Erin Patterson denies lying about making herself vomit after fatal mushroom lunch
In her sixth day in the witness box, Patterson was repeatedly asked under cross-examination by prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC whether she was lying about the deadly lunch and other parts of her evidence before her triple-murder trial.
Patterson, 50, faces three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder relating to poisoning four in-laws with beef wellington served for lunch at her house in Leongatha on 29 July 2023.
Patterson has pleaded not guilty to murdering her estranged husband Simon Patterson's parents, Don and Gail Patterson, and his aunt Heather Wilkinson, and attempting to murder Ian Wilkinson, Simon's uncle and Heather's husband.
Lawyers for Patterson say the death cap mushroom poisoning was a tragic and terrible accident.
Patterson told the court last week that she had a pre-assessment booking for gastric bypass surgery scheduled at Enrich Clinic in September 2023.
But Rogers said to Patterson on Tuesday that Enrich was a cosmetic dermatology clinic, and did not offer gastric bypass surgery.
Patterson said she was 'puzzled' that was the case.
'In what way?' Rogers asked.
'Well I had an appointment with them, and that's my memory of what the appointment was for, so that's why I'm puzzled.'
Rogers confirmed the appointment was made, and had been cancelled by Patterson two days before it was scheduled.
Patterson believed the appointment related to weight loss surgery, but said it may have been a different procedure.
'It wasn't a lie, that's what my memory was,' Patterson said.
Rogers also asked Patterson about her evidence last week that she made herself vomit in the hours after the lunch, after she felt overfull from eating the beef wellington and a large portion of orange cake. Patterson said she had a history of binge eating and purging dating back to her 20s.
Rogers accused Patterson of lying about vomiting on the afternoon of the lunch after her guests left.
'You did not tell a single medical person that you had vomited up after the lunch on the 29th of July?' Rogers asked.
'That is true, I didn't do that,' Patterson said.
Rogers suggested to Patterson that she lied about vomiting after the lunch, and about how much she ate at lunch, 'because you're trying to account for why the others were seriously ill and you were not'.
'I wish that was true, but it's not,' Patterson responded.
Patterson also denied suggestions from Rogers regarding the plating at the lunch. Patterson said evidence Ian gave about the guests being served on matching large grey plates, and Patterson serving herself on a smaller lighter coloured plate, was incorrect.
She said she did not know whether evidence Simon gave about Heather making two comments to him about mismatched plates was also wrong.
Rogers suggested to Patterson she used different plates as she made poisoned beef wellingtons for her guests, but that hers did not contain death cap mushrooms.
'To avoid any error, you took the extra precaution of using a different and smaller plate, to plate your non-poisoned serve, correct or incorrect,' Rogers asked.
'Incorrect,' Patterson responded.
Patterson said she did not one a set of four matching plates.
'I suggest your whole story is untrue that you plated the food without discrimination,' Rogers asked her.
'You're wrong,' Patterson replied.
Earlier on Tuesday morning, after answering a question from Rogers regarding the internet search history of devices seized from her home, Patterson attempted to further clarify the evidence before Rogers asked another question.
'Ms Patterson, I am the person who asks the questions,' Rogers said.
'If there something that needs to be clarified in re-examination, your barrister will do so.'
'No problem,' Patterson replied.
The trial continues.
In Australia, the Butterfly Foundation is at 1800 33 4673. In the UK, Beat can be contacted on 0808-801-0677. In the US, help is available at nationaleatingdisorders.org or by calling ANAD's eating disorders hotline at 800-375-7767. Other international helplines can be found at Eating Disorder Hope
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
BlueBet fined for allowing man to gamble $700k despite ‘clear red flag behaviours'
A man who 'binge gambled' $40,000 in an 11-hour session was awarded VIP status by the bookmaker BlueBet and assigned a dedicated personal manager who encouraged him to keep betting and took a cut of his losses. A regulator has found it wasn't until the man had gambled $700,000 four months later and displayed multiple 'clear red flag behaviours' that BlueBet checked whether he could afford to be betting so much. The Northern Territory Racing and Wagering Commission (NTRWC), which regulates most online gambling companies in Australia, described Bluebet's conduct as 'unacceptable' and 'extremely concerning'. The regulator found that when the man complained about having run out of money to gamble, his VIP manager supplied him with bonus bets, deposit matches and placed funds directly into his account. Sign up: AU Breaking News email On one occasion, when the man's request for an inducement was initially declined, he requested his account be closed. Within two minutes, the VIP manager had placed $500 of bonus bets into his account. The man had already lost $4,000 that day. A federal parliamentary inquiry, led by the late Labor MP Peta Murphy, called for inducements like bonus bets to be banned. It warned they encouraged riskier bets, higher losses, and undermined harm minimisation messages. BlueBet, according to the regulator, prioritised the retention of a profitable customer over its legislated 'responsible gambling responsibilities'. It found no evidence the VIP manager had been trained in harm minimisation. 'Instead of monitoring the situation and engaging in meaningful responsible gambling actions, BlueBet chose to award the complainant VIP status and assign a dedicated VIP account manager, whose commission was tied to the complainant's net gambling revenue,' the NTRWC decision said. Bluebet told the regulator that it called the man for a 'responsible gambling check-in' after he repeatedly failed to place bets on his credit card due to insufficient funds. But the regulator found this call, which went unanswered, was prompted, in part, by 'payment processing issues' and not concern for his wellbeing. On the day after the phone call, the man continued gambling and requested bonus bets from his VIP manager. 