&w=3840&q=100)
China's $11 trillion stock market is a headache for both Xi, Trump
Even after a recent rally, Chinese indexes have only just returned to levels seen in the aftermath of a dramatic bubble burst a decade ago. Instead of incentivising consumers to spend, poor equity returns have nudged them toward saving. A $10,000 investment in the S&P 500 Index a decade ago would now have more than tripled in value, while the same amount in China's CSI 300 benchmark would've added just around $3,000.
Part of the reason, long-term China watchers say, is structural. Created 35 years ago as a way for state-owned enterprises to channel household savings into building roads, ports and factories, exchanges have lacked a strong focus on delivering returns to investors. That skew has spawned a host of problems from an oversupply of shares to questionable post-listing practices, which continue to weigh on the $11 trillion market.
The country's leaders are under pressure to fix this. President Xi is counting on domestic spending to reach the 5 per cent economic growth goal, especially as a tariff war with the US heats up over the massive trade imbalance. At the same time, Beijing has reasons to keep prioritizing the market's role as a source of capital: the country needs vast funding to nurture companies that underpin its tech ambitions — even if their profitability remains questionable.
'China's capital market has long been a paradise for financiers and a hell for investors, although the new securities chief has made some improvements,' Liu Jipeng, a securities veteran who teaches at China University of Political Science and Law, said in an interview. 'Regulators and exchanges are always consciously or unconsciously tilting toward the financing side of the business.'
The limits of China's stock rally have again been evident this year. The CSI 300 has risen less than 7 per cent despite a burst of optimism over AI, trailing benchmarks in the US and Europe. The underperformance — along with factors including an uncertain economic outlook — helps explain China's extraordinarily high savings rate, which stands at 35 per cent of disposable income.
Chen Long, who works in the asset management industry, has taken to social media platform Xiaohongshu to warn people of the risks of chasing the recent rally.
'Many ordinary people come in thinking they could make money, but the majority of them end up poorer,' Chen said in an interview, adding that he has been investing since 2014. 'State-owned companies primarily answer to the government rather than shareholders, while many private entrepreneurs have little regard for small investors.'
Over the past year, China's top leadership has shown greater awareness of the stock market's importance as a vehicle for wealth creation. That's especially the case with an ongoing property slump and a fragmented social safety net, which exacerbates a sense of insecurity.
The Communist Party's Politburo pledged to 'stabilize housing and stock markets' in a December meeting — a rare expression of support for equities at the high-level gathering. The body also called for 'increasing the attractiveness and inclusiveness of domestic capital markets' in July.
There is no quick fix to boosting household confidence 'except for a stock market rebound,' said Hao Hong, chief investment officer at Lotus Asset Management Ltd. 'This is a topic that we economists have been discussing in the closed door meetings in Beijing.''
In some ways, the market's malaise has been decades in the making.
'The exchanges are motivated to fulfill the government's call for increasing companies' financing,' said Lian Ping, chairman of the China Chief Economist Forum, a think tank that advises the government. 'But when it comes to protecting investors' interests, there are few who are motivated to do it.'
An explosive growth in new listings made China the world's biggest IPO market in 2022. Yet insufficient safeguards for shareholders and lax oversight of IPO frauds have led to share price crashes and delistings — what retail investors refer to as 'stepping on a land mine.'
Take Beijing Zuojiang Technology, which listed in 2019. The company said in a 2023 statement that its product was modeled after Nvidia's BlueField-2 DPU. The company warned in January the following year that it was at risk of being delisted, citing an investigation for disclosure violations. It was subsequently removed from the Shenzhen bourse.
The China Securities Regulatory Commission didn't immediately reply to a fax seeking comment.
Recent years have seen greater efforts to screen poor-quality IPOs and crack down on financial fraud. There's also a push to reduce additional stock issuances by listed companies and share sales by major stakeholders, while encouraging more corporate profit to be passed on to investors.
There has been visible progress. Initial public offerings shrank to nearly a third of 2023 levels last year. Shanghai and Shenzhen-listed companies handed out a combined 2.4 trillion yuan ($334 billion) in cash dividends for 2024, up 9 per cent from the previous year, according to state media.
'The regulations and overall requirements after IPO have become stricter, in terms of reliability, transparency, or information disclosure,' said Ding Wenjie, investment strategist at China Asset Management Co.
Reforms, however, have fallen short of transforming the market into one that prioritizes investor returns.
