logo
NASA Installs Heat Shield on Private Spacecraft for Journey to Hunt Life on Venus

NASA Installs Heat Shield on Private Spacecraft for Journey to Hunt Life on Venus

Yahoo01-03-2025
A company that's slated to launch the world's first-ever private mission to Venus is getting ready for the planet's super-hot temperatures with some help from NASA.
The space agency boasted in a press release that it's working with Rocket Lab, a California-based aerospace manufacturer, to apply a heat shield onto the small space capsule that's scheduled to launch next summer.
Along with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Rocket Lab has since 2021 been planning its Venus Life Finder mission that will, as the name suggests, check for signs of life amid the cloudtops of the second planet from the Sun. To prepare the 50-pound probe — which will also track weather patterns on the uber-acidic world — for the intense heat of our Solar System's hottest planet, NASA is applying a brown woven material that can protect crafts from temperatures up to 4,500 degrees Fahrenheit.
Known as the Heatshield for Extreme Entry Environment Technology, or "HEEET" for short, the rugged spacecraft outerwear that looks like something out of "Star Wars" was invented at NASA's Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley. To test it out, researchers subjected the woven material to extremely high temperatures at the Ames' Arc Jet Complex, which NASA bills as the highest-powered "arc-heated hyper-thermal test facility" in the US.
While NASA clearly has the infrastructure to support and test out these sorts of materials, the woman running the Venus Life Finder mission has suggested that private companies like Rocket Labs will be able to launch these sorts of projects for far less money than the agency could.
"We hope this is the start of a new paradigm where you go cheaply, more often, and in a more focused way," explained Sara Seager, the project's principal investigator, in an MIT news release back when the mission was first announced in 2021. "This is a newer, nimbler, faster way to do space science."
Indeed, as the Planetary Society notes, the Venus Life Finder mission was estimated by the MIT Tech Review to cost less than $10 million — a minuscule amount compared to the $500 million per project price tag on NASA's DAVINCI the Jet Propulsion Lab's VERITAS, which both are slated to go to Venus soon.
As fascinating as the mission will be once it launches, the probe isn't going to spend very much time sailing through the Venusian clouds. As MIT Tech notes, the 50-pound capsule will likely only have about five minutes to transmit its findings back to Earth as it falls further and further down to the planet's surface, where it will end its days.
To make sure the capsule survives long enough to radio its discoveries back to Earth during that short window of time, some majorly high-tech gear will be necessary to protect it — and luckily, NASA's got just the thing.
More on planetary visits: NASA Spacecraft Whipping Around Mars to Slingshot Itself Toward Jupiter's Mysterious Moon
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California Coastal Commission opposes SpaceX launch expansion on West Coast, again
California Coastal Commission opposes SpaceX launch expansion on West Coast, again

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

California Coastal Commission opposes SpaceX launch expansion on West Coast, again

By Steve Gorman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -The California Coastal Commission voted on Thursday against a plan by Elon Musk's SpaceX to nearly double the number of Falcon 9 rocket launches the company is permitted to conduct each year from Vandenberg Space Force Base, from 50 to 95. But as was the case when the commission voted last October to oppose a previous SpaceX launch expansion from 36 to 50 at the installation, the U.S. government can merely override the objections of California regulators and approve the latest plan. The U.S. Department of the Air Force, parent agency of the Space Force, has taken the position that the proposed launch expansion at Vandenberg, about 60 miles (97 km) northwest of Santa Barbara on the central California coast, is a federal activity exempt from further state oversight. A commission staff report countered that of 51 rockets launched last year from Vandenberg, SpaceX Falcon 9s accounted for 46 of them. While SpaceX flies some missions for the Defense Department and NASA, the enlarged launch operations SpaceX envisions are primarily for carrying payloads for the company's own Starlink satellite network, the report said. SpaceX also has sought to expand its launch facilities at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida. Air Force officials did not attend Thursday's commission meeting in Calabasas, north of Los Angeles, where the panel voted 11-0 against SpaceX. Neither representatives for SpaceX nor the Air Force could immediately be reached for comment. SpaceX has sued the California Coastal Commission over its previous objections, accusing the agency of singling out Musk's company for greater regulation in retaliation for his political views. In addition to allowing as many as 95 launches a year by the company's workhorse Falcon 9, the new plan would permit up to five Falcon Heavy rocket launches annually, and up to 24 landings by the company's reusable rocket boosters, twice as many as previously approved. Two new landing zones at the base would also be built. At-sea landings would also be increased. In recommending disapproval, commission staff cited what it called insufficient information about the plan and concerns over noise pollution and wildlife disturbance from more frequent, louder sonic booms as SpaceX launch activity escalates. The staff report also cited the need for more frequent closures of public beaches and campgrounds that lie within the launch hazard zones around the base. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

