Recent college graduates increasingly unemployed, research finds
(NewsNation) — Recent U.S. college graduates are increasingly struggling to find employment despite their qualifications, research has shown.
Oxford Economics determined that graduates — those age 22 to 27 with a bachelor's degree or higher — have contributed 12% to the 85% rise in the national unemployment rate since mid-2023.
Those graduates make up only 5% of the total workforce, meaning they're contributing more than double their share to unemployment statistics.
How AI is shaping industries across the US
Recent graduates also have a nearly 6% unemployment rate, beating out the national unemployment rate of 4.2%.
That's the highest since 2021 and more than double the rate for all college graduates, according to an analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Underemployment is also on the rise: 41% of recent graduates work in jobs that typically don't require a college degree, up from 39% in January.
Teachers bring back blue books to curb AI cheating in classrooms
Oxford researchers pointed to temporary causes for the spike in unemployment — including tariffs and inflation — and more longstanding issues, such as the saturation of tech fields like computer science and artificial intelligence overhauls.
'Higher unemployment among recent college graduates is primarily a function of a structuralshift in hiring in the tech sector amid strong labor supply growth,' researchers wrote. 'While some of it is related to a normalization after the post-pandemic surge, there are signs that entry-level positions are being displaced by artificial intelligence at higher rates.'
A recent Indeed survey found 51% of Gen Zers think getting their college degree was a 'waste of money.'
NewsNation's Andrew Dorn contributed to this report.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Buying a House Is the Second Most Important Financial Goal for Gen Z—the No. 1 Goal Is Why It's Out Of Reach
Gen Z is falling behind on the path to homeownership. In 2025, they made up just 3% of all homebuyers, according to the National Association of Realtors®, the smallest share of any generation and a sharp contrast to baby boomers, who accounted for 42% of buyers. While high interest rates and higher home prices have made it harder for young adults to break into the market, new research suggests another force might be working against Gen Z: how they manage their money. According to PYMNTS Intelligence, a payments data provider, despite valuing homeownership, Gen Z's top financial goal isn't buying a home. It's paying off debt. The average Gen Z adult carries an average of $94,101 in personal debt, with credit card debt being the most common. With so much of their income tied up in monthly payments, even high earners in this generation are struggling to save for a down payment or qualify for a mortgage. Debt, not disinterest, might be the real reason Gen Z is falling behind—at least for now. 'Though Gen Z Americans may dream of homeownership, still-high housing costs mean that stepping onto the property ladder may not be possible at this point in time,' says Hannah Jones, senior economic research analyst at 'By prioritizing paying off debt, Gen Z prospective buyers are setting themselves up for success when homeownership does become more feasible.' PYMNTS Intelligence identifies two key money management mindsets: Planners, who proactively save and pay off credit cards Reactors, who handle bills as they come and often rely on credit or loans Gen Z overwhelmingly falls into the latter group. A striking 73% of Gen Zers are classified as reactors, making them more likely to live paycheck to paycheck, carry high-interest debt, and struggle to build savings. That reactive approach can seriously undermine major financial goals, like buying a home, because it prioritizes short-term survival over long-term stability. Even more surprising, the reactor mindset is gaining ground among high earners across generations. Since February 2024, the share of six-figure earners who identify as planners has dropped by 25%. Now, 52% of top earners are reactors, a shift that underscores how widespread short-term financial thinking has become, even among those typically viewed as having the means to plan ahead. Unlike baby boomers, 54% of whom are planners focused on long-term stability, Gen Z is chasing growth. According to the PYMNTS report: Just 7.7% of Gen Z cite retirement saving as a top financial priority, compared with 22.1% of baby boomers. Nearly 7% of Gen Z say their No. 1 goal is starting a business, making them eight times more likely than boomers to focus on entrepreneurship. 'Gen Z Americans have time on their side and may be more willing to take big swings financially, while older generations are more risk-averse,' says Jones. While starting a business can lead to long-term wealth, it typically comes with short-term financial instability, exactly what makes it harder to qualify for a mortgage or build up a down payment. Irregular income, high credit utilization, and limited savings make it much harder to qualify for a mortgage under traditional lending models. Even high-earning Gen Z entrepreneurs might struggle to demonstrate the consistent income or financial reserves lenders expect. This risk-oriented mindset might be a reaction to the current conditions of the housing market. Buyers now need to earn 70% more than they did just six years ago to buy a home, to say nothing of the difference between buying a house now than in the 1960s and '70s, when many baby boomers bought their first homes. These conditions have made many in Gen Z feel that shooting for the moon in business is a more realistic goal than saving for that white picket fence. Homeownership hasn't fallen off Gen Z's radar, but it's taking a back seat to paying off existing debt. Buying a house ranks as this