Red White & Bloom Brands Provides Update on Status of Management Cease Trade Order
TORONTO, May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Red White & Bloom Brands Inc. (CSE: RWB) ('RWB' or the 'Company') is providing this update on the status of a management cease trade order granted on May 1, 2025 (the "MCTO") by the British Columbia Securities Commission under National Policy 12-203 – Management Cease Trade Order ("NP 12-203").
On May 1, 2025, the Company announced that, for reasons disclosed in the news release, there would be a delay in the filing of its financial statements and accompanying management's discussion and analysis for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 (the "Annual Filings") beyond the period prescribed under applicable Canadian securities laws (the "Default Announcement").
The Company reports that the audit continues to progress and the Company will provide a further update on the timing of its Annual Filings on or about May 30, 2025 if it has not filed prior to this date. The Company is also progressing on completion of its interim financial statements and accompanying management's discussion and analysis for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025, and will provide a further update on or before May 30, 2025. Further updates on timing will be provided by the Company as necessary.
During the MCTO, the general investing public will continue to be able to trade in the Company's listed common shares. However, the Company's chief executive officer, president and chief financial officer will not be able to trade in the Company's shares.
Other than as disclosed in this news release, there are no material changes to the information contained in the initial press release associated with the MCTO. The Company confirms that it intends to satisfy the provisions of NP 12- 203 and will continue to issue bi-weekly default status reports for so long as it remains in default of the Annual Filings requirement. These updates will include information regarding the progress of the Annual Filings and any material changes to the Company's business, if any.
About Red White & Bloom Brands Inc.
Red White & Bloom Brands is a multi-jurisdictional cannabis operator and house of premium brands operating in the United States, Canada and select international jurisdictions. The Company is predominantly focusing its investments on major U.S. markets, including California, Florida, Missouri, Michigan, and Ohio in addition to Canadian and international markets.
Red White & Bloom Brands Inc.Investor and Media RelationsEdoardo Mattei, CFOIR@RedWhiteBloom.com947-225-0503Visit us on the web: https://www.redwhitebloom.com/.
Follow us on social media:
X @rwbbrands
Facebook @redwhitebloombrands
Instagram @redwhitebloombrands
Neither the CSE nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the CSE) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain information contained in this news release may constitute "forward-looking information" or "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-looking information is often identified by the use of words such as 'plans,' 'expects,' 'may,' 'should,' 'could,' 'will,' 'intends,' 'anticipates,' 'believes,' 'estimates,' 'forecasts,' or variations of such words and phrases, including the negative forms thereof, as well as terms such as 'pro forma' and 'scheduled,' and similar expressions that refer to future events or outcomes.
Forward-looking statements in this release include, without limitation, statements relating to the anticipated timing, review, completion, and filing of the Annual Filings; the expected duration of the MCTO; the Company's ongoing operations; and the Company's intention to issue bi-weekly default status updates.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks associated with audit completion processes; regulatory reviews and approvals; market conditions; the Company's financial condition and liquidity; the ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the debt restructuring; and the risk that the Company may not be able to complete its Annual Filings within the timeframe currently anticipated.
There can be no assurance that such forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information contained herein, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required by applicable securities laws.
THE FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS NEWS RELEASE REPRESENTS THE COMPANY'S EXPECTATIONS AS OF THE DATE OF THIS NEWS RELEASE AND, ACCORDINGLY, IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE AFTER SUCH DATE. READERS SHOULD NOT PLACE UNDUE IMPORTANCE ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND SHOULD NOT RELY UPON THIS INFORMATION AS OF ANY OTHER DATE. WHILE THE COMPANY MAY ELECT TO, IT DOES NOT UNDERTAKE TO UPDATE THIS INFORMATION AT ANY PARTICULAR TIME EXCEPT AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAWS.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
GreenPower Closes Third Tranche of Term Loan Offering
VANCOUVER, BC, June 8, 2025 /CNW/ -- GreenPower Motor Company Inc. (Nasdaq: GP) (TSXV: GPV) ("GreenPower" and the "Company"), a leading manufacturer and distributor of all-electric, purpose-built, zero-emission medium and heavy-duty vehicles serving the cargo and delivery market, shuttle and transit space and school bus sector, announces the closing of the third tranche of its previously announced secured term loan offering for an aggregate principal amount of U.S. $300,000 (collectively the "Loans"). Please refer to the Company's news release dated May 13, 2025 for more details regarding the term loan offering. In connection with the Loans, the Company entered into respective loan agreements with companies controlled by the CEO and a Director of the Company (the "Lenders"). Management anticipates that the Company will allocate the net proceeds from the Loans towards production costs, supplier payments, payroll and working capital. The Loans are secured with a general security agreement on the assets of the Company subordinated to all senior debt with financial and other institutions and will bear interest of 12% per annum commencing on the date of closing (the "Closing Date") to and including the date all of the Company's indebtedness pursuant to the Loans is paid in full. The term of the Loans will be two years from the Closing Date. As an inducement for the Loan, the Company issued 340,909 non-transferable share purchase warrants (each, a "Loan Bonus Warrant") to one of the Lenders. Each Loan Bonus Warrant entitles the holder to purchase one common share of the Company (each, a "Share") at an exercise price of U.S. $0.44 per Share for a period of twenty-four (24) months from the closing date of the Loan. In addition, one Lender will be issued an aggregate of 68,181 Shares (each a "Loan Bonus Share"). The Lenders are each considered to be a "related party" within the meaning of Multilateral Instrument 61-101 Protection of Minority Security Holders in Special Transactions ("MI 61-101") and each of the Loans and issuance of Loan Bonus Warrants and Loan Bonus Shares, as applicable, is considered to be a "related party transaction" within the meaning of MI 61-101 but each is exempt from the formal valuation requirement and minority approval requirements of MI 61-101 by virtue of the exemptions contained in section 5.5(a) and 5.7(a) as the fair market value, in each case, of the Loans, the Loan Bonus Warrants, and the Loan Bonus Shares, as applicable, is not more than 25% of the Company's market capitalization. All securities issued in connection with the Loans will be subject to a statutory hold period of four months plus a day from the closing of the Initial Loan in accordance with applicable securities legislation. For further information contact: Fraser Atkinson, CEO (604) 220-8048 Brendan Riley, President(510) 910-3377 Michael Sieffert, CFO(604) 563-4144 About GreenPower Motor Company designs, builds and distributes a full suite of high-floor and low-floor all-electric medium and heavy-duty vehicles, including transit buses, school buses, shuttles, cargo van and a cab and chassis. GreenPower employs a clean-sheet design to manufacture all-electric vehicles that are purpose built to be battery powered with zero emissions while integrating global suppliers for key components. This OEM platform allows GreenPower to meet the specifications of various operators while providing standard parts for ease of maintenance and accessibility for warranty requirements. GreenPower was founded in Vancouver, Canada with primary operational facilities in southern California. Listed on the Toronto exchange since November 2015, GreenPower completed its U.S. IPO and NASDAQ listing in August 2020. For further information go to Forward-Looking Statements This news release includes certain "forward-looking statements" under applicable Canadian securities legislation that are not historical facts. Forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts, but rather on current expectations and projections about future events, and are