logo
The shaky science behind treating measles with vitamin A

The shaky science behind treating measles with vitamin A

Yahoo21-03-2025

As a fatal measles outbreak continues to spread, the United States' leading public health official has offered some advice that's not backed by science. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., told Fox News earlier this month that his department was delivering vitamin A to Texas, and that health officials were getting results by treating measles with cod liver oil, a substance that has high levels of vitamins A and D.
While vitamin A is, in fact, part of the recommended treatment for measles, 'It's not good advice,' said Adam Ratner, a pediatric infectious disease expert, and member of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Infectious Diseases. 'I think the problem is that he's taken something where there's a kernel of truth, which is that there is an interaction between vitamin A status and measles outcome, and he turned that into vitamin A and vitamin D. He's talking about cod liver oil, which is not how you would supplement someone, in part, because there's not a known amount of vitamin A in that.'
Kennedy's advice couldn't have come at a worse time. As of March 18, the Texas Department of Health and Human Services was reporting 279 cases since the end of January, with 36 patients needing hospitalization. One unvaccinated child had died in Texas, while another unvaccinated person died in New Mexico. Cases have been reported in at least seven other states. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), over 100,000 people, mostly children under the age of five, died of measles globally in 2023.
While Kennedy may have been wrong overall, as Ratner noted, there was still a sliver of truth in his statement. Both the CDC and WHO recommend dosing children diagnosed with measles with vitamin A, which is found in foods like carrots, spinach, pumpkins, eggs, milk, sweet potatoes, and mangoes.
Numerous studies have found vitamin A is effective in reducing the severity of measles, including lowering mortality rates. According to AAP guidelines, children who test positive for measles should be given two daily doses of vitamin A for two days, with the dosage varying by age.
However, many of the studies that concluded vitamin A was an effective treatment were conducted on populations that tend to be malnourished in general. In more developed countries, such as the United States, vitamin A's effectiveness is less clear. A 2021 study conducted in Italy found no significant difference between vitamin A and a placebo in treating children admitted to hospital with measles.
Ratner noted that the Italian study suffered from a small sample size, but acknowledged that, 'There's some data on the side of saying that the impact in Italy or somewhere like the United States is likely to be less of giving vitamin A supplementation than it is somewhere with a lot of malnutrition. This goes back to observations from a long time ago that children who were malnourished had much higher rates of severe disease and death from measles than kids who were well nourished.'
[ Related: How to check your measles vaccination status amid outbreak. ]
The reasons that vitamin A is good for measles are both straightforward and complex. The vitamin 'plays a vital role for immune system functioning,' said Erik Blutinger, an assistant professor of Emergency Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine. 'It helps the body produce antibodies. It helps the body mobilize T cell responses, and it prevents immunity from weakening overall.'
Vitamin A is also critical to skin health, as it helps maintain healthy cells in the epidermis, the outermost layer of skin.
'The skin is one of our vital organs and serves as a protective barrier even for our immune system,' adds Blutinger.
The trouble with the recent recommendation is that some parents may hear that a little vitamin A is good, so more must be better. As with most medicines, this can be dangerous thinking. In large doses, vitamin A can become toxic. Symptoms can include nausea, vomiting, headaches, and blurred vision. In extreme cases, it can even lead to permanent liver, bone, or nervous system damage.
Vitamin A is particularly dangerous 'because it's fat soluble, it gets stored in the liver,' said Ratner. 'It's very easy to give someone too much, and that can either be too much in terms of individual doses or even reasonable doses for too long a period of time. It can endanger the liver, it can endanger the bones. Vitamin A supplementation is great for people who are vitamin A deficient, and it's a reasonable thing to do just for the two doses at the time of measles diagnosis, because we think that there's a potential benefit just during that little window. But it's not something that people should be doing on their own, and it's not something that should be done long term unless there's some very specific medical condition that someone's treating.'
In a 2023 article published in the Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open, Blutinger noted that there is no antiviral treatment for measles yet available. While two days of vitamin A doses is recommended, followed by another dose several weeks later, the study concluded that the best and surest way to combat the disease remains vaccination.
[ Related: Is raw milk safe? Science has a clear answer. ]
Beyond vaccinating, the best advice Blutinger could offer parents was to 'be well informed with verifiable information that comes from your primary care doctor and from the medical professionals that do not care about politics.'
'My other advice is to take measles extremely seriously and to do what you can to protect your loved ones, your children, the elderly, everyone around you, because, as we saw during COVID, pandemics are not easily tamed,' he added. 'If measles continues to spread rapidly, we may be in even more serious trouble.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pope Leo XIV to canonize first millennial saint Carlo Acutis in September
Pope Leo XIV to canonize first millennial saint Carlo Acutis in September

