Queer Wisconsin lawmakers Tammy Baldwin's and Mark Pocan's names found on Minnesota shooting suspect's list
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
The suspect, 57-year-old Vance Boelter, was taken into custody Sunday after a statewide manhunt and appeared in federal court Monday on six charges, including two counts of murder with a firearm. Local prosecutors have also announced plans to file first-degree murder charges. Authorities say Boelter fatally shot Hortman and her husband, Mark, and critically injured state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, Yvette, after reportedly showing up at the homes of at least four Democratic lawmakers early Saturday.
Related: Man arrested for killing Minnesota Democrat gave anti-LGBTQ+ speech in Africa
According to law enforcement and federal prosecutors, Boelter left behind notebooks naming dozens of current Democratic officeholders. Both Baldwin and Pocan confirmed that they had been notified their names were among those listed.
'Senator Baldwin was informed by law enforcement that she was included on the alleged shooter's list of names,' Baldwin's communications director, Eli Rosen, said in a statement to The Advocate. 'She is grateful for law enforcement's swift action to keep the community safe and remains focused on the things that matter most here: honoring the legacy and life of Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, Mark, praying for the other victims who are fighting for their lives, and condemning this abhorrent, senseless political violence.'
Baldwin, the first out gay person elected to the U.S. Senate, also responded on social media shortly after the shooting, calling the events 'stunning, terrifying, and heartbreaking.'
'Political violence like this is not who we are as a country,' she wrote. 'It's on all of us to condemn and stop it at every turn.'
Pocan, a longtime out member of the House and former chair of the Congressional Equality Caucus, said that the U.S. Capitol Police informed his office that his name appeared on additional documents found after the initial notebook was discovered. He said he learned of the connection on Sunday and that no further details had been shared with him. 'I'm appreciative that law enforcement apprehended the suspect,' Pocan said in a statement to The Advocate. 'I will not back down in the face of terror. However, we as elected officials must do better to lower the temperature. That said, my schedule remains unchanged.'
Federal prosecutors have not yet identified a motive, but Acting U.S. Attorney Joseph Thompson said the evidence paints a clear picture of a politically charged intent.
'Obviously, his primary motivation was to go and murder people,' Thompson said during a Monday press conference. 'They were all elected officials. They were all Democrats.'
As The Advocate previously reported, Boelter's public record shows a pattern of anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric and Christian nationalist ideology. In 2023, he gave a speech in the Democratic Republic of the Congo where he railed against queer and transgender people, declaring that 'people in America… don't know what sex they are. They don't know their sexual orientation — they're confused. The enemy has gotten so far into their mind and their soul.'
That same rhetoric has now been distorted and weaponized further: in a recent appearance with right-wing pundit Benny Johnson, Donald Trump Jr. falsely claimed Boelter was aligned with the 'radical transgender movement,' labeling trans people 'the most violent domestic terror threat.'
Related: Trump Jr. falsely blames 'radical transgender movement' for Melissa Hortman assassination
In reality, trans people are far more likely to be victims than perpetrators of violence. A 2021 study by the Williams Institute found that transgender people are more than four times as likely as cisgender people to experience violent victimization, while cisgender individuals have committed 99.9 percent of mass shootings since 2014.