therefore subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from the future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as "upon", "may", "should", "will", "could", "intend", "estimate", "plan", "anticipate", "expect", "believe" or "continue", or the negative thereof or similar variations. Forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the expectations of management regarding the use of proceeds of the Loan. Although the Company believes that and the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results, performance or developments to differ materially from those contained in the statements including that the proceeds of the Loan may not be used as stated in this news release, and those additional risks set out in the Company's public documents filed on SEDAR+ at and with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed on EDGAR at Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking statements are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on these statements, which only apply as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. Except where required by law, the Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. ©2025 GreenPower Motor Company Inc. All rights reserved. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE GreenPower Motor Company View original content to download multimedia:
Time Business News
4 hours ago
- Time Business News
Navigating Homeownership in Texas: A Canadian Expat's Comprehensive Guide to Tax Complexities in The Woodlands
Introduction: When Opportunity Crosses the Border Your employer in Ottawa calls you into a Monday‐morning meeting and announces a career-altering transfer to The Woodlands, Texas. The upside is clear: world-class master-planned communities, towering pines, and proximity to Houston's booming business ecosystem. Yet with that same offer letter comes the practical question: should you buy a home in Texas, and what does that mean for your tax life on both sides of the border? Canadian citizens relocating for work quickly discover that cross-border real estate is less about granite countertops and more about treaty articles, withholding rules, and competing definitions of 'principal residence.' In this deep-dive, we unpack the layered tax rules triggered when a Canadian purchases—then eventually sells—a Texas property. We also show how partnering with a cross-border financial advisor skilled in cross-border tax planning and holistic Canada U.S. Financial Planning can turn potential minefields into manageable stepping-stones. 1. Profile of Our Relocated Canadian Meet Daniel, a 38-year-old software architect from Ottawa who will spend the next three to five years heading his company's U.S. product division. He moves with a spousal work permit, two school-aged children, and an eye toward laying down roots in The Woodlands. His goals: Purchase a family home within six months. Keep ties to his Canadian RRSP and corporate pension. Minimize cross-border tax friction during ownership and upon eventual sale. Avoid shocking surprises if he returns to Canada or remains in the U.S. long-term. Daniel's situation is typical of thousands of Canadian professionals sent south every year. The decisions he makes in the first twelve months will shape his tax exposure for a decade. 2. Why The Woodlands Appeals to Canadian Expats Before diving into taxes, it helps to grasp why The Woodlands is a magnet: No state income tax. Texas's lack of state tax is attractive, but the savings can blind newcomers to other levies—especially robust property taxes and potential federal implications. Texas's lack of state tax is attractive, but the savings can blind newcomers to other levies—especially robust property taxes and potential federal implications. Corporate campuses and energy corridor access. Many Canadian energy and tech companies maintain Houston-area offices. Many Canadian energy and tech companies maintain Houston-area offices. Lifestyle parity. Top-ranked schools, extensive green spaces, and family-friendly suburbs echo the comforts of Canadian metropolitan life. Yet each perk comes bundled with unique tax nuances that differ sharply from Ontario, Alberta, or British Columbia norms. 3. The Cross-Border Tax Landscape—Setting the Table 3.1 Dual-Tax Residency Tension Upon arrival, Daniel could be considered a resident of both Canada and the United States. Canada taxes worldwide income based on residency, while the U.S. taxes based on citizenship or substantial presence. Because Daniel is neither a USC nor a green-card holder, his U.S. residency hinges on the Substantial Presence Test (SPT). If he spends 183 weighted days or more during a calendar year—or elects residency under IRC §7701(b)(4)—he becomes a U.S. resident for federal tax purposes. Implication: Owning a Texas home can strengthen U.S. residency ties, but the Canada-U.S. Tax Treaty's tiebreaker rules may still assign him to one country. Understanding that interplay is critical before signing a purchase contract. 