Chicago Tribune

time26 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Pope Leo XIV to canonize first millennial saint Carlo Acutis in September

ROME — Pope Leo XIV on Friday set Sept. 7 as the rescheduled date to canonize the Catholic Church's first millennial-era saint, Carlo Acutis, in what is expected to be Leo's first saint-making ceremony as well. Leo made the announcement during a meeting of cardinals, known as a consistory, to set the dates for a handful of new saints. Acutis' canonization was originally scheduled for April 27, but was postponed following the death of Pope Francis on April 21. Acutis was 15 when he died in northern Italy in 2006, after a short bout with leukemia. He has become enormously popular especially among young Catholics who have been flocking to his tomb in Assisi. While he enjoyed regular pastimes for his age — hiking, video games and joking around with friends — he also taught catechism in a local parish and did outreach to the homeless. He used his computer skills to create an online exhibit about more than 100 eucharistic miracles recognized by the church over many centuries. His tomb in Assisi has become a pilgrimage site especially during the 2025 Holy Year underway. It features a glass coffin in which Acutis can be seen dressed in sneakers, jeans and a sweatshirt. In setting the Sept. 7 date, Leo announced Acutis would be canonized along with another Italian Catholic, Pier Giorgio Frassati, who also died young at age 24 after contracting polio. Assisi Bishop Domenico Sorrentino expressed joy Friday at the new date for the canonization and invited Leo to visit the tomb. He said the canonization of Acutis and Frassati would 'put holiness in ordinary life at the center of attention of the church, especially for new generations.' The Vatican requires that the church confirm two miracles attributed to the candidate's intercession in order to proceed with canonization. In Acutis' case, the second alleged miracle concerned the medically inexplicable healing of a Costa Rican young woman who suffered a severe head injury when she fell from a bike in Florence in 2022. Doctors said she was in an irreversible coma. According to Sorrentino's office, the young woman's mother prayed at Acutis' tomb and soon thereafter her daughter's condition improved. She was well enough to visit Acutis' tomb in September. The first alleged miracle occurred in 2013 in Brazil and concerned a young boy afflicted with a grave pancreatic disorder who got better after praying to Acutis.

BMI & Nutrition Support Predict Weight Loss in Liver Disease
BMI & Nutrition Support Predict Weight Loss in Liver Disease

Medscape

timean hour ago

  • Medscape

BMI & Nutrition Support Predict Weight Loss in Liver Disease

In patients with metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), higher BMI, nutritionist support, and liver stiffness measurement ≥ 10 kPa were significant predictors of at least 7% weight reduction. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective study to identify clinical factors that predict successful and sustained weight loss in 897 patients with MASLD (mean age, 61.6 years; 57.1% men; mean BMI, 30.3). They were referred between January 2019 and December 2021, with follow-up occurring between 18 and 24 months at four Italian tertiary centres. The diagnosis of MASLD was confirmed if patients had hepatic steatosis on ultrasound and at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, such as a BMI ≥ 25 or high waist circumference, fasting glucose levels ≥ 100 mg/dL or type 2 diabetes, blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mm Hg, triglyceride levels ≥ 150 mg/dL, or low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Baseline and follow‐up data, including demographic, anthropometric, clinical, and biochemical parameters, as well as liver stiffness measurements, were collected from medical records. Details on lifestyle interventions such as Mediterranean diet recommendations, physical activity, and support from a nutritionist were also noted. TAKEAWAY: Over a median duration of 21 months, 18.3% of patients achieved at least 7% weight loss, with 8.5% losing 7%-10% and 9.8% losing more than 10% of their baseline weight. Higher baseline BMI was associated with increased odds of weight loss, with BMI 30-34.9 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.30-2.95) and BMI ≥ 35 (aOR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.21-3.57) associated with at least 7% weight loss. Nutritionist support (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.12-3.71), liver stiffness measurement ≥ 10 kPa (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.07-2.70), and bilirubin levels ≥ 1.2 mg/dL (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.29-3.51) were independent predictors of achieving at least 7% weight loss. The use of GLP-1 agonists was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of losing at least 7% weight (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.19-3.80). IN PRACTICE: "Our findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive approach to MASLD management, encompassing medical, nutritional and lifestyle interventions," the authors of the study wrote. "Lifestyle intervention remains crucial for all patients, but for those without predictive factors, close follow-up and early consideration of additional treatments are warranted to maximize therapeutic benefit," they added. SOURCE: This study was led by Nicola Pugliese, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. It was published online on June 04, 2025, in United European Gastroenterology Journal . LIMITATIONS: This study was retrospective in nature with varying observation periods among the patients. A standardised intervention protocol was lacking across centres, potentially leading to varying management. The absence of systematic data collection from intermediate visits and self-reported data also presented a limitation. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by funding from the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research and other projects to an author. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest.

