Doing business by hiding identity is wrong: Baba Ramdev on Kanwar Yatra's directive
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Supporting the Uttar Pradesh government 's move to ask the owners of eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display their information, Yoga Guru Baba Swami Ramdev on Sunday said that doing business by hiding one's identity is wrong.Ramdev said here that he is proud of being a Hindu and 'Sanatani' and, in the same way, Muslims should also be proud of being Muslims, claiming that their ancestors were also Hindus.Asserting that it is up to the customer to decide whose shop they want to eat at, he asked, "What is the reason that Muslims are doing business in Kanwar Yatra by hiding their names? Hiding one's identity is wrong in every moral and religious sense."On the Marathi language row, the yoga guru called the assault on Hindi speakers in Maharashtra unfortunate. He said that all languages should be equally respected, but Hindus should not fight among themselves based on different languages, castes, classes, sects and genders."This harms Sanatan, national integrity and unity. We all should live together,' Ramdev said on the sidelines of a Patanjali function here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Thailand accuses Cambodia of violating ceasefire, Thai army says soldiers injured in landmine blast
A Thai soldier was seriously injured by a landmine near the Cambodian border just days after both countries agreed to a fragile ceasefire Armoured personnel carriers are seen on a road near Thailand-Cambodia's border in Sisaket province, the day after the leaders of Cambodia and Thailand agreed to a ceasefire in a bid to bring an end to their deadliest conflict in more than a decade and ahead of military negotiations. File image/ Reuters The Thai army said that a landmine near the Cambodian border on Tuesday wounded a Thai soldier, only days after the neighbours in Southeast Asia reached a truce after a deadly five-day clash last month. The soldier's left ankle suffered severe damage after he walked on a mine while patrolling a normal border route near Ta Moan Thom temple in Thailand's Surin province, according to an army statement. According to the report, the soldier is receiving treatment in a hospital. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Thai army spokesperson Major-General Winthai Suvaree, the event is convincing proof that Cambodia violated both the ceasefire and international accords such as the Ottawa Convention against Landmines. Cambodia continues to covertly plant landmines, while the Thai army has consistently adhered to peaceful approaches and has not been the initiating party, the statement said. 'Should circumstances become compelling, it may be necessary to exercise the right of self-defence under international law principles to resolve situations that cause Thailand to continuously lose personnel due to violations of ceasefire agreements and sovereignty encroachments by Cambodian military forces,' the army said. Cambodia rejected the Thai charges. 'Cambodia, as a proud and responsible State Party to the Ottawa Convention, maintains an absolute and uncompromising position: we have never used, produced, or deployed new landmines under any circumstances, and we strictly and fully honour our obligations under international law,' the defence ministry spokesperson said in a post on social media. It was the fourth time in a few weeks that Thai soldiers have been injured by mines during patrols along the border. On Saturday, three soldiers were injured by a landmine in an area between Thailand's Sisaket and Cambodia's Preah Vihear provinces. Two earlier incidents led to the downgrading of diplomatic relations and triggered the clashes. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bangkok has accused Cambodia of planting landmines on the Thai side of the disputed border that injured soldiers on July 16 and July 23. Thailand and Cambodia have bickered for decades over undemarcated points along their 817-km (508-mile) land border, with ownership of the ancient Hindu temples Ta Moan Thom and the 11th-century Preah Vihear central to the disputes. The latest clashes that started on July 24 were the worst fighting between the countries in more than a decade, and involved exchanges of artillery fire and jet fighter sorties that killed at least 43 and left over 300,000 people displaced on both sides. The fragile ceasefire has been holding since Thailand and Cambodia agreed last week to allow observers from the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to inspect disputed border areas, ensuring that hostilities do not resume.