The violence sent shockwaves through the Midwest and LGBTQ+ communities nationwide. Hortman, who previously served as Speaker of the Minnesota House, was known for championing LGBTQ+ rights and reproductive freedom. Her assassination has prompted vigils, condemnations, and calls for urgent federal action against political violence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Why redistricting is so important, in 3 charts
Texas Republicans' move to redraw their congressional map mid-decade and Democrats' retaliatory redistricting efforts have captured national attention for a very simple reason: How House districts are drawn can shape American politics for years. Gerrymandering generally reduces the number of competitive races, and it can lock in nearly immovable advantages for one party or another. Under the new map proposed in Texas, no seat's presidential vote would have been decided by single digits in 2024, and Republicans would have a path to pad their narrow congressional majority in the 2026 midterm elections. This means more people could reside in congressional districts under solid control of one party. NBC News analyzed how the question of who draws the maps — and how they do it — can shape elections for years afterward. The difference between safe seats and competitive districts Who draws district lines can make the difference between contested general elections in a state in November and elections that are barely more than formalities. NBC News analyzed every House race in the country from 2012 to 2020, the last full 10-year redistricting cycle, based on how each district was drawn. In states where state legislators drew the maps, single-digit races (elections in which the winners won by less than 10 percentage points) were rarest. Only 10.7% of House races fell into that competitive category. There are plenty of reasons that don't involve gerrymandering. For one thing, voters of both parties have increasingly clustered in recent years, leaving fewer places around the country that are politically divided. Still, gerrymandering does play a significant role. When commissions or state or federal courts drew the lines last decade, the rate of competitive elections jumped, though safe seats are still overwhelmingly likely. Competitive elections were especially prevalent in states with court-drawn districts: 18.1% of races in those states had single-digit margins from 2012 through 2020. A look at Pennsylvania, whose legislative-drawn map was thrown out and replaced in 2018 by the state Supreme Court, illustrates the dramatic change that can come based on who draws congressional lines. The same state with the same voters living in the same places suddenly had many more competitive elections. From 2012 through 2016, just three of Pennsylvania's 54 House general elections under the initial map had single-digit margins. After the state Supreme Court threw out the map and imposed a new one, the number of battleground races bumped up. Eight of 36 House races had single-digit margins in 2018 and 2020. Meanwhile, ahead of the 2026 midterms, The Cook Political Report with Amy Walter rates 40 House districts as toss-ups or slightly leaning toward one party. More than half (23) of those 40 competitive districts are in states where commissions or courts drew the maps. How a state's partisanship compares with whom it sends to Congress The power of the redistricting process can bend a state's representation in Congress away from its overall partisanship, with wide differences between the statewide vote in some states and the makeup of their House delegations. Take Illinois, for example, where Donald Trump got 44% of the vote in 2024. Republicans hold only three of the state's 17 seats in Congress, or 18%. (NBC News is looking at presidential data instead of House data here because some races are uncontested.) And even though Trump got 38% of the vote in California last year, Republicans hold only 17% — that's nine seats — of the state's 52 congressional districts. On the other side of the ledger, Trump got 58% support in South Carolina last year, and 86% of the state's House delegation is Republican. In North Carolina, 51% voted for Trump last year, and Republicans have 71% of the delegation. The comparison between House seats and presidential election performance isn't perfect. But it demonstrates that how district lines are drawn can generate different results from what statewide results might suggest. Right in the middle of the chart is Virginia. Its 11 congressional districts split 6-5 for Democrats, meaning Republicans hold nearly 46% of the state's seats in Congress, and Trump won 46% of the vote in Virginia last year. Also, just because a state's maps favor one party compared with the statewide results after one election doesn't mean the redistricting process was biased. Tightly divided Pennsylvania has seven Democrats and 10 Republicans in Congress, and three GOP-held districts are rated as toss-up or lean-Republican races in 2026, according to the Cook Political Report. Each state charts its own course Since each state is responsible for handling its own redistricting, the process is different depending on where you look, giving immense power to different institutions state by state. In 27 states, legislatures approved the maps. In seven, independent commissions approved them, seven had court-approved maps, two had political commissions, and one state's maps were approved by a backup commission, according to data from Loyola Law School. (The six states that elect only one person to the House don't draw new congressional maps.) Loyola Law School's " All About Redistricting" website defines politician commissions as panels elected officials can serve on as members. The website defines backup commissions as backup procedures if legislatures can't agree on new lines.
Bloomberg
14 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Japan's Political Woes Spur Caution Over 30-Year Bond Auction
Japan's mounting political and fiscal uncertainties risk weighing on demand at an auction of 30-year government debt on Thursday as fragile investor sentiment keeps yields elevated. The sale will serve as a test of the market's appetite for long-dated debt following the ruling Liberal Democratic Party's defeat in last month's upper house election. While the previous 30-year offering in July cleared smoothly, traders are bracing for a more cautious outcome this time as speculation swirls over Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's potential resignation.
Los Angeles Times
42 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump yammers that he's the victim of rigged statistics. But he's the rigger in chief.
