Authoritarian states operating without impunity to silence dissidents in UK, report finds
Transnational repression has increased in recent years, with foreign states using online harassment, lawsuits, surveillance and physical violence to intimidate people in the UK, a report published on Wednesday by the Joint Committee on Human Rights said.
There has been a 48% increase in MI5 investigations into threats from other states in the UK since 2022, the report said.
Chairman Lord David Alton warned the rise in threats was "going unchecked" in the UK and said the government "lacks a clear strategy" to address transnational repression (TNR).
He said: "This risks undermining the UK's ability to protect the human rights of its citizens and those who have sought safety within its borders.
"We have seen prominent cases of Hong Kongers with bounties placed on their heads, Iran intimidating journalists - but evidence submitted to the inquiry suggests this may be the tip of the iceberg."
Amnesty International called the report "damning" and said it shows the UK has become a "hunting ground" for authoritarian regimes.
The committee called on the government to adopt a formal definition of TNR, a dedicated reporting mechanism for victims, data collection, specialised police training and to work with "like-minded states" to coordinate international action against authoritarian regimes using TNR.
The cross-party committee said the government is not doing enough to help victims and should develop a "proactive outreach strategy" aimed at individuals and communities at risk of TNR within 12 months.
It said strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) - aimed at exhausting a defendant financially and psychologically - are increasingly being used to "intimidate and silence" people, especially journalists, who expose or criticise authoritarian regimes.
The MPs and Lords called on the government to expand protections for defendants in SLAPP cases where it is used as a TNR tool, as there is currently only protection if it is an economic crime.
1:55
Dozen countries carrying out TNR
They said China, Iran and Russia were the "most flagrant" perpetrators of TNR, but they also heard evidence from people being targeted by Bahrain, Egypt, India, Pakistan, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates.
The committee also received "substantial" evidence of TNR carried out by the Eritrean government, including being forced to pay a 2% "diaspora tax" and those who refuse "are considered government opponents and face harassment, intimidation and ultimately social isolation", the UN Special Rapporteur on Eritrea told the committee.
Interpol red notices
The committee criticised Interpol "red notices" - international requests for arrest - saying they were being used to harass dissidents and said Interpol has refused to acknowledge there is a problem.
Nearly half of the 6,550 current public red notices have been issued at Russia's request "to intimidate and silence journalists, activists, and other critics", the report said.
Lord Alton, who is sanctioned by China, said the UK government needs to press Interpol for action on abuse of red notices and introduce a mechanism to alert people they are subject to a red notice, if there is a strong basis to believe it is politically motivated.
China and Hong Kong
While Iran and Russia are more obvious with their tactics, the committee said China uses a "broad range", including surveillance, online harassment, and threats to family members abroad.
It highlighted the Hong Kong government placing bounties on several democracy protesters who have fled to the UK, naming 20-year-old Chloe Cheung.
She gave evidence, telling them it has affected her "mentally, emotionally and physically in profound ways that I never expected" and she now carries lots of self-protection devices and her first thought about people who suddenly want to make friends or approach her is they must work for the Chinese government.
Ms Cheung, now an advocacy manager for the Committee for Freedom in Hong Kong Foundation, said it is "important the UK government doesn't just acknowledge this report, but actually acts on it" to help protect dissidents like her.
Concern was also raised about unofficial Chinese "police stations" in the UK, used to monitor and pressure the Chinese diaspora, and the proposed Chinese "super embassy", with fears it could serve as a spy base.
The committee repeated calls made by MPs last month for China to be placed in the highest tier of the foreign influence registration (FIRS) scheme, saying its omission risked "undermining the credibility and coherence" of the scheme.
Russia
The report said Russia has engaged in the "most serious forms" of TNR, including direct threat to life - and highlighted the Salisbury nerve agent attack as creating a "chilling effect" among Kremlin critics.
Iran
Iran represents "one of the highest kidnap and assassination state threats to the UK", with tactics including physical attacks, smear campaigns, hacking, assassination plots, and "cultural centres" as surveillance fronts, the report said.
Kerry Moscogiuri, campaign director at Amnesty International, said the government needs to "now act on these recommendations, not just in principle, but in practice".
An Interpol spokesperson said: "Every year, thousands of the world's most serious criminals are arrested thanks to Interpol's systems.