3.2 Capital vs. Ordinary Income Canada and the U.S. both treat real-property gains as capital in nature, but depreciation rules, currency fluctuation reporting, and the principal-residence exemption differ dramatically. 3.3 Withholding Regimes (FIRPTA) When foreign persons sell U.S. real estate, the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA) generally requires buyers to withhold 15 percent of the gross selling price. Daniel might recoup a portion upon filing his U.S. return, but cash-flow pain is real unless planning steps are taken before listing. 4. Buying a Home in Texas—Step-by-Step Tax Concerns 4.1 Financing: U.S. Mortgage vs. Canadian HELOC U.S. Mortgage: Generally easier for local underwriters to evaluate, but Daniel must build two‐year U.S. credit history or rely on cross-border lender programs that accept Canadian credit reports. Generally easier for local underwriters to evaluate, but Daniel must build two‐year U.S. credit history or rely on cross-border lender programs that accept Canadian credit reports. Canadian HELOC (Home Equity Line of Credit): Tapping equity in an Ottawa property introduces exchange-rate exposure and potential thin-capitalization issues if the HELOC is later converted to U.S. denominated debt. Pro Tip: Some Canadians structure purchases through cross-border lenders who report mortgage interest to the IRS on Form 1098, simplifying deductibility claims on a U.S. Schedule A. 4.2 Down-Payment Sourcing Large CAD-to-USD transfers trigger FINTRAC and U.S. anti-money-laundering forms. Banks may request Form 3520/3520-A filings if funds flow through Canadian trusts or corporate entities. Missteps can incur $10,000+ penalties, making early consultation with a cross-border financial advisor essential. 4.3 Texas Property Taxes & Homestead Exemption Texas eschews state income tax and instead funds schools and counties via property taxation. New arrivals often gasp at effective rates of 2–3 percent of appraised value. Claiming a homestead exemption can lower this burden, but Daniel must establish Texas residency (driver's license, voter registration) while ensuring he does not inadvertently sever Canadian ties too soon. 5. Canadian Tax Treatment During Ownership 5.1 Principal Residence Exemption (PRE) Limitation If Daniel keeps his Ottawa condo and designates it his Canadian principal residence, the Texas property accumulates non-resident capital-gain tax in Canada. Conversely, electing the Texas house as his PRE may jeopardize Ottawa gains. The formula is: Exempt years=years designated as principal residence+1years owned\text{Exempt years} = \frac{\text{years designated as principal residence} + 1}{\text{years owned}}Exempt years=years ownedyears designated as principal residence+1 5.2 Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) and Double Tax Relief When Daniel files his T1 return, gains from U.S. real estate remain taxable in Canada absent PRE coverage. However, he may claim a foreign tax credit for U.S. taxes paid, limited to the lesser of actual U.S. tax or Canadian tax on the same income. Coordinating the timing of sale to maximize FTCs—while avoiding Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) intricacies—is a classic value-add from cross-border tax planning . 5.3 Foreign Reporting (T1135) The Texas home, as foreign real property, must be reported annually if cost exceeds CAD $100,000. Failure to file T1135 triggers penalties averaging CAD $2,500 per year, plus potential gross-negligence fines. 6. U.S. Federal Tax Treatment During Ownership 6.1 Mortgage Interest & SALT Deduction Limits Post-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, SALT (state and local tax) deductions are capped at USD $10,000. Property taxes alone in The Woodlands can hit that ceiling. Mortgage interest on up to USD $750,000 of acquisition debt is deductible if Daniel itemizes. Strategic loan sizing and thoughtful prepayments can maximize after-tax benefits. 6.2 Depreciation vs. Canadian Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) U.S. rules allow 27.5-year straight-line residential depreciation, generating annual losses that may offset rental income if Daniel converts the home to a rental later. In Canada, claiming CCA on foreign rental property forfeits PRE for that year and complicates recapture. Proper ledger separation is crucial. 