generation's second most important financial goal, with 14.1% of Gen Zers ranking it as a priority. But deprioritizing homeownership, even temporarily, can come at a long-term cost. In a market where prices keep climbing, every year spent focusing elsewhere can make the eventual buy-in more expensive. And because lenders heavily weigh savings, credit usage, and income consistency, Gen Z's current financial behaviors—like revolving debt and low reserves—can delay homeownership even further, regardless of intent or income. In other words, Gen Z still wants to own, but the reactive financial path they're following makes it harder to get there. Without a shift in priorities, many might find themselves stuck in a cycle where the dream of owning a home never quite catches up to their ambition. To bridge the gap between ambition and ownership, Gen Z might need to rethink how they prioritize and manage their money. The good news is that paying off debt, Gen Z's top financial priority, will eventually help them buy a house by lowering their debt-to-income ratio. The area where they can make the biggest changes, though, is in moving from a reactive mindset to a planning mindset. Here's how they can get started: Automate savings to gradually build up a down payment. Track spending patterns to identify areas to cut back. Use credit strategically, aiming to pay in full each month. Pursue both goals in parallel—treat debt repayment as a priority, but not at the cost of building a safety net to support future homeownership. Gen Z hasn't turned away from homeownership, but when the top priority involves risk or volatility, it can make the second one harder to reach. With the right habits and tools, Gen Z can build both the freedom to pursue big dreams and the foundation to one day own a piece of them. What Happens If I Stop Paying My Mortgage? Giving or Receiving a Down Payment Gift? Here Are the Tax Consequences How To Get a Mortgage With Bad Credit (Yes, You Can)
CNBC
a day ago
- CNBC
UK Finance Minister Rachel Reeves' spending plans risk creating ‘a snowball effect' that pushes borrowing costs higher
Britain's government is planning to ramp up public spending — but market watchers warn the proposals risk sending jitters through the bond market further inflating the country's $143 billion-a-year interest payments. U.K. Finance Minister Rachel Reeves on Wednesday announced the government would inject billions of pounds into defense, healthcare, infrastructure, and other areas of the economy, in the coming years. A day later, however, official data showed the U.K. economy shrank by a greater-than-expected 0.3% in April. Funding public spending in the absence of a growing economy, leaves the government with two options: raise money through taxation, or take on more debt. One way it can borrow is to issue bonds, known as gilts in the U.K., into the public market. By purchasing gilts, investors are essentially lending money to the government, with the yield on the bond representing the return the investor can expect to receive. Gilt yields and prices move in opposite directions — so rising prices move yields lower, and vice versa. This year, gilt yields have seen volatile moves, with investors sensitive to geopolitical and macroeconomic instability. The U.K. government's long-term borrowing costs spiked to multi-decade highs in January, and the yield on 20- and 30-year gilts continues to hover firmly above 5%.Official estimates show the government is expected to spend more than £105 billion ($142.9 billion) paying interest on its national debt in the 2025 fiscal year — £9.4 billion higher than at the the time of the Autumn budget last year — and £111 billion in annual interest in 2026. The government did not say on Wednesday how its newly unveiled spending hikes will be funded, and did not respond to CNBC's request for comment about where the money will come from. However, in her Autumn Budget last year, Reeves outlined plans to hike both taxes and borrowing. Following the budget, the finance minister pledged not to raise taxes again during the current Labour government's term in office, saying that the government "won't have to do a budget like this ever again." Andrew Goodwin, chief U.K. economist at Oxford Economics, said Britain's government may be forced to go even further with its spending plans, with NATO poised to hike its defense spending target for member states to 5% of GDP, and once a U-turn on winter fuel payments for the elderly and other possible welfare reforms are factored in. Additionally, Goodwin said, the U.K.'s Office for Budget Responsibility is likely to make "unfavorable revisions" to its economic forecasts in July, which would lead to lower tax receipts and higher borrowing. "If recent movements in financial market pricing hold, debt servicing costs will be around £2.5bn ($3.4 billion) higher than they were at the time of the Spring Statement," Goodwin warned in a note on Wednesday. Mel Stride, who serves as the shadow Chancellor in the U.K.'s opposition government, told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe" on Thursday that the Spending Review raised questions about whether "a huge amount of borrowing" will be involved in funding the government's fiscal strategies. "[Government] borrowing is having consequences in terms of higher inflation in the U.K. … and therefore interest rates [are] higher for longer," he said. "It's adding to the debt mountain, the servicing costs upon which are running at 100 billion [pounds] a year, that's twice what we spend on defense." "I'm afraid the overall economy is in a very weak position to withstand the kind of spending and borrowing that this government is announcing," Stride added. Stride argued that Reeves will "almost certainly" have to raise taxes again in her next budget announcement due in the autumn. "We've ended up in a very fragile