"Children are saved from sexual exploitation and terrorists, cyber criminals and traffickers are brought to justice.
"Interpol knows red notices are powerful tools for law enforcement co-operation, which is why we have robust processes for ensuring that all Interpol notices and diffusions comply with our rules.
"Our constitution forbids Interpol from undertaking activities of a political, military, religious or racial character and all our databases and activities must also comply with the universal declaration for human rights."
A Home Office spokesperson said: "We take the threat of transnational repression extremely seriously.
"Any attempts by a foreign state to coerce, intimidate, harass, or harm individuals on UK soil are considered a threat to our national security and sovereignty, and will not be tolerated.
"The committee's review echoes many of the same findings and recommendations from the Defending Democracy Taskforce report on TNR, published in May, and we are already taking action arising from those recommendations to further strengthen our response."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
A long-term plan is needed to get the country out of its financial hole
SIR – Whether by raising income tax rates, a wealth tax or through less overt measures, the Government will try to extract more money from the people that it serves ('Reeves facing £50bn black hole as tax pressure mounts ', report, August 6). However, such measures risk being self-defeating. Those who are unable or unwilling to leave the country will bear the brunt of the tax rises. That includes standard and higher-rate taxpayers. Every pound the Government extracts from their bank accounts is a pound that cannot be spent on businesses that provide goods and services. Thus, businesses will take another hit which, in turn, will reduce their tax payments. Since the failure of the Truss administration, there has been no long-term plan to get the country out of its financial hole. Eventually, there will have to be one and it will likely involve curbing the insatiable appetite of government to control and spend. When such a plan sees the light of day we may be surprised at the boost it gives to confidence and investment. David Porter Plymouth, Devon SIR – Labour dug itself a financial hole when it pledged not to increase National Insurance (NI), VAT or income tax rates. Instead of imposing VAT on private schools and possibly even on private health, a simple 1 or 2 per cent rise on NI and/or the basic rate of income tax would have solved the Chancellor's problems. Now she is having to cast her net wider – and creating more problems as a result. John Tilsiter Radlett, Hertfordshire SIR – Taxing jobs and taxing capital is not going to result in economic growth. Is it too much to expect a former Bank of England economist to grasp this? Patrick Loxdale Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SIR – There is a limit to which any economy can be taxed. The UK is at that limit. The British public understands this. It is plain that public sector expenditure must be cut to balance the books. Given the Government throws billions around like confetti – on the Chagos Islands, the immigration fiasco, welfare, public sector pay rises, excessive numbers of civil servants – there is much low-hanging fruit. The economy is being badly managed as never before. Enough is enough. Please can we have some economic sanity. Stuart Moore Bramham, West Yorkshire SIR – Having continually criticised the Conservatives for the last 12 months for creating a £22bn black hole in the public finances, I trust Labour will now be constantly criticising itself for doubling the deficit. Paul Webster Dyserth, Denbighshire
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch says Josef Fritzl case made her ‘reject God'
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has revealed the case of Austrian sex offender Josef Fritzl caused her to lose faith in God. Mrs Badenoch said she was 'never that religious' while growing up but 'believed there was a God' and 'would have defined myself as a Christian apologist'. But this changed in 2008 when she read reports that Fritzl had imprisoned and repeatedly raped his daughter, Elisabeth, in his basement over 24 years. Mrs Badenoch, whose maternal grandfather was a Methodist minister, told the BBC: 'I couldn't stop reading this story. And I read her account, how she prayed every day to be rescued. 'And I thought, I was praying for all sorts of stupid things and I was getting my prayers answered. I was praying to have good grades, my hair should grow longer, and I would pray for the bus to come on time so I wouldn't miss something. 'It's like, why were those prayers answered and not this woman's prayers? And it just, it was like someone blew out a candle.' But she insisted that while she had 'rejected God', she had not rejected Christianity and remained a 'cultural Christian', saying she wanted to 'protect certain things because I think the world that we have in the UK is very much built on many Christian values'. During her interview, which is due to be broadcast on Thursday evening, Mrs Badenoch also said her tenure as Conservative leader was going 'well', adding her job was to 'make sure that people can see that we are the only party on the centre-right'. In an apparent dig at Nigel Farage's Reform UK, she said: 'There are pretenders. We're the only party on the centre-right, and we're the only ones who still believe in values like living within our means, personal responsibility, making sure that the government is not getting involved in everything so it can focus on the things it needs to look at, like securing our borders.' She went on to defend previous comments saying the fact she had worked at McDonald's made her working class, saying: 'I had to work to live. 'That, for me, is what being working class is. It's the lifestyle that you have. You have to work, to survive.' And she argued that parents who were 'worried about their children getting stolen or snatched' had created a younger generation that lacked the 'resilience' to deal with problems in life. Responding to figures suggesting a quarter of people aged 16-24 said they had a mental disorder, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I think they think they have a mental disorder, I don't think they all have a mental disorder.' She added: 'I'm not a medical expert so it is not my expertise on exactly what we need to do to get them into work, but we should be trying to get them into work.'