Even with the rise in share buybacks, CSI 300 companies spent only 0.2 per cent of their market value on repurchasing shares in 2024, far less than the nearly 2 per cent spent by S&P 500 firms, according to calculations by Bloomberg.
The recent policy push to attract more tech listings is also a worrying sign for some investors. Regulators are resuming the listing of unprofitable companies on the STAR board, dubbed China's Nasdaq, while allowing them for the first time for the Shenzhen-based ChiNext board — which is earmarked for growth enterprises. IPOs so far this year have increased by nearly 30 per cent from the same period in 2024.
That's an inevitable move to secure capital for firms that are vital to China's battle against the US for supremacy in AI, semiconductor and robotics, but also signals that authorities may again be putting funding needs ahead of investor protection. Fast-tracking more firms to list without tackling the core problems of corporate credibility will 'just add volume without restoring investor trust,'' said Hebe Chen, an analyst at Vantage Markets in Melbourne.
Stock exchange officials have been actively reaching out to investment banks and encouraging companies to file for IPOs, according to people familiar with the matter. Some high-quality tech applicants could get access to so-called "green channels" for a faster review and approval process, the people said.
'The entire regulatory environments are still not up to the task of delivering the best out of those companies,' said Dong Chen, chief Asia strategist at Pictet Wealth Management. It requires a more comprehensive improvement of the institutional environment 'to provide the right incentives'' for companies to deliver values to their shareholders, he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Bertie goes back to school
Bertie misses the years he spent in a dorm room. His inability to remember anything that failed to interest him, combined with the preponderance of Greek-riddled finance and abbreviation-laden marketing courses, quickly convinced him that he was not destined for anywhere close to the top of the class. That eased a lot of the pressure and made life straightforward—just enough classes and assignments to earn a respectable marksheet and sovereignty over the rest of his time without any attendant responsibilities. This was what he particularly cherished: reading things he liked irrespective of whether they would contribute to his grades; a cavernous library stuffed with all manner of texts; sundry sporting activities; and time spent shooting the breeze with friends he hoped would last him a lifetime. There were no finances to take care of, no office politics to navigate, and without a reality check from the outside world, no dream seemed too big. To relive those moments, Bertie looks forward to visiting college campuses and staying in a dorm room again. He got an opportunity to do so last weekend when he attended a history of investing course conducted by an old friend. The layout of the classroom, the simple mess food, and the hostel room, with a large study table and an almirah for books, took him back to the old days. Of the many investing truths that were discussed—sometimes with anecdotes and sometimes with data—the one that stayed with Bertie was the market's obsession with big events and its attempts to predict their outcomes. The continuous news cycle provides fodder to this tendency, with even savvy investors getting sucked into the preoccupation. Bertie's friend made the point that for one to make money from a big event, one has to get two things right: the outcome of the event, and then the market reaction to that outcome, which may not necessarily be what one thought would happen. Numerous examples of this were cited. The effect of Brexit, which was supposed to spell doom for global equities, lasted for just about an hour before the markets resumed their upward march. Similarly, in November 2016, when Donald Trump became US President for the first time, the S&P was up every single day of the results week—the first two because the markets thought Hillary Clinton was a shoo-in, and the next three because the markets deemed Trump's policies to be business-friendly. Something similar has happened in India after the recent surprise 50 basis points rate cut by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). On the eve of the cut, the government 10-year bond was trading with a yield of around 6.25%. If one had correctly forecasted the quantum of the cut, one would have been tempted to buy the bond. The yield today hovers around 6.40%, so bond prices have moved in the opposite direction of what one might have expected. Several reasons are cited post-facto for such counterintuitive market behaviour, like pre-positioning, which is market speak for how investors are positioned in the run-up to the event. But the truth is that markets are rarely driven by a single factor, event, or narrative. Generally, when the bulk of participants decide to focus on just one thing, something is quietly shifting elsewhere in the landscape. Bertie savoured the two days on campus, basking in the feeling of being a student again. Some old lessons were reaffirmed, some new ones learnt, and the wide-open spaces widened Bertie's frame of thinking as well and reassured him once again that no dream is too big. Bertie is a Mumbai-based fund manager whose compliance department wishes him to cough twice before speaking and then decide not to say it after all.