TRAPPIST-1d isn't the Earth-like planet scientists had hoped it to be, according to JWST data
TRAPPIST-1d isn't the Earth-like planet scientists had hoped it to be, according to JWST data

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

TRAPPIST-1d isn't the Earth-like planet scientists had hoped it to be, according to JWST data

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. There's bad news for our hopes of habitable planets existing around TRAPPIST-1, with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) finding no evidence for an Earth-like atmosphere on a third world orbiting the red dwarf. However, that still leaves four other planets in orbit around TRAPPIST-1 that could be habitable, with at least two or three of them in what is regarded as the "habitable zone" where temperatures would be suitable for liquid water to exist —- assuming an Earth-like atmosphere that can retain heat. Previously, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) had failed to find evidence for an atmosphere around the two innermost planets in the TRAPPIST-1 system, world TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c. Now, we can add the next planet out, TRAPPIST-1d, to the list. "Ultimately, we want to know if something like the environment we enjoy on Earth can exist elsewhere, and under what conditions," Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb of the University of Chicago and the Trottier Institute for Research on Exoplanets (IREx) at Université de Montréal, said in a statement. "At this point, we can rule out TRAPPIST-1d from a list of potential Earth twins or cousins." All seven planets of the TRAPPIST-1 system are seen transiting, or passing in front of, their star. Although not even the JWST can see the silhouette of the transiting planet, it can detect where the star's light has been absorbed by molecules in the planet's atmosphere during the transit. This is called transmission spectroscopy. Yet, despite using the JWST's sensitive Near-Infrared Spectrometer, or NIRSpec, astronomers led by Piaulet-Ghorayeb found no evidence for water, methane or carbon dioxide, all of which are common in Earth's atmosphere and which act as natural greenhouse gases to retain heat and keep a planet warm enough for liquid water. "There are a few potential reasons why we don't detect an atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1d," said Piaulet-Ghorayeb. "It could have an extremely thin atmosphere that is difficult to detect, somewhat like Mars. Alternatively, it could have very thick, high-altitude clouds that are blocking our detection of specific atmospheric signatures — something more like Venus. Or, it could be barren rock, with no atmosphere at all." The problem that the TRAPPIST-1 planets collectively face is their star. Red dwarfs, small and cool, seem at first glance to be unthreatening, but in reality they are tumultuous with frequent violent outbursts of radiation. These repeated flares can strip an atmosphere from a world a piece at a time. It is quite possible that this is the fate that has befallen TRAPPIST-1b, c and d. In particular, planet d seems like a real blow to our hopes of finding a world with an Earth-like atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1 because it resides on the inner edge of the system's habitable zone. That said, so does Venus in our solar system, and a Venus-like planet is still on the table. And there are four other planets still to go. "All hope is not lost for atmospheres around the TRAPPIST-1 planets," said Piaulet-Ghorayeb. "While we didn't find a big, bold atmospheric signature for planet d, there is still potential for the outer planets to be holding onto a lot of water and other atmospheric components." Planets e and f are definitely in the star's nominal habitable zone, g is at the outer edge like Mars is in our solar system, while planet h is beyond the habitable zone and will be almost certainly too cold to support an Earth-like atmosphere. However, probing whether any of these outer planets has an atmosphere is more difficult. Their greater distance from their star means any spectral signature is weaker, perhaps too weak even for the JWST to detect. RELATED STORIES — TRAPPIST-1: A guide to the system with 7 Earth-size exoplanets — Why the 7 worlds of TRAPPIST-1 waltz in peculiar patterns — TRAPPIST-1 Worlds Are Rocky and Rich in Water, New Research Uncovers But even if all the worlds around TRAPPIST-1, which is 40 light-years away, prove to be a bust, there are many more fish in the sea. Red dwarf stars are by far the most common type of star, making up about three-quarters of all stars in the Milky Way galaxy, and there are numerous other interesting planets around other red dwarfs, such as Teegarden's Star b, LHS 1140b and even Proxima Centauri b, even though the latter does not transit. And the search continues for rocky planets in the habitable zone of more sun-like stars — a search that the European Space Agency's PLATO mission, currently set to launch in December 2026, will accelerate. The latest news regarding the search for an atmosphere around TRAPPIST-1d was published on Aug. 13 in The Astrophysical Journal. Solve the daily Crossword