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘One in four councils could lose money' under Government's funding proposals
Around a quarter of councils in England could lose money under the Government's proposed reforms to how local authorities are funded, analysis has found. A report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said the changes would create big 'winners and losers' as ministers attempt to address perceived unfairness in levels of core funding across the country. Sir Keir Starmer's own council, Camden in north London, will be hit by the reforms when taking inflation into account, the IFS added. The think tank said Camden, along with other inner London boroughs including Westminster, will have less money to spend on services even if they increase council tax by the maximum amount allowed. Whitehall will provide a minimum level of funding, a so-called funding floor, for council leaders during the changes, but the IFS said overall cash for inner London town halls would be 11-12% lower in 2028-29 in real terms. The paper said: 'Around one in four councils would see real-terms falls in overall funding under the Government's proposals, with around 30 on the lowest funding floors seeing real-terms cuts of 11–12%. Conversely, another one in four councils would see real-terms increases of 12% or more.' The changes, which will come into effect from next year, are being consulted on by ministers. The Government plans to create a new methodology to assess local authority needs relatively and factor in population and deprivation. It will also assess need for adult and children's services. Overall spending will fall for 186 councils and rise by the same total sum for 161. One in 10 will see a fall in overall funding, while one in 10 will see an increase of 10% or more. The overall Government spend on local authorities will not change. The changes will be phased in across three years, from 2026/27 to 2028/29. Kate Ogden, co-author of the IFS report and a senior research economist with the think tank, said: 'England has lacked a rational system of local government funding for at least 12 years – and arguably more like 20. It is therefore welcome that the nettle of funding reform is being grasped, and some councils will benefit substantially under the new system. 'But the changes will sting for those councils that are assessed to currently receive too high a share of the overall funding pot, and so which lose out from moves to align funding with assessed spending needs.' The proposals are criticised in the report as 'not particularly redistributive to poor, urban areas of England'. It cites South Tyneside and Sunderland councils being among those to lose out from the reforms as slow population growth is accounted for. The report added: 'It is somewhat surprising that, on average, councils in the most deprived 30% of areas would see very similar changes in overall funding over the next three years to those for councils in the middle 40% of areas.' It noted that rural areas, which feared being badly hit by changes, will benefit from a 'remoteness adjustment' which will compensate areas with higher needs due to being far from large towns. London will gain the least, with a cash-terms increase in funding of 8% in the next three years. Analysis by the London Councils collective has highlighted the risk of the funding 'dramatically underestimating' needs for local services in parts of the capital. It noted the city has the highest rate of poverty in the country when housing costs are factored in. Outside the capital, the East Midlands (22%) and Yorkshire & the Humber (19%) are set to see the biggest increases in funding, with the South East set to see the smallest at 13%. However, the proposals have been criticised by youth charity the National Children's Bureau, which said it was 'significantly concerned' about the way the Government plans to work out needs for children's services. Ms Ogden added: 'The Government should consider giving highly affected councils which currently have low council tax rates greater flexibility to bring their council tax bills up to more typical levels to offset funding losses. 'More generally, reform of council funding allocations is just one part of the financial sustainability puzzle. Efforts to reduce demands on, and the cost of providing, local services through reform and the use of new technology will also be vital.' A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'The current, outdated way in which local authorities are funded means the link between funding and need for services has broken down, leaving communities left behind. 'That's why we are taking decisive action to reform the funding system so we can get councils back on their feet and improve public services, with the IFS recognising that our changes will better align funding with councils' needs.'