For President Trump, right behind retribution as a guiding principle comes projection: He falsely projects onto his enemies the sins of which he's guilty. Trump, whose vision only seems to extend backward, lately has renewed his tired lies that the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections were rigged against him. As he yammers away, he's also openly attempting to fix the 2026 midterm elections for Congress by brazenly goading Republicans to redraw congressional districts. If he succeeds, it could prevent the widely favored Democrats from capturing majority control of the House — just as they did in the 2018 midterms of his first term — and with it the power to block his agenda and investigate his evident abuses of power. But the president's rigging goes beyond elections, to all aspects of governance, if his cruel, chaotic maladministration can be called that. Don't like the weak jobs numbers from the nonpartisan bureaucrats at the Bureau of Labor Statistics? Fire the woman in charge, slander her for, yes, 'rigging' the numbers on employment and inflation 'to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad,' and look to hire someone who by hook or crook actually will rig the number to try to make you look better. As if the experts everywhere who rely on quality U.S. economic data will be fooled. Or even average Americans, who don't need BLS reports to conclude that food, housing and healthcare costs are a source of stress, as 86% of them said in an Associated Press/ NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll released Monday. Mad that federal judges rejected your former defense lawyer Alina Habba and other incompetent loyalists as U.S. district attorneys, as provided by law? Devise complicated end runs to keep them in place anyway, and have your aides condemn the judges (including Republican appointees) and their 'left-wing agenda.' That charge is especially rich when Habba, Trump's pick for U.S. attorney for New Jersey, makes no secret of her own right-wing agenda: Her goal, she told a right-wing podcaster, is to 'turn New Jersey red.' Want to impose punishing tariffs on U.S. trading partners, though the Constitution empowers Congress to set import duties? Seize on a law giving presidents emergency economic powers and twist its definition of 'emergency' beyond recognition or precedent. Go ahead and impose 50% tariffs on Brazil, for example, because it's conducting a 'witch hunt' (sound familiar?) against former president and Trump ally Jair Bolsonaro. It's not as if the subservient Republican-run Congress is going to object and reclaim its constitutional power. But courts might step in. One federal court has ruled against Trump on the tariffs issue and an appeals court last week was hostile during arguments in the two cases before it. Ultimately, however, the question of the president's tariff power will be up to the ever-deferential Supreme Court, which Trump and Senate Republicans really did rig in his favor during his first term. Trump even cheats on relatively small stuff (besides his golf game). An exhibit at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History on presidential impeachments naturally included Trump, the only president to be impeached twice. But somehow, any mention of him was removed, leaving just Presidents Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon, the last of whom resigned before he could be impeached. Presto! 'Wiping away the impeachments like an ill-fated Kremlin apparatchik,' in the Atlantic's words. Trump's rigging is of course most obvious, and most hypocritical, in his unabashed demand to concoct congressional maps that could all but guarantee that Republicans don't suffer the usual midterm election losses for the party in power. He's already messed with Texas, with its trove of Republican votes and compliant Republican leaders. There, at Trump's command, a special session of the Republican-controlled state legislature, which was supposed to be about providing relief to victims of the July 4 Guadalupe River deluge and mitigating future flooding tragedies, has turned into a partisan power play to re-gerrymander Texas' congressional maps so that Republicans win five additional House seats next year. But just in case five seats aren't enough to stave off a Democratic takeover of the U.S. House, Trump and his team are pressing for sudden redistricting in other red states, including Missouri and Ohio, as well as Indiana, where Vice President JD Vance is scheduled to visit Thursday in his side role as Trump's deputy election-rigger. Such machinations have provoked Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, to threaten counter-gerrymanders in their blue states. Gerrymandering is a ploy nearly as old as the nation. Yet the skulduggery traditionally has been limited to once a decade, after the decennial census that the Constitution requires so states can redraw their political maps to reflect population changes. Trump and team haven't even bothered to sugarcoat their extraordinary mid-decade power grab: 'We are entitled to five more seats,' the president ridiculously decreed on Tuesday. Trump and his political aides cooked up their scheme to rig the 2026 House elections several months ago. In June, White House aides met with Texas Republicans in Congress to urge a 'ruthless' effort to get the state's districts redrawn. According to the New York Times, the aides warned — as if Republicans need warnings by now — that the vengeful Trump would pay close attention to who helped that effort and who didn't. On Tuesday, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, desperate for Trump's endorsement as he seeks reelection, tried to show some MAGA muscle by asking the FBI to help locate and arrest Democratic state legislators who fled the state so the Texas House couldn't vote on the Republican gerrymander plan. Trump didn't blink at the idea of his appointees sending federal agents after elected state officials who aren't breaking the law: 'They may have to,' he said. After all, he's the rigger in chief. Bluesky: @jackiecalmesThreads: @jkcalmesX: @Jackiekcalmes