The Webb telescope's look at an Earth-size alien planet was bleak
The Webb telescope's look at an Earth-size alien planet was bleak

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Webb telescope's look at an Earth-size alien planet was bleak

As scientists delve deeper into a star system with seven rocky worlds, the prospect of one being a habitable planet seems to be quickly fading. Researchers who used the James Webb Space Telescope, a joint partnership of NASA and its European and Canadian counterparts, determined the third planet from the TRAPPIST-1 star is unlikely to have air. For anyone keeping count, that's strike three for the system, which lies about 40 light-years away from Earth in space. The new findings on exoplanet TRAPPIST-1d, published in The Astrophysical Journal on Wednesday, mirror similar results for TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c, which orbit closer to their red dwarf host, a tiny-yet-violent type of star found throughout the galaxy. "On a personal level, of course, there's a part of me that would have loved to see signs of air on TRAPPIST-1d," Caroline Piaulet-Ghorayeb, a University of Chicago fellow and lead author of the paper, told Mashable. "Science isn't about hoping for a yes, it's about finding what's real. So here we've learned that TRAPPIST-1d is not an Earth twin." Astronomers discovered the TRAPPIST-1 system about eight years ago with the now-retired Spitzer Space Telescope. Soon they made the swarming exoplanets a priority for investigating their potential for life, with all seven roughly the size of Earth. Scientists were particularly interested in finding out whether the TRAPPIST planets have atmospheres, because red dwarfs are the most ubiquitous kind of star in the Milky Way. If these planets can retain atmospheres, even while subjected to close-range blasts of stellar radiation, perhaps an abundance of other worlds out there could, too. When TRAPPIST-1b and TRAPPIST-1c didn't appear to have atmospheres, the research community wasn't deterred, as neither sibling planet was predicted to have one, given how close they are to the star. But TRAPPIST-1d, which circles the star every four days, is a different story. This exoplanet is on the cusp of the star's theorized habitable zone — the region of space where worlds might be able to have lakes and oceans on their surfaces. "Science isn't about hoping for a yes, it's about finding what's real." Webb observed TRAPPIST-1d with a method called transmission spectroscopy. When a planet crosses in front of its host star, starlight should shine through its atmosphere, if there is one. Molecules within an atmosphere absorb certain light wavelengths, or colors, so astronomers can look for missing segments of the rainbow to figure out chemicals in its composition. The researchers looked for things like water vapor, methane, carbon dioxide, and sulfur dioxide. But first, the team had to account for so-called "stellar contamination." Just like the sun, red dwarfs can get sunspots, so their starlight isn't completely uniform. Variability in the light signals can obscure or even imitate signals coming from a planet. After correcting for this problem in the data, the researchers found no clear signs of gases. That means scientists can rule out certain types of atmospheres, like the thick hydrogen-rich atmosphere of Neptune, or a cloud-free atmosphere akin to that of early Earth. But a few other potential scenarios could explain the results without the planet having to be a barren rock. It could have an extremely thin atmosphere, sort of like Mars, that would be difficult to detect with this method, Piaulet-Ghorayeb said, or it could have thick, high-altitude clouds blocking atmospheric signatures, perhaps like Venus. "We also learned something about what the best way to even look for water in the atmosphere of these temperate planets might be," she said. "Maybe transmission spectroscopy isn't it." Whether red dwarf stars, sometimes called M-type, can harbor planets with atmospheres is a key question for Webb to answer. The observatory has begun a massive study of rocky worlds, first reported by Mashable, specifically to figure out if planets orbiting closely around them could have air. Rather than transmission spectroscopy, the survey will rely on a different method, called the secondary eclipse technique, which avoids some of the stellar contamination issues. The team says not to give up on the TRAPPIST system just yet. After all, planets E, F, G, and H could have a better chance of holding onto their atmospheres because they're farther from the star's flares, which can strip away a planet's atmosphere. In particular, TRAPPIST researchers are looking forward to studying E, the fourth planet from the star. The challenge for Webb will be overcoming the planets' more extreme distance and colder environments, which make atmospheric readings more difficult. What makes Piaulet-Ghorayeb hopeful about the continued quest for rocky worlds with water and air is the milestone achieved. "For the first time, if there had been an Earth-like atmosphere on a temperate terrestrial planet, we could have found it," she said. "And I don't think that in any study before, with any instrument that we had before, we could really get to that level of precision." Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store