RFK Jr.'s new vaccine panel is packed with vaccine skeptics
RFK Jr.'s new vaccine panel is packed with vaccine skeptics

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr.'s new vaccine panel is packed with vaccine skeptics

During his Senate confirmation hearings for health secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went to great lengths to downplay his previous anti-vaccine positions to try to assure the public that he wasn't as extreme as his record indicated. But now that he has unveiled new members of an important vaccine advisory committee, his long-held extremism is not only coming back into full view, it's also being operationalized. On Monday, Kennedy removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, which is made up of medical and public health experts and advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As NBC News reports, this committee makes 'recommendations to the CDC about who should get certain vaccines, including the schedule for childhood vaccinations.' These recommendations are then adopted by medical professionals and insurers. Kennedy justified the move by alleging that the experts on the panel were all compromised by financial conflicts of interest. But the claim looked like a dubious pretext for clearing the way for a new panel. As NBC News reports, 'Members of ACIP, who undergo an extensive vetting process before they are appointed, are required to disclose conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from voting on vaccines for which conflicts exist.' Sean O'Leary, chair of the infectious disease committee for the American Academy of Pediatrics, who serves as a liaison to the committee from the pediatric academy, told The New York Times that the idea that the old committee's decisions were influenced by financial conflicts of interest was 'factually incorrect, and you can look at the record to see that.' He called Kennedy's firings 'manufactured chaos.' Kennedy's vision came into clearer view on Wednesday when he announced eight new people to serve on ACIP's board, including several experts with questionable or outright dangerous track records on vaccinations or public health recommendations. They include: Robert Malone, a physician-scientist and biochemist whom The New York Times has described as a 'misinformation star,' in part because of his record of misleadingly questioning the dangers of Covid and the safety of Covid vaccines. Vicky Pebsworth, the director of research and patient safety at the National Vaccine Information Center, which NBC News reports is 'considered a leading source of misinformation about vaccines.' Cody Meissner, a Dartmouth pediatrics professor who was a signer of the Great Barrington Declaration, the statement that opposed lockdowns during the Covid pandemic. Retsef Levi, a professor of operations management at the MIT Sloan School of Management. NBC News reports that he 'has called for an end to Covid vaccinations, claiming mRNA vaccines cause serious harm and death, especially among young people.' Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist and biostatistician who was one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration. Kennedy didn't pick random people off the internet; they have credentials, often at highly esteemed institutions, although some of these academic backgrounds apparently deviate from the kind one typically expects for this panel. But many public health experts and those who keep a close eye on vaccine skeptics and anti-vaxxers note that Kennedy appears to be putting together a slate of experts who skew ideologically against consensus and near-consensus views on vaccine safety and efficacy. 'Kennedy did not pick people with strong, current expertise in vaccines,' Dorit Reiss, a professor at UC Law San Francisco who studies vaccine policy, told NPR. 'It tells me that Kennedy is setting up a committee that would be skeptical of vaccines, and possibly willing to implement an anti-vaccine agenda.' David Mansdoerfer, who served as deputy assistant secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services in the first Trump administration, called Kennedy's announcement 'a huge win for the medical freedom movement.' It's not yet clear how the advisory board will rule on vaccine recommendations in the future. But the real-world effects of this could be significant. As The New York Times notes, the panel's recommendations, which don't have to be adopted by the CDC but typically are, can affect how strongly doctors recommend vaccinations. If the panel's recommendations skew away from recommending vaccines, then it could mean that physicians might be more hesitant to counsel patients to take vaccines that have long been proved to be safe. Furthermore, the panel's recommendations could affect how health insurance companies cover vaccines. 'Right now, insurance companies cover the four-dose polio series. But without an A.C.I.P. recommendation, the shots might cost you more than $300,' the Times reports. We still don't know how this newly formed panel will play out. But contrary to Kennedy's 'Make America Healthy Again' mantra, all indications so far are that Kennedy is laser-focused on advancing activist goals that will make our society less healthy. This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store