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's punishing tariffs to deepen the slump in one large corner of Indian banking
Mumbai: Indian banks have low exposure to the sectors in the direct line of US President Donald Trump's tariffs. Yet, as trade disruption ripples through the economy, they may not escape a further slowing in corporate loans. Sectors including textiles, jewellery, apparel, seafood, machinery and mechanical appliances, chemicals, and auto components are expected to bear the brunt of the 50% tariffs on Indian goods entering the US. Direct lending by top banks such as State Bank of India, ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank to these industries is estimated to be about 10% of the overall loans, limiting the impact on lenders. What is concerning is the second-order hit. There are three primary reasons behind concerns about a potential slowdown in corporate credit growth on account of tariffs, according to analysts at Fitch group company CreditSights. 'First, we expect banks to be more cautious to lend to export-oriented companies, particularly in sectors heavily reliant on US demand, as the 50% tariff would have a significant impact on their businesses," Lim Ze Hao, analyst, financials at CreditSights, told Mint. It is likely that export orders are put on hold or even scrapped as US buyers seek cheaper alternatives from countries with lower tariffs, he said. Second, with the high tariff rate now and some uncertainty over where the tariff rate will eventually settle, exporters and manufacturing firms are likely inclined to pause expansion plans, resulting in reduced demand for bank loans. According to Ze Hao, finally, the 50% tariff rate will also have a moderate drag on India's GDP growth. 'Slower GDP growth typically translates into slower overall system loan growth, as businesses become more conservative about expanding operations because of slower demand, and consumers will also be more cautious about making major purchases." India's growth rate is estimated to decline by 20-30 basis points as US President Donald Trump imposes tariffs on trading partners to fulfil his election promise of bringing back jobs to the US. India faces one of the highest levies, at 50%, including 25% for buying Russian energy. Indian conglomerates have already flagged uncertainties emanating from tariffs. Corporate credit slump Reliance Industries, in its annual report, warned that 'continuing geopolitical and tariff-related uncertainties may affect trade flows and demand‑supply balance" for its oil-to-chemicals business that encompasses transportation fuels, and polyesters, among others. JSW Steel said in its annual report that 'the policy uncertainty is adversely affecting business and consumer confidence". Demand for corporate loans wasn't strong even before Trump started using tariffs as a negotiating stick. Indian banks have been waiting for corporates to borrow more. A recovery in credit demand has been impeded by the companies' reluctance to embark on new capital expenditure and their use of internal accruals, instead of bank loans, to fund projects. Bank loans to industries—micro, small, medium, and large—stood at ₹39.3 trillion at end-June, up 5.5% on year. Yet, the growth has slowed down from 8.1% seen in the previous year. The segment accounted for 21.4% of the overall non-food credit of banks in June, down from 22.1% in the same period of the previous financial year. Non-food credit excludes loans to the Food Corporation of India. A Mint analysis of cash holdings of 285 BSE-listed firms, excluding banking, financial services and insurance companies, showed a 12% year-on-year rise to ₹5.09 trillion in FY25. However, new project announcements—a proxy for capital expenditure—fell 5% in FY25, following a 3% contraction in FY24, Mint reported on 6 July, citing data from the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE). Lenders still optimistic Banks are hopeful that corporate loan demand will recover.C.S. Setty, chairman, State Bank of India (SBI), said on 8 August that corporate loan demand is expected to be at least 10% in the December quarter of the current financial corporate loan book grew 5.7% year-on-year, down from 15.9% a year earlier. The state-owned lender's total domestic loan book expanded 11.1% in the June quarter versus 15.6% a year earlier. Sashidhar Jagdishan, chief executive of HDFC Bank, told analysts on 19 July that the bank is 'not seeing anything great on the capital, private capex side as yet". However, the private lender 'shall surely participate in across all our segments, whether it is rural, whether it is retail, whether it is MSME and whether it is corporate as well". But it's not just that the demand for corporate loans has slowed down. 'There is a general demand slowdown, whether it is consumption in general or demand for corporate loans," said Anil Gupta, senior vice-president and group head of financial sector ratings, Icra Ltd. 'Banks would be ready to fund but in an uncertain environment, loan growth may remain tepid in the near term." According to Gupta, exporters may be in a wait-and-watch mode, given the uncertainty on tariffs and possible additional costs, which may reduce demand for working capital loans. As far as term loans are concerned, he said, clarity on demand revival may revive private capital expenditure.


Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
India may crack open the gates to Chinese inflows
New Delhi: Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit, India is weighing easier rules for Chinese investments in select sectors in another step to restore ties as New Delhi seeks to bolster trade amid US tariff uncertainty, said two people aware of the matter. The proposal under consideration is to identify non-sensitive areas such as specific segments of manufacturing, renewable energy, and consumer goods, where investment proposals from Chinese companies could be cleared through a faster and simplified approval process, said the first of the two people cited above. 'Talks are underway at the diplomatic level to find a workable solution, keeping sensitive sectors such as defence and telecom, and critical digital infrastructure to ensure that national security is not compromised even as economic benefits are realized," said the second person. Both spoke on the condition of anonymity. 'As there is no plan to review Press Note 3, investments from China will be considered through the government approval route and not via the automatic route," this person said. Under Press Note 3, investments from countries sharing a land border with India must be approved by the government first. India restricted Chinese investments after the deadly clash between the soldiers of the two nations in Ladakh's Galwan Valley in trade continued to grow as India relies on its neighbour for imports of pharmaceutical raw materials to electronic imports from China increased from $94.57 billion in FY22 to $113.45 billion in FY25. In contrast, exports to China declined from $21.26 billion in FY22 to $14.25 billion in FY25. Inbound shipments from China during April–July 2025 stood at $40.66 billion, up 13.1% from a year earlier. Exports to China jumped 20% to $5.76 billion during the period. On its part, China has also exerted pressure on India by leveraging its dominance in critical sectors. Its near-monopoly on rare earth magnets gives it significant leverage against India, which is heavily reliant on imports. China has also strategically controlled the supply of tunnel-boring machines (TBMs) used in major infrastructure projects, causing delays and increasing costs. This is compounded by the withdrawal of Chinese tech professionals from Indian manufacturing units, potentially disrupting operations. As Trump announced tariffs on its trading partners, New Delhi started easing some of the curbs to improve strained ties. India has resumed issuing tourist visas to Chinese nationals after a five-year gap. In a parallel move, New Delhi is preparing to restart direct flights to Beijing from next month, restoring air connectivity that has remained suspended since the Covid-19 pandemic. Modi will also visit China for the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit. Queries sent to the ministries of commerce and external affairs remained unanswered till press time. Need to boost FDI Trump, meanwhile, imposed the highest 50% tariffs on India, including a 25% penalty for buying Russian oil. The first set of 25% duty came into effect on 7 August, while another 25% will come into force on 27 August, giving India time to negotiate. However, the sixth round of talks for the India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA), which was scheduled for 25 August, has been cancelled, and no fresh dates have been announced, leaving the negotiations in limbo. 'As India aims to achieve developed nation status by 2047, building a stronger manufacturing ecosystem and attracting greater investment(from China)without jeopardising the domestic sector will be the key drivers of this ambition," said Dr Amit Singh, associate professor, Special Centre for National Security Studies at JNU. India attracted foreign direct investment (FDI) worth $81.04 billion in FY25, up 14% from the previous year, data from the commerce ministry showed. The services sector emerged as the top recipient of FDI equity inflows, accounting for 19% of the total, with investments rising nearly 41% to $9.35 billion in FY25. However, FDI inflows into India had peaked at $84.83 billion in FY22, according to data shared by minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary in the Lok Sabha on 10 March. FDI slipped to $71.35 billion in FY23 and $71.27 billion in FY24, amid concerns over a potential global recession, economic crises triggered by geopolitical conflicts, and rising protectionist measures worldwide. Attracting Chinese investments is 'important as it could help replenish investment and address the recent decline in FDI flows", said Biswajit Dhar, a trade policy expert from the Delhi-based think tank, Council for Social Development. 'If India is able to attract more export-oriented investments—what is often referred to as investment-led trade—it could also have a positive effect on the country's rising trade deficit." The government targets to attract $100 billion in FDI in FY26. Modi's first visit since 2019 Meanwhile, Modi is scheduled to travel to Tianjin, China, to attend the SCO summit from 31 August to 1 September. This will mark his first visit to China since the Galwan Valley clash in 2020. He last visited that country in 2019. Ahead of the summit, the Prime Minister will visit Japan on 30 August to participate in the annual India-Japan Summit with Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, after which he will head to China, according to media reports. In the run-up to Modi's visit, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi will be in New Delhi from 18–19 August for the 24th round of special representatives' talks on the India-China boundary question with National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, according to a statement from the ministry of external affairs.