situation, particularly when you've got the tariffs around the world," he said. Rufaro Chiriseri, head of fixed income for the British Isles at RBC Wealth Management, told CNBC that rising borrowing costs were putting Reeves' "already small fiscal headroom at risk." "This reduced headroom could create a snowball effect, as investors could potentially become nervous to hold UK debt, which could lead to a further selloff until fiscal stability is restored," he said. Iain Barnes, Chief Investment Officer at Netwealth, also told CNBC on Thursday that the U.K. was in "a state of fiscal fragility, so room for manoeuvre is limited." "The market knows that if growth disappoints, then this year's Budget may have to deliver higher taxes and increased borrowing to fund spending plans," Barnes said. However, April LaRusse, head of investment specialists at Insight Investment, argued there were ways for debt servicing burdens to be kept under control. The U.K.'s Debt Management Office, which issues gilts, has scope to reshape issuance patters — the maturity and type of gilts issued — to help the government get its borrowing costs under control, she said. "With the average yield on the 1-10 year gilts at c4% and the yield on the 15 year + gilts at 5.2% yield, there is scope to make the debt financing costs more affordable," she explained. However, LaRusse noted that debt interest payments for the U.K. government were estimated to reach the equivalent of around 3.5% of GDP this fiscal year, and that overspending could worsen the burden. "This increase is driven not only by higher interest rates, which gradually translate into higher coupon payments, but also by elevated levels of government spending, compounding the fiscal burden," she said.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
3 Critical Reasons Why Business Transformation Still Matters
A new Oxford Economics study uncovers critical reasons why business transformation is more important than ever. getty Many organizations praise business transformation as visionary and essential, but only a few look forward to or enjoy the disruption real change can bring. So why do companies willingly take on the pain of transformation? Business transformation represents a comprehensive strategic evolution. As outlined in the Forbes story, 'What Does Business Transformation Mean?,' transformation involves four critical dimensions—people, processes, applications, and data. —that serve as the 'what' and 'how' of transformation. The 'why' can take many forms, as organizations pursue transformation for a variety of reasons. It could be in response to shifting market relevance and regulatory changes or simply striving for greater operational efficiency and accelerated growth. Underlying all of these is the desire to become more resilient, agile, and competitive, ensuring sustainability in a dynamic business environment. According to a study by Oxford Economics and SAP, organizations undertake significant business transformation initiatives for three leading reasons: increased profitability, improved customer satisfaction, and increased market share. Companies initiate transformation journeys focused on streamlining operations, reducing costs, and optimizing resources, leveraging technology along the way to increase efficiency and profit margins. In an era where the customer experience is crucial, businesses also adopt customer-centric strategies to enhance satisfaction, build loyalty, and boost their reputation, ultimately driving repeat business and revenue. By expanding into new markets and utilizing data-driven insights to identify unmet needs and seize emerging opportunities, companies aim to capture larger market segments and differentiate themselves from competitors through innovative offerings. 'The Estimation Game: What Do Business Transformations Really Cost?,' study by Oxford Economics and SAP, January 2025. Oxford In general, each business transformation initiative can be categorized as either proactive or reactive. Proactive transformation occurs when companies preemptively change to leverage potential opportunities or innovate. It might be driven by the desire to break through growth ceilings, explore new markets, or adapt to foreseeable regulatory changes. A company expanding into international markets before the local market becomes saturated is an example of a proactive transformation. Reactive transformation happens in response to emergent challenges that could disrupt existing business operations. This includes sudden market disruptions, new technology, or urgent compliance adjustments. For example, a financial institution may need to overhaul its data security systems abruptly after a breach or new cybersecurity regulations. Whatever the 'why,' business transformation capability is the 'how.' The rationale behind business transformation varies, along with the anticipated gains. From proactive innovations to essential reactive adjustments, these strategic maneuvers are vital for maintaining and enhancing competitiveness. Businesses face new challenges and opportunities in a rapidly evolving market environment, making adaptability and foresight crucial components of success. To execute a transformation, a business must define its target state, plan how to get there, manage initiatives from end to end—including employee adoption—and continuously monitor for improvement. Building this strong business transformation capability steers organizations through their transformation journey, no matter why they seek to transform. Curious about the business transformation landscape? Discover key factors for success, common challenges, and practical strategies toward achieving success in your transformation efforts. Explore our in-depth report, 'The Estimation Game: What Do Business Transformations Really Cost?' created in collaboration with Oxford Economics. Get the free report