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Dharmasthala 'mass burial' case: BJP demands interim probe report
Raising the issue during Zero Hour in the Assembly, BJP's V Sunil Kumar said a prominent Hindu religious centre was being targeted on social media on the pretext of the investigation.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Winners and losers in times of political churn
In the early 1980s, the tallest Brahmin leader of northern India and the Congress, Kamalapati Tripathi, had suggested that the party leadership appoint a Dalit chief minister (CM)in Uttar Pradesh to stop the Dalit Shoshit Samaj Sangharsh Samiti (DS4) from mobilising Dalits. DS4 was Kanshi Ram's creation, which later grew into the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP). Tripathi's fears proved true as the BSP weaned Dalits away from the Congress that was, till then, ruling the country with the support of a coalition of Dalits, Brahmins and Muslims. Brahmins recognise that their political rehabilitation will have to wait since OBCs and Dalits form 85% of the population. In any democracy, numbers matter the most. (Hindustan Times) The Congress, despite the loss of Dalit votes, remained the first choice of Brahmins until Muslims left the party after the shilanyas (foundation laying) of the Ram temple in Ayodhya in 1989. Rajiv Gandhi and Narayan Dutt Tiwari were then the prime minister (PM) and Uttar Pradesh CM, respectively. Subsequently, the Brahmins moved to the BJP. Soon, the grand old party lost power in UP and Tiwari turned out to be the last Congress as well as Brahmin CM of UP. Though Brahmins formed barely 5% of the country's population, the Congress had rewarded them with posts and positions in lieu of their support. Several states in northern India had Brahmin CMs. The loss of office in the southern states in the 1960s did not hurt the community so much, until they started to lose influence in the Hindi heartland after Mandal politics took centre-stage. Their frustration over their marginalisation in the country's politics increased further after the demise of former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee, a Brahmin. Now, when the leadership of most parties is with the OBC and Dalits, the opinion makers of yesteryears find themselves on the political margins. Against this backdrop, some Brahmin BJP leaders and professionals met in New Delhi on July 21 and decided to establish a World Brahmin Welfare Board. The meeting was presided over by former governor of Rajasthan and BJP's Brahmin leader from UP, Kalraj Mishra. BJP's Rajya Sabha member Dinesh Sharma had posted pictures of the meeting on Facebook. Brahmins recognise that their political rehabilitation will have to wait since OBCs and Dalits form 85% of the population. In any democracy, numbers matter the most. The caste census may further erode their position. 'We are now just a mohra (pawn) to be used and dumped,' a disillusioned Brahmin leader of Madhya Pradesh said. Adding to their consternation is the Congress-led Opposition's promise of population-based quotas. As of now, there are four Brahmin CMs — three belonging to the BJP (in Maharashtra, Assam and Rajasthan), and the fourth in West Bengal — across India. Rajasthan has a Brahmin CM after 33 years, while the last Brahmin CM in Madhya Pradesh, Shyama Charan Shukla, was in office back in 1989, for 86 days. However, the bureaucracy continues to have a sizeable Brahmin presence. Interestingly, a Brahmin, Prashant Kishor, is testing the waters in the backward caste-dominated Bihar, which had its last Brahmin CM, Jagannath Mishra, in 1989. Brahmins are discussing options before them as the BJP is feeling the heat of assertive backward politics. The growth of the BJP, founded in 1980, coincided with the rise of Mandal politics. The party struggled to blunt the mobilisation of the backward castes by giving representation to diverse groups. Its experiment of appointing JP Nadda, a Brahmin from Himachal Pradesh as national president, did not appeal much to the Brahmins. When the BSP won office in 2007 with Brahmin support, reconstructing the old Congress vote bank of Dalits, Brahmins, and Muslims, they were hopeful of regaining some heft. With the BJP also chasing OBC and Dalit votes, the Brahmins feel they are left with two options. One is to unite and demand a share in office. In Rajasthan, they organised a Brahmin mahapanchayat ahead of the selection of the CM. This is somewhat on the lines of the Rajputs, who are better united in demanding their share in power and in getting their caste candidates elected. Their second option is returning to the Congress, which has started showing signs of recovery. But the Opposition INDIA bloc appears like a ragtag political arrangement with no common minimum programme or agreement over leadership. Ironically, Brahmins who have supported the BJP after they deserted the Congress, are now talking about the need for a stable Opposition for a healthy democracy. Some of them even lament that the Congress lost a big opportunity by not projecting the party's national president Mallikarjun Kharge as the prime ministerial candidate for the INDIA bloc before the Lok Sabha elections in 2024. Their surmise is that Dalits, who harbour the dream of having a Dalit PM, would have returned to the party, simultaneously attracting Brahmins and Muslims. A senior Brahmin leader from Varanasi, the centre of Brahmin politics in the North, recited a couplet of Urdu shayar (poet) Rahat Indori to explain the plight of Brahmins in the country: 'Mere hujare mein nahin, aur kahin par rakh do, asman laaye ho le aao, zameen par rakh do, ab kahan dhoondne jaoge, hamare katil, aap to katl ka ilzam hamin par rakh do' (Do not keep in my room, keep it somewhere else, if you have brought the sky, bring it, keep it on the ground! Now, where will you go to find my murderer, you will put the blame of my murder on me). The views expressed are personal.