6.3 Passive Activity Loss (PAL) Limitations If Daniel's adjusted gross income exceeds USD $150,000, passive losses may be suspended. A future sale can unlock those suspended losses, reducing taxable gain—a nuance often missed without sophisticated Canada U.S. Financial Planning . 7. Currency Considerations—The Hidden Tax 7.1 Foreign Exchange on Purchase Buying at CAD $1 = USD $0.72 and selling at parity can inflate capital gains when measured in Canadian dollars. Both CRA and IRS require reporting in domestic currency. Daniel should maintain contemporaneous FX records, ideally automated through multi-currency software recommended by his cross-border financial advisor . 7.2 Mortgage Currency Mismatch If Daniel borrows in USD but earns in CAD, each mortgage payment involves a deemed FX disposition. Over years, small unrealized currency gains can snowball into taxable events in Canada. 8. Selling the Texas Home—Major Minefields 8.1 FIRPTA Withholding Mechanics Unless Daniel becomes a U.S. green-card holder, the buyer must withhold 15 percent of gross proceeds (not net gain). Exceptions: Sale price under USD $300,000 and buyer intends to occupy. IRS withholding certificate obtained pre-closing by projecting actual tax liability. Applying for a certificate demands credible cost-basis documentation—closing statements, renovation invoices, depreciation schedules—meticulously curated during ownership. 8.2 Section 121 Exclusion (U.S. Principal Residence) If Daniel (and spouse) live in the home for at least two of the five years preceding sale, they may exclude up to USD $500,000 of gain. But watch: Nonresident aliens cannot claim §121; Daniel must be a U.S. tax resident in year of sale. Depreciation recapture from rental years is taxable at 25 percent. 8.3 Canadian Capital-Gain Inclusion Canada taxes 50 percent of the capital gain, converted to CAD at settlement date FX. If Daniel already used his PRE on the Ottawa condo, the Texas gain is fully taxable in Canada. However, U.S. federal (and potential FIRPTA) tax becomes a foreign tax credit, mitigating double taxation. 9. Estate Tax, Probate, and Gifting 9.1 U.S. Estate Tax Exposure Non-U.S. persons owning U.S. situs assets above USD $60,000 face U.S. estate tax. Treaty formulas prorate Daniel's exposure based on his worldwide estate relative to the U.S. unified credit. Titling the home in a Canadian corporation or cross-border trust can shield estate tax but may sacrifice preferential rates on capital gains. 9.2 Texas Probate Texas probate is relatively streamlined, yet any foreign executor will need an in-state attorney ad litem. A revocable living trust or enhanced transfer on death (TOD) deed can avoid probate delays. 9.3 Gifting the Property to Children A well-intentioned gift could trigger FIRPTA, U.S. gift tax (if donor or donee is U.S. resident), and Canadian deemed disposition. A coordinated gift-splitting strategy under treaty Article XXIX B may alleviate double levies. 10. How a Cross-Border Financial Advisor Adds Value 10.1 Pre-Arrival Blueprint Residency Modeling: Simulate days in U.S. vs. Canada under multiple scenarios to determine treaty residency and tax domicile. Simulate days in U.S. vs. Canada under multiple scenarios to determine treaty residency and tax domicile. Financing Structure: Compare cross-border mortgage programs, evaluate CAD-indexed lines of credit, and optimize deductible interest alignment with personal cash flows. 10.2 Ownership Phase Management Recordkeeping Automation: Tools for dual-currency ledgers, T1135 reminders, U.S. FBAR reporting, and depreciation tracking. Tools for dual-currency ledgers, T1135 reminders, U.S. FBAR reporting, and depreciation tracking. Proactive SALT Optimization: Balancing property-tax prepayments with SALT cap, charitable bunching, and Roth vs. TFSA contribution timing. 10.3 Exit and Re-entry Strategy FIRPTA Certificate Applications: Coordinate appraisals, gather cost basis evidence, and file Form 8288-B to reduce withholding at closing. Coordinate appraisals, gather cost basis evidence, and file Form 8288-B to reduce withholding at closing. Gain Harvesting vs. Deferral: Weigh selling during low-income sabbaticals or before anticipated CAD appreciation. Weigh selling during low-income sabbaticals or before anticipated CAD appreciation. Repatriation Planning: If returning to Canada, merge proceeds into RRSP top-ups, RESP funding, or principal-protected notes to hedge FX risk. 10.4 Integrated Canada U.S. Financial Planning Across these stages, advisors combine treaty literacy with investment management, insurance structuring, and estate design—creating a unified roadmap. Without such guidance, homeowners may overpay taxes, misfile forms, or miss filing windows that close after 15 June (CRA) or 15 April (IRS). 