'At no stage did the account manager make mention that BlueBet was concerned about his wagering activities from a responsible gambling perspective,' the NTRWC decision said. 'Rather, the VIP manager continued to encourage the complainant to wager with BlueBet through the promise of the provision of upcoming bonuses.' In the two weeks after the unanswered phone call, the man gambled close to $400,000 with BlueBet. The man's gambling account was eventually closed when he texted his manager to say he wished he 'had been pulled up earlier by you guys' as he had lost everything. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion 'Given the numerous earlier red flags, it is extremely concerning that it took the complainant himself reaching out to BlueBet for his account to be closed,' the decision said. 'BlueBet missed multiple opportunities for timely and appropriate action and it's disappointing that the responsibility fell on the complainant rather than BlueBet taking a more assertive role in protecting the complainant from further harm.' Despite finding Bluebet's conduct to be extremely concerning, the bookmaker was fined $53,380, which is less than 10% of the $570,000 the man lost. This was the maximum penalty available to the commission. The Tasmanian independent MP Andrew Wilkie has previously called for financial penalties to be massively increased to ensure gambling companies are effectively punished for their misconduct. 'It should be an amount that hurts the company financially and hurts them so much that they think, 'heavens, we can't afford that again',' Wilkie said in 2023. 'It should hurt them so much that shareholders say to the board, 'that must not happen again'.' BlueBet merged with gambling company Betr earlier this year and no longer operates as a stand-alone brand. The conduct examined by the regulator took place during 2021. In Australia, Gambling Help Online is available on 1800 858 858. The National Debt Helpline is at 1800 007 007. In the UK, support for problem gambling can be found via the NHS National Problem Gambling Clinic on 020 7381 7722, or GamCare on 0808 8020 133. In the US, call the National Council on Problem Gambling at 800-GAMBLER or text 800GAM.s
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Explosive messages between Army major and his late wife reveal his affair two years before he was accused of drowning her on a kayaking trip then moving to Thailand
Text messages between a retired Australian Army major and the wife he is accused of killing reveal the alleged fallout of an affair he had while posted to Papua New Guinea. In one message, Jacqueline Davidson appeared to refer to her husband Graeme's lover as a 'black count' and accused the pair of having sex while she was trying to call him.
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shock twist after driver was ‘critically injured' in a car crash and his sister begged for help to raise money for his recovery
A young motorist, whose sister launched a GoFundMe campaign after he was involved in a horror crash caused by the 'weather', has been charged with reckless driving. International student Saksham Saini, 21, and two family members, a woman and man who were both 25, were travelling in the wet on the Ring Road at St Albans, Melbourne, at about 9pm on June 9. His sister, Sargam, said the downpour caused Mr Saini's sedan to 'slip off' the road. The car careened 150m down an embankment beside the road, splashed through a creek, and finally came to a rest under the M80. Mr Saini and his passengers were rushed to hospital. Sargam launched a crowdfunding page desperately pleading for help to raise money for her brother's recovery after he underwent significant surgery for his leg. The fundraiser has raked in around $2,500 since it was launched on Sunday. However, a Victoria Police spokeswoman confirmed to Daily Mail on Wednesday they had investigated the circumstances surrounding the crash and charged Mr Saini. 'He has since been charged with several offences including with reckless conduct placing a person in danger of serious injury and driving whilst exceeding the prescribed concentration of alcohol,' she said. He was bailed to appear before Sunshine Magistrate's Court in October. At the time, Senior Constable Alistair McDonald said the crash was 'astounding'. 'It's hard to believe that actually all three of the occupants are still alive at the moment,' he said. Police initially believed two vehicles were speeding along the road before the Hyundai veered down the embankment. 'I've seen some dashcam footage which shows this vehicle and another vehicle travelling at extremely high speeds on the ring road right before the collision occurs,' Sen Const McDonald said in June. Sargam said her brother had surgery on his leg, which is now braced by metal rods. The certificate four automotive student also received treatment for his lips and chin, which were battered in the crash, she said, while a blood clot in his left ear is causing hearing loss. Saksham Saini (pictured) has been left with metal in his leg and a blood clot near his ear after the crash Sargam said her brother is in 'constant pain' and is unable to work or support himself. Victoria Police said his two passengers received non-life-threatening injuries. Mr Saini is facing mounting bills and expenses, including tuition, while he recovers, his sister said. 'With no ability to earn an income for many months, this situation has become overwhelming,' she said. 'To make matters worse, the car involved in the accident was his, and it's now completely damaged.' Sargam claimed to Daily Mail that her brother has yet to receive his charge sheet from Victoria Police. However, that was disputed by Victoria Police. 'As the accused was charged and bailed, they would have received their charges sheet personally,' a spokeswoman said.
