
Kenya scraps 3% digital asset tax following industry uproar
Kenya has scrapped a controversial 3% digital asset tax that would have taken effect in a few weeks following industry uproar and concerted lobbying from local and regional virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
The tax was first proposed two years ago, and since then, the sector has been pushing back against it. In the past year, this pushback has accelerated as industry stakeholders joined hands to rally against the proposal, led by the local Virtual Assets Chamber of Commerce (VACC).
Legislators have finally caved. According to local outlets, the Kenyan parliament's finance committee withdrew the proposal from the 2025 finance bill, which lawmakers passed in mid-June and which President William Ruto signed into law last week.
Under the Income Act, the committee repealed section 12F to scrap the proposed tax in a big win for one of Africa's largest digital asset markets. Instead, the government will impose a 10% excise duty on all the transaction fees that exchanges and wallets levy on their users.
According to MP Kuria Kimani, who heads the committee, the lobbying efforts by the country's VASPs played a vital role in the tax amendments. These companies have banded together this year to make their voices heard, enlisting the services of PwC as an advisor.
In May, a group led by the VACC and local companies like Busha, Swypt, Kotani Pay, and Luno presented their case before the finance committee. In addition to fighting the 3% tax, the group called for digital assets to be classified as property and subjected to capital gains tax only, and for VASPs to be recognized as financial institutions.
'Fundamentally, as an industry, we would prefer to be regulated in terms of the offered service and not the underlying technology,' Keega Gakuua, the co-founder of local digital asset payments firm Swypt, told the lawmakers at the time.
Digital asset taxation remains a challenge for most governments, with even the most advanced economies, like the United States and the United Kingdom, still struggling with taxation. One study found that in 2022, only 1.6% of American digital asset owners paid taxes, and even then, the country ranked in the top 10 for compliance. This study ranked Finland first for tax compliance at 4.1%. Still, some economies are giving tax breaks to digital asset holders to stimulate industry growth. Thailand recently approved a five-year tax exemption plan for the sector, joining island nations like the Bahamas and the Cayman Islands. Others like Singapore and the United Arab Emirates impose no capital gains tax for holders, while Portugal extends the same offer, but only to those who hold their assets for more than a year.
Kenyan MPs approve five joint regulators for digital asset sector
Away from the taxation, the finance committee of the National Assembly has approved a proposal to have five regulators jointly oversee the digital asset sector.
The proposal was introduced by social enterprise organization Credence Africa, reports local newspaper Daily Nation. If it gets the backing of the full House, it will see the central bank jointly oversee 'crypto' with the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), the Competition Authority of Kenya, the Communications Authority and the Office of the Data Protection Commissioner.
The proposal would also give leeway to the Cabinet to appoint any other regulator to police the sector. It covers any company dealing in 'crypto,' tokens or 'a number held in digital form and generated through cryptographic means and providing a digital representation of value exchanged.'
Crucially, the committee also approved a separate proposal to scrap a clause in the Virtual Asset Service Providers Bill that gave regulators authority to conduct off-site surveillance. While calling for the amendment, the VACC deemed the clause too vague and as offering no clear definition of what off-site surveillance entailed.
But while many laud Kenya's digital asset regulatory strides, some smaller VASPs are decrying a perceived regulatory capture by major companies, led by Binance. They claim that Binance has been sponsoring lobby groups, including VACC, and that it's getting a seat at the regulators' table under the pretext of policy reform.
'All regulation conversations by VACC that happened recently have been sponsored by Binance. Then VACC, a private consulting entity, with a non-compete with Binance 'magically' gets a regulatory seat? How is this fair? How is this constitutional?' one source at a local exchange told Kenyan Wall Street.
Watch: Bitcoin tech is all about unleashing potential for small people
title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen> Binance Credence Africa Kenya Regulation Tax Virtual Assets Chamber of Commerce
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
10 hours ago
- The Guardian
The roundtable is a test of Labor's courage and vision. Will it rise to the occasion?
