investigated by the force was the "the biggest offending misconduct".Cleveland Police Assistant Chief Constable Richard Baker said the force "acknowledges it missed opportunities" in 1993 and 2003, adding: "For this, I apologise unreservedly."He said he was "satisfied" with the force's 2020 investigation and pledged to investigate any new evidence. A Church document showed the institution did not investigate following advice from Cleveland Police in 2003, the same year the force now admits it missed opportunities."It's incomprehensible that the Church takes direction from the police," said Wendy, who was "speechless and "enraged" by the Church of England said, "in 2003 the accepted practice was to follow the advice of statutory services".Jenny thinks "the whole institution [of the Church] is in danger" and nothing less than "a profound reformation" will "solve the problems they've got themselves into".The Church admits it "must build future foundations" to ensure it's "as safe as it can be".Christina is demanding a change in attitude from Church leaders."Too often I've heard 'that was in the past, you need to forget about it'," she said, adding: "That's somebody who doesn't understand the impact of trauma."You can't just forget about it." Follow BBC North East on X and Facebook and BBC Cumbria on X and Facebook and both on Nextdoor and Instagram.