11. Case Study: Daniel's Tailored Outcome With his cross-border financial advisor , Daniel: Secured a USD $600,000 mortgage through a lender accepting Canadian credit, ensuring Form 1098 issuance. Claimed Texas homestead exemption while preserving Ottawa condo as Canadian PRE under treaty tie-breaker year one; year two he cut Canadian ties and became U.S. resident, unlocking §121 eligibility. Automated FX logs via multi-currency bookkeeping to track CAD cost basis. Initiated a revocable trust holding title, minimizing probate and segmenting estate-tax exposure. Filed Form 8288-B at listing; buyer withheld only estimated tax, freeing cash for a down payment on a new Houston suburb upgrade. Leveraged foreign tax credits to eliminate Canadian tax after Ottawa condo sale, resulting in combined capital-gain tax below 10 percent. Net savings over a five-year horizon: USD $140,000 compared with do-it-yourself compliance, plus immeasurable peace of mind. 12. Practical Checklist for Would-Be Buyers Phase Action Item Advisor Touchpoint Pre-Purchase Model residency days; apply CRA Form NR73 if needed Residency calibration Obtain pre-approval from cross-border lender Mortgage structuring Closing Draft statement of adjustments capturing currency rates Cost-basis tracking Ensure title insurance recognizes foreign status Legal coordination Ownership File T1135 annually; claim U.S. deductions Ongoing compliance Review property-tax assessments; protest if inflated SALT optimization Disposition Request FIRPTA certificate 90+ days pre-close Withholding mitigation Allocate suspended passive losses; time sale for low-bracket year Exit strategy 13. Beyond Taxes: Lifestyle & Risk Considerations Healthcare Coverage: Provincial health coverage may lapse after 182–212 days abroad; supplemental U.S. plans must coordinate with travel back to Canada. Provincial health coverage may lapse after 182–212 days abroad; supplemental U.S. plans must coordinate with travel back to Canada. Insurance Gaps: Texas homeowner policies exclude windstorm and flood; cross-border advisors coordinate umbrella liability with excess personal‐liability riders valid in both countries. Texas homeowner policies exclude windstorm and flood; cross-border advisors coordinate umbrella liability with excess personal‐liability riders valid in both countries. Education Savings: RESP contributions may be penalized under U.S. PFIC rules—alternatives include 529 plans or brokerage accounts, harmonized via global asset-allocation overlays. 14. Frequently Overlooked Pitfalls Treaty Elections Filed Late: Missing the Article IV tiebreaker statement or §216 election for rental income can double-tax first-year rent. Ignored Departure Tax: If cutting Canadian residency, deemed disposition on worldwide assets—including pensions—may trump property concerns. State-Level Surprises Outside Texas: Future job moves to states with income tax (e.g., California) alter deductibility and estate planning frameworks. Canadian 'Foreign Buyer' Taxes: Provinces like British Columbia impose speculation taxes on homes left vacant; returning expatriates may unwittingly owe if they keep Canadian real estate. Conclusion: Transform Minefields into Milestones Real estate has long stood as a symbol of stability and personal success. For Canadians dispatched to The Woodlands, however, the purchase of a dream home doubles as an intricate cross-border tax project. Navigating dual-residency rules, withholding regimes, depreciation traps, and currency swings requires more than guesswork—it demands specialized expertise. A seasoned cross-border financial advisor integrates legal, tax, and cash-flow insights into one cohesive playbook. Through proactive cross-border tax planning and comprehensive Canada U.S. Financial Planning , homeowners like Daniel not only avoid pitfalls but also leverage treaty advantages, maximize cash retention, and secure generational wealth across two nations. In the end, the key lesson is simple: treat your relocation home not just as a roof over your head, but as an asset that spans two tax jurisdictions. With the right guidance, you can enjoy Texan sunshine, Houston career growth, and Canadian financial peace of mind—without getting scorched by unexpected tax rays along the way. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
U.S. envoy closely eyes Canada defence spending; says NATO about collective defence
OTTAWA - The American ambassador to Canada is closely watching as Ottawa shapes its defence budget, but says the U.S. will not dictate what the Canadian government must spend. 'We're not expecting anything; that's not our job to make those expectations,' Ambassador Pete Hoekstra said in an interview with The Canadian Press this past Friday, a day after NATO defence ministers endorsed new spending targets. Hoekstra also said the point of the NATO military alliance is to defend each other when under attack. He noted Americans haven't forgotten the 'investment and the sacrifice' Canadian troops made in Afghanistan when the U.S. invoked the NATO treaty's article on collective defence. 'They were fulfilling the commitment that they made to NATO — that when one of us is attacked we are all attacked, and we will defend each other,' Hoekstra said of Canadian soldiers. Hoekstra was not directly commenting on U.S. President Donald Trump's statement in March that Washington would not necessarily come to the aid of countries that don't pay their fair share on defence and that Canada has been freeloading on American defence of the continent. He did acknowledge Canada's defence spending has been an 'irritant' in the relationship with the U.S. This past week, defence ministers from NATO countries met in Brussels to discuss raising the member spending target on defence to as much as five per cent of GDP. Canada has never met NATO's existing spending target of two per cent since it was established in 2006. Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney are engaged in what both sides have characterized as 'intensive' discussions toward the new economic and security deal the two leaders agreed to work on once the Canadian election concluded in April. NATO figures suggest Canada's defence spending rose from about one per cent in 2014 to 1.33 per cent in 2023. The NATO secretary-general's annual report, released in April, said Canada's defence spending would hit 1.45 per cent for 2024. In terms of absolute dollars, a Canadian Global Affairs Institute analysis last year said Canada ranks as the seventh largest spender in NATO, and the 14th largest in the world. Carney promised during the recent election campaign to move up Canada's deadline for meeting the 2 per cent threshold from 2032 to 2030 or sooner but has not yet shown a plan for how to do that. It will require Canada to add billions of new dollars annually. The prime minister is set to join other heads of government from NATO countries for an annual summit starting June 24 in the Netherlands. They are expected to approve a new defence investment plan that defence ministers hammered out this week, which would have member nations invest 3.5 per cent of GDP on core defence spending, and 1.5 per cent on defence and security-related investment such as infrastructure and resilience. That proposal is coming amid waning American commitments and a revanchist Russia. In recent years, both Democrats and Republicans have urged Canada to boost its Arctic defence, and the previous Biden administration praised much of what Ottawa outlined in an Arctic foreign policy last year. Trump has suggested defence of the Arctic is part of his 'Golden Dome' plan for a continental missile-defence shield. On May 27, the president said he told Ottawa it would cost US$61 billion to be part of the project. Hoekstra said he hasn't seen a breakdown of the costs, but said the 'really awesome technology' is likely estimated at 'proportionally what we think the Canadian share should be.' Defence Minister David McGuinty said Canada was reviewing its defence spending from 'top to bottom' and would have more to say about its plans soon, though the government isn't planning to table a budget until the fall. Hoekstra framed NATO as part of the wide partnership the U.S. has with Canada in security, which also includes secure energy flows and stopping illicit drugs. 'We need to do the things that will keep our citizens safe,' Hoekstra said. 'There are a lot of things that Americans and Canadians have in common, and we're looking forward to great days.' Hoekstra said Trump is trying to take the U.S. off an unsustainable trajectory, which he framed as millions of people crossing the U.S. border undocumented, spending way beyond government revenue and large trade deficits. 'The president is transforming that, because we need to,' he said. Trump's discussions with Carney will likely include the sweeping reform of border security that the Liberals tabled in Parliament last week. Hoekstra had yet to go through the legislation as of Friday. The ambassador said he's focused on win-win policies for both countries and not the prospect of Canada becoming an American state, despite Trump raising the notion as a way for Canadians to save on the cost of joining his Golden Dome project. Former Canadian diplomat Colin Robertson has said Hoekstra is limited in how much he can diverge from Trump's comments. But he said the ambassador has great access to the president, and his public messaging likely reveals how he has been advising Trump. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025.