Remember when governments took bold steps – deregulating the dollar, introducing the GST, freeing up trade and rolling out the NDIS? Not any more, even though the need is greater than ever. Treasury explicitly advised Jim Chalmers in its post-election advice that the budget settings are 'unsustainable', that personal and company tax are too high and that 'indirect taxes' are a solution for reform. Addressing the intergenerational inequity in our tax system requires courage and vision. At this rate, we will be passing on a lower standard of living, diminished health and education outcomes, and a degraded environment to younger Australians. The most recent federal election was defined by embarrassing small-mindedness from the major parties – promises of $7 off your weekly fuel bill or a $5 tax cut. These are not serious solutions to the structural challenges we face. When you combine these small target strategies with the increasing need to show an electoral 'mandate' before tackling any policy issue, how will we ever address the big challenges? Sign up: AU Breaking News email There are two schools of thought about how reform happens: one argues that it requires a strong majority government; the other believes it will take a minority government pushed by a principled crossbench. The fact that overall support for the major parties fell again with 33.6% of voters supporting community independent or minor party candidates demonstrates increasing frustration at the major parties' unwillingness to confront Australia's long-term challenges. The election of independents to the crossbench was driven by two decades of gridlock on economic reform, coupled with a lack of a coherent approach to climate change mitigation. During the 2022 election campaign and immediately after, I spoke of the urgent need for broad tax reform. In the last parliament, I raised this issue in the house 10 times. Allegra Spender spoke about it 21 times. The major parties avoided the topic entirely. I was heartened by the treasurer's decision to expand the agenda for the economic reform roundtable to include tax reform. Could this be the moment when the government finally confronts the structural challenges in our budget and the demographic shifts ahead? It was refreshing to hear the treasurer push back against the 'rule in, rule out' game that has stifled meaningful debate for years. But unfortunately, the prime minister is managing our expectations down to tinkering. The case for tax reform is compelling and GST provides an opportunity. Our current tax system disproportionately burdens younger Australians. Bracket creep – the stealthy tax increase on workers – is our only plan for addressing the deficit. We need to explore alternatives with productivity in mind. The economist Chris Murphy has shown that, per extra dollar of revenue raised, the GST causes the least economic harm, followed by personal income tax, and then company tax. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion Yet our GST is among the narrowest and lowest in the OECD. It applies to just 7.5% of the economy, compared to an OECD average of over 11%, and its rate is half the OECD average. Broadening the base and increasing the rate could allow us to shift the tax burden from those who work to those who spend. In anticipation of the roundtable, the economist Richard Holden and I revisited our 2023 work and asked the Parliamentary Budget Office to model a 'progressive GST' – a way to relieve pressure on personal income tax while protecting low and middle-income earners. Under our model, the GST rate would increase to 15% and exemptions would be removed. To ensure equity, every Australian adult would receive a $3,300 annual payment, effectively making the first $22,000 of spending GST-free. PBO modelling shows that this could leave the bottom 60% of income earners better off, even before accounting for the personal income tax cuts enabled by the additional $24bn in revenue. This is the test. The Labor government has a 19-seat majority. If a comfortable margin is truly a prerequisite for reform, now is the time to act. If we see no action now and the major parties decide an electoral mandate is required, they are now on notice. The voters are on to you. You have three years to build community support for a bold and viable plan to fix our tax system. Any party that wants to be taken seriously as a contender for government in 2028 must come to the election with a tax plan that is fair, future-focused, and fit for the demographic changes ahead. The small target game is over. Australians are ready for courageous action to secure a prosperous future for our children. Kate Chaney is the independent member for Curtin


Reuters
11 hours ago
- Reuters
India confident of meeting fiscal deficit target, despite planned tax cuts
NEW DELHI, Aug 17 (Reuters) - India is confident of meeting its fiscal deficit target of 4.4% for the current fiscal year, according to a government source with knowledge of the matter, despite its plans to cut consumption tax later this year. In the biggest tax overhaul since 2017, Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Saturday announced sweeping changes to the complex goods and services tax (GST) regime which will make daily essentials and electronics cheaper. "India's federal and state governments have options to offset any loss of revenue due to lowering of rates," the government source said without providing further details. The source also said it will end the practice of collecting compensation cess by December. The GST compensation cess is an additional levy imposed on certain items to compensate states for any revenue loss incurred due to the implementation. India's finance ministry did not respond to a request for comment sent outside of office hours.


BBC News
12 hours ago
- BBC News
Sudan army torturing people to death, says rights group
A prominent Sudanese human rights group has accused the country's army and security forces of torturing people to death and operating "execution chambers".The Emergency Lawyers group said it had documented hundreds of arrests in the capital Khartoum. It said that in the "worst cases", some captives had later been found dead with evidence of Sudanese army recaptured the city from the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in March, against which it is fighting a bitter civil war that has killed tens of thousands in two army did not respond to the BBC's request for comment on Sunday. Throughout the war, the Emergency Lawyers group has documented atrocities by both the army and the RSF. Sudan war: A simple guide to what is happening'Tortured and terrified' - BBC witnesses the battle for KhartoumIn a statement on social media platform X, Emergency Lawyers said it had observed a "dangerous escalation in violations".Some detainees were arrested at random and taken to large detention centres, the group alleged."Their fates range from continued detention in inhumane conditions, trials conducted by security agencies that lack the most basic standards of justice, or release in poor health," the statement said."In the worst cases, some are found dead after being killed or declared dead as a result of torture."The use of torture was common during the oppressive rule of president Omar al-Bashir. Throughout the current war, the RSF have also been found to have abused and executed UN Independent International Fact-Finding Mission for the Sudan said in March that both sides were responsible for "a widespread pattern of arbitrary detention, torture and ill-treatment of detainees". It said both both the RSF and the army had used "rape and other forms of sexual violence, arbitrary arrest and detention, as well as torture and ill-treatment".The fighting has sparked one of the world's worst humanitarian crises - 12 million people have been forced from their homes and famine has been declared in parts of the week, medical charity Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said the war has fuelled the worst cholera outbreak the country has seen in have been nearly 100,000 cases of the disease and 2,470 deaths over the past year. More BBC stories on the war in Sudan: 'Our children are dying': Rare footage shows plight of civilians in besieged Sudan cityOil-rich Sudanese region becomes new focus of war between army and rival forcesThe two generals at the heart of the conflict Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica